Always better. The more that we can drag down the franchise, the less money for TERF causes.
Legal institutions can jail people for life, but vigilantes can't. Kidnapping a CEO and ethically keeping him alive in a private blacksite for life (food, entertainment, medical care (ironically)) is cost prohibitive and also much harder to pull off.
You might want to read more about how the Constitution is interpreted in practice.
Did you escape your asterisks in *younger*? Should be younger and now my brain is melting.
And who enforces that law?
Hopefully the statute of limitations is more than 2 years.
There used to be a law against using federal funds to spread political propaganda domestically, but it was abolished some time in the past few years.
Hey, I heard we control both houses now. Hmm.
I don't know if you're joking, but the Supreme Court are fucking assholes and always have been, because they're people, and people all suck at the end of the day.
Classic example: Ruth Bader Ginsburg originally made a name for herself establishing gender equality in the Supreme Court by bringing a case of discrimination against white men.
If you ever get into a trouble with the cops, always be polite as possible, because if you're rude, judge and jury will fuck you over out of spite even if your rights have been clearly violated.
So yes, if you want to build case law holding cops accountable for their action, start with black cops violating the rights of white citizens, and if you want to overturn Citizens United, try a muslim.
The Supreme Court goes outside the strict text of the Consitution all the time... Saying, "I don't like how the Supreme Court is voting, so I'm going to appoint as many Justices as I want until I get my way" is a pretty clear violation of powers.
But y'all can believe in unicorns and chocolate trees or whatever the fuck makes you feel better. I'm out.
FIRST, a "majority of the principle officers" of the cabinet have to assert the President is, indeed unable, THEN they need 2/3 in the Senate and House.
25thing requires:
- Majority of the cabinet
- Supermajority of the House
- Supermajority of the Senate
Whereas as impeachmeant requires:
- Majority of the House
- Supermajority of the Senate
Amazon, believe it or not.
Mutually shared:
- People upvote things that make them feel good, downvote things that make them feel bad.
- People getting in the way of a hate train are plastered.