Outside of typical remarks from Donald Trump, JD Vance and Mike Johnson and a Fox News report, party stayed mum

Republican voices were mostly silent as No Kings rallies and marches against Trump administration policies unfurled on Saturday, many in the spirit of a street party that countered the “hate America” depiction advanced by senior members of the party.

Instead of provocation, there were marching bands, huge banners with “we the people” references to the US constitution, and protesters wearing inflatable costumes, particularly frogs, which have emerged as a sign of resistance.

It was the third mass mobilization since Trump’s return to the White House and came against the backdrop of a government shutdown that not only has closed federal programs and services but is testing the core balance of power, as an aggressive executive confronts Congress and the courts in ways that protest organizers warn are a slide toward authoritarianism.

top 98 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 116 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I went to one and it had pretty good turnout for a town in the middle of nowhere in Maine

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [+] 103 points 1 year ago (15 children)
  • [–] 44 points 1 year ago (13 children)

    It was supposed to be this dark, violent uprising of slavering feral ANTIFA Commies, and instead, it was a just a huge national street party/ MAGA Roast that MAGAs weren't invited to.

    Now they have to explain to their cult how wrong they were about the left being violent and hating America, without looking like their feeling are hurt for not being included in the fun.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago (11 children)

    The right wing media is just waiting for the handful of police reports to come in from the weekend to fixate upon, and talk about non stop, so they can make that "violent uprising" a reality for their viewers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    I just heard an ABC reporter saying that the protests were non-violent, "for the most part."

    "FOR THE MOST PART?" He said that without pointing out a single instance of it, and I haven't heard of any reports of violence. So why does he have to suggest, on national TV, that there was at least some violence, somewhere? All that does is feed MAGA lies. Now that can say that the protests were violent, they heard it on ABC, and they'd be accurate.

    News organizations, whether left or right, should be required to be accurate.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Unfortunately the major outlets that claim to be more left are really just right wing lite, and at the end of the day they are still part of the propaganda machine.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 86 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Ours coincided with our Pride, they actually marched with us in the parade up to the capitol and then joined us. It was incredible, unlike anything I've seen in this city. Do I think Trump is going to magically be unseated? No. But let's make a habit of this, since I am not sure voting will actually happen in 28, and we need mob size forces to be easily called up.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    A lot of these protests, especially in bigger cities, have all kinds of booths at them too. The one near me had like 6 for just one congressional candidate, one for a mayoral candidate, and multiple for revolutionary socialists/communists, along with people walking all over the rally handing out fliers about a general strike.

    Tons of people sign up for these things, or even if they don't sign up to strike/canvass, end up changing their voting habits accordingly. A lot of local stuff can be really impactful, since a lot of the policies most directly felt by people are local policies (e.g. is the pothole in front of your house fixed? Is your rent expensive? Is there visible poverty on the streets? Are the buses slow?) rather than federal ones (e.g. "we cut billions in research grants but you'll only really start noticing the overall effects yourself many years from now")

    I do wish we could just get all the people going to things like this to head over to ICE facilities and block 'em day and night, but it's a good consolation that they're taking some other actions regardless.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 56 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Mostly silent?! Except for the video King Trunp posted of him literally shitting on Americans. Presidential enough for you??

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I had to find it for myself because I couldn't believe what you wrote. But its true! He's not even hiding how much he hates Americans anymore.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] 51 points 1 year ago (5 children)
  • [+] -10 points 1 year ago

    You all left social media. What the fuck did you all expect?

    It's so funny you have one of the largest protests in history but it's like you all are starting to realize you forgot a key part of any of this.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 48 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    It's part of the propaganda strategy to pick their battles. They never speak on your terms. They only speak when they have the upper hand. Keep in mind in general they never directly acknowledge any of your talking points. Not unless they have an avenue to interject logical fallacies and pivot the dialog to their terms.

    The moment they start talking about this they lend credence to your side. It carves open space in public discourse. This is the exact same tactic they use against you. And people fall for it every time. You're never supposed to lend credence to their trolling. You're not supposed to feed the trolls. Yet here we are. A decade into this era of internet troll right wing politics. People started feeding the trolls and cannot help themselves.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 47 points 1 year ago* (4 children)

    I was at a rally all day today. I saw two noteworthy attempts to counter protest the HUNDREDS of "no king" protesters that showed up in my city.

    One was a guy who wrote couchfucker propaganda on his car in chalk paint. "JD Vance 2028" or something like that. He flipped us off at 50mph. Few saw it.

    The second was a guy that brought his Charlie Kirk flag to the last 25 minutes of the protest, after 2/3rds of the no kings folks went home.

    So, one was a coward that drove by one time. One time. I think he yelled something, but since Trump supporters don't believe in science, he didn't realize we can't hear shit when he's speeding by at 50 in a 35.

    The second guy... Man, what do you even say? How about 'what the fuck even is a Charlie Kirk flag?' These people are mentally fucking ill. They will villainize and glorify anyone and anything. If Trump told them douchebags were a hallowed object tomorrow, they'd be lovingly calling themselves 'douchies' by next week.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 1 year ago (12 children)

    Can't believe how many people haven't even heard of it when it's one of the biggest protests in US history. Those left-leaning news channels sure doing their job by covering it for 5 minutes I guess. None of my friends nor 3 other people I talked to today even knew what the protest was or that it was happening until I told them about it.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    A lot of media outlets worldwide are ignoring these protests or covering them very briefly when nobody's watching. Most likely due to influence from the US.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] -8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Most likely because the world has given up on the USA and is moving on. Your problems are well-deserved, they figure.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Sadly we can't be that disengaged from the US because when your economy goes under from all of this, so will most of the worlds.

    If the situation is anything like Canada in many nations, most media outlets are owned by US corps. Over half of our outlets are being controlled the same as US media.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Most people live their lives wholly unaware of reality. If their entertainment programming doesn’t consist of anything informational, they will never know about events except second hand from others, like your case. The silent majority doesn’t vote in elections, not because they don’t see the point, it’s because they likely had know idea there were elections.

    I had to explain to my friends what “mid-terms” were. They vote in presidential elections..

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago*

    Uninformed and disinterested people are a very useful demographic to those in power. It’s also notable that even when they encounter information regarding important events, they won’t be aware of what actions they can take in response to it. Not being informed on important events and their progression also impacts how they perceive those who are taking action to change or influence those events. This can easily lead to the perception of justified responses being excessive or alarmist.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 70 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    They're silent because they know all the protestors will go back to work tomorrow. If you want to force them to acknowledge it you need to show up the next day as well.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago*

    If these parades are ever to work, they need to stop being predictable. Stop giving the enemy info about them like how long they'll last of where they're being held. Find ways to spread the word without them finding out and make it a continuous thing that has no end in sight until demands are met. Make sure you showcase you will escalate if they feel they can safely ignore you.

    When the enemy goes low, you kick them in the face as hard as you can.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    The tricky part about a general strike is that you dont have much room for do-overs if it turns out you don't have the numbers you need. Protests are largely symbolic, but are also a good way for organizers to gauge how willing/able folks are to engage in more drastic action.

    If a general strike is what you think the movement should go towards, I recommend your next steps be strengthening community support systems - food banks, free clinics, shelters, etc - since these things will be needed to support a general strike (folks will choose feeding their children over political action, so make sure they can accomplish both). In the mean time, it also helps out folks who have been hit the hardest by republican and trump cuts to services.

    I highly recommend folks read up on some of ICNC's stuff, since they focus on the practical side of nonviolent conflict.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Had an asshole roll coal on us while they drove by

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    There were a couple republicans on harleys driving past repeatedly that I made fun of and called pussies.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 44 points 1 year ago (29 children)

    It's almost like "peaceful protest" is something that fascists can simply ignore.

  • source
  • hideshow 29 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    You don’t understand how dictatorship works. Something as small as a busted escalator can bring down regime. You can’t afford to look foolish.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Yea, he really got SLAMMED by the escalator fiasco. Or literally anything else in the last [his entire life].

    What rock you livin’ under?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (4 children)

    You clearly don’t know how dictators work.

    You ever see Vladimir Putin get stuck on an elevator? No he’d have tha footage scrubbed and everyone who saw it shot.

    You have to maintain a certain image if you want to be king.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    Buddy open your eyes. You literally brought up the busted escalator that very clearly did not bring down Trump. Neither have his myriad of other on-air disasters and the party obssessed with screaming about child abuse has done nothing about his obvious attachement to Epstein.

    We have loads of pictures on the internet of Putin in his stupid high-heels because he’s insecure about his height. I wouldn’t go around waving that shit around in the Red Square, obviously, but it’s not like they’re going around shooting everyone who might have seen a meme.

    The evidence is right their in front of your eyes. You ignoring it is not a gotcha.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Buddy open your eyes!

    Trump has been struggling as much as can to be a king. He’s been trying since day one!

    Despite his mind controlled cult member following him blindly…. He still can’t make it happen. He keeps hitting roadblocks from us.

    Yes, he’s making more progress than we’d like but you are a damn fool if you think things like the broken escalator aren’t hurting him. You’re a fool to not see he lost a lot of people already over Epstein.

    You are a fool if you don’t see how someone like trump looks like a silly little baby compared to Putin or any other strong man dictator.

    Looking foolish even for a moment hurts him very badly. It slows him down considerably.

    The book “power broker”. The most powerful man in all of New York City (probably ever) was taken down by some moms standing in a park and blocking his bulldozer. That mother fucker battle sitting presidents and won, that guy walked all over mayors and governors, he wiped out entire neighborhoods and permentally blocked beach access to most of New York. He was a titan! He was defeated by looking foolish. He was destroyed by moms in a park. YOU CLEARLY DONT UNDERSTAND HOW DICTATORSHIPS WORK!

    Sorry I can’t snap my fingers and make the world perfect for you. We are fighting against tyranny. It’s a long slow battle. Don’t discredit our wins as an attempt to stop us. We don’t buy what you’re selling.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Speed bumps, maybe, but they keep on being able to do stuff without consequence. People are still disappearing, there’s some tepid resistance from a couple centrist governors, and your economy is doing terribly yet he’s still very free to fuck around and post AI shit-bomb videos.

    The only thing keeping him from anything is his own disastrous health and the “elite”, the real kings in the US are still allowed to do whatever the hell they want without any major pushback.

    Let’s not get too far from the comment I replied to which was about something small being what brings it all down despite that not at all being the case. People aren’t afraid Trump, they’re afraid of the goons armed with guns that will do whatever the fuck he says and don’t give a shit that he’s a child rapist so long as they get a paycheck to go hurt people. We can post all the memes we want but at some point something has to happen about it.

    Ya’ll’re acting so frickin’ tough for people that are generally regarded these days as being largely spineless. Farmers in France dumped shit on the roads when they were pissed, it doesn’t have to be violent but you better start causing problems.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago (15 children)

    Fascism on a national scale requires the consent or fear of the people in order to maintain power. They have to look strong. Anything that disturbs their voting bloc or contradicts the official narrative, especially on a broad stage, is going to cause them exponential problems because it looks like weakness. That's part of why fascism is inherently weak. Being able to ignore dissent is a luxury afforded only to the truly strong.

    The fact that they aren't saying anything in this case means that they've calculated that the erosion of their base is preferable to letting the news cycle keep running with this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [+] -8 points 1 year ago (14 children)

    My teenage pot head kid wrote this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (12 children)

    Sorry about that, let me know what you don't understand and I'll be happy to explain it to you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago* (11 children)

    It's not true. Nobody outside of leftist groups or media care about this. It's not out of trying to maintain fear or concern about erosion.

    There's nothing that comes from these protests anymore. We're in a digital world. These analog solutions don't work anymore. You need digital solutions. You need a network and digital presence to spread anything you do like this. But we all removed ourselves from any digital spaces so there's no need for the right to prevent anything. They know this even 24hrs ago. We're all back to work. A lot of people didn't even realize this was going on.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (10 children)

    Nobody outside of leftist groups or media care about this.

    Eight million people disagreed with you on Saturday. That's a significant fraction of the adult population.

    More to the point, history disagrees with you. No fascist regime has ever survived large-scale protests by a significant percentage of their population.

    We're in a digital world. These analog solutions don't work anymore. You need digital solutions.

    In an increasingly digital world, the only thing that does work is analog solutions.

    Know what happens if you email a senator? Even a state senator? You get a canned auto-reply. For a while, the workaround was faxes. I'm not kidding, that got through. But then they stopped acknowledging those, too. The only things that work anymore are analog: phone calls and showing up in their office.

    This applies to almost every political action, too. Digital marketing barely moves the needle; a lot of campaigns don't even bother anymore. But door-knocking sure does. Phone banking sure does. Digital spaces are great for organizing and for dissemination of information, but the spaces are too siloed for any reasonable hope of changing anyone's mind, even before you get to the astroturfing and foreign actors.

    Even better, analog action demonstrably gets under Trump's skin. And the more he shows himself to be bothered by it, the more he looks weak and impotent.

    We're all back to work.

    Yeah, I mean, we still have to eat. But nobody's under the illusion that one protest is going to do this; it's about the long game, about the conservatives on the ground seeing that it's not actually a "hate America" rally, and if the GOP is lying about that, what else might they be lying about?

    So we'll capture a news cycle here and there. And we'll keep doing it until something changes, for better or for worse.

    A lot of people didn't even realize this was going on.

    But a lot of people did. People who only believed the Fox talking points saw that they were wrong this weekend. And the fact that the people at the top are quiet about it means that they know they can't fight it. Which means that at least they know it could work.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (9 children)

    Sure, we'll see.

    I've said this after every major protest the past ten years. But yes, I'll say it again and again and again.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (8 children)

    Ten years is not very much time, in protest terms. When I say "long game," I really mean it. But we're getting ever closer to critical mass. Don't get impatient.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (7 children)

    You're not reaching critical mass because of protests. You're reaching critical mass because people are communicating and sharing content that highlights what the Trump government is doing. The protests success resr on how effectively the left has shown his corruption and not just shown but marketer the messages enough to convince people to pay attention

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (6 children)

    That's also critical! As I noted earlier, digital sources are fantastic for news dissemination but terrible for changing minds. Growing protest would not be possible without strong reporting; I don't think there's any way that either arm of this could possibly happen alone.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (5 children)

    How is it terrible for changing minds?

    If it's terrible for changing minds, why is there so much money invested into advertising using it?

    Are these massive professional companies ignorant to something and like wasting billions on useless tactics?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (4 children)

    They aren't changing minds. They're reinforcing and radicalizing the beliefs of people who are already in the bubble they're in. And it's far from useless!

    Try to think back to the last time you saw an ad that was (1) actually directed at you, and (2) trying to change your mind. I can't tell you the answer for me, because I never see ads like that. Harris ran her campaign on that last fall, and it failed; partially because people have been lied to through screens often enough that they tend to only believe things that screens say when they're saying stuff they already believe.

    As you already know, we'll do all sorts of mental gymnastics to make new facts fit with old opinions, probably because there was some kind of evolutionary advantage. The fact is, most people have already made up their minds. Changing those minds is hard, because people have a visceral reaction to facts, ideas, and opinions that go against their pre-existing beliefs—just like what's happening to you right now. It can be stronger or weaker depending on how important the belief is, but in either case, the only time we're likely to change our minds is in person; again, probably due to some evolutionary advantage (pack bonding, maybe?). Not online, not via broadcast, but in person; usually in small groups or even one-on-one (I've seen some evidence, though I can't find a link, that voice and video calls—but not text messages—are almost as effective as in-person discussion).

    Protests gain momentum when more people change their minds, and people change their minds when the people they know and trust and respect go to protests. It's not the only way that fascists are overthrown, but it is definitely the least-bloody way.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    You didn't answer my question at all. Why do companies and celebrities and people who are powerful and who have access to the best and brightest minds pay so much for an online presence?

    Ads work. Majority of them you don't even realize are ads. But they work. People like you on the left are so oblivious to this stuff. I don't get it. It's so obvious and you all just keep refusing to see the answers right in front of your faces.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    You didn't answer my question at all. Why do companies and celebrities and people who are powerful and who have access to the best and brightest minds pay so much for an online presence?

    I did. You didn't read it, apparently, but I did.

    To wit:

    "They aren't changing minds. They're reinforcing and radicalizing the beliefs of people who are already in the bubble they're in. And it's far from useless!"

    Literally the first paragraph in my response. They're paying for ads in order to reinforce and radicalize and mobilize people to act in accordance with the advertiser's desires.

    Ads work. Majority of them you don't even realize are ads. But they work.

    Of course they work, but they don't do what you think they're doing. They don't convince people to change their minds, they convince people to act: to buy, or vote, or be more strident in accordance with the beliefs the advertiser already knows they have.

    The ads you see are carefully crafted to appeal to people who believe what you believe. That's why pro-Trump ads in red areas didn't say "here's why you shouldn't vote for Harris," they said "you already know Harris is a bad choice, and here's why you should make sure to go vote." It's a distinction so subtle that most people don't notice it and think that the ads really are trying to change their minds, but that's not how it works.

    I started my career in marketing, I know how campaigns are put together. The discussions aren't about how to make a group of people believe a thing, they're about how to frame the conversation so that the people who already believe something act on that belief in a way that benefits the advertiser. So you get ads like, "you care about your dog, so make sure you feed them Dogfood Xyz." You don't get ads that say "here's why you should care about your dog," because the people who already care about their dog don't need to be convinced, and the people who don't have a dog won't listen anyway.

    How do you get people to care about a dog? You take them to a humane society shelter in person and introduce them to a dog.

    People like you on the left are so oblivious to this stuff.

    Paternalistic nonsense. Oh wise and great guru, please bestow upon me thy wisdom.

    Also, bringing my political affiliation into this is laughable. I knew all of this back when I was an angry conservative, too. And what changed my mind to make me more progressive? Meeting people who weren't like me.

    I don't get it. It's so obvious and you all just keep refusing to see the answers right in front of your faces.

    The conservative urge to say "the truth is right in front of your face, stupid sheeple!" "Oh, this thing that I believe and have had reinforced to me by people who directly benefit financially from that belief is actually really obvious, duh!"

    If it's so obvious, then surely you have evidence for me. Right? No? All the evidence is in my favor? Huh, how 'bout that. See, you can't convince people of reality online. Exhibit A: this conversation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (1 child)

    www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/oct/11/advertising-industry-fuelling-climate-disaster-consumption

    Advertising works by getting under your radar, introducing new ideas without bothering your conscious mind. Extensive scientific research shows that, when exposed to advertising, people “buy into” the materialistic values and goals it encourages. Consequently, they report lower levels of personal wellbeing, experience conflict in relationships, engage in fewer positive social behaviours, and experience detrimental effects on study and work. Critically, the more that people prioritise materialistic values and goals, the less they embrace positive attitudes towards the environment – and the more likely they are to behave in damaging ways.

    Even worse, findings from neuroscience reveal that advertising goes as far as lodging itself in the brain, rewiring it by forming physical structures and causing permanent change.

    So not sure what your experience is in marketing but in my experience and from research I've looked into, it isn't just convincing people what they already know. It works to change views through repetitive messaging.

    So to sum up. I think you're wrong. I think the left is wrong because they feel like you do and are really missing something that the right have accepted for a long time. They're playing chess and the left don't even understand they're even playing a game.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Protesting is peaceful, but honestly, it's a show of potential capacity for violence. I went to the protest, but I went with eye protection, respirator, and ear protection. I wouldn't put it past trump to order the military to deploy LRADs against protestors. Also brought medical supplies, multi-tool and a sign.

    Also, for comparison, the largest right-wing protest I could find in the US was a mere ~650,000 people. We just put over 10x that amount on the streets in a single day.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The Woman's March, BLM, Occupy Wallstreet, and the first No Kings were all successfully ignored. Millions of Americans marching is clearly not enough for us to be heard.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    7 million people is roughly 2% of the population. It's 10% of the people in this country that couldn't be bothered to vote. There's also no threat or demands to accompany this protest. Like what are the people in power supposed to think. An easily ignorable voting block is slightly agitated enough to spend a few hours holding a sign? Are they going to stop working or consuming? Are they going to gather votes and banish the two parties that have failed us? No lmao they're just gonna get together once every couple of months, there's absolutely no pressure to a public gathering.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago

    They know they are guilty.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago

    To be honest, we shouldn't even need Republicans to turn the tide. We just need to get people off their asses and stop pushing both sides bullshit.

    Democratic primaries will be fast approaching and now is the best time ever to support Democratic candidates like AOC (likely to primary Schumer), Mamdani, Talarico, Chakrabarti, etc. and get out the AIPAC crap.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    First of all, stop calling them Republicans. The Republican party is dead, replaced by the MAGA Party.

    The Republican foundation of Smaller Government, Lower Taxes, Responsible Economic/Fiscal Policy, Family Values, etc. has been replaced by the MAGA foundation of Treason, Corruption, Racism, White Supremacy, Rape, Pedophilia, Violence, Cowardice, Ignorance, Incompetence, and Intolerance.

    The Democrats get crazy when a MAGA calls them the "Democrat Party," so hit them back, and make it official that the Democratic Party no longer recognizes the Republican Party, and will never refer to it again in speeches, interviews, campaign literature, etc. As far as the Democratic Party is concerned, it is now the MAGA Party.

    Then stick by it, and watch them melt down. They LOVE being Republicans, they are proud of it, after building it up in the Conservative Propaganda Machine for decades as an honorable institution. Many of them have to be uncomfortable with being sidelined by MAGA, and getting lip service from them. They already know that the Republican Party is dead, but they are afraid to say it out loud.

    So the Dems should do it, and give them their worst nightmare - they allowed the MAGAs to destroy the "Party of Lincoln."

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    While I love the idea, they'd probably just come back and always refer to the dems as the Woke Socialist Party.

    it really only works if the media also gets onboard, and i doubt they'd get onboard with either of those.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    The old "I know you are, but what am I" Defense? That's lame and pathetic, and everybody knows it.

    And they don't need the media to be on board. The media weren't on board with calling it the Democrat Party, but they don't do anything about it if a MAGA calls it that on their airwaves, either.

    Dems just need to consistently call them MAGA, and NEVER use the word Republican.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›
    2 comments in c/politics@beehaw.org view that post