[–] 3 points 4 months ago (8 children)

No, they are now charging by usage. They will either end up with boatloads of money while people still have ChatGPT integrated into their workflows, or they will end up with zero money as people either switch to other models or realize that AI was a shit idea all along.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago*

    Look, I hate Ticketmaster too. But there’s an infrastructure cost. I started with a percentage fee, but that leads to incentive for higher resale values. A nominal transaction flat fee not to exceed $1.00 would make sense

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  •  

    Might still be considered “southern Ontario”, but I’m talking 3 hours north of Toronto.

    Every time I go up skiing and the weather seems horrid, I’m doing something like 40-60 in an 80 or 90 because my 3pms all seasons make it feel dicey. Yet, I get passed all the time by people going around the speed limit.

    What kind of tires you guys running?

     

    This guy is literally messaging people after he gets downvoted because he doesn't like the word "Bro".

    "Bro" was literally used as an expression of disbelief.

    from atomicpoet @piefed.social

    You’re receiving this message because I consider the word “bro” to be offensive, and I noticed you downvoted my request that a commenter avoid using it.

    I want to politely ask that you not encourage language or behaviour that could bring toxicity into !fediversenews@piefed.social .

    This is a friendly warning. If it happens again, I will have to issue a ban.

     

    Requirements:

    • Must be more user friendly than LFS
    • Must not be in the RHEL/IBM family/stream or derivative
    • Must not be SLES or derivative
    • Does not make you install a desktop environment
    • Must have steam

    Hopes

    • Rolling release
    • Has a package manager of some sort
    • Doesn’t require manual intervention every six months
    • Maintainers aren’t psycho
     

    I was excited when I found out there was a link aggregator (read: I was obsessed with reddit-like forums) that divorced itself from the controversy or the alienating political idealogy of the lemmy developers.

    However, other than that, I can't understand piefed.

    1. The project seems unorganized. The first google result for "piefed" is the piefed.social instance and not about the project. I had to go to "About" then click on "PieFed" just to get to this link the project page. For lemmy? The first link about lemmy the project is about the project not an instance. Point to lemmy.

    2. Lemmy uses rust which, like the main devs' political idealogy, may be polarizing (see Linus vs Rust Devs). Piefed uses, well, python. Yes, there is a learning curve to a new language, but rust is statically and strongly typed whereas python is duck typed. Also, it appears as though pip is one of the tools used in the installation which has been prone to supply chain attacks. Yes, more people know python. But that isn't necessarily a net positive and I wouldn't consider that if I were choosing the stack. Another point to lemmy (for me)

    3. Piefed is on codeberg/forgejo. Lemmy is on github. Point to piefed.

    4. Piefed doesn't have controversial devs (supposedly Lemmy does). Point to piefed.

    So, as much as I want to like piefed, I'm having trouble really choosing it. Can someone add on why they use piefed over lemmy? I really want to like piefed.

    view more: next ›