no comments (yet)

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here
48 comments in c/news@lemmy.world view that post
[–] 61 points 1 month ago (1 child)

Trust the woowoo people to have 0 consistency and even less math.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 46 points 1 month ago

    Minuscule amounts of toxic materials can evade the immune system & bio-accumulate to ill effect

  • source
  • [–] 40 points 1 month ago*

    Pretty soon the FDA will just grind "food" into white powder that can be snorted from toilet seats...for safety.

  • source
  • [–] 38 points 1 month ago

    Same motherfuckers who bitched about fluoride in water are gonna be perfectly fine with this.

  • source
  • [–] 33 points 4 weeks ago (1 child)

    America under every republican administration(also some neo-con democrats not trying to dismiss) have always prioritized business over voters.

    Fuck Reagan.

    Over turn citize United

    Release the Epstein files

    Hang all the traitors.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 25 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Why would you need to use perchlorate in a grain bag?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Search says it's an anti-static agent.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Thanks. I couldn’t find anything when I searched. I doubt this is the only chemical they could use for that. It’s always about money — like what’s cheapest, or what’s subsidized. Sad sad sad.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 22 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    Was the fall of Rome this quick?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Which one? Rome fell like five times before it was finally killed. The western Roman Empire, The Kingdom of the Romans in France, The Fourth Crusade, The Fall of Constantinople, and the conquest of Trebizond. Most of these were pretty quick and roughly comparable to the US if you start with Reagan.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Start with Reagan and we're at what point in history by comparison?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 4 weeks ago (1 child)

    Make America Hospitalized Again

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 18 points 1 month ago

    Read as: we’re already doing this and this is how we let you know

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 1 month ago

    toxic chemicals, it's what plants crave.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 1 month ago

    Having 1 food item per week turn out to be toxic/dangerous in some way is rookie numbers--soon enough we'll have daily food advisory warnings! You'll never eat safely again! 🥹

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago

    What the fuck even is America

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 4 weeks ago

    Damn, if I were living in the US, I'd start to seriously consider growing my own food, perhaps together with friends and family. It's getting worse and worse.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago

    But MAHA though right?

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 4 weeks ago

    They wouldn't want kids to have brain damage because then they would grow to be republicans - if they survived to adulthood I mean, without any vaccines.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Do they think they are somehow exempt from toxic food?

    Or is it that MAGA endtime brainworm yet again?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 4 weeks ago

    he will allow parasites to be acceptable in food soon.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago

    Republican eugenics.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago

    And that's supposed to make America healthy again?

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

    The US has been allowing toxic chemicals in food for decades that aren't legal in most of the world. Reading ingredient lists of US products is fucking horrifying, it absolutely has a major effect of most of the US population.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 weeks ago (1 child)

    Better to replace the scary words with E numbers, that makes them safe!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 4 weeks ago

    Things like lemon acid also has an E number. This lead to the conspiracy theory claiming lemon acid is a nazi invention, not made from lemons, and is named as such to both fool people believing it's natural and that lemon doesn't have "alkalizing" properties. Others just think higher E number equals more dangerous.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Those of us who are not american can read this. And you folks get angry when our governments, food organisations and consumers refuse to buy your food exports.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 weeks ago

    you folks get angry when our governments, food organisations and consumers refuse to buy your food

    Pundits and politicians sometimes make a fuss. Maybe some massively rich agribusiness jackasses are annoyed. I don't think very many real people get angry.

    You might say that this outrage is one of our inorganic exports.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 4 weeks ago

    It should be a rule that cabinet members of the government and leadership of oversight agencies are obligated to partake in the products. If they don't, they lose their job.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 4 weeks ago

    This article is a weird mix of fearmongering / pseudoscience and actual real concerns. I don't like that especially because I consider the Guardian to be a pretty good source, but a lot in this article makes me doubt their journalistic integrity.

    For example, they mention substances acting as fillers or binders - at 0.5 parts per billion. Anything with that little CANNOT by its very nature be a binder or filler. It would be as ridiculous as trying to say an ant on a highway was "speeding" or something like that.

    Also, when they talk about companies adding compounds/flavourings to food to basically make you want to eat more. While companies do want you to enjoy the food so that you want to eat more, that has absolutely nothing to do with the topic at hand.

    So, where are the legitimate concerns?

    For one, the TOR exception has been about substances that somehow manage to get into food during the process, but are not specifically added to food. This rule change basically allows for companies to specifically know substances are being added. For example, if you didn't read the article: Bags used to store/move grain in large amounts (hundreds of pounds) have coatings so the grain doesn't stick. But during loading/unloading, very very tiny bits of the coating can get into the grain - not enough to exceed 0.5ppb, but enough to be detected, and this may have some negtive health effects. That's not new, that was already happening and this rules change doesn't affect that. But it does mean that basically more things like that might happen.

    Also, the 0.5ppb science was established long enough ago that since then, we are figuring out that it may not be safe enough for all things - because longterm chemical exposure even at that tiny level can have effects, and also, some things just can have effects at even that small amount. The good news is that for most everything, that threshhold is sufficient. But the bad news is...... maybe not for everything.

    But I think what concerns me more than that actual possible harm here - which is real, but not huge - is the absolute fearmongering of the article. I'm extremely disappointed by that.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 child)

    This pic of RFK jr looks like some huckster trying to sell you a timeshare.

    What is a little brain damage among friends, I guess?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 4 weeks ago

    I'm pregnant... yay.... toxic chems for the baby!

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 4 weeks ago

    just make sure all of it is sent to kennedy's table

  • source
  • [–] 0 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

    What is up with the Guardian and initialisms? "FDA," "TOR," "BASF" and "EDF" are all caps, but "generally recognized as safe" is just "Gras" now? "Maha" instead of "MAHA?" I don't get it.

  • source
  • 11 comments in c/health@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 28 points 1 month ago

    Less than a year ago, this sort of thing was still called a "scandal", now it's just business as usual.

    https://www.foodnavigator.com/Article/2026/01/08/nestle-infant-formula-scandal-escalates/

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    I don’t get it. Doesn’t this poison them too, along with the plebs? Do they just not care?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    rich people eat chef prepared meals not proletarian kibble

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 4 weeks ago (1 child)

    The example of perchlorate in the grain bags is happening at the farm or at the mill level. That's going to wind up everywhere.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 4 weeks ago

    Hm, that's a good point. I guess the rich people aren't thinking about how bulk transport packaging materials are just as capable of leaching poison into their $17/lb. organic heirloom grains as they are into dollar store rice.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    The real reason for the announcement is because it is already in our food they were just letting you know they are okay with that. Also has other poster stated they don't eat same food we do. And Trump cares nothing for his base.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 4 weeks ago

    "The new proposed TOR expansion would allow companies to use the chemicals as an ingredient added directly to food, as flavorings, preservatives, emulsifiers, processing aids, enzymes, stabilizers and binders, and for myriad other uses, in ultra-processing."

    The rich eat good whole foods. They don't eat that stuff

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago

    That's nothing new. Just compare American and European versions of a number of food products, and you will find stuff in the American versions that are even illegal in China...

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 4 weeks ago

    Bring back yoga mat bread at Subway. It’s gone downhill since they took it out.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 4 weeks ago

    Red #5 is back, baby!

  • source
  • 11 comments in c/boycottus@lemmy.ca view that post
    [–] 17 points 4 weeks ago (1 child)

    Why in the fuck are we not banning american goods at this point.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 4 weeks ago* (1 child)

    Make America Healthy Again*

    *unless it harms corporate profits

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 10 points 1 month ago

    Thanks Reagan and Trump!

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 4 weeks ago (1 child)

    The US already has a policy that only prohibits ingredients proven to cause harm.

    Compare that to the EU where ingredients must be proven safe before being permitted.

    It's why most liquid smoke flavorings were recently banned in the EU as they couldn't rule out having a genotoxic effect. In the US they are all available still as far as I know.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 4 weeks ago

    and in the US once a chemical has been proven dangerous they tweak it to a slightly different molecule that's similar and keep going. It takes years and a ton of money to prove something is harmful because it requires proper science.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 4 weeks ago

    USA: Why won't those assholes at the EU allow American food into their market!?

    Also USA: Hey, let's allow poisons in our food! I mean at least it's not cancer, right?

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 4 weeks ago

    US: YOOO COVID VACCINE IS PROBABLY POISON AND NANOBOTS. (half the poors agree)

    Also US: YOOO LETS PUT POISON IN THE POOR'S FOOD (and half of the poors celebrate)

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 4 weeks ago

    Just grind it into a white powder, snort it off a toilet seat, and you're all good.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 4 weeks ago

    Yeah but the dyes though...

  • source
  • 6 comments in c/usa@lemmy.ml view that post
    [–] 5 points 1 month ago (1 child)
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    I can't wait to get back to real America. Back when they used lead to color milk and sometimes when you opened a container it'd just be filled with maggots. Back when thousands of people died every day due to milk contamination alone. Those sure were the days.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    I HIGHLY reccomend that anyone in America stop eating prepackaged processed foods entirely. It was already unhealthy but can now be dangerous. Get whole ingredients, wash them, and cook your own food. Go to a local resturant that does the same instead of some fast food place. Want some peanut butter? Buy peanuts and put them in the blender with some canola oil. It takes a few minutes and you know your not eating whatever nurgleite nonsense this idiot is letting them put in your food.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 2 comments in c/usa@lemmy.ca view that post

    When I read the perchlorate line about it being used in rocket fuel, I thought it was going to be another X is in food but also used in yoga mats, not mentioning it's also in medicines that save millions of lives or something like that. But nope, perchlorate is primarily used for rocket fuel. I'm just so surprised by the non bs use of that kind of sentence that I had to remark on it.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    the grapes of wrathine

  • source
  • 1 comment in c/usa@lemmy.ml view that post