Jon von Tetzchner, CEO and founder of Vivaldi Technologies, refuses to integrate AI features in its browser and wants human engineers, not AI, to write its code.

top 100 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 199 points 1 day ago (13 children)

"Customers don't want it" is surprisingly difficult to understand for a lot of companies nowadays. Vivaldi must be run by some sort of language genius.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 56 points 1 day ago (11 children)

    It's a private compnay, they don't have to follow shareholders so it explains it

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 day ago (9 children)

    Methinks shareholders should somehow be concerned what end users want.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 day ago (6 children)

    They are only concerned about money

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago (5 children)
  • [–] 2 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

    Yeah but they are usually not that smart, they only think in short term than long term

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 22 hours ago*

    It's really dumb but it holds true. I work for a company that profits tens of millions per year, and we're owned by one guy. I've worked at places that are owned by hedge funds or giant corporations like GE and you can just tell the difference. Here I've been told that if the shop needs something, it's basically a blank check. The owner gave everyone in the company a $3 raise last year, and we get a 10% bonus of your salary annually as a profit sharing initiative. Annual raises are good, wages are excellent, benefits are some of the best in the country and they do everything they can to keep them as a low cost. We just happen to manufacture things that nobody else in the country does.

    Compared to other other more typical companies it's really night and day. I used to get a 3% annual raise and a "I can't get you more even though I want to". And some of the shittiest health insurance imaginable. My coworker broke his foot and they wouldn't wait on him until he saw a specialist like wtf he literally just needed a cast

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 90 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    Tetzchner says the company asked its users whether they wanted added AI features, and the response was “no.”

    Revolutionary technique, asking if anyone wants a feature before you go all-in on it.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 89 points 1 day ago (12 children)

    Vivaldis not bad. Good for work where you need different profiles; not crazy resource intensive

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 1 day ago (4 children)

    And for people like me with a problem closing tabs, the memory management is excellent, killing off anything that hasn't been used in a while.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 10 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    You can do that in Firefox too tbf

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    It's my secondary browser. Pretty much just for HDR on YouTube. Firefox still can't do it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 10 points 1 day ago

    Yeah, it's a good Chromium browser. I used it for a few years before switching to Firefox browsers. If you have to use Chromium, I'd recommend it. If you can though Firefox has been far more enjoyable (I'm using Zen currently).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 68 points 1 day ago

    I'm not switching to Vivaldi, but it is refreshing to see someone say "I didn't put X in the product because people don't want X in the product."

  • source
  • [–] 37 points 1 day ago (6 children)

    Build Vivaldi on top of Firefox rather than Chrome, and I'm in.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] -8 points 23 hours ago (5 children)

    Just use Firefox. It doesn't have any AI built into it as far as I'm aware.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

    Its got a whole panel that pops open when you click the button in upper left corner under the tabs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 18 hours ago*

    Unfortunately, vanilla Firefox does have AI built-in, as well as a lot of other garbage. Librewolf is a fork that strips out all that junk, and it bundles in some cool security features as well.

    But apparently Vivaldi is good, too.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 30 points 21 hours ago*

    "it turns out the public hates the culture of corporate greed; let's figure out how to monetize that hate"

    also, yall stop saying firefox sucks because all web browsers capable of the bloated standards are de facto corporate controlled

  • source
  • [–] 24 points 1 day ago (5 children)

    This ai stuff is like the new clippy the paperclip, GTFO of my phone.

    I don't want features just rolled out without my consent.

    Long term I will have to install custom roms and get bank cards from my bank again thanks to AI.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 23 hours ago (4 children)

    I hate the fact that it's so hard to buy an android phone without it coming with a load of proprietary apps that I can't remove. If I want their casino shit, their stupid health apps, whatever - I'll download it myself. Being unable to uninstall it really pisses me off. I'm pretty sure it's practically malware. And the AI shit is just as bad - phone I'm on now came with at least 3 different AI apps for whatever. I did actually manage to remove two, but they keep trying to reinstall, could be hiding behind my launcher. And I bought this phone 2 years ago, I can only imagine it's even harder to get away from these days.

    Maybe I'm out of touch, but I think most people just want an operating system and the opportunity to install what they want on it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 21 hours ago* (1 child)

    I mean, much of it meets all the criteria to be called malware, so it is "walking like a duck" and "quacking like a duck".

    All that bloat is typically cross-marketing agreements made with the makers of those apps to subsidize the phone's cost without user consent. The part that I find weird is that there have been almost no marketing trials from major players testing the waters to see how much of a market there is for the same products that are not subsidized in this way, available at "full price". Maybe they're afraid that would draw too much attention to how atrocious the existing offerings are by comparison. It might put the privacy discussion more into the public discourse, which could be bad for their "business model".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 20 hours ago

    Yeah, agreed. My suspicion is that the major players have considered this and decided that the value of the customer data they gain from their bullshit malware apps is more than they would make by selling a clean phone, even at premium prices. I don't know how the numbers break down, but I'm sure they do and they are probably right. Maybe most people would rather have a cheap phone full of tacky bullshit. It would be nice to have the choice tho!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 18 hours ago (1 child)

    One of the happy accidents that has come from American technofascism is this rennaisance of open-source programming and development and a renewed interest in digital sovereignty. People have been building alternatives to what the tech oligarchs have been cramming down our throats, and it's not only more secure and more functional, it's getting more and more accessible to the public.

    Take Graphene and PostmarketOS for instance. They're both extremely easy to install on the right hardware. I haven't had any complaints yet! :)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • I bought a Pixel 9A and a Pixel tablet and installed Graphene because I wanted control over my own device, no unnecessary spyware apps and no forced AI and the ability to just install what I want and both have been great. Everything I've needed has basically just worked (a couple of apps required me to change a setting) but there's a few major outliers to that 'it just works' that fortunately I don't need - like the VW app. I was shocked at how easy it was to install and by Lemmy standards I'm not very tech savvy (although I had an issue with a Linux update on my computer last night and was able to get it working again, so by normal people standards I'm a hacker lol).

    Right now it's fantastic but I worry Google's crackdown on "sideloading" is going to hinder that open source adoption - anyone who has already done so is probably going to be less squeamish about a couple extra steps and whatever bullshit warnings Google throws at them but for new normies I worry they're more likely to be scared off. It's also a sign Google is going to take more steps to fight our rebellion - I did just find out the Pixel 11 will be getting Graphene so I was going to say that's another Google attack but good news on that one, initially they thought it wasn't going to be possible.

    How's Postmarket compare to Graphene? I went with Graphene because fewer development targets are usually a good thing for the end user, but that tablet end of support is closer than I'd like...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 21 points 1 day ago* (8 children)

    It's hard to convince me to switch away from Firefox, but Vivaldi doesn't seem like a horrible choice if you need Chromium for WebUSB or something.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago (7 children)

    If you really need Chromium ... just use Chromium?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    yeah, ungoogled chromium is boss

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 day ago (10 children)

    I really hope Vivaldi stays good. It's basically the only browser I'm considering usable. I'll make do with something else in a pinch, but surfing the web without Vivaldi is like not having a hand.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 day ago (7 children)

    Waterfox is better, it’s open source, not based on chromium and has a split DNS resolution path through their own servers and cloudlfare. A few tweaks in about:config and it’s by far the best option out there.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    What are some of your about:config tweaks?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 21 hours ago (1 child)

    There are several, depending on your level of paranoia, you may want to only change a few or go deep into the rabbit hole. Basically when you install waterfox, you should first check the regular settings, for example, strict enhanced traffic protection in the privacy and security tab is a good start, there are more in other tabs that you can navigate quite easily and are pretty straightforward.

    In about:config, one of the most important is geo.enabled, this one should definitely be set to false, it’s even recommended on the arch Linux wiki. You can also set both privacy.fingerprintingProtection and privacy.resistFingerprinting to true (the second one will, among other things, set your local clock static at UTC 0, so the payload you send out will always show UTC timezone, wherever you are). However, keep in mind that the second one will also break some websites that you’ll visit as well as slowing down your browsing experience a bit.

    In the end it’s always a trade off between privacy and convenience, so you can explore and see the config that works best for your particular case.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 17 points 1 day ago

    adult person right here. true G.

  • source
  • [–] 28 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    Would give it a try if it wasn't proprietary.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    A good ol' browser war in the comments to get the day started :/

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 41 points 1 day ago* (5 children)

    I'd use Vivaldi if it wasn't chrorium and closed source, sadly it's such a turn off

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 19 hours ago (1 child)

    Isn't Vivaldi largely open source?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 12 hours ago

    the devs like to pretend that it is and say how only a small part of it is proprietary, but it's a deceptive PR stunt because they're counting the whole chromium source into that statistic. if we don't consider the chromium source they didn't write, their own vivaldi code is largely proprietary.

    regardless, a program consisting of 99.9% free code and 0.1% proprietary code is proprietary as a whole - you can't audit, modify or redistribute copies of it as long as any non-free code is present.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 8 points 18 hours ago

    I kinda find this idea cool like theres other browsers like Firefox that makes AI optional to choose

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 day ago (6 children)

    My husband has a lot of nostalgia for opera (long story, don't ask) but some of the dubious connections there made them a non-option for us as we got more into internet privacy. He was super happy when I switched him over to Vivaldi.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (4 children)

    I was an Opera user for a decade. I think their designers left to start Vivaldi.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    I never heard that connection but I do know it was sort of intended as a spiritual successor to opera, so if true, that would make a LOT of sense

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 47 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (13 children)

    I've tried Vivaldi before in the past and it's UI and cluttered interface turned me way off. I've got my own concerns about it still that hasn't made me jump to it. That being, it relies on the Chrome Web Store to install extensions. If Google themselves decided not to have something on that store and you're using it on Vivaldi, well you're SOL.

    That's an advantage for Firefox, that has its own extensions. Some of us are stuck with Firefox despite their interestingly bad choices and historical lack of fulfilling promises on their own behalf. There are still key advantages with Firefox than most browsers.

    And even if some of us are tired of Firefox anyway, we've got its forks to use.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    I’m the inverse. The amount of customization and power user features are what makes it my daily driver, though I agree the reliance on Google isn’t good. Also having their sync data stored e2e encrypted with my own private key is a nice touch. Though if a heavily customizable fork of Firefox with features like that was available I’d likely switch. I don’t have the time to maintain a highly customized userchrome.css that could break with every update, unfortunately

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago

    Just like the other person, I used Vivaldi for several years, but then switched to Firefox. Zen is my current browser, and it seems to fit into the place Vivaldi had pretty comfortably. It's not identical, but it has a similar niche.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

    just as "most users" don't want ai baked into their browser, "most users" probably don't use any addons, or use only one--an adblocker. ad blocking (with configurable filter lists) is built into vivaldi already, no separate addon needed. works well-enough.

    that said, the chromium base and its dependency on google to provide the 'addon store' is vivaldi's main detractor, because google has been putting the screws to anything that threatens their business as a data harvesting advertising company.

    vivaldi does have some features not found in other browsers or other chromium browsers (excepting some in common with opera). the one i appreciate the most is the configurable toolbars, both items and their positions.. similar to how you can configure firefox's main toolbar.

    i do occasionally need a chromium browser for specific tasks. vivaldi is the one i use. usually as a 'portable' installation that is easiest to trash when i'm done. it's also the one i use for a couple streaming sites because it does use chrome addons (but also is not chrome, either).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 19 hours ago (2 children)

    Does it still have built in mouse gestures? Opera was the first one to have them decades ago and I got so used to it I need addons for that now...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 day ago

    Some of us are stuck with Firefox despite their interestingly bad choices and historical lack of fulfilling promises on their own behalf. There are still key advantages with Firefox than most browsers.

    That's why I use Librewolf/Ironfox on my laptop/phone. All the benefits of Firefox and none of the half-baked promises or bad decisions!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    That being, it relies on the Chrome Web Store to install extensions. If Google themselves decided not to have something on that store and you’re using it on Vivaldi, well you’re SOL.

    Note you can sideload extensions essentially. Google's been fine afaik, but if they did suddenly go crazy it wouldn't be that hard for Vivaldi and other chromium browsers to run their own store.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›