"Pocket sand! Your wife will never expect it!".
This shit guide didn't mention it had to be in your SHIRT POCKET, got my ass beat by my wife while I struggled to get into my pants pocket that was buried underground.
"Pocket sand! Your wife will never expect it!".
This shit guide didn't mention it had to be in your SHIRT POCKET, got my ass beat by my wife while I struggled to get into my pants pocket that was buried underground.
What's your objection here then? You don't seem to have a problem with the ideas core to Marxism such as class struggle and the abolition of private property, even if you reject the terminology used to describe it. Do you just reject the attribution of these ideas to Marx or there bundling under the term Marxism? If I rephrased my arguments and quoted bakunin instead of Marx would I still be indoctrinating people?
If Darwinism was used to brutaly oppress and murder countless people I would seriously question it.
It has been and I gave examples above which you refuse to address. Darwinism is as core to eugenics as Marxism is to leninism, both take an idea and use it to justify the control and murder of people in the name of progress.
The ideas of Marx, such as class conflict, private property etc. , have advanced socialists understanding of society and political economy significantly. To reject all of those ideas because they were co-opted by dictators is myopic.
Are you going to reject Darwin's theories of evolution because he had some questionable views on eugenics and since his ideas were used to justify Nazi eugenics policies and the Holocaust?
Are you indoctrinating people into a philosophy from a hundred years ago that has been used by brutal regimes espousing social darwinist ideals to send people to their death when you explain the concept of natural selection?
I haven't driven at night in a while until recently and I was wondering if it was just me losing my ability to distinguish cars but when I looked into my rearview at night, especially on multilane highways, it just looked like a disorienting constellation of stars. I don't remember trying to figure out wtf is happening behind me being so hard.
Am I just getting bad at driving or is this a universal experience?
Only if you dip them in "cheese" sauce to get protein, that's what's called a balanced diet.
It's not just the Saudis, in fact they're one of the few who haven't signed on to the abraham accords, it's the entire ruling class of the Arab world who would rather get US money and weapons then confront the terrorist state destabilizing the region.
you don't have to torture yourself by typing anything on a phone.
I think that's part of the generational divide, gen z / alpha can type better on their phones then on a keyboard. Also probably very reliant on auto correct.
Sacrificial lamb to the almighty stock market to stop the stock from hemorrhaging value.
I agree in most contexts I wouldn't use it, but this is a meme about communism on lemmy which is 90% socialist / fellow travelers. The level of discussion on this forum is high enough that we can use or introduce people to ideas like Marx's definition of private property. We don't need to dumb down shit for the normies here.
I'm having trouble understanding you're objection to it then. If the purpose of art is to make you feel something and this AI media is accomplishing that, why do you need to distinguish between the two?
Do you not trust what's happening in those higher dimensions?
Do you want to preserve a walter benjamin-esque aura in human art?
In this sense, the theory of the Communists may be summed up in the single sentence: Abolition of private property.
/- Karl Marx
Marxists distinguish private property and personal property. Personal property is stuff you own to use, eg. Your home, your car, your phone etc. Private property is stuff you own to make money from the labor of others, eg. Rental homes, factories, stocks, bonds etc.
Seizing the means of production doesn't fully capture the goals of communism as it would leave other forms of exploitative property, ie. Rental properties, in the hands of the rich.
We could save on water and pollution by using children for anything we already use machines for, that doesn't make it right.
Should we have children toiling in the mines because the mechanical drill uses too much water and emits pollution?