top 99 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 1 point 1 year ago

Ketchup lobby in full swing

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    "There is nothing more American than shooting a man in this Walmart of a world."

  • source
  • [–] 59 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Fruit the botanical term and fruit the culinary term are just not the same word. Similarly to how theory means something different in science and in colloquial speech. That's just how language works.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    More people ought to learn about the programming language concept of namespaces. Generalize from that and you realize that every domain of discourse has its own namespace of words that have different meanings from those same words outside the domain.

    My favourite is math which has loads of wonderfully generic-sounding terms such as rational, irrational, radical, real, imaginary, complex, group, ring, field, category, set, operator, element, and unit which all have radically different meanings from the everyday senses of those words.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 51 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    Botanically, there's no such thing as a vegetable.

    That's a culinary term, which seems to cover some fruits, some plant roots, some plant stems, some plant leaves, and some plant flowers.While culinary fruits are the other botanical fruits, and a few flowers (figs are weird)

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    The legal decision is important for a slew of reasons including taxation, SNAP benefits, etc. The decision was less about science and more about the reality of how tomatoes are used in our society.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Now I get why some (a ?) states declared pizza a veggie or something like that? Like if vegetable is a culinary term it makes sense you could classify pizza as a vegetable. But like, why the fuck is law declaring what anything is culinary?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    Speculating here, but taxes are one reason.

    Almost all the rules about what counts as wine, beer, whiskey, etc. comes from some country making definitions for tax purposes. Often from hundreds of years ago.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    I've also heard of cannabinoid soft drinks available in states that have (compared to states that legalized it) pretty strict cannabis laws in place. All because of some loopholes (I've read about the farmer bills and all but my terminology is rusty). That's so strange.

    And suddenly its all OK. At least legally. I think its sad. At the moment, eating healthy is becoming harder and harder for the first time in my life. I get why so many Americans eat the way they do, financially. And ethics and morals don't mean anything if its choosing between eating or not. Just so sad.

    These laws don't seem to help the average struggling American at all. With an president promoting his love for cheeseburgers lol.

    I guess I feel blessed to eat fresh non processed food 6 times a week.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    The loopholes on the farm bill are so big that I don't know why we're debating legalization at this point.

    To meet the 2018 farm bill requirements, your thing needs to have <0.3% delta-9 THC by weight. This opened up the delta-8 market--less potent but you can just add more of it--but that was only the start of exploring the new legal territory this opened up.

    10mg of THC delta-9 is considered a good sized dose in edible products. A standard can of soda is about 225 grams. So do the math: 0.01g / 225g = 0.004%. Close to two orders of magnitude under the farm bill limit, and a lot of THC seltzers come in bigger cans than that. You can sell that in every state that hasn't specifically banned it otherwise.

    It gets even better. To get 10mg of THC delta-9, a gummy only needs to be about 3g to make the 0.3% limit. Not that big at all.

    That mostly leaves smoking/vaping as the only methods that don't have an easy loophole.

    Just legalize it already. This is stupid.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 46 points 1 year ago (13 children)

    Botanically, sure, but from a culinary perspective they're used like a vegetable.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 43 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    I don't think vegetable is a botanical term. So fruit and vegetable aren't really mutually exclusive.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    If my grandmother had wheels, she would be a bicycle. But she would also be my grandmother.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

    As they say, intelligence is knowing tomato is a fruit, wisdom is not putting it in a fruit salad.

    (That's the saying, but IMO it's wisdom to know and intelligence to not do it, maybe I'm mixing things up).

    @Ilovethebomb has the answer IMO: knowledge and wisdom.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    From Dungeon Crawler Carl:

    I grumbled a bit about that three in intelligence. Yeah, I never did too great in math, but I never considered myself a slobbering idiot, either. I could fix most anything electrical after studying it for a bit. My friend Billy Maloney, now that guy was an idiot. Just last week we’d come out of a bar, and he’d peed right on a cop’s bicycle while the cop was giving someone else a ticket for drunk and disorderly. That guy deserved an intelligence of three, maybe two.

    . . .

    After I complained about my intelligence score to Mordecai, using the Billy example, he said, β€œIntelligence told you that bike belonged to a police officer. Wisdom told you not to urinate upon it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 40 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Vegetables do not exist. Well, they exist as a culinary thing. There’s just no scientific/botanical definition of what makes something a vegetable.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    I appreciate the message, but I find this presentation style to be unbearable, like a shitty clickbait version of a TED talk: fast cuts with exaggerated audience reactions, playing hide the ball with the actual information being presented. And then they took what I imagine is a normal studio production designed for normal TV screens and cropped it into vertical video, published on Youtube as a short. Gross.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago*

    Tbf it's a comedy show, it being informative is mostly an accident. This one is rare for being factual and not about why we should nuke the moon or which cartoon characters are invited to the cookout or something like that.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 112 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

    Okay, but the ruling is totally sensible inasmuch as it applies to "purposes of tariffs, imports and customs". Tomatoes by and large aren't being imported for their botanical value; they're being used for food. This ruling exists so corporations can't "um ackshually" their way out of paying their fair share.

    But that's too sensible; in reality, this unanimous ruling that I never bothered to spend five seconds researching independently (I am very intellectually superior) was just "le Americans uneducated ecksdee".

    (And before you point it out: yes, an "um ackshually" definition of vegetables includes fruits, although this is using a culinary one. So indeed, the original post can't even pedant right.)

    Edit: to totally gild the lily, imagine your country adds a tax to crab meat because overfishing for a luxury good is destroying the Earth's oceans. Someone sells Alaskan king crab, and they go to the courts demanding their taxes back because "um, ackshually, crabs are infraorder Brachyura, but king crabs are nested cladistically inside the hermit crab superfamily". You would hope the court would tell them to get lost, because for the environmental impact and culinary uses that the bill is targeting, it's a crab.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    'Fruit de la mere' is obviously just some attempted tax dodge.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    This is dumb, botanically tomatoes are a fruit doesn't preclude them being vegetables because vegetable isn't a botanical term at all. Tomatoes are fairly sweet but they have more culinarily in common with vegetables. Nutritionally I'm not positive but it's a separate issue.

    Regardless the supreme court decision was regarding tariffs/imports/customs which makes sense to classify it simply by the way in which people consume it. People eat tomatoes as a vegetable, just like we eat zucchini and cucumber as vegetables despite them all also being fruit.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Obviously fruit/vegetable should be broken down into whether or not you can just make a sauce with it.

    Tomatoes: easily broken0 down into a sauce Apples: guess what? saucable

    Zucchini: not easily sauced. Cucumber: don't even think about it!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • Hilarious but we're gonna end up with a few weird things like jackfruit and bananas becoming vegetables. I'd also add that apples are only sauceable through maceration which really puts them into the same camp as squash like zucchini, and any root really like carrots or celeriac.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Pretty sure it's so giving ketchup to school kids constitutes a serving of vegetables.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I'm going to take this as an opportunity to point out that bees are a type of fish in California.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago

    You weren't kidding!

    California enforces many wildlife regulations. CESA, or the California Endangered Species Act, is designed to keep animal and plant life from extinction. The law covers any threatened β€œbird, mammal, fish, amphibian, reptile, or plant.”

    Insects weren’t mentioned in the specific act’s wording. However, a separate California regulation legally defines fish as β€œa wild fish, mollusk, crustacean, invertebrate, amphibian, or part, spawn, or ovum of any of those animals.”
    So, are bees actually fish? Yes, because all invertebrates are according to California law. The broad definition of fish allows activists to fight for insect survival.
    The California Department of Fish and Wildlife has clarified that β€œIt was not believed necessary to include the term invertebrate in the original legislation because β€˜fish’ is defined in the Fish and Game Code to include β€˜invertebrates’…”

    Talk about by-the-book!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Fun fact, the vatican classifies capybaras as fish

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Strange times for Berry Club

    From Mr. Lovenstein whose website unfortunately doesn't seem to work, except to redirect you to Meta-owned socials. Ugh.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    There are two big grocery chains where I live. One puts the olives in the canned vegetable aisle, the other puts them in the canned fruit aisle. I keep forgetting which does which and end up in the wrong aisle every time.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    The fruit classification seems insane to me. Maybe I’m unfamiliar with dishes that use it as a sweet?

    Does that store have a separate aisle with canned beans, or is it just one big canned-things aisle?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Botanically, fruits don't have to be sweet. It's anything that's a seed carrier of some kind. Vegetables are other plant parts that don't contain seeds, more or less. It. Culinary usage takes a different approach, hence the different aisles.

    Not sure about beans, I don't usually buy canned beans.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I remember watching a YT video once about a legislative move of a US county to declare the number Pi to be exactly 3.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    Not unique because EU also classifies tomatoes as vegetables.

    Is the tomato a fruit or a vegetable?
    The classification of fruit and vegetables can be based
    on various approaches β€” botanical, agronomical,
    culinary β€” thus resulting in different definitions. For
    example, the tomato is botanically a fruit, but it is
    commonly considered a vegetable from both the
    agronomical and the culinary points of view.
    The facts and figures presented in this briefing follow
    Eurostat's definitions based on the farm management
    and agronomical practices, according to which the
    term 'fresh vegetable' refers to annual (or, rarely,
    biennial) horticultural crops, and the term 'fruit' refers
    to perennial crops.
    Following this approach, tomatoes are included in the
    main statistical aggregate of vegetables, as well as
    melons, water melons and strawberries, which are
    commonly considered and consumed as fruit.

    https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2019/635563/EPRS_BRI(2019)635563_EN.pdf

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Is there even a botanical definition of vegetables?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I wonder if in other romance languages is the same, in Spanish and Catalan the two definitions are distinguished by being masculine or feminine. Fruto/fruit being masculine is the botanical fruit and fruta/fruita is the culinary fruit.

    How is it in other romance languages?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Almost, but not quite. Fruto and fruta are not two genders of the same word, but two different words, with different sources words (fruto fructus and fruta fructa)

    Meanings are very similar, so there's a lot of mixup.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • You're completely right, they are two different words. For me that distinction was so clear that I never considered that what I wrote could be interpreted as two genders of the same word, that would make no sense.

    I didn't know the origins though, cool.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    So tomatoes are trans?

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago

    All fruits are vegetables, but not all vegetables are fruit.

    Vegetable = any edible plant part.

    Fruit = Ovary of a flowering plant that carries the seeds.

  • source
  • [–] 34 points 1 year ago (18 children)

    Being smug over the meanings of words that aren't ever actually used in a consistent way is even more American.

    Um actually, Strawberries are not a berry, it's a Gameboy, not a Nintendo, and I lick toads. Can you go to the bathroom?

    The only thing similar that I have experienced in Europe is the protected food name law, e.g. Champagne and Parmesan, but that's an EU cultural protectionism law that the US doesn't actually follow.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geographical_indications_and_traditional_specialities_in_the_European_Union

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago* (9 children)

    No worries, "being smug over the meanings of words that aren't ever actually used in a consistent way" is done over here in Europe as well. People have the exact same conversations you list as examples. I would even go so far and say that this is true for the whole world and throughout time, a human condition. I would also think that it really isn't about the words/language, but rather about having control over the conversation and power over others.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (4 children)

    If I had a nickel for every lemmy post and comment being hostile over another countries language/use of language, I'd be a rich fucker indeed

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    I don't see anyone being hostile, do you?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    No! How dare! My unique lived experience is unique to only me and my arbitrary group! You can't be the same!

    What next? You gonna tell me the "wait 5 minutes" joke about weather basically applies everywhere?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I don't see much difference between the Parmesan case and Apple sueing against a vaguely similiar looking logo.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    How so? You can have a cheese that's a molecular perfect replica of a Parmesan and have no legal issues. You only have problems is you call it Parmesan without following the requirements.

    To be honest, it seems like the complete opposite issue.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Pizza is a salad according to your legal system

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments
    view more: next β€Ί