[–] [S] 0 points 4 months ago* (1 child)

What do you mean by not seeing this particular one?

I lean towards agreeing that this is a massive bubble, it's just these things are complicated and I don't support making quick judgements in such situations.

Or were you talking about something completely different? Sorry, I am a little bit confused.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] [S] 2 points 4 months ago

    Era of $200 dGPUs is over and it's not even purely due to ML tech impacting component costs. Inflation and overall cost of packaging mean that it's not viable to have $200 dGPU (outside of the absolute low end that's barely comparable to mediocre iGPU performance).

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 9 points 4 months ago* (1 child)

    The usage itself feels alot more snappy compared to the PPP, general UI work is comparable to a normal android i would say, and no longer each action has a delay.

    What UI system do you use (as I understand there are KDE and Gnome mobile launchers and others?). How do they compare to the Android launchers/platforms (perhaps you've tried Samsung OneUI)?

    I am thinking of getting a Jolla phone in the coming months. While leaving US mobile platforms doesn't seem viable in the immediate future, I thought I might as well start preparing for the move.

    Any issues related to battery / heat are extremely challenging to deal with in a smartphone. You can workaround certain things not working, platform derived battery issues are the kiss of death.

    Cheers!

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Phones cheaper than USD$400 tend to have 6-8year old chipsets

    What area of the world are you from? Just curious where there is such a state of affairs.

    This is definitely not true for Asia and Europe. It been a while since I was living in North America, but this didn't seem true back then. Although I lived in a city and didn't buy through carriers and never dealt with carrier blocking independently bought phones.

    Perhaps North American carrier requirements have changed since then.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • I recognise that Pinterest is a pretty big player in social media and seems to have relatively broad reach (first heard about it in my country maybe in 2011?).

    It just seems Pinterest (as a product) is really subpar compared to say Insta, TikTok or even Twitter. I am not talking about their commitment against the interests of the user/public (they all suck on that front), it's the UI/UX and subpar features.

    One big one is slow loading and display of images. It's always slow and they didn't even try to design it in a way that would perhaps move attention away from this.

    Their image categorization algorithm and source/context provision is a joke.

    While I hate Google Lens with a passion, it does seem to have the most powerful source identification feature and it can come up rare variants/sources that are not available though other such systems.

    My focus is on research though, not commercial activity so my use case is probably not important to Pinterest.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • view more: next ›