[–] 1 point 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

That's what I said.
It's not double to add an additional person. It's double to add 2-5 people. If you only have one person to add, the Duo plan is only 50% more. So it's never more than an additional 50% per additional person. And that drops to nothing after the 2nd.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 4 days ago*

    Agreed. That would be terrible. Terrible with or without AI coding. And the statement oddly goes against everything they've done up till now, with Andy at the helm the whole time. That's why I'm not certain it means what most here assume it does.

    As far as I'm concerned the article is an allegation, not a conviction. It's like the prosecution making their argument to a grand jury without any opposing arguments. I agree there's more than enough in the article to have a trial. So far the defence has managed to poke a few holes in the prosecutor's case. The haven't obviously destroyed it, forcing 404 to make a retraction or anything; And they probably won't. We'll have to see in the next weeks and months how much more of 404's story they can cast reasonable doubt upon.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 2 points 4 days ago (6 children)

    All I want is a software that works as intended and tested well.
    Don't want anything Vibecoded

    Can AI code not be tested well to ensure it works as intended?
    I'm not sure using AI is synonymous with "vibecodeing" or "slop".

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 child)

    Right, that's what the title says.
    But what of the questions I asked?

    Actually never mind about those.
    Are you looking for help with it, or a reason?
    Or do you just want to complain about an odd, minor, one off bug you may have found, as though it's a valid reason to DeGoogle?

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 8 points 6 days ago* (2 children)

    Sure, it's rotating now. But what does that mean to how it started rotating?
    Will seeing it rotate help anyone understand what caused it?
    Did you think that was the part of the story that we would doubt?

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

    I don't think the public knew at all while he was in office. There may have been some early signs those closest to him noticed. There was certainly nothing at the level of Rump. Regan could easily hold on to the thread of a whole sentence from start to finish.

  • source
  •  

    For years now I've wondered why people keep complaining about dialog in movies. Now I've spent a few days in a hotel with a TV stuck on default picture and sound settings. I started a Dune marathon. (He just passed the gom jabbar)

    Much of the dialog is far quiter than it should be. Enough to be difficult to understand if I didn't know the movie so well. Even softer sounds I know should be there aren't audible at all. While I wouldn't call the loud portions too loud, I'm in a hotel and don't want to disturb my neighbors, so I'm riding the volume some.

    I don't have access to the TV's settings, so I don't know if it's possible to improve things at all. I can say, the built in sound on televisions is certainly not what it should be. It could be improved from factory, with better down-mixing and level curves. That might cause issues with other programs though.

    Atraides are about to rescue a harvester. I'll get back to it.

     

    New Mexico’s congressional delegation on Thursday called upon major tech companies Apple and Google to commit to ensuring New Mexico retains its name on the companies’ maps.

    The letter to Apple CEO John Ternus and Google CEO Sundar Pichai follows President Donald Trump’s social media posts on Sunday that first showed New Mexico’s name altered on a map to be “New America” and then later expressed enthusiasm for such a change by writing: “So much more prestigious and beautiful for the people of that potentially incredible State. Wow, I Love It!!!”

     

    The United States Agriculture Department’s move to repeal protections for roughly 45 million acres of federal forestland nationally without a public hearing prompted New Mexico environmentalist groups to host their own forums across the state this week, including one Wednesday evening at a basketball gymnasium in Albuquerque’s Barelas neighborhood.

    USDA Secretary Brooke Rollins on Aug. 18 announced that the department had formally proposed repealing the 2001 Roadless Rule, which currently protects federal forestland, including roughly 1.6 million acres in New Mexico, from road construction and timber harvesting. She unveiled the proposal last year in Santa Fe during the Western Governors’ Association annual convention.

     

    The increase is higher than the nationwide median increase of 15%, according to a statement from the office, and will take effect Jan. 1. Despite the rise, OSI officials noted that the state’s premiums have historically been lower than the national average and that next year’s boost will result in monthly healthcare payments that are largely in line with the rest of the nation.

     

    Two environmental groups — the Santa Fe-based New Energy Economy and the national Center for Biological Diversity — in August filed petitions with the New Mexico Supreme Court challenging proceedings for the massive Oracle and OpenAI data center campus under construction in Doña Ana County.

     

    New Mexicans on Medicaid should keep an eye out for a turquoise envelope in the mail this week. It contains important information about changes to Medicaid rules coming because of President Trump’s “Big Beautiful Bill,” as well as resources to help New Mexicans comply or seek exemptions so they continue to maintain access when they need it.

    view more: next ›