top 96 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 175 points 2 months ago (17 children)

You could also play with camera angles, but dimensionally, yeah, no substitute for a big dude.

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 86 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    Or a little dude to make a normal dude look big like in LotR.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    I thought a lot of their work was camera tricks. Jonathan Rhys-Davies was 6'3.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 2 months ago

    They used every trick out there at some point. They even invented a new technique for 2 shots in Bag End where they had motion-controlled cameras, tables, and benches synched up so they could do the only ever forced-perspective shots with moving cameras ever really used.

    Everything since then went digital in the following years, the technique was never really used again.

    In the Hobbit films, they had to lean more into digital because they were in 3D, so forced perspective shots wouldn't work.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago*

    They replaced the hobbits with doubles who were little people on some scenes.

    Not that I disagree with what you're saying. I'm pretty sure most of it was camera trickery, but my earlier comment was more about three specific scenes where doubles (halves?) were used.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 29 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    See: Hagrid's behind-the-scenes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    And Lord Of The Rings in Bilbo's house

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 2 months ago

    Honestly seeing the camera shift in a MAKING OF clip for some of the angles made my brain work overtime, because when watching the movie so many times over the years, my brain just goes "yeah, hobbit next to man riding on a wagon" or "hobbit and man at a table across from each other" but then you see them from a different angle and it's just... Wrong.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    This is one of the reasons why I love love love cinema history. The lengths that the crew and creative team went to in order to make an illusion work is just mind-boggling. One of my favorite things to do as a kid was watch the DVD extras about Lord of the Rings, Star Wars, Labyrinth, all that.

    One of my favorite forced perspective tricks ever was Darby O'Gill and the Little People. That old Irishman playing a fiddle above a cavern full of leprechauns, galloping around a pile of ancient treasure on tiny horses, and then rushing off to hunt foxes through a magical crack in the wall?

    Literally, one of the most incredible feats of practical film illusion ever concocted, right up there with the velociraptors of Jurassic Park and the chest-burster from Alien.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 85 points 2 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 14 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Holy shit that’s Wilt Chamberlain??

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 23 points 2 months ago*

    It is!

    To put this photo in perspective Wilt "The Stilt" was 7'1" and 250lbs (216 cm/113 kg). Andre was 7'4" and 520lbs (224 cm/236 kg). Almost twice Wilts overall size, just an absolutely massive unit of a human being.

    They both make Arnolds impressive 6'2 & 210lb (190cm/95kg) seem relatively dwarf-like.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 67 points 2 months ago (10 children)

    Now is where someone better at storytelling than me would talk about the time Andre the Giant drunkenly passed out in a hotel lobby and nobody could move him so they just left him there.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 65 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Andre had a lot of joint problems related to his gigantism, as well as physical injuries from his wrestling career. He self-medicated with alcohol, and became addicted to it.

    It was really sad.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 50 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Hello sir, yes hi. I came for an amusing anecdote, but instead I was shown nothing but sadness and pity. I’d like a refund please.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    I'm sorry I am not authorized to give refunds, but I hope that the following Andre the Giant facts will help: he was widely known as the "Gentle Giant" because his real-life personality was exceptionally kind, friendly, and generous. He was soft-spoken and gentle around children, lifting them up and being patient so they wouldn't be scared. He disliked arrogance and mean-spirited people, and would physically "reprimand" bully coworkers in the ring.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 32 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Or the time he let out a fart for, like, 3 minutes straight and someone asked "Andre, are you okay?" to which he replied "I am now, boss."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    I think I'd feel better than okay after a fart like that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

    pay attention after your next (first?) colonoscopy. they pump you full of air and most of it comes out the same direction it came in.

    just don't hold it. my mother was feeling too dainty to fart (we had back to back colonoscopies with the same gastro. even did the prep together. what a bonding experience) so she ended up with trapped gas. and then did not get enough dilaudid and only got to the gut clench phase of the drug and ended up in more pain.

    then she farted the long fart and all was right in the world again. but her gut was still clenched from the drug so it was not so pleasant.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 57 points 2 months ago (7 children)
  • [–] 71 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    How does his parents knew he was going to be giant as a baby? Or it was just luck that he was named Andre the Giant, and grew up to be giant?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 57 points 2 months ago (18 children)

    To be fair, André was one especially Big McLargehuge beefy specimen of mountainous manmeat.

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 68 points 2 months ago* (16 children)

    Mandy (Inigo) is 6 foot (1.83m), Wallace (Vizzini) is 5 foot 2 inches (1.57m)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 2 months ago (15 children)

    I never realized Inigo was himself tall. Wild

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 months ago (13 children)

    6 ft is only a little bit above average.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 2 months ago (9 children)

    If 6 inches is ‘a little bit’ then sure.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Average is 5'10". 6' is 2" above that, not 6".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    You’re going to need to specify what demographic you’re talking about when you say average. The global average is 5‘6“.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 18 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    I still struggle with how animators in 1937 were able animate the ripples in the water in Snow White at about 1:36.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Not cooked, they just don't know.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago

    I feel like the right thing to do is show them a movie from the early to mid 80s that used early CG and then show them Legend from 1985 point at Darkness and be like "That's a dude in a suit. 5 and a half hours of makeup every day for him to look like that." Then pull out Clue and point at Wadsworth and be like "This is the same dude."

    Then get a mop because you have to clean up after their heads explode.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Today with Robert Bobroczkyi. What an absolute unit. Singular. Unique.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 22 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    The irony is that he's actually not that tall. It was practical effects. Not digital.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    He's 7ft tall. Even being 6'3, my reaction to a 7ft tall person is, "Holy shit, that's one tall dude."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    I mean, they might be cooked but that seems like a reasonable question for a kid who doesn't know all the tricks and hasn't seen it before. This feels like "I'm going to bash the youth because I'm old" boomer humor

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Lmao these idiot children don't understand the intricacies of filmmaking. Bet they don't know shit about 3-point lighting and ADR either. Stupid kids need to spend less time on the tick tocks and more time studying cinema!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Stupid kids need to spend less time on the tick tocks and more time studying cinema!

    Listen, until they've tried making their own full claymation stop motion to fully understand onion skinning and editing I don't want to see their faces at the dinner table

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago

    Still happening today. Backrooms did some numbers this year on a low budget, and relied on a 7'7"/2.3 m actor (with prosthetics and makeup) for one of the freakier looking characters in recent film.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago

    The biggest dude of all. A giant!

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    I ran across a study a while back how social media is causing brain damage in kids.

    AI, social media and internet is becoming the lead poisoning of this generation.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    But this particular example is far from a cooked brain situation. I had the same questions when I was a kid about how they make cartoons and movies. There are many practical and in camera effects that were used to make people bigger or smaller and are very interesting to learn about. Nothing cooked about it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago
    [–] 5 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    i don't remember ever questioning his size. WWF and arnold were so popular that it was normal to see huge, roided out dudes in pop culture.

    andre the giant was just slightly bigger.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago

    Arnold is 6'2" and was ~250 pounds in his peak body building days. Andre was 7'4" and ~500 pounds. There were lots of huge dudes at the time but Andre really was kind of in a league of his own.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    not too many giants in the world these days i guess

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    Does twitter-op not know about practical effects? I never watched the movie, but im gonna guess stuff like low filming angles, stools, plateau-shoes existed back then

  • source