Right-wing influencer Laura Loomer announced she is taking a “brief hiatus” from her Loomer Unleashed podcast just hours after a Trump administration adviser exposed her for being paid to post some of her manic, hateful content.

It all started on Thursday, when Alex Bruesewitz, who is behind much of Trump’s digital media strategy, took aim at conservative social media influencers following the GOP’s massive midterm election loss.

“Believe it or not attacking Democrats over their relationships with a streamer (Hasan Piker) wasn’t an effective hit,” Bruesewitz posted, not mentioning Loomer by name. “GOP candidates probably shouldn’t take messaging advice from fringe right-wing ‘influencers’ moving forward.”

Loomer took the bait.

“But they should take their advice and meetings with @TuckerCarlson instead?… It’s completely reasonable for people to be appalled with Democrat candidates campaigning with a guy who said America deserved 9/11. Hasan Piker regularly makes comments in support of jihadi groups,” she wrote. “What wasn’t helpful was your friend Tucker Carlson essentially endorsing Abdul El-Sayed over Mike Rogers and using his show to tell people to not support Rogers just a few weeks out from an election. But we all know you will never condemn your buddy Tucker.”

“Laura, you are basically the Republican version of Hasan Piker. Democrats over the years have attacked Republicans for affiliating with you. Those weren’t effective hits either,” Bruesewitz replied. “Voters simply don’t care enough about ‘influencers’ or streamers. lol”

Loomer took offense to that, claiming that she was not an influencer and criticizing Bruesewitz for his association with Omeed Malik, a conservative venture capitalist and major Republican donor.

“I’m a journalist and an opposition researcher Alex. What are you? What is it that you do for Omeed Malik exactly? He’s a Muslim right? Half Iranian and half Pakistani if I’m not mistaken,” Loomer fired back. “Is that why you have such an issue with the things I say about Islam?”

“Okay lol. But is it common for journalists to get paid for their opinions and tweets?”

“You say ‘Okay lol.’ Not sure why you are laughing. I recall last year your company X strategies reached out to me asking me for help. Do you deny that? What is so funny? I guess I don’t get the joke,” Loomer said, admitting that she was indeed paid to tweet. “You loved sharing my journalistic reports during the 2023/2024 DeSantis-Trump primary too. What changed?”

“No I don’t deny that. I’ve paid you for tweets before. I haven’t for at least a year though,” Bruesewitz wrote back. “I also know you still get paid by others for tweets so I do think it’s fair to refer to you as an ‘influencer.’ What percentage of your tweets are paid for?”

....

Hours later, Loomer announced a “one to two month show hiatus.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 111 points 1 day ago (21 children)

Eat each other. Do it.

I thonk it should be illegal to push someone else's message without an explicit and obvious disclaimer.

Beyond that I think it is shameful and embarrassing. Anyone who posts other people's opinions or propaganda as their own for money should feel like a piece of shit, because that's what you are.

  • source
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 23 hours ago (1 child)

    The FCC already has rules that influencers must disclose they were paid to endorse a product. That why you see those "#ad" tags in YouTube videos or whatever. It's kinda crazy that it doesn't extend to political influencers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 23 hours ago

    It does still impact political influencers, just not in the desired way since the content itself nor the group it's endorsing aren't a product per se. They should close that loophole.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 1 day ago (7 children)
  • [–] 13 points 1 day ago (6 children)
  • [–] 12 points 1 day ago (5 children)

    Apparently I didn't thonk very hard

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 day ago (4 children)
  • [–] 3 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

    I thonk it should be illegal to push someone else’s message without an explicit and obvious disclaimer.

    Representing it as your own message when someone else wrote it, OK. Otherwise it steps on free speech far too much.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 hours ago

    The listeners should have a right to know whose message they are hearing. It's a civil issue - I think any laws should have fines and required communication fixes, not any criminal charges or jail time - but allowing fake grass roots movements that are actually collaborations between billionaires and grifters is harmful to civil society.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    One stopped and admitted he did it. The other doubled down.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 hour ago (2 children)

    Hasan is still doing it. Loomer took a break. She'll be back too. It's just a fucking grift for all of them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    I mean, journalists, newscasters and any other media organization about news are being paid to say what they're told. We all know that, but I don't think it makes a difference. The 1% decides what most of us hear.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 1 day ago

    I think there is an extremely big difference in how I view a message coming from someone who believes what they are saying, and someone who i know is getting paid to push a message.

    I will actually attempt to process and debate someone's honest opinion. A paid shill? You know its disingenuous so why even waste your time on it.

  • source
  • parent