While Black August is coming to a close, the fight for Black liberation rages on. Seeing the representation of Black faces in high places does not diminish the plight of Black Americans. That’s because the entire system is rigged against Black working class people – and no matter who is in the White House, the symptoms do not get any better. For Black liberation to become a reality, the entire system must fall!

The cycle of poverty is a never-ending, self-fulfilling prophecy under the capitalist system. When communities don’t have an adequate tax base or political influence, then critical programs are not properly funded. When critical programs aren’t properly funded, educational, environmental and health outcomes are all predictably worsened. Impoverished communities, then, become even easier for governmental bodies to neglect as “a lost cause”.

Black communities entered 2026 facing the same economic inequalities that have plagued Black communities for generations — higher unemployment, lower wages, and a persistent racial wealth gap.

In July 2026, Black unemployment stood at 6.3%, compared with 3.6% for white workers. Black full-time workers earned a median of $1,029 per week in the second quarter of 2026, roughly 19% less than the $1,268 median for white workers.

The latest data shows that the median Black family holds just $44,900 in wealth, compared with $285,000 for the median white family.

That we see more Black people represented in higher positions of power today does not diminish the grave reality of widespread poverty and disinvestment that Black working class people are experiencing.

In fact, this disparity can be used as a means of further criminalizing Black communities. Black communities experience higher levels of policing, but all the research shows that police don’t actually solve crime. They end up perpetrating the crime of mass incarceration instead. While Black people make up only 13% of the U.S. population, they represent nearly 40% of the prison population, further contributing to the deterioration of Black communities.

The entire system is rigged against Black working class people – and no matter who is in the White House, the symptoms do not get any better.

Throughout the history of this country, the struggle of the Black community for equality and democracy has been the main engine of progress.

The overarching goal of the Trump administration is to undo that progress and plunge the country into a new era where there are no limits on the power of the rich and corporations to exploit the people and destroy the planet. Even if he focuses his racist rhetoric against other targets, like immigrants from Latin America, at the core of Trump’s agenda is an all-out assault on Black people.

Trump’s second term has brought a direct assault on Black communities and the gains of the Civil Rights Movement. His administration has dismantled federal DEI and affirmative-action programs, gutted offices responsible for enforcing workplace civil rights, and pushed the Justice Department to abandon or dismiss investigations into police departments accused of unconstitutional treatment of Black communities while rolling back federal oversight. At the same time, the administration has taken positions against expanding Black voting power under the Voting Rights Act and is pushing new restrictions on mail-in voting that threaten to make voting harder for millions.

Trump’s 2025 budget law cuts Medicaid and SNAP, programs millions of working-class Black families depend on, while shifting resources toward tax cuts, policing, immigration enforcement, and the military. The administration is also shrinking the federal workforce and dismantling programs designed to address racial discrimination, threatening jobs and protections for Black workers. These policies make clear that Trump’s agenda is not simply about rolling back “DEI” — it is about dismantling the public institutions and protections that working people have fought for, while leaving Black communities to bear the greatest costs.

But just because Trump wants to push through racist policies, doesn’t mean he’ll be able to get away with it.

Racist injustice against Black people is so persistent in the U.S. not solely because of personal attitudes and prejudices. Racism is an essential tool used by the billionaires who rule this country and the powerful institutions they control to cement their domination over society.

White supremacy allows the ruling class to grow even richer by exploiting Black workers especially intensely — with slavery as the most extreme example upon which the country was built. And further, racism divides working people, helping the elite maintain their political power. If Black people are demonized and presented as the source of social problems, then the millionaires and billionaires who are actually to blame get let off the hook.

Through courageous struggle, there have been periods of historic progress towards Black freedom. But whenever that struggle slows down, the natural tendency of the system is to roll back that progress. Take affirmative action for instance — the Black liberation movement of the 1960s won affirmative action programs nationwide, but starting in 1978 the courts gradually restricted these policies before ending them altogether.

For decades, the vast majority of Black voters have supported Democratic Party politicians, only to have those politicians abandon the interests of the Black community as soon as they take office.

No matter how many Black politicians are elected, or how many Black people are in positions of prominence in economic and cultural institutions, conditions for the working class majority of the Black community never change — or even get worse.

The problem is at the roots: this country is ruled by a tiny handful of billionaires, and decisions are made to maximize profits for those billionaires. White supremacy persists because it is in their interests for it to persist. But the grinding oppression and inequality Black communities are subjected to would be totally at odds with the goals of a society ruled by the working class, where decisions are made to meet the needs of the people and the planet.

Featured Image: Demonstrators in Philadelphia park during 2020 mass uprisings against racism and police brutality. Credit: Amistad Law Project.

no comments (yet)

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here
31 comments in c/progressivepolitics@lemmy.world view that post
[–] 1 point 2 months ago (30 children)

But just because Trump wants to push through racist policies, doesn’t mean he’ll be able to get away with it.

The cognitive dissonance of Liberation Staff, in full display.

  • source
  • hideshow 30 child comments
  • [–] [S] 3 points 2 months ago (24 children)

    Where is the cognitive dissonance? Just because capitalists can desire something doesn't mean workers cannot organize against it. It's how all social struggles have been fought.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 24 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago* (23 children)

    Then where is the antifascist organization fighting against Trump’s executive branches?
    Literally the next post after this one is ICE and TPD doing mass raids on nightclubs, and everyone complying.
    Everyone.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • [–] [S] 4 points 2 months ago (22 children)

    Continuing with the theme presented by the article, the PSL has been actively organizing strikes and protests. There are also other groups attempting to do similar forms of resistance. What does "fighting against Trump's executive branches" look like to you, where strikes do not fit in? What should people be doing instead?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (21 children)

    Strikes and protests are performances, you know this. The 2003 Strikes and protests didn't end ICE raids.
    Resistance is met with equal force, not bump stops.

    What does “fighting against Trump’s executive branches” look like to you

    An actual force, a militia. As in physically opposing an illegal regime.
    The days of performances was a generation ago.
    You're in the final gestalt of full project2025.

    What should people be doing instead?

    Demolishing deathcamps, destroying datacenters, uprooting fascist resources. You know, actual anti fascist actions. Not these nonfunctional appeals to public sentiments.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] [S] 3 points 2 months ago (20 children)

    Strikes and protests are important forms of class struggle that develop millitancy and organization within the working class. You cannot jump from nowhere to a protracted guerilla war. It's the people that make revolution, not a tiny terrorist cell. Organizing builds a disciplined cadre that can help steer revolutionary movements in a positive direction, but they cannot create said conditions.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (19 children)

    If it's immediate. An entire generation went and died before millitancy and organization took place. The Obama Admin was the last warning showing Democrats will still continue the deathcamps. Or do still believe Americans have what it takes organize themselves?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] [S] 3 points 2 months ago (18 children)

    I'm not advocating for the democrats, I am advocating for organizing. A protracted guerilla war is not going to break the empire within the core at the moment, all of our efforts should be on organizing at the moment. Cynicism ties our hands.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (17 children)

    Then tell PSL & strikers to organize for warfare, as these performances haven't worked.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] [S] 3 points 2 months ago (16 children)

    Orgs like PSL are rapidly growing. Strikes are helping push back ICE where they manage to kick off. Revolutionary organizing isn't something you can kick off through adventurism, a disciplined party and an organized working class that sees no other way out must be present. The people make revolution, not random adventurists.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago* (15 children)

    Then thank you for informing me PSL+strikers aren't disciplined in history, that the only way they see change can occur in the present is repeating mistakes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 2 months ago (14 children)

    History teaches us that revolution is made by the people, not random adventurism. Marxists study the history of class struggle and revolutions. Starting a random guerilla war before the masses themselves are ready to take up arms just alienates the party from the rest of the masses.

    Let's try an example. Where would you start your guerilla war? Against what targets?History teaches us that revolution is made by the people, not random adventurism. Marxists study the history of class struggle and revolutions. Starting a random guerilla war before the masses themselves are ready to take up arms just alienates the party from the rest of the masses.

    Let's try an example. Where would you start your guerilla war? Against what targets? With what people, and what weapons? If you're depending on others to follow your lead, then I ask, why do you want to repeat mistakes of failed revolutions?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (13 children)

    Calling Appalachians “adventurists” is quite the illuminating take I see.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 2 months ago (12 children)

    You're fully capable of answering my questions and engaging with my point. I never condemned the coal wars, I asked you specifically what you think is necessary right now. No vague platitudes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (11 children)

    What should people be doing instead?

    Demolishing deathcamps, destroying datacenters, uprooting fascist resources. You know, actual anti fascist actions. Not these nonfunctional appeals to public sentiments.

    Do I also need to teach you how to reclaim arms that belong to the proletariat?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 2 months ago (10 children)

    Let’s try an example. Where would you start your guerilla war? Against what targets? With what people, and what weapons? If you’re depending on others to follow your lead, then I ask, why do you want to repeat mistakes of failed revolutions?

    These are the questions I asked. It all sounds good, but how do you actually do it?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (9 children)

    How do I organize the strikers to go deathcamps, demolish them, go to datacenters and destroy them, go to fascist headquarters and uproot them, when you said they intend to protest and strike instead? Are you asking me if I have the answer to convince the historically illiterate stubborn strikers how to effectively praxis antifascism?
    Because if I did, it would have occured in 2003. I have failed to convince the performists performances do not work. I have failed to amass a militia ready to fight for what matters. I have failed to lead the unwilling.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] [S] 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (8 children)

    So in other words, you understand that the people make revolution, not adventurists, so that the actual necessity for revolution is to organize the working classes and educate them so that they better understand their place in the struggle, rather than engaging in random terrorism without the people behind you. You're just cynical about the whole project, and don't grasp how consciousness actually changes among the working classes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (7 children)

    Yeah, 4 red scares, and a brain drain of class consciousness does that to anyone literate. Do enlighten me how the strikers have secured food for their next generation. Do they own their shelters? Do they own their means?
    You can't revolt without even securing the basic needs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    You're arguing that the existing socialist parties should be launching guerilla wars, correct? Why do you agree that the primary task right now is organizing and education, and that parties do not make revolution, they steer it, yet still claim adventurism is the only acceptable path?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (5 children)

    Consistently I’ve advocated for antifascist actions. Guerrilla tactics are the ONLY thing you keep advocating, which we know doesn't work at uprooting fascism. I am beginning to assuming you don't know what it takes to make decentralized organized militias able to operate independently and exchange cooperatively in ongoing anti fascist teardowns. An uneducated class is a blind class. It cannot usher a revolution based on ignorance and proven bad tactics.
    The only person insinuating adventurism and 🚩terrorism🚩 is you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)

    I'm arguing for educating, agitating, and organizing. The masses make the revolution. Again, it seems like you're frustrated that the people aren't already taking up arms, and the groups that are trying to raise class consciousness are somehow either not effective enough at it or are harming the movement because the masses aren't already taking up arms. It's a circular, self-defeating analysis.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] [S] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Do the masses make revolution, or do parties?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    The fact you are asking means no revolution will be dealt.
    The masses are a party.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 2 points 2 months ago

    No, the masses are not a party. Otherwise, the masses would already be organized. Parties are specific social groups and form subsets of broader classes. I'm asking you if revolution is made by having a party start a guerilla war with no mass support, or by the masses themselves, under the guidance and support of a worker party.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    Statists typically don't understand how the state works to reinforce the oppression of the capitalist system. They naively think the system will save them from itself.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 2 months ago (2 children)

    Do you think a socialist state is the same as a capitalist state? How do socialist states reinforce capitalism?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago* (1 child)

    All states, by the nature of hierarchical authority structures, will always seek to oppress those they have authority over in order to maintain that social power.

    Socialist states are not immune to this function of systemic structure.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 1 point 2 months ago

    I'm familiar with the slogan, but that just doesn't track with the results for the working classes once they have achieved a worker state. Why is it that in countries like Cuba, where the working classes take power, we see mass land redistribution, huge literacy campaigns, an end to the old slave-based system, and a more equitable society? Why is this immense upliftment of working people consistent across all socialist states?

    Ultimately, the reason socialist states deliver such starkly different results is that states do not exist outside of the class struggle. States exist to entrench and uplift the ruling class of society. When workers own and control the state, they can and do use it for mass upliftment with an expansion of democratization for the whole of society.

    Hierarchy is not the problem. Class is the problem. Our social relations to ownership of the means of production play a massive role on what our interests actually are. When the state is owned and run by workers, who share the same level of ownership as the rest of the working classes, they share the same class interest in continuing to collectivize society. This isn't merely trusting ideology, but a genuine recognition of material interests aligning.

    Under capitalism, the ruling class is the capitalist class. Even in the Nordic countries, where welfare is higher, welfare is both shrinking and still ultimately depends on benefiting from the system of imperialism. Socialism doesn't need imperialism, nor is it compelled to become imperialist. Capitalism must eventually turn to imperialism to continue to function, as capital needs to expand, or else it dies.

    All of these critical differences hammer home that it's not enough to say "states are bad." We have to investigate why socialist states and capitalist states benefit dramatically different sections of society, and this answer returns to Marx: it's because of the differences in the ruling class.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago

    Knowledgable statists are one thing, ignorant ones are the zeitgeist. The campist below you comprehends both are ultimately going to resist at poll booths. Not as the deathcamped, die. For both our sakes, I didn't engage in the history of PSL snitches and cop-pologies. I could read the cop above.

  • source
  • parent