"Customers don't want it" is surprisingly difficult to understand for a lot of companies nowadays. Vivaldi must be run by some sort of language genius.
post
Tetzchner says the company asked its users whether they wanted added AI features, and the response was “no.”
Revolutionary technique, asking if anyone wants a feature before you go all-in on it.
Vivaldis not bad. Good for work where you need different profiles; not crazy resource intensive
I'm on librewolf just now having used vivaldi for about three years as my daily. Great browser, I just fancied swapping the chromium problems for gecko problems for a while :D
And for people like me with a problem closing tabs, the memory management is excellent, killing off anything that hasn't been used in a while.
You can do that in Firefox too tbf
It's my secondary browser. Pretty much just for HDR on YouTube. Firefox still can't do it.
Yeah, it's a good Chromium browser. I used it for a few years before switching to Firefox browsers. If you have to use Chromium, I'd recommend it. If you can though Firefox has been far more enjoyable (I'm using Zen currently).
Idk about not resource intensive but it does browser things happily.
It's good for work when a woork-related website won't accept a Gecko-based browser.
I'm not switching to Vivaldi, but it is refreshing to see someone say "I didn't put X in the product because people don't want X in the product."
Build Vivaldi on top of Firefox rather than Chrome, and I'm in.
Just use Firefox. It doesn't have any AI built into it as far as I'm aware.
Its got a whole panel that pops open when you click the button in upper left corner under the tabs.
Unfortunately, vanilla Firefox does have AI built-in, as well as a lot of other garbage. Librewolf is a fork that strips out all that junk, and it bundles in some cool security features as well.
But apparently Vivaldi is good, too.

also, yall stop saying firefox sucks because all web browsers capable of the bloated standards are de facto corporate controlled
This ai stuff is like the new clippy the paperclip, GTFO of my phone.
I don't want features just rolled out without my consent.
Long term I will have to install custom roms and get bank cards from my bank again thanks to AI.
I hate the fact that it's so hard to buy an android phone without it coming with a load of proprietary apps that I can't remove. If I want their casino shit, their stupid health apps, whatever - I'll download it myself. Being unable to uninstall it really pisses me off. I'm pretty sure it's practically malware. And the AI shit is just as bad - phone I'm on now came with at least 3 different AI apps for whatever. I did actually manage to remove two, but they keep trying to reinstall, could be hiding behind my launcher. And I bought this phone 2 years ago, I can only imagine it's even harder to get away from these days.
Maybe I'm out of touch, but I think most people just want an operating system and the opportunity to install what they want on it.
I mean, much of it meets all the criteria to be called malware, so it is "walking like a duck" and "quacking like a duck".
All that bloat is typically cross-marketing agreements made with the makers of those apps to subsidize the phone's cost without user consent. The part that I find weird is that there have been almost no marketing trials from major players testing the waters to see how much of a market there is for the same products that are not subsidized in this way, available at "full price". Maybe they're afraid that would draw too much attention to how atrocious the existing offerings are by comparison. It might put the privacy discussion more into the public discourse, which could be bad for their "business model".
Yeah, agreed. My suspicion is that the major players have considered this and decided that the value of the customer data they gain from their bullshit malware apps is more than they would make by selling a clean phone, even at premium prices. I don't know how the numbers break down, but I'm sure they do and they are probably right. Maybe most people would rather have a cheap phone full of tacky bullshit. It would be nice to have the choice tho!
One of the happy accidents that has come from American technofascism is this rennaisance of open-source programming and development and a renewed interest in digital sovereignty. People have been building alternatives to what the tech oligarchs have been cramming down our throats, and it's not only more secure and more functional, it's getting more and more accessible to the public.
Take Graphene and PostmarketOS for instance. They're both extremely easy to install on the right hardware. I haven't had any complaints yet! :)
I bought a Pixel 9A and a Pixel tablet and installed Graphene because I wanted control over my own device, no unnecessary spyware apps and no forced AI and the ability to just install what I want and both have been great. Everything I've needed has basically just worked (a couple of apps required me to change a setting) but there's a few major outliers to that 'it just works' that fortunately I don't need - like the VW app. I was shocked at how easy it was to install and by Lemmy standards I'm not very tech savvy (although I had an issue with a Linux update on my computer last night and was able to get it working again, so by normal people standards I'm a hacker lol).
Right now it's fantastic but I worry Google's crackdown on "sideloading" is going to hinder that open source adoption - anyone who has already done so is probably going to be less squeamish about a couple extra steps and whatever bullshit warnings Google throws at them but for new normies I worry they're more likely to be scared off. It's also a sign Google is going to take more steps to fight our rebellion - I did just find out the Pixel 11 will be getting Graphene so I was going to say that's another Google attack but good news on that one, initially they thought it wasn't going to be possible.
How's Postmarket compare to Graphene? I went with Graphene because fewer development targets are usually a good thing for the end user, but that tablet end of support is closer than I'd like...
It's hard to convince me to switch away from Firefox, but Vivaldi doesn't seem like a horrible choice if you need Chromium for WebUSB or something.
If you really need Chromium ... just use Chromium?
yeah, ungoogled chromium is boss
Vanadium appreciates the mention.
Vivaldi is pretty nice though
I really hope Vivaldi stays good. It's basically the only browser I'm considering usable. I'll make do with something else in a pinch, but surfing the web without Vivaldi is like not having a hand.
I'm using it for stuff that doesn't work without Chromium (like a translation tool that doesn't break SPA forms) but yeah not being able to use my custom adblockers concerns me.
Waterfox is better, it’s open source, not based on chromium and has a split DNS resolution path through their own servers and cloudlfare. A few tweaks in about:config and it’s by far the best option out there.
What are some of your about:config tweaks?
There are several, depending on your level of paranoia, you may want to only change a few or go deep into the rabbit hole. Basically when you install waterfox, you should first check the regular settings, for example, strict enhanced traffic protection in the privacy and security tab is a good start, there are more in other tabs that you can navigate quite easily and are pretty straightforward.
In about:config, one of the most important is geo.enabled, this one should definitely be set to false, it’s even recommended on the arch Linux wiki. You can also set both privacy.fingerprintingProtection and privacy.resistFingerprinting to true (the second one will, among other things, set your local clock static at UTC 0, so the payload you send out will always show UTC timezone, wherever you are). However, keep in mind that the second one will also break some websites that you’ll visit as well as slowing down your browsing experience a bit.
In the end it’s always a trade off between privacy and convenience, so you can explore and see the config that works best for your particular case.
And it's also free of AI.
Would give it a try if it wasn't proprietary.
A good ol' browser war in the comments to get the day started :/
I'd use Vivaldi if it wasn't chrorium and closed source, sadly it's such a turn off
The UI layer is the only part that's closed source. Vivaldi's UI is also one of the main reasons people use it.
Isn't Vivaldi largely open source?
the devs like to pretend that it is and say how only a small part of it is proprietary, but it's a deceptive PR stunt because they're counting the whole chromium source into that statistic. if we don't consider the chromium source they didn't write, their own vivaldi code is largely proprietary.
regardless, a program consisting of 99.9% free code and 0.1% proprietary code is proprietary as a whole - you can't audit, modify or redistribute copies of it as long as any non-free code is present.
I kinda find this idea cool like theres other browsers like Firefox that makes AI optional to choose
My husband has a lot of nostalgia for opera (long story, don't ask) but some of the dubious connections there made them a non-option for us as we got more into internet privacy. He was super happy when I switched him over to Vivaldi.
I was an Opera user for a decade. I think their designers left to start Vivaldi.
I never heard that connection but I do know it was sort of intended as a spiritual successor to opera, so if true, that would make a LOT of sense
That's correct. They wanted to build Opera the way it could have been if different choices were made. I think they built something really good.
I've tried Vivaldi before in the past and it's UI and cluttered interface turned me way off. I've got my own concerns about it still that hasn't made me jump to it. That being, it relies on the Chrome Web Store to install extensions. If Google themselves decided not to have something on that store and you're using it on Vivaldi, well you're SOL.
That's an advantage for Firefox, that has its own extensions. Some of us are stuck with Firefox despite their interestingly bad choices and historical lack of fulfilling promises on their own behalf. There are still key advantages with Firefox than most browsers.
And even if some of us are tired of Firefox anyway, we've got its forks to use.
I’m the inverse. The amount of customization and power user features are what makes it my daily driver, though I agree the reliance on Google isn’t good. Also having their sync data stored e2e encrypted with my own private key is a nice touch. Though if a heavily customizable fork of Firefox with features like that was available I’d likely switch. I don’t have the time to maintain a highly customized userchrome.css that could break with every update, unfortunately
It's been a long time since I used Vivaldi, but I find Zen browser fits what I remember of Vivaldi.
Just like the other person, I used Vivaldi for several years, but then switched to Firefox. Zen is my current browser, and it seems to fit into the place Vivaldi had pretty comfortably. It's not identical, but it has a similar niche.
just as "most users" don't want ai baked into their browser, "most users" probably don't use any addons, or use only one--an adblocker. ad blocking (with configurable filter lists) is built into vivaldi already, no separate addon needed. works well-enough.
that said, the chromium base and its dependency on google to provide the 'addon store' is vivaldi's main detractor, because google has been putting the screws to anything that threatens their business as a data harvesting advertising company.
vivaldi does have some features not found in other browsers or other chromium browsers (excepting some in common with opera). the one i appreciate the most is the configurable toolbars, both items and their positions.. similar to how you can configure firefox's main toolbar.
i do occasionally need a chromium browser for specific tasks. vivaldi is the one i use. usually as a 'portable' installation that is easiest to trash when i'm done. it's also the one i use for a couple streaming sites because it does use chrome addons (but also is not chrome, either).
Does it still have built in mouse gestures? Opera was the first one to have them decades ago and I got so used to it I need addons for that now...
Some of us are stuck with Firefox despite their interestingly bad choices and historical lack of fulfilling promises on their own behalf. There are still key advantages with Firefox than most browsers.
That's why I use Librewolf/Ironfox on my laptop/phone. All the benefits of Firefox and none of the half-baked promises or bad decisions!
I feel like I could have written this comment word for word. But luckily you already did so now I only have to write this short one.
got rid of it after i realised its more work to disable every new feature that just gets in the way.
That being, it relies on the Chrome Web Store to install extensions. If Google themselves decided not to have something on that store and you’re using it on Vivaldi, well you’re SOL.
Note you can sideload extensions essentially. Google's been fine afaik, but if they did suddenly go crazy it wouldn't be that hard for Vivaldi and other chromium browsers to run their own store.
top 100 comments