This is useful for those trying to convey more precisely the amount of fucks they give.
post
And relative fucks
Nice try but no proof yet if the fuckery field is irrational.
Oh, there's definitely irrational fucks. I don't see a proof that there's indeed a fuckomorphism between C and F, though.
Nah, just look at the folks over in HR. Irrational fucks to a person. Though I suppose all that means is that there are some irrational elements in the set, not necessarily that it's isomorphic to the field of complex numbers. So can we diagonalize fuckery somehow...?
Here, I gotchu:
The phrase "you stupid fuck" Implies the existence of irrational fucks.
So what’s their opinion on the holy fuck?
There are definitely positive and negative fucks
What in the fucking fuck?! is a good one, too. Has some real what in tarnation? energy to it.
I also learned that FUCKING GOD!! is my go-to expletive when I spilled some icecream and my daughter (3 at the time) started yelling it in the car.
No prove of irrational fucks yet tho
Ok, everyone but me seems to get it, so I'll ask. I get everything but the last bit. What does "isomorphic with the complex field" mean? I think I know what isomorphic means from some dabbling I've done in category theory.
In means you can map every element bijectively to one from the complex field AND addition and multiplication can be performed in either field without leading to contractions, i.e. a+b=c <=> f(a)+f(b)=f(a+b)=f(c) and equivalent for multiplication. This is the part that the meme fails to consider, because nowhere is addition or multiplication for this novel field defined.
I'll give this some attention when time permits because this does not make things clearer, lol.
I'll start with what a field is and a complex field 🤞
ELI5: it means that for every number there's a matching fuck and vice versa.
"i do not give a single fuck" implies an additive identity fuck, and "I don't give two fucks" implies a multiplicative identity fuck. That's a start at least!
Holy fuck?
Which implies the existence of a non god affected fucks.
Given the overwhelming prevalence of holy fucks relative to damned fucks, does this suggest sanctified beings get laid more?
Must be a reference to the space of topological fucks. I believe this one is equivalent to the torus.
Fucks can also have a social hierarchy, as evidenced by the phrase:
"I don't give a single solitary fuck"
What the uncomputable fuck
fucking fucks implies fucks are procreating.
I actually tend to treat fucks like the constant C in calculus. Ideally it should cancel out entirely and you should give the minimal amount of fucks in all of your final answers.
I see this comment section is full of various operations defined on fuckery. I don't think they form a field or even a ringi
The real question is - is fuck Turing-complete?
It's actually a beautiful language for arguing about computability because of how similar it is to a theoretical turning machine in that it possesses a read/write head that can move left and right on an infinite band. It's also incredibly simple to simulate using any other language of choice, including assembly and heck, even raw logic gates.
In this essay I will explain why Brainfuck should be the first language taught to computer science majors.
Well that's fucked...
So what's fuck fuckity fuck fuck fuck?
If you'd like to hear about the versatility of the word 'fuck' click and enjoy some Wildhearts at the same time :)
You may want to skip the last minute...on the original cd it was waaay longer!
Doesn't entire fuck imply it's finite?
And even if it's not a finite set, there is nothing that says if it's countably or uncountably infinite.
I just realised it could also mean the entirety of a set with an infinite cardinality.
But we don't have enough evidence to conclude the cardinality of fuckery. And if the cardinality is not the same, there can't be a bijection and therefore also no isomorphism between two groups.
An "entire" fiction is analytic at all points on the complex plane, so by Liouville's boundedness theorem, it is either constant or unbounded. I think we can agree that this fuck function isn't constant, so it must be unbounded. It is also continuous, thus infinite.
Fraction, negatives and an imaginary component don't imply the existence of irrational numbers, which are a required part of complex numbers as we know them.
Well if you give a single fuck about one thing and an imaginary fuck about something else, then you give ✓2 absolute fucks.
Hmm. I think we might be able to get there by combining a fucking jerk with a unit circle jerk. This should result in pi fucking jerks. Now just divide by jerk and we have an irrational amount of fucks.
Most fucks are some kind frictional, not fractional.
Some uncle knows about negative fuck ;c
Yet most imaginary fucks are positive.
all 61 comments