
What a pathetic way to lose ~50 employees/volunteers

What a pathetic way to lose ~50 employees/volunteers
Jesus Fucking Christ.
The decomposing corpse of the blockchain cult is getting even weirder than it was at the peak of the mania.
The mandate’s visual aesthetic — the anime and other illustrations — reflected imagery from a controversial online figure who was known to promote “white nationalist ideology and disturbing pro-anorexia content,” according to the lawsuit.
When an Ethereum Foundation board member objected to the aesthetic, Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin responded that “the controversialness (sic) of those aesthetics is itself part of the point,” according to the lawsuit.
After demanding that employees agree to the mandate, Bastian Aue, co-executive director of the Ethereum Foundation, defended the suicide pledge to employees as “part of the artwork of the mandate.”
It was, he said, “a cultural reference like other elements in there. Chosen deliberately, but not meant to be taken literally.”
"We deliberately referenced white nationalism when getting you to promise suicide if you don't do as we say, but we didn't mean it"
Titled “The Ethereum Foundation Mandate,” the document featured ethereal illustrated scenes of glowing lights and anime-style characters voyaging through dark forests. The pages featured white text against a navy blue background and were adorned with cartoon flowers, rainbows and diamonds.
And on page 11 — nestled between a winking anime woman and three yellow cats — was a suicide pledge.
Authors, maintainers, editors and distributors of “this software” would pledge to ensure the software remained free and publicly accessible, and would also vow to “take his or her own life with a sword upon failure to uphold any of the pledges in this license,” the illustration read. It was labeled “Source Seppuku License,” an apparent reference to a traditional Japanese ritual suicide.
To work in crypto you have to have a fairly high baseline separation from reality but this is impressive.
“If you reward making a stink with outcomes, then everyone will know that essentially making that kind of show both internally and externally is the way to cause outcomes inside of the EF,” he said, according to the lawsuit, which cited a recorded conversation between the pair.
So he doubled down instead of removing a suicide pledge? Legitimately insane. Now he's getting sued because of it. But from his point of view it was more about asserting who was in charge. He's insane.
"Dude, it's a joke, how dense can you be?!!
... Sign here, here and here or you're fired. The sword and a body pillow of your assigned anime waifu staring into your soul have been delivered to your desk."
What the fuck? Lmao, cringe anime seppuku pledge?
Crypto bros are so pathetic.
Looks like the funny money bros running the fucking cringeshit cult must come from 8chan.
This is on par with Aum Shinrikyo and Happy Science. Shades of Lychee Light Club.
Another reason to yell FUCK CRYPTO.
Had to look up Lychee Light Club, and despite the stort synopsis, it looks like an interesting read, in a very morbidly curious kinda manner.
So, probably not intentional on your part, but thanks for sharing a dark story I'm now morbidly curious about checking out.
Pretty worthless with the paywall
How do these websites determine who gets served a paywall? I don't get one at all.
Me neither.
Maybe to rope people in? I can't remember ever reading the Denver Post before, so maybe it's like a free sample?
And on page 11 — nestled between a winking anime woman and three yellow cats — was a suicide pledge. Authors, maintainers, editors and distributors of “this software” would pledge to ensure the software remained free and publicly accessible, and would also vow to “take his or her own life with a sword upon failure to uphold any of the pledges in this license,” the illustration read. It was labeled “Source Seppuku License,” an apparent reference to a traditional Japanese ritual suicide. When the document went out on that Friday in March, employees were told to commit to the principles in the mandate by Monday or quit their jobs, according to the lawsuit brought by Kayleen Fulton, a Boulder woman who was fired from the Ethereum Foundation after she led employee resistance to the suicide pledge.
Winking character, keep it free... I am not a crypto holder but something seems off with the article.
If you're reporting facts on something that is wildly unfortunate and bizarre, it's not the facts that are off, it's* the thing you're reporting on that's off.
Again, I want to know what's going on with this. Is this another Thiel? Do you know anything about the company executives? I don't own crypto so I don't really follow it.
It's like the Linux foundation issuing a vision that the software should remain free. Members of foundation should pledge towards that mandate. If a scumbag is going to rug pull it to a commercial license, violating the pledge, they will probably reneg on any voluntary penalties that they also pledged for violating the first pledge.
While its all a bit dramatic, the game theory of the drama should have been explained better, in that drama for traitors traitoring will include their pledge to kill themselves which as traitors will just have to dismiss, while enduring drama.
The people running that company are nut jobs who demand cult like loyalty because they sell a scam product with a cult like following. I could totally see them doing some kind of sovereign citizen type of joke contract like this as some kind of loyalty test.
Here make a legal declaration regarding this anime cartoon that's contains some clauses which are binding and others which are just there for color.
I think this would be the best contract to sign. Including BS like that in it would make it easy to argue the contract is completely void. And given the timeline and threat of being fired. You can also argue it was obviously signed under duress.
Risky in the current political climate, though. We'll see where things go from here but the side that would support slavery for life contracts still has a sitting president (who is acting a bit too calm at having just lost the house and senate).
Yeah, but any litigation about this kind of thing always takes years. So either we have new leadership, or we are already totally screwed worse than the contract.
Hence it being risky as its impossible to tell what kind of people will have authority over the decision process if it ends up in court and what their values will be. What might be ridiculous to some are exactly the kind of "gotchas" that predatory people love.
Jfc…. We live in the most embarrassing timeline. And it’s VERY upsetting that pieces of trash like this company are allowed to exist in the same world where people are starving.
For anyone looking for the full PDF: https://ethereum.foundation/ef-mandate.pdf
Thanks. It's full of cringe "animu Lain suicide cult" pictures, I don't understand how they have employees at all.
This is the only part mentioning a license
Supported projects must pledge that they will not change their open source or copyleft license in the future. Permissive licenses are accepted, viral copyleft licenses are appreciated, but merely source-available licenses are not tolerated.
Edit: my bad. it's in an image on page 11
That they would produce a legal document with a clause like that and in such a childish format speaks of the general sleaziness of crypto.
Omg Crypto CEOs need to get Luigied so hard, he's practically begging for it
Nearly 80 of the foundation’s 250 or so employees voted to nix the suicide pledge after the draft was released
Nearly 80... So the other 170 employees were okay with this? I'm going to go out on a limb here and suggest that just maybe this is a cult of some sort.
Edit: I pledge to not math before coffee anymore.
Seppuku if they don't keep things open source? Wow that's messed up!

If I had to legally defend the foundation my main argument would be that any proposed thousand-year policy is clearly satire, and that this was actually a test to weed out those who didn't get it.
I can't find the post off hand, but I saw the document pages with this suicide pledge software license on it abd thought it was a joke! Knowing it's not is disgusting!
I thought it was some sick, edgy joke about the state of tech companies. I guess I shouldn't be surprised that modern tech companies and even nonprofits are trying to build the torment nexus from within their own walls, but here I am.
Downvoted for paywall. Sorry.
Huh, a guy I went to college with actually worked for EF for about 5 years. Looks like he left and joined Argot Collective a few months ago, though. Though I'm curious how different the culture there actually is.
Ya all take this way too seriously. That seppuku license (definitely not enforceable in court btw) has probably been written after snorting a thick line of coke. These are crypto bros after all.
all 58 comments