all 95 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 72 points 1 month ago (13 children)

All of nu-trek seems to have lost the hope of a post-scarcity utopian society.

We have plenty of gritty dystopian stories. Star Trek lost what made it special

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • Many of the best TNG episodes feature the darkness creeping back in, with Picard acting as the guardian of the light they have worked so hard to create. The big example I have in mind is Drumhead. Picard recognizes fascism for what it is and immediately moves to counter it, delivering one of the best speeches of the franchise.

    This wasn't a show that shied away from dark subject matter; there were multiple murder investigations, an entire two-parter about Picard being tortured at the hands of space nazis, two separate episodes about ordering crew members to their deaths...this show could handle weighty subjects, subjects weightier than "this character is being mean to that character." And it could do it with the fucking lights on.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 52 points 1 month ago (8 children)

    To be fair, the post-scarcity utopia was most present in TNG. TOS was more focused on the cosmic horror encountered in deeps space, and far less idealistic. DS9 really dove into how much that utopia would comprise when faced with an existential threat, while ENT tried to show how a flawed society would strive reach that utopia.

    The difference is that everything after TNG was responding to that utopia, either by affirming it or challenging it, while New Trek just...forgot it was a thing. I remember watching season 1 of Picard, and Raffi is living in trailer in the desert because Admiral Picard ruined her career and thinking, "Wait, why are you poor? You guys don't even use money anymore."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    I always assumed that she was living in a trailer in the desert to get away from people, and just dug the isolated vibe of it... It didn't seem like it was awful or nuthin. Maybe trailers are nicer in the future lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 34 points 1 month ago

    Well, she also says something to the extent of, "we don't all have a family vineyard to live on." The implication definitely seemed to be that PIcard was a, "have," and she was a, "have-not," which seemed very antithetical to the universe established in Old Trek.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Well DS9 did the whole "section 31 exists this shit is a violation we do not do this" and nu!trek explicitly keeps going to that well as protagonists so yeah, there's a big difference there

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

    All of them still felt more optimistic than nu Trek. And purely stylistically they were filmed in a very different way that felt comforting whereas these new shows want to be as grimdark as possible

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    Yeah, their was far too much spent on style and too little on substance. Everything is highly cinematic, and they clearly spent tens of millions of dollars per episode, so they feel they have to make, "epic," stories that reflect that scale. The thing is, that's never what made Trek great. Chain of Command said more about war with a cheap set and four spotlights than all of season one of Discovery said on a $100 million budget.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    I think it all comes down to capitalists own the star trek franchise and post-scarcity is a scenario that really challenges the core ideas of capitalism, especially when they show this advanced utopia, even if it was a bit frayed at the edges and some had a hard time relating to the idea that the crew of the various Enterprises were pretty much all doing it as a hobby rather than a job (albeit with military-level organization).

  • source
  • parent
  • as a dc comics fan, i have no problem with dark and moody. i just think the newer trek has a writing problem. there might be a few good episodes, but so much just feels like mediocre fan fiction. i think trek peaked with ds9 and with paramount's new leadership i don't think that's likely to change.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago

    Unpopular opinion; Picard is not actually a Stark Trek show, it just stars a former Star Trek captain.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago

    I just think that the writing team are caught in the massive gravitation pull of a black hole

  • source
  • [–] 25 points 1 month ago* (18 children)

    I've had trouble watching all the latest Star Treks SAVE FOR ONE.

    Lower Decks is fucking amazing. It captures the vibe perfectly while also adding genuine comedy.

    They did what Seth failed so miserably at, and they animated it of all things (and then UNANIMATED it for one episode.)

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago (13 children)

    SNW started off well but now it's primarily just shitposting. Ugh.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    I feel this so much.

    It was great when there was the occasional oddball episode, but the main focus was on the story.

    But this last season has been absolutely nothing except weird comedy episodes, every single week.

    Made SNW go from one of my most-liked Trek outings to among the worst.

    Perhaps I should rewatch Season 1 to recover.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    I've been doing a trekculture binge (building a mass of servers for work, good background) and Sean really nailed it when he said that s1-2 and 3-4 feel like entirely different shows - and that SNW has no real identity of its own

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    I haven't seen it, I don't watch TV anymore, but did I hear they've done for real everything SG-1 did in the episode 200 as a shitpost?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

    Worse. 200 was at least novel and fun

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    SG-1 said "wouldn't it be stupid if we did this?"

    Discovery did it

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 1 month ago

    Stargate Universe did it. Specifically, just about everything in the "younger, edgier" bit from "200" ended up occurring unironically in Universe.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (4 children)

    I haven't seen any of the latest episodes, what does this mean? How can a show like this become "shit posting"?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Let’s put it this way: they turn into Muppets in 1 episode this season, so yeah.

    It’s starting to feel like GoT season 8.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago

    love how someone downvoted you for that. That muppet ep was objectively shit. The only darkly funny thing about it was watching Sean Ferrick's soul leave his body doing the ups and downs on it. They're trying to rip off the Angel ep Smile Time but Smile Time worked because they had plot, they had premise and they had stakes. The muppet ep had none of that. Hell, even the Trek musical ep worked because they set up premise. Level-Five Transporter Accident was just a bunch of stupid shit happening "for the lulz" and they didn't even achieve that

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -4 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Lower decks is cheap as fuck humour, with Boimler being a literal memberberries mouth-piece.

    I clocked out early in season two when the day was saved with a joke of repeatedly kicking the first officer in the balls.

    It's Star Trek with the Idiocracy treatment.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 month ago* (2 children)

    the NU-MOVIES style of CINEMA, making dark scenes to hide the fact the props are so bad in the show and the poor writing.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Props have gotten bad because all of the skilled prop masters have left the industry. So much is CGI now, it's become gig work and nobody wants to pay the rates these guys command.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 23 points 1 month ago (8 children)

    9/11 killed the optimistic sci-fi. American culture was deeply wounded. It went emo. It wasn't a phase.

    They're too scared to be happy.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago* (5 children)

    Game of thrones is when I really noticed that almost everything became dreary and pessimistic. It's gotten to the point where apparently kids these days can't get on board with concept of the good guys even existing because every show both-sides all the characters.

    Media like LOTR where the villains are unabashedly bad and the good guys are genuinely good will slowly die out. We lost the little bit of moral compass we had. Sometimes I wonder if Hollywood did it deliberately.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    The old guard of Hollywood were a bunch of people who had absolutely no problem with saying people that act like Nazis are bad. Those people are gone or nearing retirement/irrelevant. Also, writing is now done by committee so it never has any over-arching narrative, it's just a bunch of different writers trying to be noticed instead of creating a good plot.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 1 point 1 month ago

    I blame the Battlestar Galactica reboot. That was insanely successful while being dark and moody, so networks in the coming decades kept trying to chase that kind of success in their own shows by making them dark and moody as well. Game of Thrones seems like someone decided to take a LOTR-like medieval world and give it the tone of Battlestar Galactica.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    What about anime? They're gotten goofier and brighter in my opinion. Popular stuff used to be Inuyasha, Fullmetal Alchemist. Then you had Death Note, Bleach, Naruto. These are all on a scale of pretty moody with tads or dapples of sunshine and goof.

    Now there's animes like "I was turned into a hedgehog and my girlfriend isn't sure how to respond!" It's wayy fucking goofier and brighter.

    What happened was people knew the world wasn't good guys and bad guys, it became clear that morality was grey and for good reason.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 child)

    In regard to your last paragraph, I'm sick of hearing this. It's now used as an excuse to justify any kind of horrible behavior. Sure I killed a puppy but my neighbor got caught smoking meth by himself so he's just as bad. It's bullshit.

    Yes people are complicated, yes morality is complex, but acting like everyone is equally good or equally bad so no one can ever hold the high ground is such an intellectually lazy, dishonest, and destructive position to hold.

    Lotr had it right. The villains are complex characters who have a path to redemption but mostly ignore it, and what they do to the world is unambiguously destructive.

    Modern media feels like it exists to excuse and enable selfish behavior no matter the cost.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    LOTR did not have complex villains in the slightest? They were bad period. Morgoth is literally evil incarnate, Sauron was evil af appreciating craft doesn't make him good, Saruman was considered completely fallen, Gollum did not have a path to redemption he had moments of humanization. They were pretty straight forward. You could argue depth was added in the Silmarilian but there wasn't really a humanizing element to call them complicated or morally complex, they were morally simple and some had a reason they fell to corruption.

    Smaug, the Goblin King, Shelob. Evil as hell.

    I guess some of the corrupt humans were more morally ambiguous but it never left you feeling unsure if someone was good or evil, it is pretty crystal clear.

    What modern media enables selfish behavior no matter the cost? Breaking Bad is literally about the cost, Game of Thrones is about everyone is basically not a good person.

    The best morally complex character I can think of is Magneto. He's not a good guy, he's not doing good things but in his position you'd ask yourself "what would I do different?" he's trying to prevent trauma he's already experienced and he unashamed about it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago

    Can just not watch new trek. Writing seems to be consistently terrible.

  • source
  • [–] 32 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (22 children)

    I'll never watch it.

    Picard, like Shymalan's Avatar and Game of Thrones Season 8, is best viewed through savage YouTube takedowns.

    And it doesn´t bother me that Picard is dark and moody. In fact, the cheery optimism of TNG is my least favorite thing about that series and the grittier DS9 shows that Star Trek can get legitimately dark. My complaint about Picard is that it is multidimensionally stupid.

  • source
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 month ago* (3 children)

    Watched Angela Collier's video and wouldn't so much as pay for the time and electricity to watch an episode of this show.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago

    I started watching this and after a few (enjoyable) minutes I noticed the top comment notes, "For the first hour I've been waiting to disagree with her but just couldn't.." and then I looked at the runtime..

    Holy moly.

    Critique in length that rivals the Lefttube greats, I'll save this one 'later'.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    I liked season 1 personally. Holy hell did it start off with a ton of potential. I did not like season 2 at all. Season 3... Meh, I gave it a shot but wasn't vibing after the first episode.

    I'll now watch this near 4 hour video to confirm my suspicion on season 3 being shit as well. I don't care if it's better rated than S1 on IMDb. I'll pretend only S1 exists, because I don't feel like watching S2 again which my brain would require me to do before watching S3.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    multidimensionally stupid

    Good way of putting it, the stupid surrounds you from multiple angles, not matter how much you lower your expectations, it still takes you by surprise.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    That sentence used to be a lot longer, but it all does boil down to stupidity.

    I heard a theory on the Adam Conover show recently that said product people--that is people that understands products and their customers--no longer run companies. Instead, we have finance people that know how to talk to investors and see their products as conglomeration of characteristics, maximized for mass appeal, and see their customers as numbers on a spreadsheet.

    I find this a very compelling theory and you can see it across all forms of media--from movie, to TV, to games. The root cause of this problem has been unstated, but I see it as somehow a result of wealth inequality and concentration of power. Bad decisions can continually be made because competition is limited, at the same time, being "in" with powerful people is career insulation from constant failure.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    There's currently much more money to be gained from attracting investment than there is from generating profit, so companies that don't prioritise selling to investors over selling to customers just won't get as big, and the feedback loop ensures that investors who invest in things that other investors will invest in later will have more money to reinvest later than investors who invest in companies that can make a profit. Historically, investors who invested in companies that couldn't become profitable lost their money, so couldn't invest in other things in the future. The system kind of does do what it's intended to, and efficiently allocate capital to where it generates the most return, but that's become decoupled from the implicit goal of most effectively providing goods and services.

    If I had to guess at the root cause, a good candidate would be that after the 2008 financial crisis, when quantitative easing was (successfully) used to stop nearly everyone losing their livelihoods by ensuring investors had access to enough money to avoid feeling pressure to pull out of all their sane investments and in doing so collapse all major employers, because it was never undone through quantitative tightening, there was enough excess money sloshing around afterwards that investors could afford to risk investing in dumb shit, and dumb shit could attract enough follow-up investment later that the early investors were rewarded.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    I don't understand how what you're saying applies to movies. Do earlier rounds of investment get a higher return? The idea is there is a budget and you don't start the movie until you've raised the money. In that case, the only two things that matter is that there are enough investors to start the project, and that the project is a success.

    But it's all a bit shortsighted, whatever is happening, because all the profit maximization is actively alienating customers. Console gaming is flat-out dying because games suck. Though, in the case of Microsoft, there is an investment angle, because they bought a lot of companies and saddled themselves with debt, so they can't afford to take risks... but refusing to take any risks across an entire ecosystem is a guarantee of failure...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    It only applies to movies and because they're expensive enough to make that the major titles almost all are things funded by a few major producers, and the investor-first approach has been pervasive long enough that the major shareholders of the studios are that kind of investor, so they pick people to be on the board who agree with them, and the board selects C-suite staff that are good at talking to investors rather than that are good at making their company produce good movies. The kind of movie they then want to make is the kind of movie that costs a lot so they can tell investors that it's the most expensive ever and therefore the best ever and therefore will make a morbillion dollars (and also says nothing so it offends no one and can be marketed to everyone) rather than making lots of mid-budget movies that might make many times what they cost or might barely break even or might become a timeless classic that makes a profit for decades. If their morbillion dollar movie flops, but the share price is higher than before it was made because investors expecting it to do well invested, the company's still considered to be better off, and they'll happily do it again.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago* (6 children)

    Season 1 was okay.
    Season 2 I skipped after a few episodes.
    Season 3 has actually been pretty good

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago* (3 children)

    season 3 was far the weakest one, 1 was pretty bad. 2nd couldve had a good setup with the friendly borg. the nostalgic arc is so poorly written.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    I don't get why people often prefer the third season. It mostly relied on referencing old stuff from previous series, even more than it did in the first two seasons. Then again, some people like that about Lower Decks.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago*

    LD was kinda better than the live action ones, so was prodigy. picard like the other 2 live action was all over the place what is with the showrunners obsession with teasing romulans/borg threat and then never mentioning them again.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Somehow it seems that the RLM boys liked Picard season 3. I almost want to watch it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago

    They talk like they 'like' it in the same sense that an abuse victim 'likes' a week in which they're only abused a little instead of a lot. The approval comes from comparison to the rest of new Trek. They also liked it better than the TNG films, which I dunno if I'd say that.

    I didn't like Picard, but I don't agree with this meme. I found season three to be the most digestible of the three servings of slop.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Careful what you wish for, or you'll get nothing but wacky gimmicks.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    It's like the NuTrek writers have just two modes:

    Mode 1: "I'm 13 and this is deep".

    Mode 2: Star Trek, but you only know it through the memes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    And the thing is, they're both just fine in moderation. But the first two seasons of SNW were so good and the last two have been almost all comedy gimmicks. I was happy to see a badmiral episode this season instead of "Star Trek but [gimmick]." And it was a pretty by-the-numbers badmiral episode.

    And Disco and Picard were continuing storylines, so if they decided to have a long stupid trudge through the mirror universe, the audience that didn't leave were stuck with it for a whole season.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago

    The only good part of season 3 was Seven's arc. The rest was just the cost of getting to watch it.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Use the top image from the first one and the bottom image from the second. It really drives the joke home.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago

    Its like we're not allowed to have stories with hopes or dreams, only hurt and suffering.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Nah, seasons 2 and 3 were dramatically lighter in tone than season 1. They even stopped cussing! I, for one, miss Admiral F-Bomb.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 6 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Just did a grep of the scripts. There were fewer instances of the word "fuck" after season 1, but many more instances of the word "shit".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    You're right, after I posted I remembered Picard telling Q he was "sick of his bullshit". Didn't realise there was much more. But "Shit" seems less offensive than "Fuck", so maybe that still counts as toning down the swearing, even if there was more of it? 🤷

    Silly language critiquing aside, I do remember season 1 feeling much gloomier than the subsequent ones.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 4 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    If you actually care, here is a table. Keep in mind this is probably from an imperfect subtitle OCR transcript or something.

    shitty fucking table

    expletive episode quote
    fuck s01e02 Oh, the cheeky fuckers.
    fuck s01e02 The sheer fucking hubris.
    fuck s01e04 You want to go to Vashti? Are you out of your goddamn mind? I hate that fucking hospitality hologram.
    fuck s01e07 P-Picard can look after himself, and somebody else can find that fucking synth.
    fuck s01e08 shut the fuck up.
    fuck s01e08 for no fucking reason at all.
    fuck s01e08 I'm sorry I had to fucking ruin it.
    fuck s01e10 Have you fucked any of them?
    fuck s01e10 and then I fucking did it again.
    fuck s02e05 to clone their fucking cats.
    fuck s03e04 Ten fucking grueling hours.
    fuck s03e08 Oh, fucking solids.
    shit s01e02 Now, here is some brown, sticky shit.
    shit s01e02 Shit.
    shit s01e03 That's bullshit.
    shit s01e05 Options? Well, if we can't grab him and we can't buy him Then we're shit out of luck, JL.
    shit s01e06 Bullshit.
    shit s01e07 Rios! Shit.
    shit s02e02 And I am too old for your bullshit!
    shit s02e02 Holy shit.
    shit s02e02 Shit.
    shit s02e02 Shit! Shit!
    shit s02e03 term is "for shit.
    shit s02e03 Oh, shit.
    shit s02e03 Shit, Gabi.
    shit s02e03 Shit.
    shit s02e03 "Shit I stole from the Borg Queen.
    shit s02e04 Shit.
    shit s02e04 Shit.
    shit s02e04 Shit.
    shit s02e05 How'd it go, Dad? Shit.
    shit s02e05 Bullshit.
    shit s02e06 to work shit out in there.
    shit s02e06 this bullshit time period
    shit s02e07 we're through all this shit?
    shit s02e08 No shit.
    shit s02e08 Shit.
    shit s02e09 or any of that bullshit.
    shit s02e09 colloquialism, bullshit.
    shit s02e10 Shit.
    shit s02e10 This entire bullshit scenario
    shit s02e10 Bullshit.
    shit s02e10 Holy shit.
    shit s03e01 Shit.
    shit s03e01 Shit! Shit!
    shit s03e01 of the underworld and shit, right?
    shit s03e01 Like shit stolen from
    shit s03e01 I'm talking world-ending shit.
    shit s03e01 take shit from someone like Shaw?
    shit s03e02 Bullshit.
    shit s03e03 Oh, shit.
    shit s03e03 more weird shit at me?
    shit s03e03 Bullshit!
    shit s03e04 I'm just some dipshit from Chicago.
    shit s03e04 Forget about all that weird shit
    shit s03e04 indeed a dipshit from Chicago.
    shit s03e05 can get your bullshit story straight.
    shit s03e06 me some bullshit disease.
    shit s03e06 How much of that goo shit
    shit s03e07 Holy shit, we got her.
    shit s03e08 in batshit circles, I'm all ears.
    shit s03e08 What? That's bullshit.
    shit s03e10 Oh, shit.
    shit s03e10 He still batshit?
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    Okay, I'm convinced, if anything they upped their swearing game. Especially since they still pulled out an F-bomb for "fucking solids" in season 3, which I really should have remembered. Solid data gathering!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago

    Picard S3 is basically just the Star Wars sequel trilogy, but instead of killing off a beloved character in the middle part, they brought a beloved character back to life.

    But it's essentially the same plot. Picard has an estranged son. Somehow the Borg Queen returned. Cool to see the Millenium Falcon Enterprise D back in action!

    I enjoyed it. But then I also enjoyed the Star Wars sequel trilogy, except for the middle part. With Picard S3 it's like they looked at what worked and what didn't work in Star Wars and made an improved version of it.

    Same as with Star Wars, I wish they would continue to move the story forward, but as with Star Wars, they just seem to only want to make prequels.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago*

    I loved the tone and art of Picard it felt salient with the last season of TNG, all self reflective and kind of deconstructive. I just wish the writers weren't Netflix hacks

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    Keep the things that are criticized and change the other things.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    You know what it means.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    They've moved from stories about us in relation to the objects and world around us to stories about ppls egos, traumas and emotional journeys. Hard to do if the federation gave most people a good childhood.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

    I stopped the moment 7 was holding someone's eye, spaghetti gore a-dangling, for a full screen shot, a-squelching and a-jiggling like some 14 year old's revenge-gone-raw, mad-mamma-mario, overly-hyphenated, underground, VHS, convention shock-schlock.

    I don't have a problem with gore, but why are we doing Troma as if it's serious? If she'd have looked at the screen and asked "why was 6 afraid of 7?" Then taken a bite saying "because"
    squelch
    "7"
    squelch
    "ate"
    squelch
    "eyes"
    gulp
    that would have been promise. Instead it just gave desperation and hack.

    From what I've read and seen it was just "hey! Remember this guy!" Over and over while they all performed some kind of brooding emotional lens flare, written by a second gen Hollywood producer getting fluffed while trying to sketch out what "the common old man" wants to see in the era of failing social support systems.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 child)

    My hopes started to falter when the female romulan villain, even when I found the actress insanely sexy in the role, delivered lines extracted directly from a manual for stupid over the top cartoonish villains. And the lost opportunities were painful (Hugh reuniting with Picard for two scenes and then Hugh being killed; Seven being the (a) Borg Queen for 30 seconds...) So much waste.

    And the less told about 'assimilation-via-transporter but only for young people', the better. Even more stupid than the transporter commbadges.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    I remember thinking oh, they're doing First Contact vibes, I enjoyed that for them. And the end credits music ever gets old hehe. But honestly, I don't remember S3 much beyond that 🫤

  • source