You know my favorite fact about credit scores? Paying your utility bills on time for your whole life will not raise your credit score one point. Forty years on time every month nobody cares. However missing enough payments on your utility bill that it gets sent to collections will lower your credit score. Kind of makes you want to burn down some buildings doesn't it?
post
Never owned a credit card, never will
"But how will you raise your credit score without accruing debt?"
I'd rather fucking die than spend my time participating in a system which wants to grade my Credit Utilization Normalization Tier (CUNT).
In my area it can be very difficult to get an apartment unless you or someone you're renting with has a decent score. Participating in this bullshit isn't a choice for some people.
I mean, good for you, but most people will need to go into debt for something at some point in their life.
Most people, no. Need, no. Many will want to, for various reasons, yes.
(Unless China and India come up with some sort of mandatory debt. Then yes all the way.)
Ok sure, I guess I don't "need" anything apart from food and water and oxygen. What I really meant was, they will need to go into debt to finance the life they want to live, which for most people includes going to college and buying some type of property (not to mention other things like starting a business, supporting relatives, etc)
I'm Australian, and this post prompted me to research the US Social Credit system. The score can determine whether or not you're accepted for home rentals, and even determine whether or not you qualify for medical treatments
You need to engage in having debt and credit in order to appease the score.
I bought an apartment recently, and I've never had a credit card or debt of any variety. When I was younger my bank would dip into negatives or reject a payment fairly regularly. In the US that could probably cost me a place to live.
And apparently the entire credit score is built up and perpetrated by these massive corporations? Like Credit Score is not even anything to do with the government, and yet it has such a pervasive effect on people's lives and their behavior.
It's straight up creepy. Dystopian vibes. How do Americans tolerate this?
It's so much worse than I think you even realize, but you definitely nailed some of the key pieces.
It's correct that we don't opt in, that it's strictly not govt, it's corporations (3 of them), and that modern life in the US makes it impossible to avoid playing this game.
Some additional details:
- the 3 companies each keep their own records - usually they match each other closely, but not always
- wrong information in the consumer's credit report is arduous to correct and basically 100% the consumer's responsibility - too fucking bad, whatever outcome this may cause
- the only way to know if our info is being used to fraudulently open accounts is to periodically check these reports (noting the difficulty in correcting them)
- malicious use is such a problem that all 3 "services" ("extortion rackets" is literally more accurate) recommended "locking" one's credit with each of the 3, so no accounts may be created at all
- many stories of kids finding out their parents loaded them up with debt, very difficult to overcome
- the score is a measure of how much lenders can expect to profit off you - financial decisions that are good for the individual are not necessarily good for the score
- evictions, like other records, stay active for 7 years I believe, and having an eviction on one's record makes every part of renting worse and harder
And nothing I've said is even recent insanity, all of that's been true a long time. It's really staggering just how effectively the US has systematized destroying our working class. We've been the global leader in innovating oppression for decades, it's been interesting watching the rest of the world start to catch on just how severe it is here.
To be fair, the fact that you haven't heard of any Aussie credit is because companies keep it private to themselves. They definitely have financial information on you and utilize it to decide the interest rate on your loans.
Much less horrible than the US dystopia for sure tho
Yeah, I would consider that somewhat "acceptable" usage though. It'd be irresponsible to approve a large loan to someone who's already extremely overindebted, for example.
Sweden's system doesn't have a specific number like the US, but mostly just shows economical health. How many active loans you have, income over the last few years, and if you've had loans go to the enforcement agency. But we have the same sickness as America: if you have had something go to the enforcement agency within the last 3+ years, it'll be basically impossible for you to rent an apartment (as if it wasn't difficult in the first place).
because you deeply misunderstand it.
it basically lets lenders know if you have a history of paying back your loans or not.
it's that simple. and in the USA medical treatment often requires loans, just like buying a house or car does.
missing a single payment does little to nothing to your score. missing several payments, and defaulting, tanks it.
Then why do you need to engage in having debt and using credit cards to have a good score? If having no credit score is nearly as bad as having a bad credit score then something is wrong.
when i hire someone for a job, how do I know they have experience without being able to verify they have held previous employment in a similar position?
the point of the system is to show you have experience and you pay back your debts. it's not that anything more than that.
a lender doesn't want to give someone a big loan if they have no experience. just like i won't hire you for a senior staff position fresh out of college. those things take like a decade or more to develop.
my credit score at 18 was like 500. and my credit limit was $250. now it's 830, because I've paid back all my debts in a timely manner and have access and have six figures in credit available to me.
if you want a a good credit score, go take out a card, make small payments with it, and pay them back.
it's not a conspiracy anymore than the fact it takes years to get promoted at a job.
How do Americans tolerate this?
Brainwashing. Americans don't realize they live in a Dystopian shithole where, since the 80s, the rules are made by the rich to keep the common person down.
We're coming to the end game of this now.
First off, it's not a social credit score, it's a financial credit score, we're not talking about the system China has for it's citizens.
As with many of these deep dives on Americanisms, what you've found is generally worst case scenarios and also not universally applicable. Some states have restrictions on what your credit score can be used for and how it can impact you, car insurance and rentals being a prime example.
Also, by simply having a credit card (and not using it!) and not having any lapsed debts (collections or reported unpaid bills) you will easily have a score in the mid to high 700s. If you carry a balance month to month but regularly make your minimum payments you will have a credit score in the low to mid 700s. Hell. my wife had 5 bills in collection and still had a 650 before I met her.
As far as credit score applicability, it's often referenced by businesses as a measure of risk. If you have a 650 instead of a 750 your car insurance might be higher because your risk of payment is higher, but we're only talking about 10-15% more per year (US south east). Same with with rental, if you have a bunch of bills in collection or default your score will be bad, but a rental provider will be less willing to provide you service if you have a history of not paying your bills. You should still be able to find a place to live, but it will likely be more limited (for example if you have a 400, but not if you have something like a 650) or you may have a larger security deposit.
Overall your credit score likely won't be an issue 95% of the time, but if you habitually don't pay your bills then your score will go down and businesses that check your score won't want to do business with you. I can't make this clear enough, you have to be deliberate in your actions if you want your score to be low enough to cause a problem. My wife had $15k in student loans, $10k in credit card debt, and 5 unpaid bills that had been sent to collections and she still was in the 600s. The score system exists for a reason, I would argue that it should be a bit more forgiving, but the reason it exists is fair.
Non US citizens might have trouble relating to this, but people in the US take blatant advantage of systems a lot of times. I have a coworker that moved for a new job, but he didn't want to sell his house because he got it at a good rate and time. He listed his house for a decent rate and his first tenant stopped paying after the second month. He waited until 4 months hadn't been paid to take them to court and it took another 6 months to have them removed. Just before they were going to be escorted out by the sheriff they paid him the entire back rent in cash to try to prevent the eviction (they had the money the whole time!) After they were evicted he reached out to the local municipality for the water account and they found out the tenant had bypassed the water meter (basically they were stealing). The municipality then said he had to pay to fix the bypass, penalized him for the stolen utilities, and said that for any future tenants he would have to keep the account in his name rather than having the tenants file it.
American credit score systems suck, but they are generally fair and they prove themselves necessary because a certain percentage of Americans seem to have fundamental problems with following common and decent rules of this world.
I just read an article the other day that said Gen Z has the highest rate of credit card fraud ever seen in US history. As a group they just don't see any issue with ordering something online and then saying it never arrived and reversing the charges. I'm all for saying fuck the system and down with corporate interests, but it's hard to have a functional modern society that casually commits fraud and theft.
It's all a scam, man. Money's just pretend. I converted all my cash to radishes. At least when the economy goes into a death spiral I'll still have radishes.
Im considering it as well. but the question is before I begin would be that a diet of only radishes everyday can prevent scurvy, if so im all aboard.
taking out loans and paying them back is the most well known way of raising a credit score.
This is so much the case that many financial institutions have "credit builder loans" which are essentially a loophole for building credit, where you're given a 'fake loan' that you repay, then you're given back your payments at the end of it. Meanwhile, the credit reporting agencies see that you took out a loan and faithfully repaid it, so your credit score goes up.
One arguably unjust part about credit scores is that the actions of people related to you, or simply sharing the same surname as you, can affect it! E.G i have heard that a friend-of-a-friend’s dad took out too many loans and now their credit score suffers.
It doesn't work that way, at all. Credit scores are individual. Either that person is mistaken, or they were a co-signer on one or more of those loans (which makes them matter to their score also).
Anyway if it’s true that the actions of other people can affect your credit score
It's not, they can't.
To be fair, your credit score can be affected by someone else's actions if the credit tracking agencies screw up and think you're the same person... This is hopefully harder to happen now, but my mother and her brother had the same initials in a different order and their SSNs were different by only one number and somehow the credit bureaus messed up and it was a headache getting that untangled.
That said... Yeah, that's absolutely not how it's supposed to work and if it happens it's because someone somewhere screwed up.
Now that it's all computerized, the odds of that happening should be pretty slim, but things do still go through a human's hands at some points of the process so it's still not impossible.
One arguably unjust part about credit scores is that the actions of people related to you, or simply sharing the same surname as you, can affect it! E.G i have heard that a friend-of-a-friend’s dad took out too many loans and now their credit score suffers.
You're mixing things here that led you to a wrong conclusion.
Credit scores are based upon credit events. The credit events come from your credit report which is separate from your credit score. The only things on your credit report should be your credit events. Not someone with the same name, nor someone from your family. If either of those things are on your credit report, that is and error you need to go through the paperwork process to get those removed from your credit report.
Easy. It's a scam to screw over anyone they feel like.
It stopped being a can the applicant afford their current outgoings and afford this loan type system a loooong time ago. Now it's a noose round the neck of anyone that has ever lost a job and missed a couple of payments or got screwed over by a company changing billing software. The number means nothing, I'm sure on some kind of grading curve it averages out but so would throwing darts at a board and assigning scores that way.
The rich fail up and everyone else has to play by the rules or get fucked over.
/Rant over
It was never a system that existed to just verify the ability to get a loan. Banks were the ones who did that.
The credit score was always a measure of how individuals took on an paid off debt in a way that the creditors wanted for maximum profits. That's why it wasn't something individuals even had access to until they came up with a way to have people interested enough that they would pay for the privilege of being able to see their personal debt monkey score.
It has always been a shit system for the average person.
The credit score was always a measure of how individuals took on an paid off debt in a way that the creditors wanted for maximum profits.
This is demonstrably bullshit.
Someone who maxes out a credit card, and then only pays minimum payments, and always makes them late, is, via interest accruing and late payment fees, making the lender basically the maximum amount of profit possible. And yet doing this will result in a garbage credit score, because using every penny of your credit limit is very detrimental to your credit score, and not making payments on time is extremely detrimental to your credit score.
Meanwhile, take me, someone who never pays a cent of interest, because he pays off his card every statement cycle (and on time, naturally), and because of card rewards, I’m the one profiting, the lender is literally the one paying me, and ‘yet’, my credit score is in the 800s.
So how do you reconcile that with your assumed truth quoted above? It’s very hard to understand how anyone can arrive at the conclusion you did, while also knowing (as I assume you do) that late payments simultaneously hurt your credit score and increase profit for the lender, just as one example.
I bet they'd stop doing it if they got literally ripped into pieces by horses. Or a horse's solar-powered motorized equivalent.
Idk man, Luigi happened and look what that did to insurance overall (spoiler: nothing). Yes I know that's insurance and not banking, but the idea is the same.
Credit scores are used to tell companies how much they can earn on lending you money.
Paying back quickly reduces the amount they can earn, lowering your credit score.
Not paying it back obviously lowers the score.
The way I understand it, to raise your credit score you need to slowly pay back your loans, so you pay back maximum interest.
Note however that I am just a cynical IT guy in Sweden with zero actual exposure to US/UK style credit scores, and that I may be talking out of my ass.
There must be something else to it. I've never paid any interest on my credit cards and I paid off my mortgage early; by your logic I should have a low credit score, but it's actually in the "Excellent" range.
Yeah paying back early doesn’t affect it as far as I can tell. Lenders just want to know if you’ll leave them in the lurch or not. If you pay back early that just means they can reinvest the cash sooner.
You have great interest paying potential because of your reliable handling of finances, so your score is high to make it easy for you to take on a lot of debt down the road.
In another comment, someone mentioned that it’s not just repayment of interest that profits credit card companies.
Even if you pay all debts monthly before interest can compound, the CC companies still charge processing fees to merchants on a per-transaction basis (which merchants either pass directly to consumers or indirectly through higher prices). They still get their cut, even if you don’t see it on a line item.
Recently I had house work done. The contractor offered to charge me 5% less if I paid with cash or check instead of credit card.
There must be something else to it.
Massive understatement—it'd be more accurate to say they're completely wrong, lol.
Here in Sweden, that would also have been rejected, most stores won't accept cash at all.
I had to pay for my car using a wire transfer a few days before I picked it up.
I do think that it would have been funny to just use tap to pay, but apparently that would have increased the cost by a lot.
Just imagine paying for a car with something like an SJ credit card and get the motherload of priopoäng!
(For the non-Swedes, SJ is a train company with a version of a frequent flyer miles point system, and they like most of those have a credit card where every SEK spent earns you 1 point. A trip from Malmö to Stockholm (600km, ~4,5h) can be bought for some 12-16000 points. A new car costs anywhere from 300000 sek up to a million and beyond.)
I get what you mean, and agree to some extent, but the reality is that handling cash is expensive and dangerous.
Back in the early 2000s, there was a large wave of high profile armours car robberies in Sweden.
Some even completely blew up the armoured car.
This lead to a debate and a deliberate effort to reduce the ammount of cash used in Sweden.
I remember reading something about 97% of all transactions inside Sweden are now done electronically.
This has lead to banks having offices that don't handle cash, and that banks are looking at cash deposits with suspicion, since you can't trace cash.
This, as usual, only really affects normal poeple, and criminals have ways around it.
In the US, it is legal tender to pay off all debts. But merchants can refuse to give you debt if you are paying cash. Thus have no obligation to accept it.
I think there has been some EU-wide regulation that you can't pay more than 10k€ in cash or sth, it's to prevent money laundering.
No joke, I’ve had a car dealership tell me they can’t sell me the car I want because my credit score was nonexistent (no credit history in 7 years). I was paying in full, in cash, literally in an envelope in my hand.
There are car dealers (especially at the low end of used cars) that don't make money selling cars. They make money with horrible debt and payment terms trying to trap vulnerable people. The worst of these dealers may end up "selling" the car 2 or 3 times repoing it each time when the buyer can't pay.
So its first possible that this dealer didn't want to sell you a car for cash because its against their business model.
Grand total of 8k, all in 100s, super easy to count.
$8k in cash is super sketchy for a single purchase. Its untraceable and that sets off fraud alarm bells. The dealership also may not be set up to deal in large sums of cash like that lacking the security to do so. Lastly there are laws at the state and federal level called KYC (Know your Customer) for some transactions that require the seller to verify the money is legit. With cash, thats nearly impossible.
You might have had more luck showing up with an $8k cashiers check or offering an $8k wire transfer from your bank. Both of these are exempt from lots of regulations (because there's a paper trail) where cash would not have that luxury.
But no, I didn’t have a “good enough credit score” so I couldn’t buy that car from them, despite having the money to do so. Mental gymnastics on that one.
I'm guessing that was just an excuse to not sell to you because either they're the sketchy dealer (that likes to sell loans not cars) or they thought you were super sketchy as a buyer.
I think you just got a shitty dealership. “Legal tender for all debts public and private” means just that, they aren’t allowed legally to refuse dollars. My cousin also successfully did what you are describing.
Not necessarily a shitty dealership, just one with low margins.
Cars are generally sold by sellers with incredibly low margins (talking like a few hundred dollars, max). They make their money through the financing. They probably didn't want to sell the car in cash, because some other chud will come along and buy it on credit and get them a higher margin.
Pro tip - always get your own financing when purchasing a car, don't get it through the dealer. But don't let them know that, look over their finance package when signing the paperwork, try to negotiate out any origination charges, etc. then simply pay the loan off immediately with your private financing.
They can easily refuse cash. It's not a debit until you owe them money. If they decide not to sell you a car then there's no debt. You aren't obligated to see someone a car if the manner of the sale isn't to your liking.
You are correct. What they can’t do though is only allow you to buy the car with one method of payment, which is what is being described here.
Why on earth do you think that's the case? They're selling something, they're not in one of the limited industries where you have limited rights to refuse, and method of payment isn't one of the reasons you can't refuse to do business with someone. A handful of places prohibit not accepting cash, but it's not enough that I would assume that's where they were, particularly if a business opted to just casually refuse.
That's not really relevant here yet. GP doesnt have a "debt" before the transaction takes place. Nothing about that statement forces a business to do business with you. They are perfectly within their rights to only agree to do business with you if you pay in chickens.
That isn’t how holding a business license works.
Sure everybody has the right to refuse service, but they can’t offer service only through one means of pay.
https://www.federalreserve.gov/faqs/currency_12772.htm
Is it legal for a business in the United States to refuse cash as a form of payment?
There is no federal statute mandating that a private business, a person, or an organization must accept currency or coins as payment for goods or services. Private businesses are free to develop their own policies on whether to accept cash unless there is a state law that says otherwise.
A few states have introduced bills to require taking cash (Idaho, Mississippi and North Dakota), but as far as I'm aware none have ever actually passed into law.
No joke, I’ve had a car dealership tell me they can’t sell me the car I want because my credit score was nonexistent (no credit history in 7 years). I was paying in full, in cash, literally in an envelope in my hand.
The dealership wanted you to finance so that you'll pay them interest, because they make more money that way. If they completely refused, what's most likely is that the car was being sold at a price that gives them zero/negative profit margin, so without financing, they'd literally take a loss selling it for straight cash.
Paying back a loan quickly will not lower your credit score. If you have a line of credit that closes as soon as you pay off a loan (eg a car loan) your score can go down if it changes your utilization rate (how much you could take out in loans vs. how much you have taken out) but paying off a loan early won't impact your score.
You can look up what things are factored into a consumer credit score. You can see for yourself that early payments are not part of the formula.
I always pay my loans back on time and every now and then the bank rise my credit limit. I think it's because I also have a bank account with them and they can see I have the money ready to go. I don't make much money for them, but I do make a consistent amount and the banks like that too.
Credit scores are used to tell companies how much they can earn on lending you money.
This is demonstrably bullshit.
Someone who maxes out a credit card, and then only pays minimum payments, and always makes them late, is, via interest accruing and late payment fees, making the lender basically the maximum amount of profit possible. And yet doing this will result in a garbage credit score, because using every penny of your credit limit is very detrimental to your credit score, and not making payments on time is extremely detrimental to your credit score.
Meanwhile, take me, someone who never pays a cent of interest, because he pays off his card every statement cycle (and on time, naturally), and because of card rewards, I’m the one profiting, the lender is literally the one paying me, and ‘yet’, my credit score is in the 800s.
So how do you reconcile that with the assertion quoted above? It’s very hard to understand how anyone can arrive at the conclusion you did, while also knowing, at least (as I assume you do), that late payments simultaneously hurt your credit score and increase profit for the lender, just as one example.
Paying back quickly reduces the amount they can earn, lowering your credit score.
Straight-up lie false.
The way I understand it, to raise your credit score you need to slowly pay back your loans, so you pay back maximum interest.
You don't understand it.
Paying back quickly reduces the amount they can earn, lowering your credit score.Straight-up lie.
No, it doesn't fit the definition of a lie, I didn't know any better, so it was ignorance, not a lie, it would be nice if you could edit and correct this line.
The way I understand it, to raise your credit score you need to slowly pay back your loans, so you pay back maximum interest.You don’t understand it.
I wholeheartedly agree with you there.
Overall you do seem to know the subject better than me, so I will mostly defere to your judgement (apart from the thing about me lying).
EDIT: Thanks for the edit! (:
There's also an element of whether or not the lendee can reliably make payments. Always having late fees doesn't show that you're able to reliably make companies money. And when you're making payments on time without fees, they still get money from the fees they charge the business. So using and paying back is still good for them. It's still all about the money, because it always is in the US.
The way I understand it, to raise your credit score you need to slowly pay back your loans, so you pay back maximum interest.
I got an 800 credit score by just using credit cards and paying the balance each month. Lenders made literally no money on me.
Hmm, I don't think so. I'm in my 60s and I've always paid my credit cards in full each month when they're due. Until very recently, I did have a mortgage and paid the regular payment (with occasional extra payments for principle), do they did make money off of me there. My credit rating has pretty much always been at or near the highest it can be.
You are entirely incorrect. The credit card company makes most of their money from the fees paid by the merchant. They make money when you, the customer, spend money because the merchant gives a chunk of it to them, usually with an additional flat fee. (Different merchants and card processors have different payment structures. A grocery store is more likely to pay a much higher fixed daily fee to avoid unpredictable transaction fees on small purchases)
They don't lower your score if you pay back early. People get confused because they see their score drop after going from $10k credit card limit with $800 in monthly usage paid on time every time and a $500 balance on a $25k car loan that's been paid on time every month to just the credit card. The reason it went down is that the number of regular timely payments went down, which means fewer trust signals, and credit utilization went up. (3% to 8%). It doesn't however snap down as though you hadn't just made a bunch of good payments, it just doesn't boost when you're done.
The credit card company makes the most money when you make a huge number of modest purchases and then immediately pay them back. When you have credit card debt their money is sitting in the merchants account. They want to minimize the time they don't have their money so they charge you based on the risk that you never pay them back, after a grace period. (You have usually a month before any interest acrues).
It's why as you get better credit scores the credit card company starts offering you increasing incentives to buy things. Bonus cash back on purchases at places that tend to be frequent, smaller purchases without bulk processing rates and so one. They'll refund you on purchases in a dispute with the merchant and then figure out the merchant dispute independently (usually by just dropping it because they don't care about $124.99 in potentially substandard curtains or whatever they just want the customer to keep buying curtains and the merchant to keep thinking it's a net positive). You're a walking $0.25 + 3.0% per purchase. Making you regret spending money is the last thing they want.
I've had a consistent score of a little over 800 before and after purchasing my house by paying off my credit cards ahead of time. I had no major long term debt other than a mortgage either. That said, this is pretty much the equivalent to that Chinese social credit score crap but it's real in this case. It just means you're ranking high in some opaque game on your financial prospects that the banks are playing.
I'm Australian, and this post prompted me to research the US Social Credit system. The score can determine whether or not you're accepted for home rentals, and even determine whether or not you qualify for medical treatments
You need to engage in having debt and credit in order to appease the score.
I bought an apartment recently, and I've never had a credit card or debt of any variety. When I was younger my bank would dip into negatives or reject a payment fairly regularly. In the US that could probably cost me a place to live.
And apparently the entire credit score is built up and perpetrated by these massive corporations? Like Credit Score is not even anything to do with the government, and yet it has such a pervasive effect on people's lives and their behavior.
It's straight up creepy. Dystopian vibes. How do Americans tolerate this?
Remind me, were we supposed to be disgusted and afraid of the Chinese social credit score system because it included woke BS like how nice you are to others, and how things you do improve society, rather than just laser-focusing on the only important thing— whether your existence can be monetized by rich assholes?
My original comment points out the social credit system is something that doesn't really exist but was used to scare western capitalists. I'm merely saying that non-existent Boogeyman is actually being used through a financial lens in the US instead.
It was definitely pitched in western media as something we should all fear. I just found it funny that everything that they tried to scare us with ("it might be used to determine whether you get a job or can rent an apartment!") applied equally to our credit scores.
E: So, yeah, completely agree.
No, because the writing was weird and foreign.
You were supposed to he disgusted at the other stuff.
"Weird and Foreign" has entered the chat. 👀
Well that's why you're supposed to be afraid of it.
There was some conservative user a while ago on lemmy that thought I was a "Chinese Bot"/"Scammer" because of the "Asian Writing" in the username, I'm an American citizen lmfao
Fucking sinophobia lol
I'm so sorry people are that stupid. Do you need a hug? Or an axe?
There was some conservative user a while ago on lemmy that thought I was a “Chinese Bot”/“Scammer”
Clearly they were an idiot too because if they knew anything about China, they should have seen the Taiwanese flag and known were you not from or supportive of the PRC. Seriously, people need to pick up a history book now and then. There's a good chunk of American history mixed in there too with how Taiwan came to be (or stay being a nation).
Oh I mean I am from PRC, that's more like an opposition thing I do because I don't like the 5 star red flag since its associated with ccp, so I use this flag in the ROC context.
是吗? I wouldn't have guessed that. I didn't think ROC flag was tolerated well 在 大陆. I still have a lot to learn about the culture.
In mainland China, probably not tolerated outside of like the context of museums. Idk about the laws, but at the minimum, cops will probably visit you and "have a chat"
I'm Chinese-Amercian, I was born in Guangzhou, but I'm no longer PRC National anymore so I don't give a shit what mainland nationalists think.
I think ROC flag is fine overseas...
I mean look at this lol

In mainland China, probably not tolerated outside of like the context of museums. Idk about the laws, but at the minimum, cops will probably visit you and “have a chat”
Gotcha, that's closer to what I had thought.
I’m Chinese-Amercian, I was born in Guangzhou, but I’m no longer PRC National anymore so I don’t give a shit what mainland nationalists think. I think ROC flag is fine overseas…
Oh certainly! It was not rare when I visited Flushing.
top 94 comments