Free Windows 10 support ended for most people this past month, and the trend line of Linux usage has been quite clear leading up to this, as people prepared for the inevitable. An increase in Linux usage is also correlated to a drop in Chinese players, which did happen this month a little bit, but Linux usage is also trending up when filtering for English only. It's worth noting that for all the official support Macs ever saw in gaming, they never represented anything better than about 5% of the market.

top 93 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 129 points 1 year ago (20 children)

I think it will continue to rise. People are updating their rigs all the time. Whenever they update their rig they’ll have to ask themselves whether they want to continue with Windows on their new rig, or try with something new.

Most will stay on Windows of course, but some don’t. And those who switch to Linux are likely not returning to Windows (for gaming at least).

  • source
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago

    Yeah, for me personally, I've got one or two devices that see irregular use that are linux now, but my main rig is still windows and will continue to be so, since I have a number of friends on xbox that I can get more cross play for via gamepass But since I'm currently boycotting microsoft, and don't know how much longer friends will stick with xbox given their general market decline, and given all the stability issues with win11 lately due to an increase of AI code usage, and all the everything... It might be a matter of time

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (17 children)

    I think it will continue to rise. People are updating their rigs all the time. Whenever they update their rig they’ll have to ask themselves whether they want to continue with Windows on their new rig, or try with something new.

    The vast majority of this increase is from people playing on Steam Decks, which run on Linux, not from people switching to Linux on their PCs.

    If it continues to rise, this is the reason. The general public is less and less into using a desktop at all as time goes on, much less running, and much less changing to, an extremely niche operating system on one.

    EDIT: The previous sentence is actually more of the reason, upon further reflection. The total number of people playing on desktops period is falling, and the vast majority of desktops are Windows, so non-Windows OSes will comparatively gain 'market share' as that happens, even if their numbers don't change at all.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 75 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Actually, the raw number percentage shows that the increase is due to Mint, Ubuntu, and Bazzite. Maybe people are installing Bazzite on their Deck but likely not the other two.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago

    I switched from Windows to Bazzite on my main rig 2 weeks ago. Likely won't go back to Windows for gaming as I've had pretty much no issues with Bazzite.

    I did also get a Steam deck recently, so anecdotally, both above answers are right.

    Insert "I'm doing my part" meme

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 31 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    The vast majority of this increase is from people playing on Steam Decks

    I believe this is incorrect. The Steam survey break down GPUs by description and the Deck's GPU appears in the results as "AMD Vangogh", which only accounts for 0.39% of respondents. That implies that the vast majority of survey respondents using Linux are actually on PC, not the Deck.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    That's not true. You can see on Steam Hardware Survey what OS people are running, and SteamOS only makes up 27% of Linux users on Steam, so the vast majority are on regular PCs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Certainly interesting to look at the fastest-growing distros: Ubuntu (the well-known, popular option), Bazzite (the gaming-marketed one), Freedesktop (someone else can answer this for me), and CachyOS (the side-gaming one? Not quite a gaming OS but very good at it)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The vast majority of the increase, is what I said. In other words, I'm saying it wouldn't be nearly at the 3% mark without those users, and with over a quarter of all Linux users coming from the Steam Deck userbase, that is, in fact, true.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    Without the Steam Deck there'd be 27% fewer Linux users. So while that would indeed mean Linux wouldn't yet be 3% of the total Steam userbase, I think you will find that 27% is not the majority.

    GamingOnLinux aggregates this data in a nicer way and as you can see there, the total Linux market share has gone from <1% five years ago to the 3% it is now. If that increase was mainly thanks to the Steam Deck, it would have to make up more like 75% of the Linux userbase rather than only 27%.

    Instead, as others have pointed out, SteamOS's share has actually gone down rather than up, which is a natural consequence of the Steam Deck being relatively old now so fewer are being sold.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 68 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    SteamOS Holo 64 bit - 27.18% (-0.47%)

    Arch Linux 64 bit - 10.32% (-0.66%)

    Linux Mint 22.2 64 bit - 6.65% (+6.65%)

    CachyOS 64 bit - 6.01% (+1.32%)

    Ubuntu Core 22 64 bit - 4.55% (+0.55%)

    Freedesktop SDK 25.08 (Flatpak runtime) 64

    bit - 4.29% (+4.29%)

    Bazzite 64 bit - 4.24% (+4.24%)

    Ubuntu 24.04.3 LTS 64 bit - 3.70% (+3.70%)

    Linux Mint 22.1 64 bit - 2.56% (-5.65%)

    EndeavourOS Linux 64 bit - 2.32% (-0.08%)

    Freedesktop SDK 24.08 (Flatpak runtime) 64

    bit - 2.31% (-3.98%)

    Fedora Linux 42 (KDE Plasma Desktop Edition)

    64 bit - 2.12% (+0.19%)

    Manjaro Linux 64 bit - 2.04% (-0.31%)

    Pop!_OS 22.04 LTS 64 bit - 1.93% (-0.04%)

    Fedora Linux 42 (Workstation Edition) 64 bit - 1.75% (-0.43%)

    Other - 18.04% (-4.28%)

  • source
  • [–] 46 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    According to statcounter, Linux desktop was over 4% marketshare in April 2025, damn that's impressive.

    We really are getting there.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Back when I worked at Apple Retail we used to say, “5 down, 95 to go”. I really want SteamOS to be a runaway success

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I'm not so sure Valve is the right maintainer for the core desktop. The Deck works well, but mainly what Valve is maintaining is the Game Mode feature and Proton. Everything else is largely better handed off to a bigger group.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Tbf, I think people are hoping for mainstream SteamOS as the "safe supported option", because they are afraid of an "unintuitive experience" (This is basically a Linus Sebastian demographic problem).

    Personally, I think that's a bad judgement call (as platforms like Bazzite have already proven that an official SteamOS environment isn't required to have a good time gaming and using your machine), but I guess that means there'll be even more excitement once that releases.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    I can't say having to fiddle around with Proton versions is exactly intuitive, though it has gotten better since last I tried it a year or so ago.

    It is still not quite as smooth as it is on Windows, and I have tech-normie friends who want to do nothing more than download and press play.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 41 points 1 year ago (50 children)

    I wonder if Valve will ever release an official desktop version of SteamOS? I think Linux adoption would really increase fast if there was a gaming focused Linux desktop distribution with the support of an established company. But does Valve want that? A full featured operating system is a lot to maintain and provide support for.

  • source
  • hideshow 50 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 1 year ago (44 children)

    Is that really needed?

    I think what could really drive adoption is if computers with Linux pre-installed was more easily accessible. Just boot the computer, choose which DE you want to install and then it’s done. It doesn’t need to be SteamOS. Just any good distro will do.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 44 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 1 year ago (34 children)

    Just boot the computer, choose which DE you want to install

    Yeah, that's not at all accessible to the average consumer; they don't know what a "DE" even is, much less why they should choose any over any other.

    Very, very few people want to deal with something other than a 'just works' situation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 34 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (32 children)

    They don't need to, just give them 3 screenshots and ask which they want. Show KDE, GNOME, and whatever the distro wants as the third. Maybe include some bullet points below each explaining what they are (pick one from the last two):

    • KDE - familiar, extensible
    • GNOME - modern, minimalist
    • Cinnamon/Budgie/MATE - something in the middle
    • XFCE/LXQT - super lightweight for older systems

    Maybe select one by default that the OEM likes, but showing the option helps nudge them toward the idea that this is a flexible system.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 32 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (14 children)

    Bazzite offers KDE or GNOME, and in the menu mentions KDE is what is used in SteamOS.

    I installed Bazzite on my HTPC recently. It was the worst install process I've seen in over ten years of using Linux. I shall enumerate the problems I had:

    1. The image is weirdly large, it's like 9GB in size. It takes awhile to download and a weirdly long time to write to a USB stick.
    2. Once written, you boot the image, and GRUB has the options to Install Bazzite or Test Media And Install Bazzite. By default, Test Media is selected. It always fails this test.
    3. If you use the typical non-live environment image, the scaling is tiny on a 4k monitor, and there's no way to adjust this.
    4. If you use the live environment image (in beta at time of writing), it might just lock up. I had that happen twice just while clicking through the Anaconda installer.
    5. The Anaconda installer, which I think they inherited from Fedora, was I think designed by one of the contrarian idiots who work for Gnome. There's a DONE button up in the far upper left hand corner of the screen that sometimes acts as a back button, sometimes acts as a forward button. You have to move the mouse from the top corner of the screen to the center of the screen a lot, for no reason. The top-left corner of the screen is a dumb place to put a DONE button because most languages read top to bottom, left to right, the DONE button is where a START button should go.
    6. There isn't a simple way to tell it "put / on this drive, put /home on that drive." There's an automatic installer which will do god knows what...fail, most likely. There's a "custom" partition dialog which I couldn't make heads or tails of, and then there's a "custom advanced" one that lets you set the size and position of each partition to the byte. Doing it this way apparently REQUIRES you to not only set up a /boot/efi partition, but also a /boot partition separate from /root.
    7. If you're in the habit of putting /, you know, operating system and software, on one drive, and /home on another drive, you have to learn from osmosis that part of Bazzite's immutableness means that there is no /home, there's a /var/home symlinked to /home.

    And if it doesn't randomly lock up, you've got Bazzite installed!

    Bazzite markets itself as a newbie friendly Linux. They've got that configurator on their website that gives you a little Cosmo quiz about what system you have, what desktop you want etc. which is good! That is good user friendly design. But the actual software you get rattles like a Chrysler. How many noobs are going to bounce right off that?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    You forgot the part where the installer fails just right before the end. Every time.

    Had this occuring on both my laptop and someone else's that I was trying to install Bazzite to, which resulted in installing Fedora on their laptop instead (and back to EndeavourOS on my end), and even Fedora's new installer errored out too. Thankfully the OS was working though.

    I am suspecting your 6th point for that one, which even if it wasn't I consider it a colossal failure on their part because it is NOT TELEGRAPHED AT ALL. I shouldn't have to stumble upon random forum posts to learn about it, come on.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • I had one fail fairly early, giving me a cryptic message because apparently it couldn't cope with how I'd set up the partitioning.

    I've had a Linux Mint install fail because it couldn't cope with a BIOS setting, the error message gave a plain English explanation "it's probably the XMBT (or whatever acronym) setting in the BIOS, see this page on the Ubuntu wiki for details:" and it gave a hyperlink, because the installer runs in a live environment, it had a copy of Firefox ready to go, AND it gave a QR code so you could easily open that link on a mobile device. THAT'S how it's done.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    I tried to go with Bazzite on my wife's old PC. Fuck knows what happened, but I could not get it to recognise that I'd downloaded the image with the Nvidia drivers built in.

    Ended up giving up and rolling Kubuntu. I know Kubuntu and like it. And it works beautifully. Back in the world of RDR2 now, and loving it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Yup, I had this exact experience. Installed Bazzite because it was a “gaming OS”. Had trouble just installing any non-gaming apps, or looking up guides to do so. Even gaming wasn’t perfect.

    Installed CachyOS, and yes, there are annoyances, but also a nice path to fix them. It’s both a good gaming OS, and a daily driver for casual use.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    That's really too bad. I've heard great things about Bazzite, and it's what I recommend when someone wants SteamOS.

    That said, that's a bit different from what I'm talking about. I'm suggesting OEMs ship a pre-installed Linux desktop, and users are presented an option on setup about which DE to use. So all that would change is enabling one and not the others, but they'd always be present. After install, you could switch between them if desired without messing with the package manager.

    I personally use openSUSE (leap on server, tumbleweed on desktop, Aeon Desktop on laptop), and their installer is solid, but I haven't tried it on a 4k monitor (worked fine on 1440p). Unfortunately, I don't recommend my distro of choice because it's not popular enough to have a good newb support network, whereas that's basically Bazzite's core demographic.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 1 year ago (5 children)
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    I don't recommend Arch forks as a rule, unless it has fantastic support from the maintainers (e.g. SteamOS curates updates). It's going to by break eventually, and it's going to require manual intervention (probably minimal), and users will get mad. Maybe it'll be fine for 6 months or a year, but it will break eventually.

    That's much less likely with something built on Ubuntu, Debian, Fedora, or OpenSUSE. Those all have solid testing and upgrade rules, unlike Arch, which is basically "works on my machine." I used Arch for years until I got tired of the random breakage, and now I'm on Tumbleweed which has far less breakage and stays reasonably close to Arch package versions.

    My first recommendation is either Linux Mint (I prefer Debian edition) or Fedora, because those have good new user experiences and aren't super opinionated like Ubuntu.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    At least some of the problems I reported about Bazzite are inherited from Fedora. Bazzite didn't create Anaconda.

    Fedora has the problem of being generally fine, but most of the world for the last decade has been targeting Ubuntu as THE Linux distro, so there's a lot if Git repos out there that don't include instructions for Fedora. Way fewer things are packaged in rpm rather than deb. I've never seen Linux Mint kernel panic unless I was fucking around with the video drivers, I've seen Fedora kernel panic.

    The main reason I'm using Fedora right now rather than Mint is Mint tends to have an older codebase, and we're at a point in PC technology where things like wayland offer support for video and graphics stuff that don't work well under X11. like my 1440p ultrawide 144Hz monitor sitting next to a 1080p 60hz side monitor. Fedora KDE has it ready to go, Mint Cinnamon does not.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    there’s a lot if Git repos out there that don’t include instructions for Fedora

    For new users, if it doesn't exist in the repos, you've gone too far. Don't look for RPMs or debs, look for your distros package, and failing that, look to add a repo tons of people online recommend for whatever you're using (e.g. RPMFusion IIRC). The vast majority of what you want will be there.

    If it's something you really can't live without, ask on the forums for your distro, and wait until you get multiple answers from different people saying the same thing. Give it a few days too.

    Installing from source isn't a bad thing, I do it all the time. But a lot of people will trust some random post on SM and then complain that it doesn't work or broke their system or something (see LTT's video where he uninstalled his DE by trying to install Steam). Don't install from source or random RPMs/debs until you're comfortable tracking down what dependencies you need and are able to read scripts to make sure nothing funky is going on. Many posts online will be outdated, and with Linux getting more attention, malware is a growing concern.

    Mint tends to have an older codebase

    Does Mint still not use Wayland?

    Having an older codebase is generally good for new users, since the software tends to be more tested and more people will know the workarounds. Newer software will have different issues, so be careful chasing the latest and greatest if you're not comfortable sifting through logs to figure out what happened.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    For new users, if it doesn’t exist in the repos, you’ve gone too far.

    I don't think this holds up under scrutiny. Theoretically sure, installing using your distro's package manager is the beginner skill, compiling from source is the advanced skill.

    The reality is, people transplanting from Windows often own hardware they want to continue to use, that require software that isn't in a distro's package manager. For me, this included a DisplayLink docking station, an Epson printer and a SpaceMouse. For some, it will include gaming keyboards or mice, stream decks, who knows what else. A lot of times, there are folks making open source software for these things, but they don't package them. So you end up on Github as a beginner looking for the thing to make your thing work.

    As you migrate into the ecosystem, you start buying hardware that is well supported by the Linux ecosystem, that problem starts to fade away.

    by rpm vs deb, I wasn't meaning downloading individual files...though I've done that. DisplayLink offered their driver as a .deb. At first, that Epson printer only issued a .rpm, and I had to use Alien to install a .rpm on a Linux Mint computer. With time, they offered a .deb, and eventually the printer was just natively supported by CUPS. I meant, I find that the Debian/Ubuntu repos (the dpkg/APT system that uses .deb files) have more stuff in them than Fedora's repos (the DNF package manager that uses .rpm files) do.

    Does Mint still not use Wayland?

    When I built my current PC, Wayland support in Mint Cinnamon was "We've just now added it, it doesn't work worth a damn but you can try it." They're coming along, but they're behind.

    Is an older codebase generally good for new users? The first distro I installed on an x86 PC was Mint Cinnamon 17. Quiana. On a then brand new Dell Inspiron laptop. For about 6 months, the kernel that shipped with the OS didn't support the laptop's built-in trackpad. I had to manually update the kernel through Mint Update for the trackpad to work. There's problems at the bleeding edge, but there's problems at the trailing edge as well.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • I find that the Debian/Ubuntu repos (the dpkg/APT system that uses .deb files) have more stuff in them than Fedora’s repos (the DNF package manager that uses .rpm files) do.

    Ah, makes sense. That's probably because Fedora doesn't package non-FOSS packages, so you need to use something separate like RPMFusion, and that doesn't contain everything. There's usually a repo for what you want, but for something really niche, yeah, Ubuntu will probably have a better chance of having it, followed by Debian.

    That said, I really like the way openSUSE does it. Basically, they have OBS, which is kind of like the AUR, but it actually builds packages for you. I think that's a much better way to handle it than building stuff from source on your local machine, since it allows you to share that package (i.e. dev machine vs other machines you have) and at least track down the dependencies needed since it starts w/ a blank slate. I don't know if Fedora has something similar, and it's certainly not a beginner-friendly option (if you're pulling packages from OBS, you're probably doing it wrong and will likely run into issues). However, that is the first step to getting something included in the official repos.

    But if it's not in the default repositories, you should definitely talk to someone more familiar w/ the distro to figure out the "right way" to do it. I've built .debs and AUR PKGBUILDs, but only after learning from the community the right way to do it to make sure it doesn't break on an update. New users are unlikely to put in that legwork, hence the recommendation to never use anything outside the default repos w/o asking for help.

    There’s problems at the bleeding edge, but there’s problems at the trailing edge as well.

    I agree. I guess my point is that if things work w/ an older set of packages, the chance that things will break is incredibly low. Whereas if things work on a bleeding edge distro, there's a good chance you'll see some breakage.

    For example, openSUSE Tumbleweed is generally a good distro, but there was a week or so where my HDMI port didn't work, my default sound device changed suddenly and was no longer consistent (sometimes would pick one monitor's speakers instead of the other, depending on which came online first), and I was stuck on an older kernel for a couple weeks due to some kind of intermittent crashing. This experience was way better than what I had on Arch, and fortunately TW has been uneventful for 2-3 years now (probably because my hardware hasn't changed).

    So for a new user, I recommend finding the oldest distro that supports all the hardware you need. For experienced users, I recommend using a rolling, bleeding-edge distro and reporting bugs upstream as they happen, because the frustration of something breaking randomly is much less than the frustration of multilple things breaking on a release upgrade, and it's nice to have the latest improvements to performance and whatnot (i.e. I used Wayland on TW way before it landed on any release-based distro, which was awesome since it allowed me to use different refresh rates on each monitor).

    For your example, I'd recommend users hop distros until they find one where everything works. If Mint is too old, try Fedora. There's usually a sweet spot where everything works and you have a reasonably stable experience overall. Even Debian Testing (pinned to the release name, not "testing") is probably a better fit than Arch or openSUSE Tumbleweed.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    EndeavourOS has that kind of menu during the install process. A few screenshots and a brief explanation of each option.

    I thought it was nice. It’s something I want to see more with other distros. The DE is what most people will notice about the OS either way.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Yeah, that is nice. I won't recommend EndeavorOS or any other Arch installer/derivative for other reasons (IMO, every Arch user should do the official install process once or twice to have a better shot at fixing stuff later), but I do like that UX.

    I wish more distros did it. My distro (openSUSE) does something similar, but I also don't recommend it because the community isn't all that good for new users IMO.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] 3 points 1 year ago (6 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (5 children)

    That tracks since I left Arch about 5 years ago, maybe a little longer, and I used it for at least 5 years.

    I used it through the /usr merge which broke nearly everything, and for a few years of stability afterward. But even when it was super stable, there were still random issues a couple times each year. It wasn't anything big (I've been a Linux user for 15 years or so), but it did require knowing what to do to fix it (usually documented clearly on the Arch homepage). This was especially true for Nvidia updates. After switching to openSUSE Tumbleweed, most of those went away, and even the Nvidia breakage seemed less frequent, and if something broke, I could easily snapper rollback and wait for a fix, whereas on Arch I had to fix things because going back wasn't an option (I guess you could configure rollbacks if you had that foresight).

    I just took a look, and it looks like manual intervention is still a thing. For example, the June 21 Linux firmware change required manual intervention. There were others over the last year, depending on the packages you use or your configuration.

    That's totally fine for Linux vets, but new users will have issues eventually. In don't even recommend my distro, which solves most of those issues, because new user support isn't there. The main reason I left was because I wanted to switch to btrfs (for snapshot rollbacks), and Tumbleweed had that OOTB so I gave it a shot.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    The main reason I left was because I wanted to switch to btrfs (for snapshot rollbacks), and Tumbleweed had that OOTB so I gave it a shot.

    This is precisely why I went with Tumbleweed as well. I wanted a rolling release distro because having initially gotten into Linux via Ubuntu back in 2007, I didn't really like the "upgrade twice a year to keep up to date with new features" method. It felt really cumbersome back then, as a regular distro upgrade often brought problems with it.

    When I looked into other features I wanted, I discovered Snapper and I was all "that's the one for me!"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Yup!

    Here's my progression:

    1. Ubuntu because I was a noob; got pissed at breakage at the release upgrade
    2. Fedora, because that's what my university used; got pissed that release upgrades took an hour (since fixed I think?)
    3. Arch, because my coworker recommended it
    4. openSUSE Tumbleweed because of snapper and they had a server distro (had recently set up a NAS and tried Leap before switching desktop to TW)
    5. Aeon on laptop because I wanted to try an immutable distro and it was in the family

    I'll probably switch my laptop back to Tumbleweed at some point and my NAS to MicroOS, but for nos things work fine so I'm not motivated.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    I don't even remember my progression. I do remember what first piqued my interest though. A guy came from BUIT (Barn-och-ungdoms IT enhet), which no longer exists, and he was troubleshooting some IT stuff at my school back in 2003. Being the nosy and tech-interested bratty nerd that I was, I hovered around the guy. He was super nice, and had no problem with my prodding questions about his laptop, which was running Red Hat Linux. He explained in simple terms what exactly that meant, and it stuck with me.

    Then, years later when I found out about Ubuntu (at the library I think) and the fact that they sent out LiveCDs I was like "Yes please!" and the rest is history. I didn't use Linux for many years, between having hardware that didn't play nice with it, and just not feeling like it. Then the other year I went back to Linux and been using it since.

    Every so often I boot into Windows to do some texture work in Substance Painter, but I don't think that's going to last. I'm very keen on trying Armor Paint, and if I like the workflow there I might as well wipe Windows entirely.

    Now, if only I could run Linux on my work PC.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Nice!

    For me, I went to the local community college in high school, and an old guy was in my Java class and gave me a FreeBSD CD. I installed it and played around with it for a year or two, but still used Windows. When I went to uni, I got an Ubuntu CD on campus and installed it on my rental, and later that year the Windows XP install had issues but Ubuntu was fine, so I switched.

    Now, if only I could run Linux on my work PC.

    I had that at my last job, but my current one uses macOS. At least it's close enough to Linux on the CLI...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    I'm stuck on Windows 11 at work. It's not a bad laptop, but Windows is insanely slow. Opening the commandline isn't instant. Explorer takes well over a second to open. It's like treacle.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (7 children)

    I agree with the other guy, that's too much choice. People don't want to deal with it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Three options is too many? If one is already selected, you can just click through without thinking. Windows already does that stupid "setting up your PC" crap, and this would be far faster.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (5 children)

    Yes.

    And they need to sort out the defaults to something good. 99% of basic users won't/can't change them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (4 children)

    Sure. If you have all three options be properly configured, it shouldn't matter too much which you pick. The point is to make it apparent that you can change stuff, if you want.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    One. Option.

    Do you know why Mac is successful? Because they have extremely few options. You basically have 3 laptops to choose from. That's not 3 software options, that's basically 3 hardware options.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    I don't think that's why. I think it's more the features that work with the iPhone that are selling Apple laptops. If you want to use iMessage or iCloud between your phone and computer, you need both to be from Apple. That, plus the better performance and battery life of the M-series is more the cause of increased market share, not the single desktop offering.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    That is exactly why they are successful, wayyyyyyy before iphones even existed. People don't have to think about anything. I think I'm going to leave this conversation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • Looking at market share stats, macOS market share is stagnant up until 2010-2015 or so, when it jumps from 6% to 12% or so, and that's also about when iPhone became dominant. They're currently around 15-17%, probably because the M1 series is so much better than x86 alternatives, so if you don't need gaming or anything, it's a great option! That wasn't true before the M1.

    If it's all up to the one choice, why didn't they take off before the 2010s? macOS has been remarkably the same since pretty much forever, unlike Windows, which changes a lot each release.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    I think the “friendly” distros like Linux Mint with built-in driver detection/management and pretty broad package repositories (surfaced as an “App Store”) are probably to the point where many normal people could use them, without significantly more technical chops than Windows. Particularly as a gaming rig where you basically just need Firefox, LibreOffice and Steam.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago

    The issue with that is, people have no idea what these "choice" even mean. SteamOS is SteamOS, Windows 11 is Windows 11, MacOS is MacOS, but Linux is a big list. If pushing adoption is the key purpose, the manufacturer need to pick one that they believe is reliable and in active development. Just one. All these editions will very likely cause choice paralysis, which lead to people deem it as "too complicated".

    Also Valve will not likely go that path again.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Some companies sell Linux prebuilts, like System76, but that's pretty niche for the average person to even know to search for.

    Now, if stores like Best Buy had a section for Linux prebuilts, that would reach a lot of people.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Its become abundantly clear to me over the past few years that Linux is in place where, to get significant share it needs to have a major figurehead. Imagine if all ThinkPads suddenly were only available with Lenovo's own fork. That kind of thing.

    Unfortunateoy, that's kinda the opposite of Linux ethos, and not necessarily likely to make Lenovo much money.

    So the best we can really hope for at this point is a company with the brand awareness of Valve pushing SteamOS into the mainstream. People who play games know and generally trust Valve, so people (like my wife) who are on the fence, or who just need their computer to work without needing too much faffing, could likely trust SteamOS in a way they wouldn't necessarily trust Bazzite or CachyOS.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I'd guess Valve wants whatever makes more games work on Linux so that their Steam Deck works better and is more compatible.

    And that means the most important thing is Linux desktop adoption by game developers so they make more native games. So somewhat ironically, I don't think SteamOS would be as high a priority as other distributions, since it focuses on players instead of developers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Ironically, some games run better on the Steam Deck through Proton rather than the native Linux version.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 40 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    shoutout to WUBI for making factorio and space age native on linux.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Silksong is also native on Linux

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    ngl the hk and silksong native ports were pretty crap on my machine (but proton + Windows version worked perfectly)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    It's sad in a way but I kinda feel like proton is going to near wipe out the very few Linux native ports we get. It's so much easier and more stable than trying to build and package for Linux.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Yeah, even more casual games like Balatro are proof of that, despite how easily you can port a game of that nature otherwise, people will choose to use proton because it's still able to sync with their progress and symlinking is too inconvenient to consider unless you're running like 2gb ram or something.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 26 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I spent the last two days building a machine from old parts and installing Linux Mint. It's my first time using Linux and I am really surprised at how lovely it is. I am still learning, but I can easily see it replacing my home gaming PC. I have yet to find something I can't get to work.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Fortnite.

    Anything with anticheat unfortunately.

    But I'm happily on Linux for daily and gaming. Welcome to the club

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago

    MORE!! MORE!!!!!!

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›
    43 comments in c/linux_gaming@lemmy.world view that post
    35 comments in c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca view that post
    20 comments in c/gaming@lemmy.zip view that post
    6 comments in c/linux_gaming@lemmy.ml view that post
    3 comments in c/hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se view that post
    1 comment in c/gaming@beehaw.org view that post
    1 comment in c/games@sh.itjust.works view that post