GTA 6 will launch on PC just a few months after consoles, according to a new report.

all 34 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 42 points 4 weeks ago (4 children)

Fuck GTA6 and it's publisher/developer. They treat their employees like absolute shit.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    So fuck the work product of the same employees you defend?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 3 weeks ago

    Again, the one and only response to this strawman is always: Employees already got paid.

    No one who developed GTA6 will get a single cent or recognition from any sales of this game. All the money and accolades for the game will be collected and hoarded by individuals who didn't have anything to do with the development.

    You can appreciate the art that went into the work by individuals, while also acknowledging that it was made by a soul sucking and horrendous corporation.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 37 points 4 weeks ago (6 children)

    This is a very quick turnaround for modern Rockstar games, but it's also a reflection of how things have changed. PC is a bigger percentage of the market than it ever has been before, PlayStation + Xbox combined is smaller than it was for the previous two generations, and even if Rockstar previously expected GTA6 to be responsible for tens of millions of consoles sold, shortages in the wake of the AI bubble now make that somewhere between improbable and impossible.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

    I doubt that's why. People literally bought out PS5's after the gameplay reveal. I think the reason they are speeding things up is due to the fact that slop machines allowed massive progress in emulation, which more than likely is going to allow PC players to play GTA 6 without waiting for Rockstar and they hate that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

    I don't think a development that happened in the last few weeks has sped up a massive ship like Rockstar. Console sales reports are on a lag, but August was a decade+ low point for hardware sales due to how expensive they are, so the addressable market is still looking likely to be far lower than what Rockstar's last two games had. Another good point that GamesBeat raised (solely conjecture, of course) is that the business of the online mode is different this time around. Roleplay servers are a big part of the appeal of GTAV, and on PC, that means people are enjoying that for free with no exposure to microtransactions on private servers. Rockstar hired those modders to roll that functionality into all versions of GTA6 Online this time around (this part isn't conjecture), and there are a lot of opportunities to pull in those PC customers from the jump. In other words, they probably care less about people double dipping when the box price of the game pales compared to GTA Online money.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    I do find it really odds that they're not releasing GTA online 2 or whatever they end up calling it at the same time as the GTA 6 release.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 3 weeks ago

    They didn't for GTA5 or RDR2 either. I suspect there are a lot of reasons for that; more time to test the server infrastructure, time for people to play through the campaign without rushing so that it gets its time in the spotlight, and time for people to acquire the game and form a critical mass of players online. All guesses, but that's what I've got.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 4 weeks ago

    Also PS5 emulation is advancing at an astonishing rate. That has to be making them a little concerned. Last night I watched someone play through the Demon Souls remake on PC. There were some audio issues and stuttering here and there but it was very playable.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 36 points 3 weeks ago

    I can't wait to not buy it.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 4 weeks ago

    Believe it when I see it.

    Then I'll proceed to wait and not pay full price. So I'll probably be waiting years to play it anyway.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 4 weeks ago (5 children)

    Is this source reputable? I've seen a lot of articles about a Red Dead 2 remaster as well

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

    It's IGN, the most major gaming publication, so I would consider it trustworthy

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

    I will still be knee deep in Fire Emblem, OoT Remake, Final Fantasy VII Revelation, Castlevania Belmont’s Curse, Fable, and Persona 4.

    There is just no time for GTA6.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    I wait for the Ocarina of Time Remake to be playable on PC, either by emulation (preferably, but might take a while) or by recompilation. Other than that, Final Fantasy 7 Remake series is my only must have (but not day one, games are just too expensive for me for that). Castlevania Belmont's Curse and Fable can wait for a deep discount.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    You are nuts to sleep on Castlevania. It’s $30! Much cheaper and it’ll be free.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

    I'm not, that's why I wait for a discount and just don't have time for it. I probably have currently 7 or 8 games "open" (in the sense of in gameplay progress, not running them at the same time) that I can't justify buying a game at launch right now.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 3 weeks ago

    And yet I still don't care.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 4 weeks ago

    I wonder if they were waiting until Maid Cafe Simulator came out on Steam, so they wouldn't be competing with that release window.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 weeks ago

    🏴‍☠️

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 4 weeks ago

    So much for Squadron 42 avoiding the buzz saw of GTA marketing.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago

    By the time it drops, we'll be playing vibe coded ports on a Commodore 64 powered by a lemon and a potato. They better hurry.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 4 weeks ago (2 children)
  • [–] 7 points 4 weeks ago (1 child)

    GamesBeat's sources say Q1 2027, so before April.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago

    We don't know if its just an estimation or leak of actual plans. Also the source being unknown (for good reason, I'm not saying we should know his identity), it makes it hard to trust. Also Rockstar has a track record of delaying after initial announcement. So I am not really confident in "before April" release period.

  • source
  • parent
  • 34 comments in c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca view that post
    [–] 47 points 4 weeks ago

    Rockstar can suck a dick.

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 4 weeks ago (8 children)

    I imagine the Anti Cheat they added to GTAV Online will be in GTAVI Online so I cant play. And even if they ship without the Anti Cheat, I imagine they will add it and block my ability to play. And with that insane price tag. Not worth the risk at all.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

    Isn't the anti-cheat only used on multiplayer? Singleplayer would be fine and honestly, after experiencing the hackers in GTA V's online mode, I'm really not interested in the same thing in the sequel.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 4 weeks ago

    Yes it is. Thats why I specifically said GTA Online was talking about it.

    GTAV Online wasnt so bad. I got alot of free money from them. And the odd lobby being fucked was a minor detail.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 4 weeks ago* (4 children)

    GTAO without some sort of protection was a total cesspool imo. And I’m not saying it’s magically perfect now.

    I wish there were better options.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 weeks ago (1 child)

    Wasnt so bad for me. Got lots of free money. The odd lobby would be fucked. But you could just switch to a new instance, or a private one if you were trying to do something. Not sure what its like now.

    Yeah P2P was a bad call. And Im sure they will make it again.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 3 weeks ago

    I tried it on Linux the other day. Every time I spawned into the world I was immediately killed (by the same account) after glitching weirdly. I assume it's an exploit.

    When I spawned myself into an "Invite Only" instance, since I was just wanting to play alone anyway, I was able to spawn but was then kicked out by Battleye after about 45 seconds.

    What a cluster.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 4 weeks ago (5 children)

    Few months, few years... Won't buy it anyway. It might boast many shiny tech achievements just as San Andreas and GTAV did (which will be great if it gives other devs ideas on how to better optimize their games) but not what I want from a game.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] -22 points 4 weeks ago (4 children)

    You don’t want to play the Project 2025 game?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

    I'm not getting it because it's rockstar, but I'm curious how it's connected to project 2025.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 4 weeks ago* (2 children)

    It isn't. That account seems to mostly exist for posting ragebait.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 4 weeks ago (1 child)

    That account seems to mostly exist for posting ragebait.

    Isn't this the definition of a troll? I don't understand why such accounts aren't getting banned then.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 4 weeks ago (1 child)

    Is this because that absolute king is threatening to release a playable PC source tree?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 4 weeks ago

    More than likely. PC ports of R* games don't usually come along for about a year and a half, and I've yet to see any evidence from that overpaid asshat that the company has suddenly found any amount of respect for the Master Race.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 4 weeks ago (5 children)

    I'm actually excited about GTA 6 on PC. Even though I have a Series S as a fallback, I prefer all games to be played on PC. But I won't buy it day one for full price, no game is worth that money.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

    I'm still waiting for gta5 on a deep discount, like $2 tops. I'm a very patient gamer

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 child)

    How much is it selling for day one?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 4 weeks ago

    https://store.rockstargames.com/game/buy-gta-vi - On PC we don't know (presumably the same as on consoles), but for consoles it will be 80 Euros / Dollars. And this is not even the full game (here called Standard Edition), because there are some stuff missing in this version, such access to some specific in game shops. For the full version (here called Ultimate Edition), it costs 100 Euros / Dollars.

    Obligatory "pre-order" rant: BTW I don't get who people pre-order a digital only game. I have some sympathy for discs and cartridge, because they can be sold out. But there are none for this game.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 4 weeks ago (4 children)

    In May, Zelnick told Bloomberg that Rockstar "always starts on console because I think with regard to a release like that you're judged by serving the core. Like really serving the core consumer. If your core consumer isn't there, if they're not served first and best, you kind of don't hit your other consumers.”

    Can someone translate that into English for me, because I can't understand it. It sounds like he's saying PC players aren't served if console players aren't served first, which doesn't make sense.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 weeks ago

    Translation:

    "Sony&Microsoft birbe us with lot of money to release on their console, because their console are worthless without birbed exclusives.

    Valve won't birbe us because they are still into that obsolete thing called... <>

    Ultimately Epic Games can't afford to biribe us"

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 3 weeks ago

    He's saying that he believes the core customer base - i.e. the people who will gladly throw money at Rockstar even if they send a literal box of horseshit to the players instead of the game they ordered - is on console.

    And he would be right based on past releases - GTA V has ~60% sales on PlayStation, ~38% on Xbox and ~2% on PC.

    Except... GTA V was also a PlayStation/Xbox exclusive on release, taking nearly two years for the PC release. ANYONE who wanted to play the game HAD to buy a console even if they had a perfectly working PC to use... And hardcore fans bought the console - most likely a PS4 - just to play GTA V.

    From there, survivorship bias kicks in and you get execs thinking all the next gen players are on console, so they further push for it. And GTA fans will go and buy console because they want to play the game on day 1.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 3 weeks ago

    This is likely out of fear of someone making a recomp of the game shortly after release.

    I bet they planned to release it a year later with extra features like they did in gta v.

    Now that recomps of ps5 games is possible, they are probably scrambling to polish off the PCs version.

    I’d bet it’s super buggy at launch and has high system requirements due to lack of optimization.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

    Can't wait to read all that whining about... anything, actually. I'm sure that would provide much more fun than the game itself.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 child)

    I bet most of the complaints will be how much it costs to upgrade to the recommended computer hardware level.

    I know that I'm not going to spend $2k to play it on PC.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 4 weeks ago

    I doubt it will have particularly high hardware requirements. It's built around base PS5 and even Xbox Series S, neither of which are very powerful systems compared to common PC gaming hardware.

    We're talking about RX 6700 or RTX 2080 levels of performance for PS5 (which can be found used for around €/$ 200 with a bit of luck) and RX 6500 to 6600 (XT) for an Xbox One S equivalent, which is a bit cheaper. CPU performance isn't even worth going into, since it's trivial to match and exceed with a PC, even on a very modest budget.

    This isn't just theoretical. I built a cheap PC around a used RTX 2080 a few years ago to match console performance (just in time for the Starfield release; I actually had a great time with this game) and it was pretty much spot-on with a bit of an advantage for the Nvidia GPU depending on the title - and with prices back then, I actually managed to build the entire PC for roughly the same price as a PS5 or Xbox Series X.

    Even if we aim for the PS5 Pro as a recommended target, we're talking RX 9060 XT and RTX 5060 Ti (16 GB versions), which can be found for less than 500 bucks with a bit of luck. Not cheap, but not outrageous money, especially if dropped into an affordable AM4 system. The rumored 30 FPS limit even on PS5 Pro is very likely due to a lack of CPU processing power, which isn't an issue on PC.

    Rockstar has every interest in the world to make this game run on as many PCs as possible, since GTA Online in particular is their main cash cow and they are hoping to convince as many players of GTA V Online to migrate over to the new game and buying as many Shark Cards as possible to speed up the grind again.

    For as much as one has every right to hate the company for its labor practices and how it's treating the gaming community, the studio is employing some incredibly talented programmers and artists who have been known to cleverly squeeze every last bit of visual fidelity and simulation complexity out of relatively limited hardware (apart from the abysmal GTA IV PC port, of course).

    This is speculation, of course. The PC port might be terrible, but I think after RDR2, this is unlikely.

    So, in short, you won't have to spend two grand on a PC to play it, even in today's crazy hardware world. Chances are, if you already have a somewhat decent PC, you might only need to upgrade it a little. What are your specs?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago

    $1400 PS5 steps into the room. Uh yeah we should release this on everything, anyone have the mobile version ready?

  • source