[–] 14 points 1 month ago (9 children)

A GNOME developer chimes in:

That's a really good start! As a GNOME developer, we outright ban AI contributions altogether due to environmental reasons. I know these are guidelines, but could there be some considerations on mentioning environmental concerns? It should align with KDE Eco.

In which one KDE dev replies:

-1 on my side for mentioning environmental concerns; I don't think it's the LLM contribution policy's job to cover that at all.

Yeah sure! If I ignore every bad thing about something I can absolutely gush about how good that thing is!

  • source
  • [–] 31 points 1 month ago

    David Gerard's response to that response:

    bro it's out there with your name on it, it's not "deceitful" to notice the URL and logos.

    if you go straight to claiming commenting about the contents of your own damn website - and you're responding literally to me linking it - is "deceitful", a hit dog is hollering.

    instead, please describe the process by which such an AI slop proposal - clearly chatbot spam - even gets this far.

    In which KDE didn't bother to answer and proceeded to block David Gerard.

    https://circumstances.run/@davidgerard/117276666726477078

    Not a good look.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 19 points 2 months ago*

    The OP of that reddit post is literally the owner of that "uncensored" subreddit lmao. It is almost like he got shooed away from the regular subs for a reason or something.

    (Namely him being a massive-ass troll and overall a prick to free software developers. Those "1000x worse replies", while I believe are absolutely made up, would be entirely warranted.)

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • view more: next ›