They’re working on it. They just need a little more of your internal documents and source code.

I'd wager it's simply not possible to be profitable using AI for most use-cases. You either burn way too many tokens on your queries or risk your business falling victim to an under-tokenized AI hallucination.

In a gold rush it is better, on average, to sell the shovels then to mine the gold.

Because it is a scam. Just like the people selling, instead of using:

• healing crystals
• essential oils
• blockchain
• penis-enlargement pills
• JIRA

They are going for the gold rush pick axe business model

Because its a scam.

Been shouting this from the rooftops since the beginning. If it was half as good as claimed, I would NOT have access to it.

If you come to seminar at the Holiday Inn, I'll teach you why! Only $500, and at the end you'll be able to start your own AI powered business and make millions per year!

If I recall correctly, shovel companies made a lot of money while only a few of their shovels actually struck gold.

I saw a thread a few minutes ago on a profitable AI business. The business model was hacking websites at scale to steal hundreds of thousands of credit card numbers...

https://lemmy.world/post/52304304

Better question is if you can really build an app as easily as writing a prompt, why would anyone pay you for your app?

Somehow AI bros like to pretend that AI is some secret lifehack despite it being one of the most mainstream things in human history.

When potatoes came over from the New World, a lot of Europeans grew them as decorative plants. New shit makes people do weird stuff.

Not everybody is trying to make a business with so-called AI. The peddlers are just the loudest.

The companies promise their models can do all this stuff for paying customers. If the models were truly that capable, the so-called AI companies ought to be doing everything with them and be raking in the dough like mad. Which they're not because they know the limitations of the models. It's what economists call the bullshit gap between marketing and reality. And by economists I mean me.

This is exactly the question i ask "investment advisor" services when they call asking if i want help managing investments.

For you to have a system that works well enough for me to be interested , there'd be no need for you to spend money on call centers full of people ringing up strangers for money, you could take all of that money and invest it in the plan you are trying to sell me.

1. The AI tech they peddle is impressive and has some uses; but it is nowhere near ready to live up to the hype they created in which you can just pay $10K a year for a license and get rid of a $250K employee

2. The AI tech they sell for $10K a year, actually costs $20K to run and they know nobody would pay the full cost, let alone the cost + their profit margin

PS: those are made up numbers to answer the question, while not real numbers, they represent the points I am trying to make

They're waiting for the to big to fail bailout like the banks in '08.

AI is becoming a pretty big problem where executives are challenging experts or subject matter experts on topics based on their Ai usage. The problem is because the answers sound really good, but often the prompts aren't quite right so then the experts need to do a bunch more work to explain and justify things that the executives just find rebuttals for through further ai prompting.

For the same reason that people were selling crypto mining boxes rather than just plugging them in:

The only guaranteed profit in a gold rush is to be the one selling shovels.

See Nvidia for details.

You're on to something …

Because you need to have idea that people agree to pay money for. AI companies have idea that is selling GPU (nvidia) computer generated chat ( OpenAI, Anthropics ). People don't really need GPU or computer chat but they are willing to pay for it because they believe it will help them to save time or money by spending time and money using this shit.

That's paradox of modern times. We are being sold time spending tools that bring nothing to our lives except turning our heads from the fact that planet is dying.

We all know why…

AI is highly subsidized for users so AI wrappers can be profitable. (Even though they are a net negative to the economy)

But ai companies burn trillions of dollars of investor money with fake promises. They can't make a reddit chatgpt bot that charges a user 10$ a month and make a profit.

Cuz it doesn't work.

They want somebody else to be on the hook for their screw-ups. Doesn't mean they won't get sued if it's something bad enough or their meatshield business decides to make an issue out of it but this way, they've reduced their risks a little.