Kinda but not really, humans brains do a hell of a lot more then any machine learning system around today.

For one human brains provide their own training data. They don't clean it, they don't have a "right" answer to verify off of. But they still learn. How?

There's lots of questions, but despite the name current neural networks are really naive approximations of what the human brain is doing. A fancy party trick in comparison.

I hate all these tainted projects.

Verse has some interesting concepts. Shame it's all vibe coded.

Not really. These things are real life cognito hazards.

Well barring any weird things like a soul, the human brain is a physical object in the world. So any and all of its abilities should be replicatable. Perhaps not with the computer architecture we have but possibly some other way.

So using the brain as inspiration basically. Seeing how it reasons and using what is learned there to build a synthetic system.

Not a LLM. LLMs aren't intelligent they are pretty much just pattern matching. No world model or real reasoning capabilities

The entire tech stack is a tactical mess

I feel for you. Going into machine learning was my dream to. Until this. I wanted to work on true artificial intelligence based on the human brain.

Yeah true AI would be quite insane. Especially if it was behind human capabilities.

There's just no way to ensure it's aligned towards good. We can't even define that ourselves. Who knows the suffering we could unleash on ourselves.

Just because he has a novel prize doesn't make him immune to propaganda.

I do bring it up every case and even if I didn't this case it's an important distinction. Artificial intelligence is a marketing term used to conjure images of Jarvis and what not in people heads.

Video games companies never claimed to have near sentiment AGI baked into their games that would replace all human workers or blow up the world.

The term artificial intelligence is used to anthropomorphize LLMs as weird as that seems.

It is an important distinction. These are large language models, not reasoning models, not AGI, not artificial life not artificial intelligence.

I know that term as been used by the machine learning community in the past to mean things like decision trees and general models, and it didn't really matter much then but it matters A LOT now.

Words have meanings. This isn't arguing semantics, it's using words as they are intended so we can communicate effectively about something in the world. To argue otherwise is naive, dishonest, and quite honestly just annoying.

It's cause it's not AI

They aren't already?