top 98 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 46 points 7 months ago

the media is owned by private individuals with their own agenda.

  • source
  • [–] 121 points 7 months ago (17 children)

    Actually, the other side mostly wants things to stay the same. Their constituents, on the other hand, would like to see better healthcare, education, unions, and stronger safety nets. But since the other side aren’t fascists, their voters are stuck with them.

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 55 points 7 months ago (16 children)

    This right here ☝️. The grassroots democrats I could support. It's the Chuck Schumers and John Fettermans that will undermine the party from within that make supporting democrats difficult.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 7 months ago (11 children)

    Why haven't the democrats kicked out Fetterman?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 7 months ago* (1 child)

    Rotating villain. He allows them to tell their constituents "we want what you want, we just don't have the power because of thay one guy, but if you vote just a little harder, we won't pull the football away this time", while telling their donors "we ain't giving them shit lmao".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

    He was elected in 2022, so his next election is in 2028.

    Senators are elected for 6 years. House Representatives have election every 2 years.

    Edit: gotta love the down vote, as if facts didn't matter, just feelings or as if I wrote the Constitution.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago* (1 child)

    How would that work, exactly?

    PA senators are not subject to recalls, so it's out of the hands of the voters. He could technically be impeached and removed from office by the Senate itself... but for what, exactly? It's not illegal to vote a certain way, even if it's against the wishes of your constituency.

    And even if Fetterman were somehow removed, PA is an extremely competitive state. Remember, he won against Doctor fucking Oz, so the chance of someone even worse coming in to replace him is quite high. The devil you know, etc etc...

    Best case scenario is that he gets primaried into irrelevance in 2028 by someone with actual integrity. But even then, I'm not holding my breath...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

    How would that work, exactly?

    You pull all of his committee assignments and neuter his value to lobbyists. If all he has is his vote on the legislation that hits the floor, he can't do much and it will hurt him both financially and politically, because if you don't have value to lobbyists they won't send you "gifts".

    You attack him personally and threaten his business or personal connections. For example, if Dems wanted to pull Manchin in line, for example, they could have sent the DoJ after his daughter for price gouging consumers on pharmaceuticals.

    And yes, while it doesn't matter now, you make sure he knows he'll be primaried out and smeared like yesterday's dog shit. Character assassination is effective and could bring someone in line, especially when they're enthusiastically supporting genocide and Israel's popularity is in the shitter.

    That's how.

    They've never been powerless. They're just complicit.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 7 months ago* (1 child)

    Because he was elected and is still serving his term?

    And it doesn't appear that he's the type of person to resign.

    Do the 21 people who have upvoted you thus far not understand how our government works?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    There's always a rotating villain.

    Used to be Dianne Feinstein. Then it was Joe Manchin. Then it was that Sinema bitch. Now it's Fetterman and Schumer.

    And people just kind of ignore the pattern and pretend it isn't a party-wide PR strategy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 7 months ago

    Not speaking for anyone else, but I’m fully aware of what the Democratic Party stands for. Problem is, the alternative has gotten so much worse.

    Before the current madness, there was a part of me aching to vote for someone crazy to come and hasten the act of burning this mess to the ground. Then I saw it, and got scared. Maybe that’s when I should’ve leaned in.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Then primary them.

    The odds of us getting out of this with a revolution are vanishingly small.

    The answer is going to be reforming the Democrat party by primarying the Schumers and the Fettermans out.

    Party reformation has happened multiple times in American history and conservatives literally just did it in the worst way possible to the Republican party over the last decade or two.

    Party reformation takes time. That is life.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    Right, but in the mean time it makes any attempt to claim "The Democrats stand for [insert policy position]" a lie, because while an individual democrat may believe in those things, the part as a whole can't agree on anything at all. They can't even align themselves on their own platform, let alone apply pressure to the Republicans. At best they're nothing but a speed break for more republican policy. You're still getting republican policy, just slower, and they can't move the needle in the other direction even if they win because they'll simply surrender in advance.

    Wasting more time and more money trying to slow the rate the US collapses into a burning train wreck is an exercise in futility. The only real solution is to try and build a "coalition of the willing" to preserve what is left and the Republicans drive the rest, screaming incoherently, off the cliff they're headed for. Small scale organizing, networks to help move people to safety "underground railroad" style, to move material and finances in ways that circumvent federal control, create safe-havens that can resist federal encroachment and operate outside of federal regulation meant to break down resistance. Register some "Churches" that can provide physical plant and meeting grounds, as well as offer support services when federal support is ripped up. Build a nation within a nation.

    Voting for Democrats isn't going to stop this spiral. They have no vision, no will, no unity, and zero political capital to actually create change. Sure, vote blue to slow the bleeding, if you're still allowed by next election, but as long as they're a party so big tent they have no direction at all, they're just a slower, more painful collapse.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 7 months ago (11 children)

    To be honest what I really want is fully automated luxury gay space communism.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    Unfortunately we are all out of name brand luxury gay space communism.

    We do, however, have Temu deluxe ambiguous resource "sharing" managed by Grok, and an couple open packs of glow in the dark ceiling stars. Only $19.99 a month at 30% interest when you buy now, pay later.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (5 children)

    Yes, but you can have my portion of gay

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    Just save it for later. Forever is a long time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Ok, I just hope it doesn't spoil. What is the shelf life of gay?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 7 months ago

    Equal? Universal healthcare is derided as the delusions of radical extremists. A mere pipedream of anti-semitic tankies, if we're talking the gambit of American media.

  • source
  • [–] 40 points 7 months ago

    No, the media doesn't think that, the owners of the media wants the media to say that they're equal

  • source
  • [–] 28 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    We need to keep repeating this, it's a CLASS war.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Obviously the republicans are genuinely terrible people

    But I'll give you an equivalence that actually holds up

    Both parties have their snouts in the trough and depend on huge levels of external funding which completely undermines your democracy

    That is a problem that needs to be fixed

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

    the "media" doesn't "think" they all just push their current agenda

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago

    The two sides are the people and the state/capital, right? ... right?

  • source
  • [–] 46 points 7 months ago (18 children)

    Correction: They SAY they want health care and education, get elected, and then spend their political capital making most people poorer, doing fascism, and genociding.

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    doing fascism

    Lol. Can you describe how Democrats "do fascism"?

    I keep seeing this stupid, counter-productive sentiment and have yet to have anyone actually explain it to me.

    Meanwhile, I'm old enough to remember when I was poor and had NO healthcare and the Dems fought tooth and nail to get Obamacare passed and then I had affordable healthcare. Millions of other people can tell you the same, if you need a history lesson.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 7 months ago (13 children)
  • [–] 12 points 7 months ago (9 children)

    Chopping off a finger is better than chopping off an arm.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [+] -12 points 7 months ago (6 children)

    Perfect is the enemy of good.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Evil is also the enemy of good and the lesser evil is still evil.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

    I don't know that I agree.

    The only difference I see here is that, under Democrats, it's primarily ICE and the cops doing the Nazi things and not CBP, and you'll recall that after George Floyd was killed Biden used his next SOTU to publicly call for more police militarization.

    Also, go look up who first appointed Tom Homan, for a very good example.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 7 months ago (6 children)

    A lot of world class dipshits on this very platform think both sides are equal. Getting pretty tired of reading

    "Both sides are fascist, one's just more open about it."

    Stupidest fucking sentiment I've ever had the displeasure of reading. Absolute lack of education and critical thinking skills to say shit like that.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 7 months ago

    The lack of critical thinking skills is when people cannot understand that one side is fascist and the other enables the fascists.

    To many leftist, capitalist imperialism is just fascism in disguise, and they are entirely correct.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago* (3 children)

    I don't think they're both equal, they're certainly both shit.

    How do you measure the quality of shit?

    Let's just say I wouldn't let Maxine Waters or Mitch McConnell watch my dog

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago* (2 children)

    If "shittiness" was a binary, they'd definitely the same. However, in the real world it's a spectrum that looks more like:

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    With their proposed ideas, I'd mostly agree.

    However, with the increasingly shittier Republicans they have compromised further and further into utter shit. They've tacked toward shitty, pretty hard in some cases, to try to lure some shitty votes their way... alienating those who want less shit. They've opted to take money from extremely shitty people because they have a lot of money but those people desire there to be more shit. The Democrats abandoned their less shitty ground repeatedly even when they managed to find some real leverage, unleashing torrents of shit for no apparent reason (unless they actually want more shit).

    So yes, their campaign websites have a lot less shit on them than the Republicans, but in practice the party as a whole has either pushed for things to be much shittier or compromised their alleged ideals unnecessarily resulting in things being much shittier.

    There are certainly diamonds in the shit. I don't think it's all of them, but current leadership is definitely way more shitty than they look. What concerns me is that every time we get rid of some small contingency of Democrats that are obviously bathing in shit and willing to open the floodgates for the Republicans, we always seem to find just enough of the remaining Democrats wiling to dive in and replace them. It gives the impression that, for a significant subset of them, their campaign slogans and alleged ideals are performative.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago*

    I was banned from the lemmy.ml memes community for saying the Democrats are slightly better than Republicans. After saying it I needed to argue with 20 people at once, all with preprepared arguments, who were adamant that both sides are the same.

    I've also recently seen that that community is extremely toxic in other ways.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    So foolish to think this way.

    The longer we sit here and make it about the "other" is another day/year/decade that these people play us and stay in power.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    “other” ... "these people"

    The internal contradiction is strong here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    You're sort of missing the point of the statement. Which would itself indicate it's not a contradiction at all.

    "Othering" people is making a blanket group an enemy. Humans do love to categorize things, and so the process of Othering based on arbitrary or immutable characteristics fits our known human biases well. It's an easy way to manipulate humans.

    "These people" refers not to an arbitrary categorization of people, but rather a specific group of individuals in power right now that are doing real harm to people.

    If anything, you could call it a limitation of English as a language, or my poor choice of words, but the statement on its own clearly indicates that there's no contradiction.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 29 points 7 months ago (25 children)

    The democrats had the house, senate, and presidency for 4+ years. Where is that Healthcare?

    Spoiler: Both sides are bad, they both get paid off. Its just that one side is really fucking honest with you right now ... to the point where they commit crimes in public because no one will do anything about it.

  • source
  • hideshow 25 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago* (2 children)

    The democrats had the house, senate, and presidency for 4+ years

    What years where these pray tell? I guess if you don't mean "4+ consecutive years" but that would be silly wouldn't it?

    Also, why did you fail to mention the Supreme Court? Interesting.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 7 months ago* (16 children)

    This argument is either based on ignorance or bad faith.

    https://www.beaconjournal.com/story/news/2012/09/09/when-obama-had-total-control/985146007/

    “Did President Obama have "total control" of Congress? Yes, for 4 entire months. And it was during that very small time window that Obamacare was passed in the Senate with 60 all-Democratic votes.”

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 7 months ago (7 children)

    The healthcare bill written by Republican Mitt Romney that didn’t have universal healthcare and ended up being a handout to health insurance companies? That bill?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 7 months ago (6 children)

    Were you not following the back and forth fight that went on back then for him to try to get anything through? Yeah it’s shit but it’s a lot better than the nothing there was. It was progress and if this country had actual adults in it instead of a bunch of emotional children and corrupt politicians then things could continue to progress.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago* (3 children)

    corrupt politicians

    Like the dems.

    if this country had actual adults in it instead of a bunch of emotional children

    Blaming the voters. The endpoint of every democratic argument.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 7 months ago

    Like the dems.

    Yeah, cuz both sides are equally corrupt.

    Two questions.

    1. Are you aware that reality is all sorts of imperfect and there will ALWAYS be corruption in political parties?

    2. Are you aware that for the foreseeable future, and most likely for the remainder of your life, you will have Dems or Repubs in control?

    So with those in mind, what good do you think it does to whine about a party having corruption when all parties will always have corruption and it's our duty to make the best decision within that reality? Such as making sure the WAY, WAY, WAY less corrupt party is in control and not the WAY, WAY, WAY more corrupt party.

    Blaming the voters.

    Why wouldn't they be to blame? How do you think the president and members of Congress got there? We live in a nation that willingly elected a convicted felon and adjudicated rapist who ran a fraudulent university and charity and already had one massively failed presidency under his belt. Not to mention the open bigotry and obviously low IQ.

    This IS a country full of child-like adults, and our government is a testament to that. Of course voters are to blame. We made this happen.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    The person you are responding to was probably still breast feeding during Obama's presidency. So they're likely completely unaware that before Obamacare millions of people just didn't have healthcare and that Obama had to fight like hell with Republicans just to get it done.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (5 children)

    Dont argue with me. Go argue with history ....

    117th Congress (2021–2023): Democrats gained control of the Senate (via Georgia runoffs) and held the House, paired with President Biden's election. The 4-Year Period: This 4-year stretch saw shifting majorities in the Senate, but the Democratic caucus maintained a working majority to control the legislative agenda from 2021-2023, while holding the House from 2019-2023, marking a four-year tenure of overall legislative

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    You said they had the house, senate, AND presidency for 4+ years. The house yes, presidency yes, senate no. Nothing becomes law without the senate. Your claim was not accurate.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    Argue with Google. Not me. Biden had the house and senate.

    You sound like AI.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Do you remember Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema? Remember how they kind of held up everything?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Why weren't they censured? Everything plays out EXACTLY like big business wants it. If you dont understand that corporations have nearly ful control of politics then we have nothing to discuss. Here is the summary ... both sides bow down to billionaires and corporations.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    Sure rotating villain and all that. Yes generally both sides serve their corporate rulers, but the progressives still caucus with Democrats, so they're slightly better and should always be voted for if the alternative is literal fascists. FPTP is the main problem in the electoral process.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -2 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    You are responding to someone who doesn't do his homework and who is being upvoted by other people who do not do their homework.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago

    You literally said dems havent had the House, Senate, and presidency ... then posted the Biden era where he had the house, senate, and pres. You are acting and posting like AI.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 7 months ago

    Both sides are bad

    Cool observation. Here's a smiley face sticker and a lollipop.

    Here's another observation.

    Both sides are NOT the same.

    So, in a system where you WILL get one or the other for the foreseeable future, what would you consider to be the intelligent thing to do?

    Also, you are wrong. Democrats haven't held a trifecta for 4+ years since the 1960s. In recent memory their control has only lasted 2-3 years at a time, and you've also failed to take into account that many things require a supermajority in Congress to enact and Dem's total control has typically been by a very thin margin.


    Key Periods of Unified Democratic Control (White House + Senate + House):

    2021–2023 (117th Congress): President Joe Biden, with narrow House and Senate majorities.

    2009–2011 (111th Congress): President Barack Obama, passing the Affordable Care Act.

    1993–1995 (103rd Congress): President Bill Clinton’s first two years.

    1961–1969 (87th–90th Congresses): Presidents John F. Kennedy and Lyndon B. Johnson.

    1933–1947 (73rd–79th Congresses): President Franklin D. Roosevelt and the start of Truman’s term.


    Where is that Healthcare?

    When I was young and broke Obama, during one of those windows of control, gave me affordable healthcare when I had none and he had to fight tooth and nail with Republicans to get it.

    You really need to do your homework before you post things on the internet that other people who don't do their homework will just accept as fact. It really doesn't help our situation.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Which side is telling us that these are the sides. I'm not disagreeing with either of the sides but I kind of feel like there's chirality to every political opinion.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 3 points 7 months ago

    I aM nEuTrAl

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago

    It’s wild how often both sides gets used to blur real differences.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›
    12 comments in c/progressivepolitics@lemmy.world view that post
    1 comment in c/politicalmemes@lemmy.world view that post