... technical name for glory hole

OR

Your mom's a fuck node

as much as i love nvim and understand people who love emacs, there are people who want that big gui thing. for those i’d recommend VSCodium if they feel like they really can’t live without VSCode or Gram for those who got to like Zed.

I'm a longtime vim user and I use nvim+lazyvim for all my personal stuff these days, but I have to use enterprise managed VS or VSCode for work.

Good question, I guess I might be using the wrong word when i say "orphan" because I see the arch wiki uses that term differently

Orphans are packages that were installed as a dependency and are no longer required by any package.

https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Pacman/Tips_and_tricks

You can remove these manually or if using an aur helper like yay there are flags/settings you can use to delete them after the desired package was installed.

However what I was talking about aur packages that are unmaintained or do not have a maintainer anymore.

I'm researching more at the moment.

Out of curiosity, is that actually true? Surely our lord and saviour must have made a tiny slip-up

Edit: Apparently TempleOS doesn't have networking

Better than OpenBSD

To be honest I'm not really sure, my comment was meant as a question to potential clamav users, I'm not really one of them.

AFAIK ClamAV is mostly for looking for windows targeted malware so I doubt it

To be honest I'm not really sure, my comment was meant as a question to potential clamav users, I'm wondering the same thing as you.

You add the rpmfusion repo and install a few nvidia packages from there. Kernel modules are then built for the driver. If secure boot is used, they need to be signed too. Sometimes the grub entry isnt updated and doesnt load nvidia drivers. Sometimes you boot into a black screen, sometimes Wayland throws a hissy fit. Hardware accelerated video decoding needs more packages, in browsers it may need extra configuration..
The components are all there and they work, but sometimes the stars don't align and you just curse a little and wonder why you didn't just buy AMD because that, just works.

In the simplest case, absolutely. I ran into black screens and wayland issues due to a combination of needing to enable simpledrm in the command line and working with secure boot. Not too much extra once you figure it out, though.

It's a couple commands and laid out cookbook style. Fedora has a very good document page on installing nVidia drivers. And the installation is generally very smooth.

The biggest hang up for first time users is understanding that you need to wait for everything to build before doing sudo systemctl reboot. How long do you need to wait? No one really knows. There is no progress bar or any other notification that the building is done successfully. You just wait and then take a leap of faith into that dark abyss and hope for the best.

Typically, it's recommended to wait “at least 5 minutes”. Maybe more. I always waited around 10 minutes, (or one cup of tea) to be sure. But some users reported needing to wait was much as 20 minutes for everything to build. YMMV

But your brain should be the best antivirus you have.

Is there an AUR package for it? seems not in the official repo

But your brain should be the best antivirus you have.

True of virtually every OS.

But "only stupid people get viruses" is exactly the kind of trap that catches folks.

I have eset home but now I've gone completely linux, and they don't do it for home - only business

Which sucks, as I have a year left on my subscription I can no longer use :/

There is no malware on Linux and there is no war in Ba Sing Se

a lot of the replies are just "you don't need antivirus on Linux"

Which is completely true when using distros like Debian, Fedora, RHEL, OpenSuse, etc.

Arch (and its derivatives) are designed to be on the bleeding edge with ALL the paper cuts that come with it. It is absolutely not focused on stability or security. If you want those things then stick to Debian or Fedora Silverblue.

And the second you introduce npm to your system you can throw any semblance of security out the window, regardless of what your operating system is, and no antivirus is going to save you.

That being said, the fundamental security models between Linux and Windows are very different. And on Linux the overall impact will likely be far less damaging (technologically, not financially) than on Windows. Windows "security" is just a corporate marketing campaign.

I'm gonna assume that their servers are not installing stuff from AUR though

They also have been developing a Linux distribution for 6 years. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Azure_Linux

errr... just FYI, if you have AUR packages through distrobox, you are basically just as vulnerable as someone running vanilla arch. You checked if you have anything form the AUR on the nearly 2k (last I checked) package list?

I'm trying Clamav but its giving me (at least what i think is) a bunch of false positives. I'll look into SElinux.