all 77 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 70 points 5 months ago (10 children)

Wow, the Pacific Ocean must be really wide, like, that's gotta be longer than 2 football fields placed end to end.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 5 months ago (8 children)

    Two? Double that number, then double it again...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    Be careful with exponentials!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 5 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 39 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    Ah yes, the optimal packing of 16 Polands

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 5 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 24 points 5 months ago

    How do you sink a Polish battleship?

    By placing the entire country of Poland into the Pacific Ocean while the Battleship is in drydock.

  • source
  • [–] 24 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    We haven't found the upper limit yet, but with more research funding we can get closer

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    There's an old mexican comedy show where the teacher asks a student how many centimeters are in a meter - she answers something like "29. And there's even room for more!"

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 18 points 5 months ago (5 children)

    I like how they started to make a grid then just went "fuck it" lol

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    If you think that’s bad, wait until they try to fit 17!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 5 months ago

    The Atlantic Ocean can hold 17 Polands. Therefore, the Atlantic Ocean is bigger.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Americans will use anything but metric

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 5 months ago (6 children)

    Isn’t the garbage island like the size of at least three Polands these days? At some point it’s going to accumulate enough organic debris to develop its own topsoil and eventually ecosystem.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 5 months ago* (2 children)

    It's not really an island though. There's just more garbage there than elsewhere.

    Despite the common public perception of the patch existing as giant islands of floating garbage, its low density (4 particles per cubic metre (3.1/yd3)) prevents detection by satellite imagery, or even by casual boaters or divers in the area.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Pacific_Garbage_Patch

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (2 children)

    i hear someone was doing something to make it smaller, which i'm not sure how i feel about because we're going to need all the viable landmass we can get

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    In the purely speculative fiction mindset of “what if”, I am kinda fascinated by the idea that nature will eventually find a to deal with our hubris. We can make the planet uninhabitable for ourselves as we know ourselves and the other living beings we currently see living around us. Because we know this and are aware of the potential we should use that same awareness to lessen the impact, not just for ourselves but because there’s living being who can’t stop or lessen the impact of what we’re doing. But give the planet a few more hundred million years and on the off chance there’s still a hominid lineage kicking it, they won’t be Homo sapiens as we recognize them and while our plastics are unnatural, Mother Nature will eventually find a way to make due with what we’ve done or recycle it. That’s not nihilism or an excuse to not care/prevent, just the reality that we’re a brief moment in geologic time even if we’ve utterly fucked the current environment during our stay.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago*

    you might enjoy the book Earth by David Bryn. I liked it because it has gravity waves and transhumanism. OOO i just remembered also voluntary reversible sterilization as like, birth control. I can't remember if the Garbage Patch was a new continent or just a city, but i think it featured in the book. I will say no more because spoilers, it's best to discover the book yourself. I think i last read it a decade ago.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Those three Polands are conspiring against the other 13!

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 5 months ago (6 children)

    16!

    It's not wrong.

    The Pacific Ocean is so vast in area it could hold 528 Polands.

    The Pacific Ocean is also deep... Can we start stacking the Polands?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago* (1 child)

    Thanks. Useful information.

    So since the mean depth of the Pacific's around 4000m, that means, without squishing them, we cannot even fit two layers. If we flip the top layer upside down, we should manage to match the tallest bits with lower bits, and fit them beneath sea level. ... since that top one's upside down now, and staying under sea level would be an arbitrary extra restriction I'd be imposing on myself, we can scrap that arbitrary restriction, and use that upturned flat cut underbelly to plonk a third ontop...

    But that's still not as many stacked as I thought.

    The pacific's tiny.

    It can only hold about 1582 Polands.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 5 months ago

    Technically correct.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago

    I've often thought about Poland and the pacific ocean. I always considered you could fit 7 or 8 or 173 or even 9. But 16? That really is mind blowing.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago*

    yeah, but one of those polands is so vast it can hold texas lovingly and tenderly

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    And this is why poland should be the standard unit of measurement.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago

    I like to bake and I use mostly weights for measuring. When I explain to people how it's easier and faster, I will finish as a joke that I weigh in stones. Those that know how bad a unit of measure stones would be for baking laugh. I dont think it would work as well using "polands".

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago

    Bigly if true

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 5 months ago (9 children)

    Modelled on a mercator projection which doesn't preserve area, then showing exactly the same size on every latitude

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (8 children)

    Not true. This is a screenshot taken from https://thetruesize.com/, which addresses the issue you mention. You can see, for example, that the yellow outline of poland is larger than the cyan one nearer the equator.

    Here's one I did myself to better illustrate that effect:

    The Pacific ocean has a surface area of approximately 165 million square kilometres, and poland is about 300,000 square kilometres, so on that basis, you should be able to squeeze around 550 polands into the Pacific, though poorly fitting edges would obviously reduce that, but suffice to say, 16 is well undercounted, and the image accurately portrays that

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago (5 children)

    No, it clearly says you can fit 16 poland in the Pacific, not more

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    You can fit 16 polands into that area. OP doesn't make any claim that you can only fit 16.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    Yeah but we only have 16 Poland in stock

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (2 children)

    Well at least there are a few backups in case Poland should ever need restoring.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 5 months ago* (1 child)

    I know that the ocean is big enough, but OP uses a Mercator projection and pastes the same size Poland all over the map

    You have used correctly resized maps, they didn't

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago

    I really don't understand why you're doubling down here, when faced with overwhelming evidence to the contrary. The map I used and the one originally posted are both from the same website, and when overlaid, the two maps match pixel for pixel. There is no difference in projection or distortion between them. The outlines of Poland are very clearly not the same size all over the map.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    something is wrong, i can see new zealand on this map

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago

    Even a multicolor assortment of 16 Polands!

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago

    That's a lot of kielbasa!

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago

    Where did you find the other 15?

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago
    [–] 1 point 5 months ago

    You get a multi buy discount if you purchase 16 Poland's in one transaction

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago

    Well that's not surprising.
    There are only 2 poles, the north pole and the south pole.
    How big can that country be?

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago

    Repost to Anything Bit Metric 😸

  • source
  • [–] -1 points 5 months ago

    Right where they belong

  • source