Omaha police agreed this week to stop carrying gloves that can deliver electric shocks to students in the halls of Nebraska’s largest public school district.

The decision affecting most Omaha middle and high schools came after The Associated Press first revealed Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s plan to give officers the gloves, which are known as G.L.O.V.E.s or Generated Low Output Voltage Emitters. The devices have also been used in recent years by some jails.

Omaha Superintendent Matthew Ray requested that police working in the schools, known as school resource officers, stop using the gloves. Omaha Police agreed.

top 96 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 235 points 2 months ago (42 children)

American culture seems to have nothing left in it besides the layers of violence.

  • source
  • hideshow 42 child comments
  • [–] 58 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    WHAT? Bet if i was there you wouldn't say that to my face.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    face

    That's a strange way to spell gun.

    That thing that make you strong and manly and AMERICAN.

    That, and the implied threat of violence because someone on the internet doesn't agree with your opinion of how great America is?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Literally impossible to tell the difference when it's just a line of text on a webpage.

    That particular phrasing isn't used as "a joke".

    That's why we typically use a "/s" to remove the ambiguity.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    Racism is so American that when you protest it, people think you are protesting America.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] -8 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    I know, not on topic really, but lets not pretend that racism is an American trait and not a human one.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    It's not human trait at all. No child is born racist, they're taught that.

    Which you're implying that it's a natutal human trait and therefore somehow acceptable on some level.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Lol, fuck off with that projection and putting words in my mouth. It's like you haven't traveled at all and experienced racism in the Far East, in Europe, in Africa, etc. What a bullshit take. Don't put fucking words in my mouth and think that you made a good point.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    It is not more pervasive here, it's just the hypocrisy is hard to take. Go to most parts of the world and you'll see racism still alive and kicking. It's just the US we have constantly patted ourselves on our backs for being the "melting pot" of the world, or the "salad bowl" as we were later described. Yet reality and history show that was, and is, just hypocritical bullshit.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 20 points 2 months ago* (7 children)

    Nothing left? Brother it had and has nothing else.

    It was started on the principles of "I moved here and now I own the land because god told me so, now stand still while I genocide your entire nationality"

    Moved to "I own you because someone brought you here on a boat and I need someone to work the fields."

    Moved to "You may have civil rights but we make all the drugs and write the laws"

    Moved to "Be free and happy, go do acid and don't look too closely at the vague yet menacing government agents wiretapping your homes, they are here for your safety"

    Moved to "Serial killers are everywhere (don't look too closely at them, either. Dont want you seeing their badges)"

    Moved to "We need agents everywhere watching everything, and Guantanamos in multiple locations because terrurists."

    Its a long line of bloody murder stretching all the way back to colonialism (and beyond!)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    Exactly! It's never been anything else. The Europeans who first came there were narcissistic and racist sociopaths and it's all been that since then.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    America has preserved European values - more specifically 17th century European values such as racism, imperialism and the whole "might is right and a 'superior' race genociding an 'inferior' race to take their shit is absolutelly normal and fine".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago* (4 children)

    Lmao ah yes, thank you for clarifying that it's specifically 17th century europe, I was really worried someone might get all confused and think that modern europe has a problem with racist imperialism. No no, that's just america.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Please point out the part of my post were I wrote that modern Europe doesn't have a problem with racist imperialism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

    Uhm... That wasn't what you did, nor what I called out? So no, but I will say that trying to reframe criticism like that is a kinda dodgy tactic (if intentional).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    You and your strawman should probably get a room

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago*

    I'm not clear if you've just wildly misunderstood my part of this conversation, or if you're simply unfamiliar with the strawman fallacy. Either way, there's been no strawman from me. And I quite suspect the one example from you was unintentional.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Im surprised school shootings is news at this point. Seems to be like a weekend event.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 65 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

    Officers were expected to give warning before using the gloves and then touch the person for up to 15 seconds while the electric shock was delivered, the statement said.

    According to the manual, these things (the Gen 5 gloves) are discharging 324–362V at 0.7–1.2A and the Gen 4s 210–380V at 0.9–1.5A.

    That's around half a kW for you folks keeping track at home. Better hope little Timmy's heatlh class is teaching him what a regular sinus rhythm is.

    I hope any officer who uses that on a child gets a prostate exam with a G.L.O.V.E. equipped.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 60 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    ...stop?

    Why the fuck did they ever start?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 53 points 2 months ago (17 children)

    They shouldn't have shock gloves in the first place.

    In fact, I will go so far to say that police should be unarmed by default. They can carry a baton, but a remote operator has to give the okay to unlock the baton for extension. A squad car can have a shotgun with rubber slugs, but the trunk also has to be remotely unlocked. Police should also receive permission from an operator for turning off their camera.

    Bluntly, the police cannot be trusted with power.

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 2 months ago

    Public site, 100% uptime, every weapons pull listed in real time. They put those gloves on, it's noted, they pull the baton out, it's listed. They draw their guns it's listed. Transparency would be a good start. Body camera footage should also be available to the people in the videos automatically in identification.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    There shouldn't be any police in schools in the first place, like in the rest of the world.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -5 points 2 months ago (11 children)

    Insane comment. What is the equipment even necessary for with that limited access?

    Perhaps that is your point, but it might as well be people deployed from a location rather than onsite personnel.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (9 children)

    There are many parts of America where people - and by consequence, officers - are thinly spread out. Having potential access to firepower is sometimes important for the occasional bear or person who is shooting at signs.

    In cases where martial power is needed, contacting people is a thing that should be done by default. Having a potential ambulance in the wings, social workers and other police on notice, and so on, is good practice.

    We now live in a age where ships at sea can have reliable access to the internet. Society should take advantage of that to ensure that police officers are not able to harm their communities. We do that, by making the powers of an officer conditional - that they are recorded at all times for infractions, prevent them from instinctively reaching for a gun, and making them aware that brutality isn't an crutch that they can rely upon.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago (8 children)

    I thought that a platform often interested in self hosting would loathe the idea of remotely activated equipment that’s often getting used in the moment, like a remotely activated baton (lol).

    My take is that you either trust it with people in the field or you don’t.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    Your typical forum-goer doesn't have the potential to kill strangers. If someone has the power to kill, they must be held to far greater scrutiny and responsibility than the ordinary person.

    If it were possible, I would prefer the police to not exist outright. Barring that, the next best thing is to highly regulate their existence and procedures.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    Got it you hate cops and have unrealistic ideas about how to regulate them. I think my original comment alluded to that pretty well.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    Cops have spent my entire life being shitty protectors of capitalism and racism. Of course I would distrust them by default, because they haven't given me a reason to trust their character and motives.

    As to my proposals being unrealistic? I think they would be much cheaper and practical than the current version of policing. A fair chunk of a town's money is spent on wrongful conduct lawsuits, due to the police abusing their power. We can have much more money to spend on social goods, if we took away the unimpeded powers of police.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (4 children)

    Agreed on not trusting the police.

    Who’s the hall monitor activating the equipment? Some person also getting paid to watch a bunch of live body cams?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    The same person who calls in a helicopter when that's necessary. You're writing as if dispatchers don't already exist to provide cops all their resources and backup on demand.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    An out-of-police-jurisdiction response center, with monitoring staff. Police and other social workers call in to report potential encounters, then are actively monitored via the body and dash cameras. The staff are not employed by police nor the city, instead it is hired by the state government, into which local governments put their taxes.

    The staff are a mixture of government staff and civil rights members. Each monitoring shift has least one member of the state and civil rights working together as a pair, and the pairings are reworked each month. This makes it harder to develop a 'good old boy' club for corruption to take root in.

    Police footage that hasn't been actively monitored is reviewed a week or two after the fact, with a team of reviewers to go over it - they do stuff like redactions, legal analysis, deletions of mundane activity, and so forth. As with the monitoring pairs, the reviewer team is a mix of state personnel with civil rights watchdogs. If the center's review team can't agree about what to do with footage, members pass a copy along to their respective organizations.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    If they can deploy a hundred thousand multi vector public surveillance cameras in a matter of months almost escaping public notice, they can invent a bunch of devices to monitor the cops just as easily. To hell with them.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 49 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Why does this country keep worshipping a cruel and unnecessarily violent police force in every corner of its society? You'd think enough regular folks have had a bad enough experience to want to reign it in over time.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago

    I absolutely hate cops and have had horrible experiences with them my entire life. I don’t understand this cop worship either they’re always the dumbest most abusive people you knew growing up.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 43 points 2 months ago (9 children)

    Why are there police in American schools? That's very weird.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago

    Stopping fights, looking for drugs or weapons, giving kids a head start on a life full of imprisonment; you know, the same safety regulations every sane nation would have 🙄 Growing up with parts of my childhood in the US private and public educational system, it became very clear very quick that the cops didn't really give a single shit about me or saving my life if something happened. They were there to 'keep an eye on the troubled, inner-city kids' i.e. "scare and threaten the minority* kids"

    *I say minority but my school was actually pretty diverse, all things considered, though the black kids definitely had a slim majority

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago*

    Absolutely weird, but the situation probably isn't exactly like what you're envisioning. Outside of a few notoriously violent/"gang activity" regions, they're not regular staff - there will be a couple of School Resource Officers (yeah, really what they're called) for an entire district, and they will float around to the various schools on a schedule (ex: my comically awful highschool had one stop by every two weeks).

    They're also there almost entirely to deal with incredibly tedious administrative tasks that students never see - things like truancy cases, monitoring parental custody orders, coordinating public risk management, following up on teacher concerns about abuse, monitoring sentence diversions, deeply unglamorous but fairly important things like that. The cliche'd idea of them "stopping school shooters" has never been what SROs are for despite what they may claim their role is (uvalde utterly debunked that pigmyth...). And while the popular image of police "raiding lockers" searching for drugs is absolutely based on real events, it's a pretty dated meme at this point; mass "dragnet" searches like that have been repeatedly ruled unconstitutional (I haven't heard of one happening in years), and very few highschools even have student lockers anymore.

    Excessive force like using these "tazer gloves" is just yet another thread in the greater tapestry of the US' issues with policing, which can be boiled down to two major issues: First, that the police have been used as the catchall for tasks that really shouldn't be their job, and second that those interdisciplinary tasks have been given to a group that is worryingly easily infiltrated by fascists. The first point is a lot more addressable than the second, but as several regions have started shifting from the police there's been dramatic improvement in the fascist problems as well, and among the most successful have been replacing SROs with Limited LEOs (essentially social workers with very restricted legal enforcement powers, who exist entirely separately from the police). Really, it's a very outdated concept and absolutely is not a role the police should have ever been used for.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -9 points 2 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 24 points 2 months ago

    No, no, to permit school shooters to go unimpeded. Uvalde could have had good samaritans intervene, if the police didn't block them from attempting to rescue kids.

    Police are fucking useless 95% of the time.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 30 points 2 months ago (8 children)

    Parents who support this support it for "urban" schools. They don't believe it will ever be used in their white, suburban public schools.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    Or they just really like electrocution of children.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    On the one hand, I love delivering electric shocks to children, but on the other hand, I really hate cops.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 29 points 2 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 28 points 2 months ago

    G.L.O.V.E. sounds like something Vault-Tec would make and sell

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›