Advertising.
post
Cars are too prevalent in most countries, but they are undeniably very useful when used correctly. I would probably say the social media does more harm than cars, but idk if it's the worst invention. Lots of candidates.
What about the idea of burning oil products in general? Sure, that made powerful and light engines possible, and they have transformed economies, logistics, trade, and entire countries. However, if we hadn’t invented that, progress would have been a lot slower.
Nevertheless, I would argue that the past 200 years of industrial progress weren’t worth the climate crisis.
I've been alive long enough to have become an adult before social media happened.
Social media is the correct answer.
I've never witnessed something have a more detrimental effect on society.
As an American, our discourse, especially political, went absolutely apeshit at the same time social media and smart phones started becoming a household thing. We absolutely would not be in the situation we currently find ourselves if not for social media.
There are simply too many ignorant humans for social media to be anything other than a total disaster.
Social Media is too prevalent in most countries, but it is undeniably very useful when used correctly.
Completely disagree because social media has done little to nothing to advance society.
Cars can at least be linked to more people able to travel further distances. Social media? "But I can still talk to my friend in another country". I could too in the late 80s.
It's called a telephone.
I think social media apps like youtube, email, and zoom have been very useful for society. The pandemic would have killed a lot more people if not for social media.
Social media spread propaganda and politicized Covid getting people who were vaccinated for other preventable diseases avoid the Covid vaccine and die.
I'd argue more people died to the pandemic because of social media and the ease of spreading fear and disinformation.
Social media allowed teams around the world to rapidly coordinate on the invention and distribution of the vaccines. COVID had fewer deaths than the 1918 influenza pandemic despite the massive increase in population since then, in part because of social media.
You need to define "social media" because earlier you named "email" and "zoom" as examples of social media, which sounds entirely wrong. Is talking to people face to face social media too? Have you just conflated "social media" with "communication"?
And then you say social helped researchers communicate when working on cures? You want to posit that Facebook or Twitter or Snapchat were vital pathways of communication for virologists collaborating on vaccines?
Social media are new media technologies that facilitate the creation, sharing and aggregation of content (such as ideas, interests, and other forms of expression) amongst virtual communities and networks.[1][2]
Wikipedia.
The earliest forms of social media appeared almost as soon as technology could support them. E-mail and chat programs debuted in the early 1970s, but persistent communities did not surface until the creation of the discussion group network USENET in 1979.
Encyclopedia Britannica.
websites and computer programs that allow people to communicate and share information, opinions, pictures, videos, etc. on the internet, especially social networking websites
Cambridge Dictionary.
It's a three way tie between:
-
Leaded Gas
-
Aerosols
-
Nuclear bombs
Interesting fact, the same man, Thomas Midgely Jr, invented both tetraethyl-lead as a fuel additive and CFCs, almost killing everyone on earth twice over.
Karma got him in the end after he got tangled in one of his contraptions after he became bedridden with polio and died of strangulation.
I first read of him in Bill Bryson's A Short History of Nearly Everything (fantastic book). It really shows how awful this man was.
I also love this quote from the wiki article on his legacy -
He "had more adverse impact on the atmosphere than any other single organism in Earth's history".
Religion. So many of today's issues stem from the magical thinking inherent in religion.
24 hour news networks.
News used to just be the news when there was a half hour of local, half hour of national twice per night with a morning show for fluff, weather, and brief news updates. 24 hour news needed to fill the whole 24 hours and also pay for itself by getting eyeballs on advertisers. That’s when all of the sensationalist stuff started taking over.
Slavery. Even after banning it pretty much everywhere, people still find ways to treat others as disposable property.
nuclear weapons, too feckin dangerous to have
The problem is that it only takes one ruler insane enough to use them to wipe out most of humanity.
You're right. But if that ruler does decide to nuke a city or something, the next bomb to drop will probably be where said ruler is.
It will inevitably happen. One day a dumb enough ruler will use it.
But what happens next? Do we just stop there, apologize and go back to our normal lives?
And you’re probably right, the next bomb would destroy that ruler, but only if the receiver has nukes as well. If he doesn’t, who’s going to do anything to defend/avange him? No one wants to enter an nuclear war.
The reciever doesn't need nukes. I live in Canada and we don't have any. But the threat of retaliation from our allies that do protect us from that threat.
If Trump decides to launch a nuke at Vancouver, which of your allies are bold enough to send one his way?
Well, none. He can do whatever he wants.
His government is slightly smarter than him so for now we’re safe, however no one’s going to stop a dictator.
The US probably since they'll also be nuking part of their own country if they did that. The fallout would 100% affect Washington.
This is a good point I never considered before.
That comment is the first time you've considered MAD? I mean, congrats on being one of today's lucky 10,000, but I'm surprised you didn't learn about it in school.
Except the part where we have exhaustive evidence that nukes do not always render land unusable.
Nagasaki and Hiroshima are entirely fine. The radiation levels were back at safe levels in days. Yes, we definitely fucked up a lot of land with nuclear testing and power plant overloads, but the actual nukes humans have dropped on other humans? They're most effective when used in an air burst, and they clear up within days.
The power generation and medical applications of nuclear science cannot be overlooked based on warmongering, especially when the part youre concerned about isnt even an issue in that application of the field.
Head on! Apply directly to the forehead
https://youtu.be/Is3icfcbmbs
The wheel. Everything went downhill from there.
It's likely LLMs in their current corporate circular funding form and cryptocurrency.
Disposable vapes come to mind, although the real answer is probably some extremely depraved torture device.
So far crypto currencies. So far they seem to expend a huge amount of electricity and used mostly for speculation.
Either leaded gasoline or pfas
Easy question:
AI
Net negative pushing us toward unavoidable global ecosystem collapse: it produces nothing but the unfulfilled promise of eventually replacing human workers, which it has never shown the capability to do and according to the researchers who founded the AI companies will never do due to "AI Scaling Laws". It has increased power consumption and costs by over 30% in some US States.
industrialization.
it's caused unfathomable damage to us, our planet, and the organisms we share our world with.
it's also saved just as many as it's harmed, but there is an upper limit when our planet dies and we all die with it.
Lead pipes.
Leaf blowers. They solve nothing permanently, it just moves around the leaves, meaning the blowers will be back again tomorrow morning, waking me up...
The biggest problem with leaf blowers is that blowing leaves is the least useful thing they can do. It is amazing for cleaning your house. Get the leaf blower out and just keep going until all the kitchen crumbs are out the back door.
JavaScript
Coffee pods. Just when we were getting close to maybe reduce or reliance and dependency on plastics BOOM! coffee pods everywhere, by the trillions.
I think it has to be something that poses an existential threat to human life on this planet, so cars (and other inventions dependent on fossil fuels) is a pretty good pick for the top of the list, IMO. I saw someone in the comments pick animal agriculture, and that, too, contributes to the existential threat of a warming planet; so that, too, feels like a good pick for the top of the list.
For me, though, nuclear weapons has to be the worst thing we've ever invented. No other invention is capable of ending human life on this planet so quickly and so thoroughly.
The 40+ hour work week.
That was actually a great invention, considering it replaced the unlimited hour work week (60-96 hours being normal in Victorian times). I agree that we should go further though.
Always room for improvement, but to think the 40 work week was a bad idea shows how little history they know.
Notice I wrote 40+ that means 60-96 work weeks are included.
And I am fully aware that workers have fought hard for the current 5 day work week, and we are working on 4 days even if it's slow progress.
Agriculture.
We could have stayed in a world where we lived in harmony with nature instead of trying to control it.
I know this will seem trendy, or whatever, but AI and social media have been the worst inventions since religion.
loans! They simply jack up the prices and help separate the haves from the have nots
top 100 comments