top 97 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 47 points 8 months ago (15 children)

…email will inherently be a lot less secure than messaging, no matter what you do.

If you truly want to be private about something, don’t email it lol

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    no matter what you do.

    Even PGP?

    ...TBF, getting your counterparty to also use PGP is the heavy lift there.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Security yes, privacy not especially.

    PGP lets you encrypt the messages and sign them to digitally prove you sent them.

    It doesn't help with the problem here which is that the metadata of who you are (the IP used to log into the webmail and the email address of the sender) and who you're talking to (the email of the recipient) and when (timestamps etc.) were able to be leaked.

    In fact, depending on the implementation, PGP could be considered slightly worse for privacy because you'd have the added identity proof of the message having a signature that only you could create with your private key (although that's encrypted, it's a stronger identity proof than the sender email address). It also generally leaks the recipients' key IDs too (although that's configurable) PGP is great for accountability, message confidentiality and non-repudiation. Not so much for privacy. For that you'd need other systems.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 8 months ago

    People like Jeffrey Epstein running one of the biggest blackmail networks in the planet and at the same time blatantly emailing each other about it from gmail really amazes me. Either they are that stupid or powerful enough that they just don't care.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago (6 children)

    Or go talk to the other person out in the middle of a field somewhere without your phones. And I'm not even 100% sure anymore that that would work. Like, maybe the lanternflies are bugged (pun intended).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    Well I'd suggest a forest instead but anyway depends how you get there :

    • look up online how? there might be now a path on a server to your target destination
    • disconnect phone in a pattern that's usually not how you use it? more surveillance
    • public transport tracking, plate tracking until you leave the city
    • rough estimation on your direction then follow up with drones tracking you, if it's 100m high it's hard to notice

    ... anyway, ending the paranoia comment ;)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Don't forget facial recognition! Then just in case you decided to wear a mask, gait recognition!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    Is it really so hard to make it secure? If both parties are using some kind of secure email client, couldn't the clients just encrypt and decrypt the subject/content?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    The main issue is that in reality, 95%+ of people aren’t using an encrypted service. So it’s proton to Gmail usually

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Sure but this is very similar to messaging isn't it? Like most of my friends use WhatsApp, but a few people use signal and that number is increasing.

    At least with email, a single client could presumably send encrypted emails to others when possible, and regular emails when not. Add opposed to messaging where I cannot send messages from signal to WhatsApp

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 217 points 8 months ago* (19 children)

    Don't hate the player. You can't send mail with E2E encrypted headers and you can't leave payment data and expect Proton to violate regulations and delete it.

    Signal has to deal with neither of these issues.

  • source
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    The FBI had the payment data and served Proton with a subpoena, they had no choice but to tell which account it was for. The data is still encrypted, though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    The FBI did not serve the subpoena directly to Proton Mail.

    "We want to first clarify that Proton did not provide any information to the FBI, the information was obtained from the Swiss justice department via MLAT," said Proton AG's head of communications, Edward Shone. "Proton only provides the limited information that we have when issued with a legally binding order from Swiss authorities, which can only happen after all Swiss legal checks are passed. This is an important distinction because Proton operates exclusively under Swiss law."

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/travel/news/privacy-focused-proton-mail-handed-protester-data-to-police/ar-AA1XH3R5

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 8 months ago

    Meanwhile, on Proton's homepage:

    Highest standards of privacy

    Proton is incorporated and headquartered in Switzerland, meaning your data is protected by some of the world's strictest privacy laws.

    The standard for email privacy

    From newsrooms, activists, and international organizations to academics, Nobel Prize winners, and movie characters, Proton Mail is the trusted choice for secure and private communication.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    ultimately, it's the choice to use a credit card that created the issue. As Proton's statement mentions, it also accepts payment by cryptocurrency and cash, which could be better ways to keep your information private if you absolutely need to.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (12 children)

    Proton can do what it likes when it comes to messages being sent between different proton accounts. Use of meta data rich protocols like standard email, instead of, e.g., the signal protocol, is absolutely something they can be blamed for.

    As is choosing operate from a jurisdiction that can comple them to collect IP addresses.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 8 months ago* (6 children)

    Use of meta data rich protocols like standard email, instead of, e.g., the signal protocol

    Brother...its an email product though...if you can use Signal, use Signal. But it's a different product entirely.

    When my bank sends me verification info and banking statements over Signal I'll be elated. Until then, we unfortunately have to continue dealing with email.

    As is choosing operate from a jurisdiction that can comple them to collect IP addresses.

    There is no such requirement. They collect them necessarily in order to function.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (5 children)

    Brother...its an email product though...if you can use Signal, use Signal.

    The point is there is no requirement for emails sent between different proton accounts to be as insecure as they are. 

    This is something where there are known open source solutions that are just flat out better than what proton is using, and proton just can't be bothered. You can't fix the whole Internet, but proton just doesn't care enough to fix itself. 

    There is no such requirement. They collect them necessarily in order to function.

    By default proton doesn't log IP addresses. They're just not needed. But when ordered to they do.

    https://techcrunch.com/2021/09/06/protonmail-logged-ip-address-of-french-activist-after-order-by-swiss-authorities/

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    What insecurities are you referring to?

    But when ordered to they do.

    And your suggestion is...refusing to comply with the law?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    I explained both these things in the first post you responded to. 

    1. Using email protocols between proton accounts means they need more meta data which is then given up on a search warrant. 
    2. If they cared about privacy they wouldn't be based out of Switzerland. They'd pick somewhere with more privacy rights.
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    And I explained to you that Proton is an email service, not a chat app.

    There is nowhere that has better privacy regulations than Switzerland.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (1 child)

    I think that when communication is between two users on the same platform, it at least could be more like a chat app. Proton distinguishes the uniqueness of this in its own documentation, so it was actually surprising to me when I heard the actual behavior isn't great. This isn't some marketing description either. It's pretty deep in their website.

    Ironically, chat apps running over "email" servers actually look surprisingly private these days.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    They are a Mail provider. You can't blame a mail provider for providing a mail service.

    You are basically asking for them to make it seem like you send mail, but in reality you send the message via some other protocol when it's send to Proton users. At that point you might as well not send mail at all.

    As for their jurisdiction: The data protection laws changed after they were founded. They are also lobbying against them and have in fact threatened to stop investing in or even leave Switzerland.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago

    Yes, I think that a transparent upgrade that improves privacy is an obviously good thing.  

    And seriously, they should have left. The law allows the Swiss government to force proton to alter the code run on their servers to satisfy requests from foreign governments. That is ridiculous.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    The annoying part is them marketing themselves as like operating from Swiss “privacy haven” when swiss privacy laws aren’t that good and the parliament is actively destroying them as we speak.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago

    Right, so Proton is actually just pop privacy marketing with a side of Trump bootlicking, like everyone with actual cybersecurity credentials have been saying. Got it. There is literally no difference between Proton and Gmail besides ergonomics.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 105 points 8 months ago (11 children)

    That is exactly what they did, the user used a credit card with their damn name on it, while Proton even allows you to send them cash money for the service.

    The FBI filed a MLAT (Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty) request which was processed by the Swiss Federal Department of Justice and Police.

    The Swiss gave a legal binding order to Proton to hand over information that they had, the only information that was handed over was the payment identifier.

    I don't get why people get hung up on a company complying with a legal order by their justice system, especially with Proton that could not hand over any more information.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (9 children)

    The issue is them having any info to give out in the first place, it is a horrendous transgression for a shop that touts privacy as their thing.

    Signal demonstrated that you can decouple payment info from account info and thus they ain't got nothing to produce, MLAT or not. The least Proton coulda done is mimic that tech.

    edit: are you shills illiterate, what's your deal? signal also accepts payments, the kind normal people use, like CC and stuff. and they decoupled payment info from account info, so nobody can link John Smith, Fuckville, AL to account protonshill4lyfe@proton.yo

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Signal demonstrated that you can decouple payment info from account info

    How did Signal demonstrate this? Signal is not a paid subscription service

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago

    That is not really the same, Signal is a donation and Proton is a subscription where a monthly (or yearly) request has to go to the payment provider for your fee, for this you need to keep the payment information on file and linked to the account. Signal can say I got donated by someone but they do not need to keep this information linked to a specific user, just the payment record (that still has your cc/bank details on it) for tax purposes.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    I have pointed this out to protards many times. The fact is there are solutions to not keeping this data on their servers. Then they have the audacity to blame the user.

    A company that was concerned about privacy and not money would have already moved this data off their servers. Proton is a garbage company.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [+] 68 points 8 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] [S] -3 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    both could log ip addresses and payment info, meta infos like who you message with, both do key management, only saves this stuff and then has to give it to the feds

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 8 months ago

    Email headers need to be unencrypted, unless they had a proprietary "almost like email but not interoperable" protocol. Signal doesn't have payment info for most users because it's free to use, but for donations they need to store payment data too.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 26 points 8 months ago (13 children)

    God, I wish more people used Signal

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 8 months ago* (7 children)

    I've been using Signal more to test if I can recommend it to other people... it's mostly like WhatsApp, which is good...

    Except, can we please disable all of those god damn popups. Everyday: "Hey! Verify your pin!", "Hey! Verify your LONG ASS recovery key!", "Hey, plz donate!", "HEY! I couldn't start a backup", "HEY LOOK AT ME!"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 8 months ago (5 children)
    • I have never been asked to verify my recovery key.
    • It asks to verify pin once a month. Which I think is fair, since it can help you recover from a lockout / transfer your device.
    • backups are important, but they can also be disabled
    • Donating to open source projects is important, as it's a large portion of their funding.
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

    I agree with all your points, BUT I do think Signal could be slightly less "user-hostile" with the reminders, maybe?

    I get annoyed at the pop-ups in my Linux system, too, and all of them are got similarly legitimate reasons. Getting the way of my current task (or worse stealing focus) doesn't ever seem like the "right" way for computers/tools to behave.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    How obtrusive are the popups? Are you on iPhone or Android? The pin verify popup is like 20% of the screen at the bottom for me. And it's nearly the same color as the background, so I sometimes don't even notice it. Or at least, I finally see it and think "how long has that been there?"

    I agree that some things can probably be scaled back. But wouldn't it be an even worse experience if someone forgot their pin, and thus was unable to access their data?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    Android and desktop. I'm no UX designer, so I don't know what the ideal is, but when I'm using the software with a purpose, anything that gets in the way of that purpose is (at best) an annoyance. I'm probably wrong, but I think I'd prefer a passive notification to verify pin / donate / whatever that triggers after/as I leave Signal for something else -- a indicator I'm done with my purpose (albeit flawed; maybe I just need to copy info from FF or whatever.)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (1 child)

    It asks to verify pin once a month. Which I think is fair, since it can help you recover from a lockout / transfer your device.

    Even that is too annoying. OK, I just realized there's a way to turn off reminders. Trust me bro, I'm not gonna forget. I'm a big boy.

    backups are important, but they can also be disabled

    Ah! YES! Thanks! I just poked around deeper in the settings and disabled them. Backups are not important to me. I don't want to backup my messages.

    I have never been asked to verify my recovery key.

    Maybe it's because I had backups on? Let's see if this popup goes away.

    Donating to open source projects is important, as it’s a large portion of their funding.

    Agreed. Which is why I donate to them.... And I still get the popups! I'm already a donor, leave me alone.


    Overall, I want to give my attention to my messages, not to Signal. Leave me alone. Let me message people. I don't want to be nagged. WhatsApp doesn't nag people nearly as much. I know Signal is overall better, but user annoyances like the excessive popups makes it harder for me to try to convince normal people to use Signal.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    One problem with Signal is that it can be difficult to connect with someone who is on there.

    I've run into this a couple of times myself. And I've had friends run into it too. We know for a fact someone is using Signal, but you can't find them in the search, even though you have them in your contacts with the correctly formatted number.

    Personally, this issue has become a stumbling block for getting people I know to use it more.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago*

    Yes this is a problem. They use to have it so that you could see all your contacts and you could use it as your normal messenger app and if they also had signal then you get encryption. At least now you can use a username instead of a phone number. Problem with that is you can only have one username. You can change it but that gets messy.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 22 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (6 children)
  • [–] 16 points 8 months ago (5 children)

    I hate this sentiment. I was part of a bachelor party, and we had a group chat going. Had Android/iPhone users, so it was just a MMS chat. I suggested we use signal, and one of the iPhone users goes on a rant

    "I'm not gonna use Signal. It's just a honeypot for the CIA. Why else would they fund it if they didn't get any value out of. It's obviously a honey pot"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    I'm not gonna use Signal. It's just a honeypot for the CIA.

    No you're thinking of telegram.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 22 points 8 months ago

    When a service can only hand over a timestamp, that’s when you know the encryption is doing its job. 🔐

  • source
  • [–] 31 points 8 months ago* (8 children)

    This comparison makes no sense.

    Signal doesn't have payment data. It's not a paid service. Proton is a paid subscription service and that payment data needs to be accessible in order to charge the user and they're not a payment processor.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    The fact that it's a paid service doesn't mean they have to keep your PID and payment info on file. I use posteo.de for my email, which is a paid service. But my payment info is only used during the payment process and they don't keep it on file once they receive the payment. You buy like 12 or 20 months and have that many credits. When it starts to get low, you buy some more.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Interesting system! Correct me if I'm wrong though, but buying credits does look like it's not an automatically recurring payment (to buy credits), so that makes sense (they do keep the receipts though according to their privacy policy. Decoupled from the account, but they do keep data).

    That's a bit different from Proton's credit card payment method (which is the case here) that automatically recurs. If Posteo offered automatically recurring payments, they'd have to save payment data as well (which they also explain in the privacy policy).

    To be clear, Proton does also offer more private ways of paying. Paying by credit card is not the only option. Bitcoin or cash is also possible. I just found out that Proton does also actually offer a credit system as well, but it's unclear to me if that's decoupled or not. Definitely a place where they could do better.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago

    Right, it's not automatically recurring. If you get below some number of credits (I forget how many), they notify you (by email of course!) so you have plenty of time to buy some more.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    What if a user donates to Signal?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 8 months ago* (2 children)

    Service A is compelled to hand over all the data it has on a user

    They comply

    Service B is compelled to hand over all the data it has on a user

    They comply

    "And that's how it's done!"

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 8 months ago

    Proton has the disadvantage of having to work with other email services as well, so there's protocol limitations. When mailing from one Proton mailbox to another, they do intentionally avoid SMTP for this reason, but Signal has the advantage of "owning" the whole protocol, too.

    I imagine if you donate with a CC to Signal, they might also be forced to turn that over. The weakness is not in Signal or Proton, but in the Visa/Mastercard duopoly and CC processing in general. Cryptocurrency has some advantages here, but they are outweighed by the abuse, fraud, speculation, and general dishonestly (and just general failure to be good currencies for "normal" purchases.)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 8 months ago

    The criticism is that better privacy can be achieved by not saving data, it is a good criticism but I don't know how legit it is because I don't know if credit card payments can be processed without saving the data (i would assume yes, if tokenized)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 39 points 8 months ago (10 children)

    I don't like Proton after the CEO posted the pro-Trump statement and did not use them after that.

    Its really weird how people are blaming Protonmail when it was the Swiss government that complied with the FBI. That to me is really suspicious. The US government is currently not a trusted source of accuracy, and for the Swiss to readily agree to it?

    Worse, the chuds blaming the proton user?

    Protonmail is used by a lot of reporters/whistleblowers. As what point is their work also a threat to the US government and will the Swiss force Protonmail to hand that over too?

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    Switzerland has been a proud fascist collaborator for at least a hundred years. Why wouldn't they cooperate with the US?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (3 children)

    We're not a monolith any more than your country is. Which one is that, BTW?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    I'm referring to the state, not every one of its people. maia arson crimew did nothing wrong.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (1 child)

    I think Ruth Dreyfus, Yvette Jaggi, and Micheline Calmy-Rey who have served as head of state might disagree. We are non-monolithic all the way up.

    We are the only diplomatically important country on earth in which the ability for the head of government to hold more than one competing thought at a time is guaranteed, by dint of there being seven of them, representing all of the major parties.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago

    Oh, so your system guarantees that at all times at least one of those thoughts is "collaborate with fascists"?

    If one person collaborates with fascists and the rest do nothing to stop it, then the fascist still gets what they want as surely as if the entire group had collaborated. You can list as many people who didn't personally collaborate with fascists as you want, as long as they didn't stop collaboration they are complicit.

    So thank you for demonstrating "pride in a state that collaborates with fascism" for the class.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    What are some good alternatives to Protonmail? I'm talking companies that don't exploit their users and also that don't support unsavory politicians. I've been looking for one (I was not impressed with that post from the Proton CEO either). Thanks.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 19 points 8 months ago

    On one side you have a free software, on the other you have a paid service. If you pay for that service with a credit card, of course they'll have your name.

    This is like comparing walking across town to hiring an Uber and being annoyed the Uber keeps a record of the transaction.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›