Really? Because if you listen to the press young people "unanimously hate this and want Albanese's head over it".

They're honest about their partisan leanings.

News is dead anyway. Basically the only credible news source is political party newsletters, because at least they're honest.

My concern isn't with transgender people, it's with transgenderism as a religion. The kind that sees anyone who does not share the same beliefs as them to be the devil incarnate, and will go on holy crusades to impose that view on others.

And often the most dogmatic aren't even trans themselves. They take a radical position, dunk on anyone who disagrees with them, and think that makes them a hero.

I support the right of trans women to exist in society. I also support the right for them to be treated as women, but I don't support that view being imposed on others especially by force of law. I don't think it even qualifies transphobia to not see trans women as women, that's just a social faux pass.

What's the alternative? The basically unusable Mojeek? Rawdogging Bing? SearXNG?

At the very least, I'd be far more approving if they didn't make me pay for a separate 300 AI searches I'd never use. If it was just "600 searches, of any type" or even just "300 searches, of any type" that would be far more acceptable.

What about the title?

If developing property becomes more profitable, there will be more competition in the market.

That aside, underground parking spaces are ridiculously expensive to build and requiring every apartment resident to pay for parking spaces regardless of how many they use just drives up car ownership, which is what really drives down the quality of a city.

It's not so much being invisible as it is avoiding highly publicized debates between "women's groups" and trans people. There are other, safer, spaces to be visible.

We've seen as a result of this court ruling in favour of trans rights that Minns is calling for changes around prisons and sports. Then again in the UK we're seeing a court ruling against trans rights do the same (although UK Labour, and especially health secretary Wes Streeting, are particularly vile human beings so that might not be a factor).

Based on these two data points, we see trans rights regress when there is a highly publicized court ruling. Keeping matters of trans rights out of the domain of the courts seems like the best way to prevent this from happening.

Enshrining the most important trans rights into law (bathrooms, healthcare, prisons, and general anti-discrimination protections) while leaving issues like gender segregated social activities up to the organizer's discretion is the best way to protect trans rights.

My tone was probably a bit harsh because I was getting frustrated with how dogmatic the "trans women are women" crowd is. Yes we should individually treat them as such, the law should also treat them as such, but drawing a legal line that they should be treated as such is a step too far.

The needs to trans people should be accommodated. But the preferences of the more dogmatic trans people should not be respected at any cost, there has to be room for another's comfort.