
post
New Worms game looking hype though

Wait, is there a new worms game for real? The best couch multiplayer, dog cuss your friends and family game ever.
Check out this fun little nugget from further down in the article:
Nvidia actually used two RTX 5090s for its demos: one plays the game, the other exclusively runs the DLSS 5 technology.
An entire second GPU just to run it.
I think you have a typo there: An entire second GPU just to ruin it.
Can hardly afford or find one, they expect us to buy two? Fuck them
They have no intention to sell them to us. They'll maybe let us play it like this thorugh GeForce Now, or any other streaming service.
They don't want regular folk to buy PCs anymore.
So, yes. Fuck them indeed.
No. They want regular folk to buy PCs. They just have no idea what regular folk can afford. How much could a banana cost, 10 dollars?
Is there scarcity somewhere? Priced out completely, but they're available.
SLI is back!
That's actually good news in my eyes, we definitely won't see this hit the consumer market for years.
2017: Buy 2x 1080 Ti for 1500 bucks, your build is GOATed, have fun spending half your time tinkering with your overclocks and fishing for the perfect SLI compatibility bits in Inspector
2026: This. It's a shame
Context is important. The following sentence is:
The use of two GPUs is required right now as DLSS 5 still has a long way to go in terms of optimisation - both in terms of performance and its VRAM footprint. However, DLSS 5 is designed for use on a single GPU and that's how it will ship later this year. Quite how scalable it is also remains to be seen, but in common with other DLSS technologies, Nvidia tells us that the computational cost scales with resolution.
Sure just double the vram and your AI can run, unfortunately you can't afford that vram because billionaires are running AI.
It's always funny to me when Nvidia releases new 8GB cards and new VRAM-heavy features as a reason to buy them.
Ha ha thats great. Reminds me of PhysX back in the day where initially it needed a dedicated card.
Some of us are old enough to remember when your games would sound different depending on which sound card you had installed.
Ahh, I remember the first time I heard the intro music to Star Control through my Sound Blaster instead of through my motherboard's piezo speaker. Like the audio version of The Wizard Of Oz switching to colour.
Sound Blaaster!!
IRQ 3 DMA 8 bit (or what was that now again)
as much as you and I both hate it and as shitty as it looks right now, i imagine that some sort of cloud hosted ai technology is the future of gaming
It sounds like indie games that will run on a potato and not require internet access will be the future of gaming. I’m completely done with aaa corposlop.
sounds like a good idea. it sounds like that's what I like doing and that's what I like playing and it sounds like it's good but I don't know man. you tell me that sounds good. I'm glad you predict the future
i hope that the universe will happen exactly as we want it to in this website In accordance with our upvotes
They tried this shit with Stadia. What would be the difference now that we also have AI? There is no reason to stream a shitty AAA game from a shitty company when you can buy and play indie hits on your own hardware.
I know the capitalists really want game streaming to be the future but every gamer with some common sense will reject that idea.
Makes perfect sense in context.
Nvidia is no longer a gaming company. They do not care about gamers. They are actively DRIVING AWAY gamers as fast as they can, because AI chips are more lucrative than dirty smelly tiny consumer products.
This is meant to show off real-time AI generation performance, which is massively marketable to AI companies. Not consumers. Nothing is about consumers.
Idk why, but this reminded me of the South Park episode where everyone is using photoshop to show off their girlfriends.
Had to make the meme

At least it would stop Gamers^TM^ from complaining about how “ugly” that character is?
Well, I know what you are talking about, but we have to admit that that character had a character in her design. Having had a look at all the before/after comparisons - almost always "before" is better. So we get something worse for quadruple price. Heh.
Yeah, I can tell hundreds of hours were poured into making her "just ugly enough."
The demos run on the back of two 5090 GPUs... At what point do we even acknowledge I shouldnt need to be using nearly 2kW of power on a gaming PC on a dedicated circuit in my home? Simply diminishing returns at a certain point and nvidia is bringing us way past that point into very unreasonable territory.
Is it cool they could do it at all?... I GUESS?! But they've definitely lost the plot here.
They say the goal is to be able to run it on one GPU.
I like how it looks except for most of the faces.
this would be funny as hell if it could pull this off with Minecraft, lol.
I’d click this thumbnail if mumbojumbo posted it.
‘Artists have the final say’
They already had the final say.
I think their most gracious implication goes like
‘Artists have the final say’ [for now]
New Mario game looks 🔥🔥fr fr

Finally, Gamers™ are getting a filter for all the female protagonists that aren't hot enough. Gaming is healing!
So it uses up way more hardware and power whilst not improving the part of the game were the fun is: gameplay.
What's next NVidia, an AI driver that plays the game for you?!
And this is why indie games will probably have a second golden age.
I get why some people would like this, but Nvidia has lost touch with their gaming market.
AI users are their market now, and this is what they want. This is an advertisment to lazy game publishers/developers like Bethesda.
Because that is what was wrong with Star Field. Graphics.
It doesn't look like the same character anymore. The right side just looks like something AI hallucinated that is vaguely similar. If that were a real person you wouldn't be able to recognize them anymore.
Also, what the fuck do you call that? "Standard Human Face" ?
AI has never fixed shit ever. It always just makes shit up. I wouldn't even use it to remove the Starbucks cup from Game of Thrones, cause I don't know what the fuck it will put there instead. Whatever it "thinks" is supposed to be there, I guess.
I just watched the Digital Foundry video on this and the way they fuckin glaze over this tech just disgusted me enough to unsubscribe.
Can't say I ever really trusted any Digital Foundry takes. They all seem to naval glaze over shiny things.
Was able to brace myself enough to skim through the video. Anyone that watches those clips and thinks that looks better has no place working on anything related to visual tech. Not only is the interpolation obvious and distracting, every scene, no matter the time of day, location, or anything else, has the exact same shitty lighting that washes out every shadow and color painstakingly added to the scene by actual professionals. Pro-tip: A white-balanced image is the starting point, not the end-goal. Making every game look exactly the same is fucking terrible, you hacks.
I can only hope this shit only finds its way into the AAAA dross that's not worth playing already.
I watched it too and noticed that there's a lot of "added detail" which doesn't make sense, noise for the sake of noise. Also the main scene they tried to highlight had an umbrella move into the scene, covering the text on the overhang. It was so perfectly timed that I can't help but think they did it intentionally to hide that this AI also fails with text.
DLSS 7: You don't even need gamers to play the game. AI will play the game for you.
(Wasn't that a Microsoft patent?)
It will be cloud subscription based too but you will need a 6090 anyway. 🤑





top 91 comments