The same goes to you, I suppose. If you don't see that the Democrats are just as bought and owned by different capitalists, then I'm not going to be able to convince you on Lemmy comments, most likely. Would require a combination of history and Marxist theory. Mind you, it's mostly different capitalists, but capitalists all the same.
Just because you're ignorant doesn't mean you get to dehumanize me for free.
Why do you believe that? The Democrats are fully influenced by capitalists, just a different wing of the capitalist class. They have no binding responsibility to the working class, which is why they never protect us and barely give us crumbs. Capitalists control the commanding heights of the economy, and the state. Simple as that.
You never were. Can you not botjacket people?
Reading circles help! You can bounce ideas off of others, and the schedule helps maintain momentum!
Peanut butter! Cheap, high calorie, with fats and proteins to balance the carbs. You can get jelly packets or even ketchup packets in a pinch (not quite as bad as it sounds) to keep it from getting repetitive.
Also consider rice and beans!
I just use the web version, works best for me. That being said, I do like Voyager and Jerboa.
Rejecting politics is a reaction to them, and thus a political choice. There's no such thing as being apolitical as long as you exist with society and play a role within it.
They did not. 99% of black women who voted in Mississippi voted Democrat (and I'm not even sure that's correct, data on voter rates isn't public yet for 2026). Further, I have never said "both sides are the same." I have said that both sides serve the capitalist class. My point is that both the Democrats and Republicans are enormously unpopular, and voting was largely against Republicans, rather than for Democrats. Neither party has the trust of the working class, and voting is treated exactly as a lesser of two evils. A better system is necessary, and this cannot happen through the Democrats.
Alright, thanks for answering the first bit! I'll address it first, as it's foundational to the split in out analysis. I'll list a few things I believe to be true, and you can explain which you disagree with and why. I'm not forcing you or cornering you into this, you don't have to participate if you don't want to, but this will get to the meat of your disagreement with Marxists, and our disagreement with you.
-
Markets historically have a tendency towards monopoly and centralization.
-
Bigger firms not only have the advantage of having more resources, but production eventually requires larger scales as the economy itself grows, ie to bust a monopoly, rather than nationalizing it, is to set productive capacity backwards.
-
Monopoly, under capitalism, turns to enshittification, so to speak.
These are 3 basic beliefs I have, and they all combine into the belief that capitalism cannot last forever, and therefore markets outlast their progressive nature in stitching together production as they scale. This means planned economy is more efficient at this point. If you disagree with any of these, I'd love to hear how and why. Genuinely.
As for China and being a democracy, why do you say that it isn't? Where did your understanding of China's democratic institutions and government structures come from? Roland Boer may be a professor living in China, but his work is academic and trusted even by westerners trying to understand China. I didn't just link a document saying "we're democratic!" I linked a textbook that describes in-detail how and why China's institutions function the way they do. You can make up for yourself if you believe these institutions are sufficiently democratic, but they factually do work the way described in the textbook.
What about all the "silly vulnerable people" that do not vote, and what about the "silly vulnerable people" that prefer revolution over reformism as a strategy?
