top 88 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 170 points 2 months ago (4 children)

The guy would probably vote for trump again if given the opportunity

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 54 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Or at best, just not vote.

    👋 1
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    This should be encouraged. It is a useful tactic, and you can tell this because it's the tactic they use on us. You see all the things about not voting for a Democrat? Those aren't people abstaining from voting for moral reasons (at least originally, but it is spread by people who buy the message). It's spread because it keeps people from voting who would solidly be voting Democrat.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 166 points 2 months ago (10 children)

    Only because it affects him directly

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 116 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (6 children)

    The older I get, the more it becomes apparent that the primary political distinction between people is how many degrees of separation from themselves they care about people. The more you care about people barely connected to you at all, the more progressive you are. The more your scope of concern for people is limited to people in your immediately sphere, the more conservative you are.

    It is not always selfishness that sways conservatives. They can care genuinely and deeply for their family, friends, colleagues, and community. But that is typically as far as that scope of concern goes. They can take on more progressive political positions or make limited exceptions when their lifelong regressive politics suddenly negatively affects themselves or those close to them. Their kid comes out as trans, their work friend is black, their community is being spoiled by a corporation, and suddenly they are a progressive ally on those things alone. But what they care about will still be limited to those in their bubble. They will not care that their politics has the same effect on someone else's family until it happens to their's. It's a genuine character flaw. They are incapable of general altruism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 2 months ago

    Unfortunately, that it's such a widespread characteristic means society can only maintain progressive institutions by figuring out a way to protect them from being considered "enemy other" by people like that. There are selfish reasons to support safety nets - treating infectious diseases in poor communities prevents transmission to wealthier communities, for example - but those reasons haven't been sold in a way to gain traction with today's conservatives.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    in-groups and out-groups

    There are 2 types of people, those who think might makes right and those who think consent makes right. The might-makes-right type form rigid hiearchies and well defined in-groups and the group leaders are always working to shrink the group and demonstrate status.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

    Right but I think that that particular strategy just plays on that character flaw. Consevatives care about very few poeple, and if you can manipulate who those poeple are that they care about, and concentrate the types of people they care about as a group, you can control WHAT they care about.

    Progressives are also susceptible to in-group/out-group manipulation too. But our out-groups are those who oppress or disenfranchise others. So you would manipulate us by convincing us that that is happening when it isn't, or isn't happening when it is. Sound like a familiar argument?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 60 points 2 months ago (12 children)

    anyone can be wrong, anyone can be fooled by false promises by sleazy politicians. but the fact that it takes people so long to realize this is bewildering. i mean, it's his second term. what big accomplishments from his first term made him vote for trump again?

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    I think the issue is a lot of my feller Americans are really fucking stupid. And that’s saying a lot coming from a 15 year IV drug user. 6 years sober. But still if I seem to be smarter then most Americans we seriously have an issue wrong with our society. My brain and body are fried.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago*

    Browsing around different forums, I have read some of what they think, and they legitimately believe that he as accomplished a lot by "protecting the culture" and deporting immigrants. But there's a lot of complaining about everything else and general dissatisfaction from what I can tell.

    Basically they are racists and they are glad about the racist things he's accomplished.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -8 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    Harris wouldn't allow beef prices to continue to rise either, so it's not like ranchers had an alternative.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    Couldn't, shouldn't, wouldn't, nobody is talking about a washed up former prosecutors from 2024. We're so far removed from then that this current fuckery could have been avoided or diverted a thousand different ways a thousand different times.

    The real question is for OPs Rancher and is who will you vote for next time? I bet we all know the answer.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago

    Vance is different than Trump and understands a rancher's needs. When he was a good Christian child growing up in the heartland he would dream about working on a ranch. Vance ain't afraid of a good fight either and he ain't woke.

    He knows that brown people can do valuable work because he married one. Vance just gets it and unlike Trump he is in it for the people. Vote your troubles away, vote Vance today!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (2 children)

    I'm going to vote for the party that isn't an open hypocrite. How can you criticize the opposition for the exact same thing your party would do?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 55 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

    He rapes children, that's where every "debate" with a trump supporter begins and ends with me lol. Fuck beef prices or foreign policy, trump belongs in a cage where he can no longer hurt children, period.

  • source
  • [–] 53 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Only when it hurt them personally... And then forget when a promise is made to hurt others.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 50 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    He's worse than that: Trump doesn't give a damn about anyone who isn't Trump.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    What do you mean? He cares deeply for those people who give him lots of money 🤡

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Same old story. Only once they are personally impacted, then they give a shit.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 2 months ago

    Thats true to varying extents for virtually everyone.

    When you're broke and can't afford to take a week off of work because it could mean ending up homeless you're a lot less likely to go spend a lot of time protesting an innocent stranger being shot dead in the street than if that innocent person had been your brother.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 90 points 2 months ago* (18 children)

    Trump's support has fallen by another 0.1% this month! It will be soon.

    Here are some approval ratings for context:

    • Trump: 39.5%
    • Merz: 14%
    • Macron: 27%
    • Starmer (just before resigning): 23%

    Trump's lowest ever approval rating in RCP's average was 37% (Dec 2017), which was around the time it was revealed to the public Trump aided the Russian military in attacking US targets.

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    For context Germany (Merz) isnt a 2 Party-System. Basically we have 4 Major ones currently (afd, spd, cdu, green) and a few minor ones (left, left but pro russia, libs). With the major ones usually getting double digits % and the minor ones barely make it over 5% which is the baseline to participate in parliament. There are also very small parties listed as "misc" getting 10-20 of votes but not participating in parliament. Imo this 5% barrier and ignoring 20% of votes is a problem.

    Anyhow, if the votes concluded its normal that multiple parties form alliances and agree which policies they want to implement to get over the 50% threshold. Mostly dropping anything the voters wanted and implementing stuff rich people want under the blanket of "finding compromises".

    While 14% is really bad it's also just harder to get everyone behind you in such a plural political scene. Also Merz said stuff to insult about any worker. But the policies are particularly bad for workers yet the (self attributed) workers party SPD agreed to these policies. So Merz is problematic but it's 2 whole parties that are problematic and outright lie during elections.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    For context Germany (Merz) isnt a 2 Party-System. (sic)

    Sure, that's true. Angela Merkel's approval rating, however, reached as high as 77%.

    Imo this 5% barrier and ignoring 20% of votes is a problem.

    I am also not a fan of the 5% threshold. If, as opinion polls now suggest could be a real possibility, the AfD manages to gain an absolute majority with less than 50% of the vote in Saxony-Anhalt, it will be more than a problem but a full-fledged constitutional crisis.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago

    Sure, that’s true. Angela Merkel’s approval rating, however, reached as high as 77%.

    that mostly is a question of how the question is being asked, like you could ask merz approve/disapprove, or does he do a good/bad job...

    but for merkel in regards to her doing a "good" job.... suprisingly many people thought that, see https://www.statista.com/chart/23144/merkel-opinion-polls-since-2005/

    and as far as i can tell, the "14%" number is voters from another party's approval rating of merz, see https://min.news/en/world/1507853cbdd8c108c09a91cd4c3a9850.html

    The support rate of the Union Party dropped to 27%, and the support rate of the Social Democratic Party dropped to 13%.

    which would make a lot more sense.

    but the fact remains, that merz is quite unpopular due to his political agenda, and him opening his mouth

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago

    Finland also has a multi-party system. Our current government is an alliance of a right-wing party, an even more right-wing party (now with verified nazis) and two small fillers that are now also right-wing parties. Hooray for democracy.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    What y'all need is Count Binface!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    we have Martin Sonneborn from Die Partei, they fill the same role, and also had (have) seats in the european union https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Die_PARTEI

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Thanks for that info.

    I know almost nothing about German politics. Is rebuilding the Berlin wall something people actually want?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 2 months ago

    not seriously... it is meant as a jab at people complaining how back before the reunification everything was better (east and west alike), and the joke that it will create a lot of jobs :D

    and "the wall" does not only mean Berlin... there were walls, fences, barbed wire all across the border between west Germany and the gdr

    and if you compare binface and die partei... the "mandatory" knoppers (kinda like a sweet snack bar) break i would liken to the 99flakes for 99p from the bin :D

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    Do these mean anything compared between countries?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    They mean whatever you want them to mean.

    Obviously, a different electoral system will affect the approval rating of politicians. Nevertheless, I think it illustrates the deeply servile attitude of Americans towards their politicians, especially considering none of the other examples have had scandals anything like the 100th-worst scandal of Trump, and while I don't agree with the politics of any of the others, one could at least make the case they were trying to run the country.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    I think it illustrates the deeply servile attitude of Americans towards their politicians

    i do not think that this assessment can be made...

    but the statistics can be compared to their own earlier stats, and that also paints a bleak picture for trump

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Does it? He's been around the 40%-mark throughout most of his first term and the current term so far. I don't think there is a reason to expect his approval rating to suddenly crater, unless a sex tape with him and Hilary Clinton were to be uncovered.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    yep.. and the 40% were already the lowest rating in history iirc... so it just shows that he is doing worse now

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Definitely not the lowest in history - Nixon hit far lower ratings, despite doing a far better job and being hit by far fewer and far less severe scandals.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 31 points 2 months ago

    Typical conservatives, they don't care about bad things happening to other people but the second it impacts their own lives, now suddenly it's unconscionable.

  • source
  • [–] 28 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    "He doesn't care about ranchers" - yeah, something happened there. He was allllll fine with fuck the immigrants, fuck the brown people, fuck everyone else, but finally Trump did something that hurt his personal little feefees and now he's upset and surprised that Trump would do whatever it was, but he'll get over it and vote for him or whoever he annoints or whoever the Republicans put out there.

    Fuck these people. I gave excuses to these fuckers for decades and I'm out of excuses for them. They are traitors to our democracy and voted in fascism time and time again. No sympathy for traitors. They have collectively killed millions of Americans, and at least millions of others around the world if not hundreds of millions by their actions.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    It’s so interesting that they can spend so much time thinking about people not in their circle, but also have no empathy for those people despite being hyper aware of them

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 19 points 2 months ago

    up until the gop quietly puts the funding a bill which wont be televised or reach any msms, because they dont want the bumpkin supporters to see how bad farms ar being screwed.

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    This is easy to fake, but I think it is happening. They're spamming Truth Social with bots to drown out the dissent now. That's not good for them.

    It might be more about the dissent rising in the right-wing media ecosystem than people waking up ontheir own, but the dissent in the right-wing media system may be driven by falling viewership, so maybe it's the whole thing collapsing in unison. Last poll I saw had him down to 33% now.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    I occasionally lurk on patriots.win, and the comments over there have become more skeptical, and now include some laments that their kids have stopped supporting Trump. I don't see any of them flipping to vote Dem the next election, but I have some optimism they will stay home and not vote at all.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Please oh please oh please oh please oh please (repeat until november)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    Democratic primaries are routinely pulling dramatically more turnout than Republican ones. I believe the Trump team is in hot water in primary battles too, not as bad as the corporatist Dems, but discord and anti-Trump sentiment are non-trivial within the party. I'm no prophet or expert analysr, but good things might happen.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 17 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Wont matter a lick if they dont go out and reverse that fucking vote.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    They only turn when they are personally affected in a big way.

    Plenty still haven't felt that yet.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Only took him 10 years to figure it out

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 2 months ago

    I remember reading a modern Captain America comic set in the WW2 era. The Red Skull, Hitler's top agent, is planning his escape from the inevitable fall of the Nazi regime. The Skull blames Hitler personally, but is still 100% committed to the cause. The Skull has enough gold to live like a king forever, but he's planning on using it to start the next Reich.

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 2 months ago

    “until it happens to affect me, i’ll shit on everyone else” - old people

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 2 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago

    s...so he's saying it wasnt worth getting poor and broken just to pown the dems? like maybe his best interests in his vote were a little off?

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Cool story bro. I have family in farm country and can drum up a dozen farmers/ranchers right the fuck now who pray before they eat and vociferously defend everything this administration is doing to defend against the libs. By right now I mean RIGHT NOW, AFTER alllllll of the pedo shit and the losing the made up war, tariffs, all of it. Does. Not. Matter.

    They either won’t or can’t give up the sunk cost

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    It's pretty sad it's essentially a cult now with all the same tactics. Leaving the cult means leaving behind fox news and conservative media which tells you no, you are smarter than them, you get it. Trump is saving you and America. I can't even blame most of them because it's emotionally stunted immature lonely people, it's just sad.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 2 months ago

    He's giving the room away because he no longer needs it. He's entrenched and he's got his gestapo.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago

    I bet that if he watches FOX News for a few hours a day, he'll come back to understanding all his personal hardship is necessary so that Trump can protect him from the libs, the worst of the worst immigrants and, to quote Darlene Graham Nordone, Boys in girls' sports.

    Very few people voted for Trump to bring the cost of eggs down. They voted for Trump for permission to do that sweet, sweet racism.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›