Ol' George there looks a healthy 45. Wonder which brand of cigarettes his doctor prescribed

I think the diiference is cigarettes, everywhere, all the time in the 1960s

Tom Holland is playing a college kid, George Lazenby a 40 year old James Bond.

oh fuck.

given the complete different style of action. one acrobatic twink, other is guns. though a better comparison is with Jon Bernthal.. and they look similar. but Jon is 50 years old!!!!

Lighting helps.

Not this crap again.

Dustin Hoffman was 30 years old in The Graduate (1967). Sean Connery looked like he could've been 30 in his high school yearbook photo. There have always been baby-faced actors, and actors who look older than their age. We could just as easily compare Dick van Dyke at age 30 in 1955 with Bill Skarsgård at age 30 in 2021, and reach similar conclusions about the effects of, say, highly-processed food and microplastics.

They should study this. It should be pretty cheap since you only need to study one person from each era to draw conclusions about whole generations. This is how science and reason work. 🙃

Look at old tar teeth.

Another note, Tom Holland looks almost childlike for your average 29 year old. Really not a good sample for that age group.

different people are different. how odd.

Fleming's James Bond character was in his 40s. It's the character.

Edit: I confused my actors lmao I thought this was Gregory Peck.

Damn the ‘60s were rough on people

Thomas Brodie-Sangster: hold my juice box..I mean beer

It’s almost like a generation brought up on alcohol and cigarettes age quicker !

I get this is just a shitpost but what is it trying to say? Should I be worried that one guy looks younger than the other? Mad? Sad? Happy?