all 42 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 72 points 11 months ago (6 children)

Welcome to Cretaceous Park!

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 55 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    It's named that way because of the raptor intelligence. "Can this raptor open doors?" "You bet jurassican"

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 42 points 11 months ago (7 children)

    We really won't talk about those "velociraptors"? The annoying kid at the beginning of the movie was the only one to get their description surprisingly accurate when he said they looked like a 2m turkey.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 11 months ago* (3 children)

    Also, wrong continent for Velociraptors (they were in Hell Creek Montana/South Dakota). Velociraptors are found in China/Mongolia.

    Deinonychus or UtahRaptors are the right size and continent, but don't sound as cool as "Velociraptor"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago* (2 children)

    I mean, I don't think the film says that they stuck to cloning local dinos.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    And most likely it's because of that movie that regular people know a Cretaceous even existed and what animals where there. It did kick the field and public interest into high gear.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago

    It absolutely did for me! I know I enjoy dinosaurs because of that movie alone. The awe, the wonder of what could be. It was a glorious time to rent it from Blockbuster and have a family night watching all these movie hits.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 11 months ago* (1 child)

    iirc John Hammond covers this in the book. I was so young, but something is triggering it for me. Could just be the subconscious trying to protect grade 4 nostalgia, though.

    Hell, I could've picked that up off playing Jurassic World Evolutions in the last six months and it's backpedal lore.

    Whatever it is, Michael Crichton was no idiot.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 11 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 26 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    It wasn't even a park, it was a zoo.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Cropped off the final text because fuck everyone that's why

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 22 points 11 months ago

    The name itself was foreshadowing of their ignorance.

  • source
  • [–] 27 points 11 months ago (6 children)

    Don’t be pedantic. They picked the name because it sounded cool and got the point across.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    And "they" means the characters, not the writer.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Not just that but a character that is written as glossing over important details for profit

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    The fact that the movie turned Hammond into a kindly grandfather figure rather than the rich, greedy bastard he was in the book was probably one of the bigger mistakes in the adaptation... The way he's presented as a visionary who actually cares in the movie makes the cut costs not really make that much sense.

    Greedy capitalist fuck who only sees how much money he can milk out of the park like he was in the book? That made perfect sense.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    What if Neil deGrasse Tyson was a paleontologist

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago

    The Huge Animals of Various Geological Periods Park.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago
    [–] 2 points 11 months ago

    Username checks out

  • source