$500 USD -> $400 USD for those of you that don't want to click.
post
I work in product management, this was not a marketing ploy.
Supplies are expensive now. They are cutting into their margin considerably and probably did find some slightly cheaper components. Maybe they cut a better deal with the suppliers.
Either way, they are playing smart by listening to the market on an untested product in a new product category of “semi-smart” phones. This could signal a comeback of this type of product but only if they pave the way with affordability and usability.
I hope this does succeed for them because we need more companies taking risks in today’s market. Everything is so bland right now.
I'm on the Engineering side and $400 buys you parts for A LOT more phone than that, especially with that screen size.
Are they planning on having the phones individually hand-assembled by Degree holding Electronics Engineers in the US - hence the manpower costs are insane - or is it a situation of putting a jet engine on a small car (tons of memory and a big processor on something with a far too small screen to be useful for most things, especially gaming)?
I bet the price bares no relation to the actual product manufacturing costs.
Yes, but also, ROI on development and marketing and research costs etc. This is a niche product with no clear distribution channel. While cost to produce based on parts alone is low, what about procurement, planning, distribution, marketing, development etc? Everyone needs to make money to get the product off the ground.
Plus this is a completely unproven product (generally) static landscape. Price is basically dictated on how they can penetrate a market, gain market share, and still make profit after all the work that goes into making that a reality.
Those things are mostly a problem due to limited number of sales and thus lack of economies of scale, as they're mostly the kind of cost that are global rather than per-device hence the more the sales the less their impact in the device price.
That's the vicious cycle of "not enough sales for cheaper prices via economies of scale leading to higher prices leading to fewer sales" for hardware startups without massive upfront investor funding and the reason why, say, a Fairphone or Jolla Phone are a bit more expensive than one would expect.
We don't need companies taking risks for the sake of risks though. We need companies that actually have good ideas and can produce products. This isn't much better than a Kickstarter. And you probably know incredibly well, no one is changing or going to succeed in the very bloated cell phone market.
You may be correct but that just makes them look dumb for trying to do this in the first place. Why? Make some mechanical keyboards, retro looking monitors or other peripherals, whatever might actually make sense for the Commodore brand and style. Not a phone.
Translation: We couldn't really sell it for that price, now we try it with this price.
(Edit: This is no mockery, only of the marketing. The phone is nice)
Was $500 now $400 still lol.
It's $400, there's no choice of carrier, the battery won't hold a charge, and the reception isn't very-
Lol I forgot that $400 was considered excessive.
Now people buy $1200 phones yearly.
Didn't Nokia still make dumbphone and only cost double digits? With $400 i can just get a decent smartphone and then install app locker and lock all irrelevant app in it.
Or get something that run on non-bloatware OS and don't download
Atari should make a pager. It also runs on Android software. It will cost $800. It comes with belt clip.
$399, what? This is tech from over a decade ago, there are smart phones that sell for under $100. Seems like a stupid gimmick only wealthy parents will buy for their kids.
Yes, mass production feature phones. This won't be a mass production product. You'd be surprised how much that increases costs. The question is of course, if one can make a product under those circumstances that people are still ready to buy. In other words, it has to offer something (can also be non-material) that differentiates it from those mass production feature phones.
In this case it's linux. I am prepared to pay gobs for proper linux devices. However, I'd rather something like a liberux Nexx if that thing ever comes to fruition.
Liberux Nexx sounds cool but also a bit like vapourware. I'd be happy to be proven wrong.
Personally, I am giving Sailfish OS a chance. After all, that isn't a "dumb phone" OS as such. They appear to dumb it down for the Callback. It is not dumbed down for the Jolla Phone. If things work out, we should get real units into our hands at the launch event in July.
Nostalgia-bait isn't going to make addictive social media go away, and these devices will probably end up with easily foiled workarounds to get to those services anyway.
Also, did Commodore even used to make flip phones? I had a legendary indestructible Nokia brick, Motorola flip phones, and one really shitty Samsung flip phone. I'd feel nostalgic for something from them if it had the same design (but not the shitty Samsung phone), not for a pseudo-oldschool actually-it's-just-Android-but-less-functional phone.
I'm still on the fence about it but the price drop does move the needle a little. I'm still going to wait to make a decision until it comes out then give it a couple of months.
I honestly like everything about this except the no browser and small screen choices. I get the idea, but I'm happy with my addiction, thanks, I just want the privacy and control. And SailfishOS looks interesting, but I cant find a way to try it, except as a VM.
So still $100 more than a LightPhone II, an already somewhat pricey 'detox phone', or about the same price as a used Moto RAZR if you just wanted a flippy phone made of pre-owned components
"We worked tirelessly to lower the price...and by subtracting 100 we managed it goddammit"
I want one, but I don't think they're going to get the pricing near anywhere where it becomes a reality.
That said, I'm really happy that this product has at least started a conversation. I would 100% prefer a dumb flip phone than the advertising machine in my pocket. There is a suggestion of a market; we'll see if the industry is too far up their own ass to respond.
Sadly I don't think the revamped Commodore will have the clout to pull it off.
How about a phone for people who aren't addicted to them, but want the basics without being spied on?
Things I want in a phone:
- GPS with maps and directions.
- A browser for the rare occasions I want to look something up when I'm away from home. The last time I used it was to find which aisle something was on at Lowe's.
- Texting.
- Phone calls.
- Notes.
- A decent camera.
- No bigger than an iPhone 12 mini, which is what I have now, and it's plenty big enough.
I don't do anything else. Mostly my phone sits on my desk, ignored unless it makes a noise at me. I take it with me sometimes when I leave the house, but sometimes I don't bother--not addicted.
This can easily be achieved with most any Android phone.
- Switch to a degoogled OS like GrapheneOS or LineageOS
- Install a minimalist launcher (there are dozens)
- install CoMaps for private gps and navigation
- use whatever chromium browser comes on the phone or install a privacy browser like Firefox (again, there are dozens)
- add a notes app (there are dozens)
I'm personally waiting for the Moto/GrapheneOS collab coming out next year. I'm rocking a slightly older OnePlus with LineageOS now.
This can easily be achieved with most any Android phone.
lots of phones are not supported even by lineage. it does not help that manufacturers are continuously farting out the same mediocre models just with slightly different hardware, so that drivers need to be figured out again
Yes, by "most any" of course I mean that you can find a device with almost any spec or form factor you choose. If you like pixel, you can choose lineage or graphene. If you have an old phone lying around - with hundreds supported by lineage - there's a good chance it works.
Most Android phones nowadays fail at
Switch to a degoogled OS like GrapheneOS or LineageOS
either because they're not unlockable or because neither OS supports that specific brand and model.
Not saying the rest isn't correct, it's just that "most" in there that in my experience is wildly optimistic.
this may very well be the phone for you. I think it does all of this
Except for the "A browser on rare occasions", which sadly is likely the only thing stopping me from buying this at the new far more palatable price. I don't need to be treated like a baby, but apparently this is considered a core feature of the phone and they won't back down from it.
I 100% agree with this. This is SO CLOSE to getting it and offering a phone I actually want. But I want to own my devices and decide what I do on them. The thing hard locking me out of a browser (and discord) is unfortunately a deal breaker. I don't want the hardware mfr to have a say in how I use the device and treat me like a literal child in the process. It's disappointing.
I was also thinking about buying it, but I want my phone to be my phone.
I actually use my browser from time to time. What is the use of a phone if you need a "backup phone" just to look something up?
Also, their reasoning for blocking the browser is absurd: "you could use the browser to access social media." I don't use TikTok, Instagram, X, or the like, so why do I need to be nannied?
Exactly. I can understand them not installing a browser by default as part of their "principled stance against social media", but blocking the install entirely is WILD. I also do wonder how they actually do that though... Just a list of "known browsers" and blocking their install? It's Linux - what if we fork a browser and rename it "totally not firefox", would it even catch it?
Its fine if it doesn't come with one by default. If it is fully capable of running one but it stops you from doing that, forget it.
Yup.
Although I’d expand texting to “messenger apps” specifically Signal for me.
Fuck SMS.
an incredible endorsement of our vision
Fake, and the price is still ridiculous. Nostalgia-bait as someone else said.
That’s more like it!
And I completely disagree with the people saying it should be much cheaper.
It’s a LTE Linux computer. In 2026. With multiple screens, a 48MP camera, good DAC, enough power to run real Android apps and tons of bells and whistles; what do you expect?
Electronics are expensive, unless it’s cheap garbage, heavily subsidized, or both. That has a huge externalized cost, and avoiding that is the whole point of this phone. R&D, customer service, and continued software support for the translation layer and OS, must crazy expensive too.
I know wages haven’t gone up with inflation, which makes $400 hard to afford, but that’s not in Commodore’s control.
If one wants a cheaper AliExpress Android fliphone, that’s reasonable.
But it’s not the same product. And you’re going to pay for it in other ways.
Android fliphone
Not interested. Want SailfishOS.
This, I think the price is decent. Most dumbphones are low cost but you notice it - terrible buttons, slow camera, lackluster audio. On top of that they have no coolness factor. This is a phone that ticks all boxes and is privacy friendly. On top of that, it is from a company I like to support.
the cheap flip phones are truly dollar-store build quality and cameras. mine has a crappy radio, it seems, too.. nearly always roaming on another carrier's nearby tower because it can't pick up the vzn one just a couple miles outside of town.
the 'rugged' ones are built better and can take a literal beating and still work, but they cost as much as a recent model 128gb smart phone.. and still have squat for storage and lousy cameras.
An Oppo A5M 4G costs around a bit over $150 in AliExpress and that's including the VAT for Europe (which will be the VAT of whatever country they imported it into, normally around 20%).
This thing has a 1080p 7" screen, which judging by the pictures is more than that Commodore phone.
Electronics are expensive for these things but that's when you're aiming for heavy use such as gaming, and that means larger/higher-density screen, more CPU/GPU power and bigger battery to feed those all the things as well as more memory and storage, which are the most expensive parts. LTE modules are comparativelly cheap nowadays, as are stupidly high resolution cameras and good DACs.
The only reason I would see for this to end up in the expensive electronics range is if they're aiming for it to run heavier AI models locally, which might very well be the case since judging by what others said the CEO of the company which bought the Commodore brand is AI-bro.
Saying "lte Linux that can run Android" means nothing. All Android phones run Linux and support LTE. It's an Android phone with restrictions on what Android apps it will run. That's it. The screen is tiny and two small screens are cheaper than a larger one.
You can buy all of that for $100 on Aliexpress.
This is trash dressed up in a fun skin to sell to Commodore fans who don't know how to delete an app from their phone.
lol, it’s worth $100
There’ll probably be several to choose from on AliExpress at that price point.
Really? I am in.
Holy shit you weren't kidding
Edit. fixed
holy mother of tracker URLs! lol
What year do you think it is?
I'd do up to $200 for nostalgia (given inflation and component prices like RAM).
I would be interested if I knew which networks it works on….
When I first saw it I was thinking 249USD. But twice that? Nah.
jesus I buy older model phones so I don't have to deal with the enormous price tag. Samsung Galaxy S10 with headphone jack and removable SD card, got it for $150. Who tf still buying new phones? even worse, who's paying 3 times as much for a phone that does so much less? I'd love a digital detox thing, but I like having google maps on my phone
Old phones, if nothing else, lack software updates meaning also security ones. Also battery might need replacement.
yeah you can replace the battery and install lineageos, good enough in most usecases
They mean new old stock, not used phones.
Security updates... meh, it's a mixed bag. Outside of maybe Google I really doubt any manufacturer bothers to keep their Android phones super up to date with all the possible fixes, even within the support period.
And as for the privacy angle... honestly the manufacturer is usually the first one to spy the shit out of you. Using Google services while worrying about a hypothetical security breach is really ironic.
The CAT S22 is $150. It doesn't have the same hardware, but I don't see $250 worth of upgrades between that one and this.
Definitely closer than asking $350 more, though. And it's not like Sailfish functionality is worth nothing.
bought and used one of these. it sucks ass. if you want something dependable dont get this. keypresses on the dialpad dont register half the time which nade t9 input impossible. also you must install a 3rd party app to use t9 as your main input. stock rom pops the qwerty touch keyboard on the yiny screen for every input
I'm more concerned about the dictatorial-feeling attitudes in the marketing than I am about the price. I'm all for a privacy respecting phone, but an even higher priority than that is respecting me and my choices. Blocking me from social media doesn't feel like it's catering to me, it feels like its nannying me and dictating my choices to me. That's not something I'm interested in at any price.
I realize that I will, in reality, be able to choose whether to leave those blocked, but having them blocked by default feels just as aggressively judgemental and disrespectful as preinstalling them and shoving them in my face like most existing brands do. It's not your place to tell me what apps to use or not to use. Give me a fucking blank slate, and let me decide, thankyouverymuch.
I have a dumb-phone. 20€. I had to buy a new one because the old one used only 2G and that infrastructure is gonna be put down sooner rather than later.
I don't get what they are trying to achieve with that thing.
More tempting now anyway. I assume with SailfishOS you can add a web browser.
It's just a flip phone with Android running on it like every other flip phone with Android running on it that they've produced over the last 5 years. Commodore never even made phones historically, I don't understand why I should care about this.
Its not running android.
I know people tend to open their mouth without having read the article, but you didnt even bother to read the thread text. Congratulations.
Yeah but it runs Android apps so it might as well be an Android phone. Again it's just a cheap flip phone being priced extraordinarily and branded with a company that never made smartphones or dumb phones or phones of any kind as far as I'm aware.
top 100 comments