top 100 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 160 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Personally I'd say every single product and service being transparently wrapped in a personal information honeypot

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 108 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    I like those note-taking apps that require my location for a better user experience

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 108 points 8 months ago (33 children)

    In case someone needs help:

    Uber/Lyft

    Airbnb

    Bitcoin/Crypotocurrency

    ChatGPT/LLMs

  • source
  • hideshow 33 child comments
  • [–] 70 points 8 months ago (24 children)

    Because you have 2/4 general terms:

    1. Rideshare
    2. Short term rentals
    3. Crypto
    4. LLM
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 24 child comments
  • [–] 62 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    Cryptocurrency not Cryptography to disambiguate again

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 38 points 8 months ago (14 children)

    "Rideshare" is also the least accurate term used to dodge regulations. It is just a taxi/cab. You are paying someone to get you from one place to another. They aren't sharing their ride, they were never going where you are going before you told them to.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago (13 children)

    Taxis/cabs are legal. Also, perhaps because of age, I tend to view taxis and cabs as phone numbers you call for a car to show up (or go to a taxi stand), whereas I see rideshare as reserve via an app.

    I think ride share really just means a vehicle that is used not solely for commercial purposes

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 8 months ago* (11 children)

    They are legal if you follow the regulations. The problem with the "rideshare" companies is that they don't. We should just call them "unregulated taxis" rather than pretending that they are a different service. I think just about every taxi company these days is on some app or another (often the same that call unregulated cabs in countries that actually got their shit together and banned the unregulated ones).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (7 children)

    I think just about every taxi company these days is on some app or another (often the same that call unregulated cabs in countries that actually got their shit together and banned the unregulated ones).

    I'd like to point out this probably would have taken another 10-15 years to achieve had it not been for the disruption of said ridesharing apps.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (6 children)

    Just because there's a inconvenience for consumers doesn't mean you make workers suffer instead of fixing the problem.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 8 months ago (5 children)

    I'm assuming/ hoping you mean the taxi drivers when you say workers.

    I empathize with anyone who's livelihood is affected by changes in society. But stagnating progress because someone somewhere will be negatively impacted only assures no progress will ever be made.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    You can have progress without forcing people into starvation because "it's the system".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    I mean we could build a better social safety net so this doesn't happen...

    You telling me you think we should continue to endure a transportation system that is basically a monopoly, where the user has little transparency on what they get charged beforehand, where they can only use the service if they call or are lucky enough to be in a high traffic location, just so no one loses their job?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Cities have a medallion system to prevent congestion of taxis on the roads. If there was a problem, increasing the number of medallions and scheduling surge pricing (like NYC has done with all cars now) would have improved service.

    Alternately, simply declaring Uber a taxi service and subject to employment laws would have fixed most everything.

    I guess since flying is a hassle, I should buy a jet and land it in parking lots to make it convenient for consumers. So what if a few hundred die a year if tens of thousands have easier air travel.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (1 child)

    If there was a problem, increasing the number of medallions and scheduling surge pricing (like NYC has done with all cars now) would have improved service.

    So.. would NYC have done this if it wasn't influenced by the existence of Uber/Lyft?

    Would the taxi companies that owned all the medallions have allowed this to happen if their existence wasn't threatened? Or would they lobby to stop this at all cost because it doesn't benefit them?

    I guess since flying is a hassle, I should buy a jet and land it in parking lots to make it convenient for consumers. So what if a few hundred die a year if tens of thousands have easier air travel.

    So hundreds are dying due to Uber?

    If you need to make a bullshit theoretical to justify your stance, you might want to reconsider your stance.

    If flying cars were possible and if benefited consumers, it should definitely be adopted and regulated properly like any other service.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago

    Would the taxi companies that owned all the medallions have allowed this to happen if their existence wasn't threatened? Or would they lobby to stop this at all cost because it doesn't benefit them?

    No taxi lobby stopped Uber.

    So hundreds are dying due to Uber?

    There is a sexual assault every 8 minutes caused by an Uber driver.

    Googling says for example Uber has 400 assaults in San Francisco and the taxi industry had 14.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/07/us/uber-driver-murder-trial.html#%3A%7E%3Atext=Former+Uber+Driver+Pleads+Guilty%2CU.S.

    I can't find any examples of taxi drivers murdering their passengers. All news is about taxi drivers being murdered by their customers.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago*

    I use a local cab company. They smartened up after getting crushed by uber in the first couple years of their existence. Now they have an app that’s similar to uber, but I just call and use the web link that shows me where the car is.

    It’s literally the same service, but I have to give my info to Uber’s app to get it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    shouldnt 4 also include AI generated images?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago (7 children)

    Uber/Lyft

    Airbnb

    Apart from the recently added surge pricing, what else is illegal about these 2?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    They literally exist as a way for tech bro libertarian idiots to circumvent laws around Taxis and Hotels because "Its totally just people rending their own stuff/time bro."

    Like, the idea of Uber where its "we go to work along the same route,lets share a ride" is vaguely admirable, ie "rideshare" where it startrd. But its become people's job and its literally just tsxis without the rules.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    To be fair, they were popular at first because they were highly convenient. I remember Uber as the first to have a GPS map that told you where your taxi was. Most taxi companies and hotels were seriously lagging behind in terms of use of technology.

    That being said, they were malicious companies from the start and the whole business angle was built on taking advantage of loopholes. I'd be fine with a lot of them if they were nationally owned companies though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 8 months ago

    They were also presented as being cheaper and more ethical. You didn't risk being roped into paying a higher price because the cabbie deliberately took a long route, or be surprised by the price being different in person. You could order an Uber, and you'd pay only what was in the app.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 8 months ago

    dependent on where you are, they are textbook skirting the law. uber got crushed when they launched in sweden because taxi drivers need to do basically the same training as bus drivers. it's an extra letter on your license, with all that entails of age limits, theory and practical tests, x amount of time driven a year etc.

    nowadays ubers in sweden are just taxis, which hilariously means that they by law have to have a price list on the cars. which basically kneecaps their entire business model.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Taxis and hotels used to be strongly regulated industries. For both, permits were required as well as regular checks. But Uber/Lyft/Airbnb created a system outside of the standard legal framework, allowing them to run an almost lawless business. So I wouldn’t say illegal but ethically grey.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 63 points 8 months ago (6 children)

    Forgot "Glorified Pump-&-Dump scheme" (NFT's)

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    NFTs are basically Bitcoin and fall under fake money for criminals.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Nah it's worse. Bitcoin actually has legitimate uses. (Yes, they are a minority of actual usage, but they exist.) NFTs are only useful for speculation, gambling and money laundering.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 58 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (7 children)

    I personally hate the "thanks to AI you now can speak to your dead relatives" ones. Especially those ones which try to spin it like a personal story for the developer of the app. Oh shut up, you would sell your own mother for money. And also you are too late to jump on that bandwagon so get lost, we have enough of you leeches.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    Literally the exact plot of a black mirror episode.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

    On a related note, I personally hate the AI partner/friend ones as well, where it's clearly preying on the lonely, insecure, or desperate. It's dastardly, dystopian, and frankly, quite sad. How many children's media show rich children as being quite miserable sods whose parents think that not having friendship can be resolved by buying their kids a friend?

    You could easily see that being in a cyberpunk story, where you can rent a friend or partner from a megacorporation, but if you don't pay the rent, they'll be repossessed and deleted/destroyed. The data would be collected and used regardless.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 8 months ago

    The Torment Nexus from classic sci-fi novel Don't Create The Torment Nexus.

  • source
  • [–] 27 points 8 months ago

    How about

    • reinventing trains but worse
    • rocketing amount of space launches filling up junk
    • we deliver everything but once we take over it'll all be crap rip off products (for slave wages)
    • we deliver any food by people who can't drive (for slave wages)
    • we'll create algorithms to enforce society divisions and hurt mental health of children
    • we'll take over a popular platform and make it even more disgusting and fascist
  • source
  • [–] 20 points 8 months ago

    What would we do without capitalist innovation? Before capitalism, nothing was invented. Look at us now!

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 8 months ago (7 children)

    I like this meme every time I see it here on anarchist forums.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    well now we can add on: “illegal gambling on literally everything”
    and “1984 level surveillance being sold to the government instead of being done by them directly so somehow legal”
    … maybe something about giant ai networks of murder robots waging war?
    fuck why did we have to get the worst cyberpunk sci-fi future….

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    I wish it was literally everything. I want to buy Trump insurance.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Oooh 16% chance by December! You've brightened my day.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    well that percentage is just determined by betting purchases of stocks related to the outcome of a prediction….
    and i think magats are over represented on there, so i’d put the odds at higher than that.
    i’ll put the cynicism behind a spoiler tag but

    spoiler for brightened days
    president jd vance will be worse than president trump… also trump being impeached was always part of the Proj 2025 plan. We could end up with V.P. Steve Bannon, then JD could resign and then, Adolph’s your uncle.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 27 points 8 months ago (5 children)

    Need to add illegal gambling to the list

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    What's worse?

    Illegal gambling in traditional sense (poker, dice, slots, etc) or legal gambling loopholes like video game lootboxes? 🤔

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Probably loot boxes since it more directly targets children

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Much like flavored tobacco or alcoholic drinks directly target children. /s

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

    Downvote but no argument? It's exactly the same kind of logic being used to push age verification laws.

    Protecing children is a parents job first and foremost, all the excuses I hear from parents read to me like maybe you shouldn't have had children if you can't dedicate the time to educating yourself and watching over their activities to a minimal degree.

    All the laws being proposed and implemented generally just impact adults much more then children anyway.

    https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/b3c5d436-a7ba-4657-8a9d-0fec9edce801.png?thumbnail=1500&format=webp

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 20 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

    Where's "video games that you never actually own, but at least you pay to beat them"?

    Where's "removal of a common phone feature, because if you don't buy a $528 external DAC and a $9164 planar headphones, you'll be okay with a pair of raycons"?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    To be fair, all money is fake and used by criminals

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 8 months ago

    Hmmm ... the technology that is literally driving people insane so a few investors can make advertising money

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    "Exploiting immigrants to deliver food"

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 8 months ago*

    Wait till you learn about their latest innovation!

    Exploiting individuals from other countries to bypass labor laws in the country of business operation via distributed outsourcing. Why even pay minimum wage in the US?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 8 months ago

    Don't forget about the tech/government surveillence state that is all up in your ass

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    People chose the one option that's able to literally take everyone's jobs away from them someday?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 23 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    It so happens that stuff useful for criminals is sometimes also useful for political dissidents or simply people who consider the country's laws too oppressive. Encrypted communication is another example of this.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago

    "We're living in the future. I'll tell you how I know. I read it in the paper. Fifteen years ago."

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago

    It’s funny how a lot of “innovations” are really just old ideas wrapped in new technology.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago

    Real Time Raytracing.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago

    Self Driving Vehicles

    Free Speech Absolutism Platforms

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago

    Needs a "penis rocket" option.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago

    Night sky destroyer

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago

    Having watched enough Kitboga I think we're underestimating the impact of the sheer joy and catharsis fake money for criminals ends up causing

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    This is funny but isn't all money "fake"?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›