It won't. There've been sales before all this tracking. Only thing it threatens is raising the price arbitrarily for individuals.
post
Can you imagine as an old person you hang outside of a grocery store: psst, hey kid I'll give you a dollar to go buy me some back medicine. They know my card number and its 50% cheaper if you buy it for me.
Won't somebody think of the scammers?!
[X] Doubt.
Now do a ban on rent surveillance and any system that uses “data” to “adjust” rent.
These people depend on us having goldfish memory… they be right to a great extent.
Boo fuckin' hoo.
Charge what you need for a modest net profit. Surveillance pricing is just the perfect refinement of capitalist cruelty.
Discounts, sales and similar tactics have worked fine for decades if not centuries, without customers being recorded.
Their claim is bullshit.
Rofl nice try, assholes
At Target you can ~10% off when you buy a retail product online for pickup. -You can't place an online order (even for pickup) without entering all of your contact and billing details...
I know it's technically not surveillance pricing, but it's still incredibly scummy.
Fine by me. If it's stupid surge pricing with occasional "discounts" or a straight price for everything then I'll take the later.
They're trying to convince us that surveillance pricing actually benefits us. Lol
Oh yeah, that's the problem... All the companies falling over themselves to give out extra discounts to consumers.
“Why is the government stopping us from charging our customers LESS??”
I think they misunderstand what people are complaining about.
People don't want discounts for one person while another gets overcharged. It's a good thing if it threatens discounts. Everyone wants to pay the same price for the same thing.
Discounts can be annoying even when they're "fair"
It's annoying when something was discounted yesterday, and now you have to pay more. Or when you just bought something last week, but now you could have saved a bunch because it's some arbitrary special day. Temporary discounts of any kind are inherently unfair and manipulative.
Tip: Some stores, realiizing you can return a product and re-buy it at the current discounted price, will retroactively price match themselves within the return window.
People don't want discounts for one person while another gets overcharged.
Yeah, maybe you have more faith in humanity than me, but I think there are tons of people who would be ok with this assuming that they're the ones getting the discount.
Your “discounts” are being subsidized by someone else’s over charges.
What ever happened to charging enough to cover your overhead and have middle class life?
There have been discounts back in time where retailers did not have personal information on that level. What happened to stickers like "10% off" for all customers?
God they're so transparent.
"But the discounts we want to give our customers!!!"
Kill it with fire.
I have already pre-boycotted digital pricetags in brick and mortar stores. I will just drop all my shit and leave. You will not get my money if you're changing the prices on customers like that.
Sounds like the rich when they threaten to leave if they don’t get their own way. If he gets voted in we will leave.
If they don’t like it they have every choice leave or not trade.
I think most of us understand economics well enough to see that there's no difference between a selective discount and a selective price hike.
If this isn't the most ridiculous thing ever. Surveillance pricing is effectively a price fixing event across all industry. Old America wanted healthy competition to best serve citizens. Me, I thought old America was bad for its citizens.
April 26th 1992...
Got a source that you can read without subscribing? Even killing Javascript doesn't get the full page to load.
Edit: had an archive.ph link to the non-paywall article, turns out we shouldn't use archive.today or any of it's affiliated links. They were behind a DDOS attack on Wikipedia, so I'm done with them, as everyone should be.
Now to find another paywall bypassing site!
not on wikipedia but on someone who published open-source intelligence on the site operator, and using visitor traffic, while also masquerading as some random person who sighted the operator a tiny bit and editing archives to keep the identity theft up
Fuckin figures. I knew that place was too good to be true. I'll delete the link and stop using them. Got a non-paywall link to the article, by any chance?
unfortunately not :(
try the extension at https://gitflic.ru/user/magnolia1234
all 11 comments