or random apps on their smart TVs and phones
It must look ridiculous to the ISP to see on average 2TB of scrambled, outgoing UDP packets/month...
What are you thoughts about (semi-) centralized moderation? (Updated with a more decentralized idea)
The idea of a centralized judicial system does not seem compatible with the spirit of federation. The safety we expect from centralized platforms is something we gave up for our freedom.
that's right but I think smaller groups of server admins could still team up and curate shared blocklists. in a small group trust is easier to manage.
What are you thoughts about (semi-) centralized moderation? (Updated with a more decentralized idea)
the reporting system could also keep track of a reporter score, measuring how useful a user's reports are. the only effect it would have is for ordering of incoming reports in the list moderators see, reports from users with a good track record show earlier in the list
I think you forgot to paste it
i get that phones could still record so i would still have those outside tho
any electronic thing could hold a mic, not only phones. mics are very small
with that said, you want to ensure that whatever laptop model you're looking at supports battery bypass charging
how can one tell if it is supported? is there a list of charging controllers or something?
contrary to what you are spreading, yes there is, to an extent. the expectation of not being recorded, and analyzed by computer algorithms. the only thing we cannot expect is not being seen by other people, but no one is arguing that.
I hear you, its very bad you need to think about this, nothing justifies cameras in the classroom. or on the bus. no companies can be reasonably trusted with handling the recordings and the access responsibly. none of them do that, everyone is going for the cheapest sloppiest solution, not caring for if the recordings are uploaded to a company dealing in even facial recognition database development.
you are right, public areas are public, and in public you are not recording passersby. public is not your reality show.
imo it does not really matter how many lines is the openssh codebase, but how many lines of it deals with authentication/authorization and decryption of the incoming traffic.
then it can have all the features, but any bugs in them can only be abused by clients that were allowed access.
still, the related part of Wireguard's codebase is likely much shorter, because it does not have multiple authentication methods and key algorithms, and whatever else. but then it still makes sense to use sftp over wireguard, because of its authentication inside the network and relative ease of use.
not true. regardless if all your user accounts are using key based auth or not, some system accounts will always be passwordless, because they are not supposed to be logged into.
DoT/DoQ is easy to block since it uses a specific port - 853.
by default. but they can use different ports.
DoH, just block traffic to known providers by IP or SNI. There you go, secure DNS defeated.
then a thousand DoH services pop up, or your friend runs one for you, or whatever, and they won't be able to find all of them. just like streaming companies can't completely block all VPN providers either.
Többen is voltak más táblákkal, őket nem tudtam lefotózni.
Több autó is dudált amíg a közelben voltam, van egyetértés!
view more:
next ›