Says the guy that has raped and killed infinitely more men women and children mathematically then piker ever has
post
If Trump says Hasan is bad for Democrats, that means he must be fantastic for Democrats.
Again, they’re horny for Hasan Piker. It’s the only thing that explains their irrational obsession. Most of the left doesn’t even consume his content.
He's coming for the tradwives.

Bruh what the fuck are you doing? I was on the train when I opened the thread and saw this and I instantly started furiously masturbating. That made me drop my phone, and some poor old man saw the meat pic, now they are furiously masturbating.
Now everyone is furiously masturbating to the meat pic. Would you think of the consequences before posting this?
Jesus, at least use the blurred version.
If it's good enough to show to the prudes of the RNC, it's good enough to show here.
Yes.. but will they work? Maybe.
They can't attack policy, because they've had absolutely no obstruction to implementing policy for nearly two years now. The Republican party has gotten to do exactly as it pleases for nearly two years now, and almost universally Americans say they are worse off than they were before.
I would be shocked if Trump has ever actually watched/listened to anything Hasan has said.
Let's be honest, this isn't trump hearing a different view, forming an opinion and disagreeing with it. This is trump being told what the current culture issue is and what his views are.
Does Trump even know what a Communist is?
To be fair, Hasan is a Communist, and has called himself as such in the past. He uses the Progressive and Democratic-Socialist labels more these days for the same reason he wears suits now, to look less threatening to the audience seeing him on TV.
Hasan is more of a communist-sympathizing social democrat. His strategy is overwhelmingly reformist.
At most you might say he's a Democratic Socialist, because his goal is still to eventuate the abolition of capitalism. He's a Communist who knows the best available action is political mobilization. He's certainly not a SocDem who only wants to reform capitalism. He's openly spoken in favor of worker revolution, but he's also aware that such a thing isn't possible in America, at least at this moment.
Democratic socialists are social democrats in practice, considering it is impossible to reform capitalism into socialism. Revolution is absolutely possible, but it isn't something you trigger, it is a response to crisis with an organized revolutionary class. We need to organize so that crisis turns to revolution.
You're saying what Hasan says, idk what else to tell you. He's not trying to reform capitalism into socialism, he's organizing a political base that will be capable of turning the coming political crises into a productive Communist movement.
I disagree that he is succeeding in that by going through the DSA and focusing so hard on electoralism. It's important to understand the necessity of democratic centralism and consistent revolutionary rhetoric, because otherwise we fall into the same problems as the second international and the SPD.
Democratic Centralism...? Oooooh you're a Tankie, I got it. I just noticed the domain.
Go back to your HoI4 campaign bud, and let the grownups do actual politics.
I'm a communist and organize for socialism. Democratic centralism is a core function of successful party-building. Infantilizing me for speaking on what I know from both historical study and practical experience as an organizer within the framework of democratic centralism is childish. How are you going to convince others of your views if you act like this? Even Hasan doesn't criticize demcent like this, and speaks very positively of demcent organizations.
For what it's worth, I've never played HoI4 either.
Even Hasan doesn't criticize demcent like this, and speaks very positively of demcent organizations.
Then what's your problem??
Dawg, if you don't think Hasan Piker is left enough to be a Communist, idk what to tell you. It's just a silly thing to say.
My issues with Hasan are that he pushes a reformist line, and focuses primarily on electoralism. I'm not some hater of Hasan, but those two positions put him squarely into social democratic territory. It's not about some arbitrary level of "leftness," it's two strategic positions he has that puts him at odds with communist struggle. And no, it isn't a silly issue at all, the concept of reformism vs revolution is an active struggle among the left in the imperial core, and the communist line historically is 100% in favor of revolution since Marx.
So... He's a Communist in every way anyone would care about, except for you, because he's not actively attempting to overthrow the US government? Before building a support base for a revolution?
So you can only be a Communist if you're suicidal, I guess?
the communist line historically is 100% in favor of revolution since Marx.
Ffs even Marx himself participated in electoral politics. Revolution was always the inevitable outcome of struggle against bourgeois democracy failing to respond to the crises bared by the proletariat.
He's using the strategies available to him now, just like me and you, and everyone else ever before us, and everyone else long after.
Again, this is just a big silly argument, drawing lines in the sand for no good reason. Calling some other Marxist organizer "at odds to the Communist struggle" while he delivers aid to Cubans and shining a light on their revolutionary struggle.
This is silly.
You are being silly.
Stop being silly.
No? I have no idea where you got these ideas. Revolutionary organizing doesn't necessarily mean throwing your life away, it means building an explicitly revolutionary and disciplined organization of cadre. These revolutionary organizations can participate in elections to advertise their platforms and grow the movement, but the understanding is always that you cannot establish socialism through reform. Marx himself was a revolutionary, not a reformist.
Again, I am not some Hasan hater. He's not an anti-communist, but his positions are those of a social democrat sympathetic to communism and socialism. That's not "silly," it's taking a consistent stance based in Marxist understandings of revolutionary change and the class nature of the state.
Revolution doesn't just "happen," you have to organize for it directly. Crisis is not the same as an assured revolution, to actually get revolution you need a revolutionary party leading the charge.
I suppose a party liability such as Trump would be an expert in the field.
Stop trying to make Hasan Piker relevant
Every single headline about him could be about a progressive candidate.
That's why neoliberals and Republicans live him. He takes up valuable real estate in people's minds so they're not talking about progressive candidate.
It's hard to tell who's doing it intentionally and who has twitch brainrot.
Hssan is supporting progressives candidates that's why they are talking about him badly every day
He’s a proxy. They can use him no matter what, if a candidate they feared the most drops out or is defeated in primaries or dies or is removed they can just connect the next one to Hassan like he’s kevin bacon.
He's literally just some twitch streamer
Pretty sure algorithms are pushing him to make democrats look stupid
I don't know... I will admit the reason he's fair game and relevant is because he has gone on campaign tours with el sayed and gotten interviews with other DSA candidates. I'd say he's not relevant to the democrats as a whole, but individuals who bring him to campaign events... are liable in the same way that any republican candidate that invites Kanye or Fuentes is accepting some baggage from them.
That being said, I'd also point out Pikers baggage is just plain stupidly overblown as well. The guy streams for like 8 hours a day. The main "ammunition" against him, is one statement he made 8 years ago along the lines of "America deserved 9/11". which he admitted he admitted was more of a misphrasing, and meant it as "america is responsible for the conditions that made 9/11 an inevitability".
And Tucker Carlson is just some youtube streamer.
Joe Rogan is some spotify streamer.
Your point is a point without a point.
Many twitch streamers are influencial. That's why many progressive candidate talked to him and that's why establishment are going to fox news the media wing of the fascists to trash him. Establishment Democrats makes Democrats stupid
He's relevant, there is no "try", it's done.
Why stop there? What about Mr. Beast’s opinions?
They literally just had Logan and Jake Paul give a speech at the Pentagon, at a time when Trump is posturing like he's going to escalate the Iran War.
You may not care about a bunch of Twitch streamers but the fucking Executive Office of the United States does. These are very stupid times.
Yeah who gives a shit about a streamer?
I wouldn't call Trump a centrist
I’m the kind of dumb liberal who gets power fifty percent of the time so you might want to show a little respect.
You wins fifty percent of time and failed each time leading to republicans winning after each 1 or 2 elections . You trash the progressive but when they wins you try to steal the wins and act like you never tried to sabotage it
No idea who the fuck he is, but if this orange loser is spamming him. He must be an ok dude in my book.
He's a twitch streamer that strongly supports the DSA, so he's a Social Democrat. He has a few million viewers and has been helping DSA candidates this midterm cycle, so he became a big target of the media. He's okay, the biggest benefit IMO is that he doesn't do the typical socdem thing by endlessly condemning socialist countries and trying to separate himself from them, which is why he gets labeled a communist despite being a SocDem.
He labeled himself a socialist. He also talks out of both mouths, he calls himself anti Zionist but it's currently bragging about his positive interviews Israeli media where he said he wants to build bridges with Zionists.
He's a net positive in grabbing people from the far right and pushing them left. He's a net negative when it comes to liberal Zionism and normalizing the colonization of Palestine.
If you're a centrist or right leaning, by all means watch him. If you're already a leftist, you can avoid the brainrot.
currently bragging about his positive interviews Israeli media where he said he wants to build bridges with Zionists
Which interview is this referring to?
Read the comments if you want to see the mindset of haaretz readers. It's a "liberal leftist" outlet that serves primarily to whitewash Israel and portray them as diverse.
Of course there's nothing leftist about a settler colonial ethno-religious supremacist apartheid state, so...
There's a paywall, so I can't see the "building bridges" part, but the summary says this
In his first interview with Israeli media, left-wing streamer Hasan Piker tells Haaretz that October 7 must be seen in the context of the Israeli occupation, that even liberal Zionists should be 'named and shamed,' and explains why most Americans just don't like Israel anymore
So I kind of doubt "building bridges" was some centrist take. It was more likely about educating ignorant/confused American Zionists out of that mindset, if I had to guess based on what I know of him. If you have access to the article though, I'm happy to read a copy/paste of it.
I do agree that an "Israeli leftist" publication seems suspicious at best. However, Piker appears on other right-wing media all the time. Fox News, Peirs Morgan, etc. So I don't think his giving an interview necessarily endorses them.
I'm not a Hasan viewer, I'm a communist. I am just more in-tune because I have to know what's salient to do org work.
Suck it Trump. You are the worst human to have ever been shit out of a womb.
I don't care what Trump thinks and know nothing about Hasan, nor do I care beyond understanding why the conservatives want his dick so bad
He is projecting again. Trump knows that he is a big liability for the GOP...
Not meant to be an endorsement, but it sure reads as an unwitting one. (For the other side, I mean)
Sounds like this Piker guy is good stuff. That is a sterling recommendation if it came from such a corrupt PoS pedophile like Dump...
The world has way more labels for trump than trump has for others. trump's voice tends to get amplified more because...you know...billionaire media owners.
I don’t even know who Hasan Piker is. Nor do I care.
I want my tax dollars, which I already pay, to be used for programs and services that benefit society rather than the Ultra-rich Trump-Epstein class.
I want sane governance that respects and upholds the constitution.
That’s not communism. Thats common sense.
Vote blue
Piker: "correct"
He wouldn't talk about him if it was as true
I'm not so sure, communist organizations are getting targeted by the state and talked about publicly now as a part of the crackdown on rising socialist and communist sympathies around the country. Hasan is more of a Social Democrat, but he is generally more sympathetic to socialism and communism than most socdems.
Says the man who has more communist policies than Hassan. Trump is very much in favour of state control of everything.
Says the man who has more communist policies than Hassan.
More rapes too
State control without any analysis of the class struggle isn't socialist in any capacity. Communists want to establish a socialist state, one run by the workers, not simply empower an existing capitalist state. Hasan generally not demonizing existing socialist states is to the left of Trump, even if he's more of a Social Democrat than anything else.
But communism as the GOP defines it, is the Stalinist model of the appearance of socialism though communism state control.
Communism is a post-socialist society where there is no state in the Marxist conception. The Soviet Union was socialist, run by a communist party. Stalin may have agreed with Marx on that, but did not invent it.
At some point, when the original definition is overwhelmed by the self described example, I think it warrants a change in definition.
Both the east and the west called the soviet union and Maoist china communist, when it was far from it based on the original definition. They were little more than authoritarian oligarchies reigning over a socialist economic system.
Just like in the west, many democracies were mostly oligarchies reigning over capitalist economic systems.
The Soviet Union and China are both examples of socialism, rub according to Marxist principles. They were called communist because they were run by communist parties with the intention of developing into communism, not because anyone thought they weren't genuine. Both the Soviet Union and PRC were what Marx described as "lower-stage communism," or what became known as the transitional phase known as socialism at the time of Lenin.
Wasn't it Sun Tsu who said not to interrupt your opponent when they are making a mistake? That's why I don't complain when Drumpf runs around the country stumping for the toadies in his own party. The orange ass-clown really believes his own hype that he's popular.
top 99 comments