all 52 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 88 points 1 year ago (9 children)

After reading I realised that this proposal isn't a single new element for all neutron stars, but a separate new entry on the table for every individual neutron star in existence, unless there are two that happen to have the exact same number of protons which is unlikely. Sounds good to me

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago (8 children)
  • [–] 34 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    we have assumed that Rex is comprised of a uniform nucleon fluid, with protons, neutrons and electrons in an idealised 1:8:1 ratio

    This is how the author is estimating it, they are assuming 1/9th of the mass is protons. No idea how good that assumption is though, there is a source which doesn't look the most convincing

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Whoopsie. I used to assume neutron stars are made of neutrons. It turns out Big Astronomy lied to me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

    Neutron stars have so high pressure that MOST but not all protons decay into neutrons plus electrons positrons (plus neutrinos)

    Edit: (see quote below)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    I'm not exactly well-read on particle physics, but to my understanding neutrons and neutrinos are neutrally charged and electrons are negatively charged. Why does a proton break down into net-negatively charged particles? I assume some weird quark shenanigans.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    https://abc.lbl.gov/wallchart/chapters/03/2.html

    I got stuff mixed

    In beta minus decay, a neutron decays into a proton, an electron, and an antineutrino: n Æ p + e - +. In beta plus decay, a proton decays into a neutron, a positron, and a neutrino: p Æ n + e+ +n. Both reactions occur because in different regions of the Chart of the Nuclides, one or the other will move the product closer to the region of stability. These particular reactions take place because conservation laws are obeyed. Electric charge conservation requires that if an electrically neutral neutron becomes a positively charged proton, an electrically negative particle (in this case, an electron) must also be produced. Similarly, conservation of lepton number requires that if a neutron (lepton number = 0) decays into a proton (lepton number = 0) and an electron (lepton number = 1), a particle with a lepton number of -1 (in this case an antineutrino) must also be produced. The leptons emitted in beta decay did not exist in the nucleus before the decay–they are created at the instant of the decay.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 123 points 1 year ago (7 children)
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I've never seen a reverse-Saddam and I am delighted to say that I'm glad it was in this community.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 54 points 1 year ago

    "It is a truth universally acknowledged that no physics problem is complete unless some major component of reality is excluded to simplify the numbers."

    I'll save this quote for my students. Amazing.

  • source
  • [–] 41 points 1 year ago* (5 children)

    Are they elements? 🤨

    Personally, I think it's high time we went back to just 4 of 'em. Earth, Wind, Water, Fire. It's so much easier to remember them all.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Do they have protons or only neutrons? because if there are no protons then it is technically just neutronium and not an element,

    If they do have protons, then it is safe to assume it is a ridiculous number like 10^40. in which case I would count it as an element. And given how unlikely is for 2 neutron stars to share the number of protons, then every single neutron star is its own element,

    And also, because they do not react with other atom, and if 2 collide then they merge their nucleus, we can agree that they are non reactive, and therefore we can consider them noble gasses…

    Wait, are they gas?

    YES, they are, if there is a single atom floating in space I think that counts as a gas

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 26 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    (not to scale) is my favorite part

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago* (6 children)

    Do they have protons or only neutrons? because if there are no protons then it is technically just neutronium and not an element,

    If they do have protons, then it is safe to assume it is a ridiculous number like 10^40. in which case I would count it as an element. And given how unlikely is for 2 neutron stars to share the number of protons, then every single neutron star is its own element,

    And also, because they do not react with other atom, and if 2 collide then they merge their nucleus, we can agree that they are non reactive, and therefore we can consider them noble gasses...

    Wait, are they gas?

    YES, they are, if there is a single atom floating in space I think that counts as a gas

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    I would argue that, since they lack an electron cloud and are comprised of a collection of free-floating nuclei, they are actually a plasma.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    can we say that neuron stars are ions?

    wait, are neuton stars positively charged?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Well, we can't call them atoms, which are defined by the presence of an electron cloud surrounding a nucleus.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    When will NASA finally approve my mission to send an electron cloud to a neuton star to force schools to print a periodic tables to include a neutron star.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago

    Astronomical levels of snark

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago

    A representation of a binuclear compound of element 10^(56) with an average bond length of 100 quintillion angstroms.

    Okay that was funny.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago

    Okay this is good

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    Hum... The width of each row increases exponentially with their number.

    It's probably just some ~1m away from the small elements. At least on the vertical.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The width of each row increases exponentially with their number.

    Doesn't it only increase quadratically?

    Since surface area of a sphere grows quadratically with radius ...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    The number of solutions to the Schrodinger equation of the atom increases exponentially with the main quantum number.

    Our current periodic table is already huge. People break the last lines down into a set of disjoint lines that have about the same width as the main table.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Shouldn't they be element 0 as they dont have any protons?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 9 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    Neutron stars do contain protons and electrons. It’s a misconception that they’re 100% pure neutrons.

    A well-known type of neutron star is a pulsar. These rotating objects have extremely powerful magnetic fields which can only be produced by the movement of electric charges. If they were purely made of neutrons there could be no electric charges to move, and thus no magnetic fields.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago*

    No, seriously, stuff like electron metal and strange matter.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    If we were to expand the periodic table to include them. would the poster fit within the planet? solar system?universe?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Would neutron stars "decay" into black holes? and would that be its own element with even higher atomic number?

  • source