Alpha AF (lemmy.world)
๐Ÿ˜† 3 ๐Ÿคฎ 3 ๐Ÿ˜‚ 2
 

top 98 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] 201 points 5 months ago (16 children)

Tate looks like a potato you forgot in the back of a cabinet and started to grow

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [โ€“] 95 points 5 months ago (13 children)

    Don't insult the potatoes. You plant them and grow more potatoes.

    Wtf does Tate have to offer?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [โ€“] 49 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    To be fair Tate grew a lot more tates.

    At least potatoes are nutritious and respect women.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [โ€“] 12 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    You make an excellent point. We have never buried Tate underground to test this. Maybe he can do the same as the potato.

    Let's at least give him reasonable doubt and bury him. Then after 3 or 4 months we'll have our answer

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [โ€“] 6 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    potatoes are actually useful and quintessential

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [โ€“] 3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    They are hardy and are a great source of starch. Love the potato.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 140 points 5 months ago (1 child)
  • [โ€“] 107 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    I find women so attractive that I don't care if they have a dick or not. Damn

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [โ€“] 106 points 5 months ago (10 children)

    "Human males are more attractive, look at peacocks"

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [โ€“] 35 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    Rumour has it Tate fucked a peacock

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [โ€“] 17 points 5 months ago (2 children)
  • [โ€“] 24 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    I always love when people make the connection with ducks for example. Like have you seen a female duck? Yeah they aren't as colorful, but their pattern is way more interesting and they are absolutely beatiful in their own right.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [โ€“] 7 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Also, idk, I think that what an ape thinks looks good has little bearing on what avians find attractive. For all we know male ducks think that bright plumage is unattractive.

    Like for real, would parrots looking at us understand what we see in permanent large breasts? Or would they look at our other comically oversized sex characteristic (large, exposed penises without a baculum) as the primary showy mating display. Or would they see us as a species where sexual selection has resulted in both parties having a display to show off? Would they think that from their perspective it's obvious which looks better?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [โ€“] 65 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    The Greeks invented sex but the Romans finetuned the concept by finding out you could also have sex with women.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [โ€“] 21 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    The original copypasta uses "orgies". Since, you know, you can't invent something that has existed before even humans.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [โ€“] 48 points 5 months ago

    Would be funny if all this manosphere shit was just a ploy to turn more twinks gay, so Tate could finally have the harem of his dreams.

  • source
  • [โ€“] 46 points 5 months ago (9 children)

    Is this actually for real?

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [โ€“] 14 points 5 months ago (5 children)

    Would it change your opinion of these weirdos?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [โ€“] 26 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    Yes. To be clear, all this makes them even stranger (and deeper in the closet?) than I previously knew.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [โ€“] 5 points 5 months ago

    Can't say for sure. It wouldn't change that all these people are trash. Let's see, if true it's sad that their stuck in a world that tells them it's not on to be who they are. And thus feeling like being shit stains of a human is the better than loving the right person. If false someone else is lieing, these guys are horrible people, no lies necessary.

  • source
  • parent
  • [โ€“] 3 points 5 months ago

    I thought the same thing, and tried to find the 2 replies. In the grand scheme of things, it does not matter though, because all three of these ghouls would say whatever gets more attention because they are amorphous blobs of shite.

  • source
  • parent
  • [โ€“] 78 points 5 months ago (1 child)
  • [โ€“] 35 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (7 children)

    The "on average"-qualifier in there working like a lifeboat on a plane falling from the sky over the Sahara

    Also

    Does this man actually know what "gay" means?

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [โ€“] 8 points 5 months ago

    I begin to think he means that in original meaning...

    "I dumno which rapper is beefing with which other rapper because I am not happy"

    "I agree man are more attractive on average because I am not happy"

  • source
  • parent
  • [โ€“] -4 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    Well.....maybe he just thinks "beefing" means shoving their beef stick intothe others man hole.

    If he thinks thats what beefing is, I could see why he thinks it's gay.

    I mean, he's wrong either way, but that would explain where his viewpoint is.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [โ€“] 21 points 5 months ago* (3 children)

    Beefing is when you're getting fucked in the arse so hard that your partner manages to get some air up there, so you fart. Like queefing, but with none of that gay vagina stuff.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [โ€“] 34 points 5 months ago

    Alpha version males are buggy and barely work. Kinda useless.

  • source
  • [โ€“] 33 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    The "it's not gay if you're the top" attitude seems surprisingly common.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [โ€“] 29 points 5 months ago

    That's a dangerous level of internalized self-loathing repression

  • source
  • [โ€“] 28 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    The Deep on โ€œThe Boysโ€ wasn't as overblown as some people thought.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [โ€“] 27 points 5 months ago

    Happy Pride, everyone!

  • source
  • [โ€“] 26 points 5 months ago (4 children)
  • [โ€“] 4 points 5 months ago* (3 children)

    There is nothing as manly as gay sex.

    It can only be performed by real men. If a women is involved, it isn't gay sex anymore.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [โ€“] 2 points 5 months ago* (2 children)

    If the sex is between two men and one woman, regardless of who is penetrating who than it is 66.66% gay.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [โ€“] 49 points 5 months ago (11 children)

    Guess they've never seen all of the statues of Athena, Artemis and Aphrodite. You don't get as many nude female statues because it was usually considered obscene for women to be naked in public.

    But the Greek male statues were fully nude and depicted ripped mortal men because they were made in line with Aristotle's idea of good art being educational. Those were arguably the marble version of "git gud, scrub".

    If there were more male "perfect" body statues at the time, which we can't establish because many have been lost over the millennia, it might actually be evidence that men were considered less attractive and they needed more body shaming to fix it?

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [โ€“] 16 points 5 months ago* (5 children)

    Also they're depicted with small pps because that body part was associated with savagery iirc. If we had the same trend today they would probably all have underwear with a huge bulge because that's where puritanism and male beauty standards are currently.

    Also one of the most significant statues of that era is a female figure...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [โ€“] 6 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    The penis thing is pretty hotly debated, but savagery comes pretty close to my understanding of the theory you mention. It's not a hugely different concept from some of the manosphere stuff you find today though.

    Basically the idea was (it's theorized) that thinking with your dick leads to making hasty and bad decisions, but you want to be like the cool smart intellectual philosopher rhetorician dudes ruling society who are strong enough to control their urges. You want to be the civilized powerful master strategist, not the uncivilized weak-willed destructive glutton. So... because art needs to be about reality and be educational (there's no place for that creative abstract shit), we're going to de-emphasize the body part associated with urges that are difficult to control. These are powerful rational dudes afterall.

    The biggest difference with modern manosphere bullshit is maybe the part where they shrunk the pps on the ripped marble dudes to make that point. Instead we get... social media statue and peacock "science" analogies.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [โ€“] 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Didn't the Vatican whack them all off with hammers?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [โ€“] 2 points 5 months ago* (1 child)

    Phrasing. But yes, some of them - they seemed to prefer making plaster and metal fig leaves thankfully. Michelangelo wasn't thrilled about being told to change his work either. Some of them were whacked off earlier than the Catholics, and some were whacked off by the Vatican even as late as the 1850s in "The Great Castration".

    Many of the lost appendages were accidental though, natural disasters and the like did a lot of amputation and decapitation, to the point where there are entire catalogue methods for mismatched heads on statues.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [โ€“] 6 points 5 months ago (1 child)
  • [โ€“] 7 points 5 months ago

    I think Nemesis is Roman, but probably a copy of a Greek statue. I might have chosen to forget because the "restoration" work on her head breaks my heart - but I know that's a common problem. Such a pity because the drapery is gorgeous.

    Looking at this Diana/Artemis, who was much luckier than most statues by having her original head reattached, you can see how different it is. The proportions make much more sense.

    Image text description below image:

    Photo of a marble statue of Artemis (aka Diana), which lives at the Louvre. Artemis is mid-step reaching for an arrow in the quiver on her back. In her other hand she's pulling on the antlers of a small deer that she has caught. She's wearing a short and practical belted tunic (chiton) appropriate for hunting, functional sandals, and an equally pragmatic hairstyle with her wavy locks in an up-do. Her arms and legs are neither skinny nor super muscly, they're very average looking. But, being a goddess, she's got a tiara. Not an ostentatious tiara, a simple solid tiara. A utility tiara, if you will. And being a female goddess, you can still see her nips pushing on the intricate drapery of her chiton. She's clearly got some sex appeal carved in, but the statue is of a capable person who is independently getting shit done.

    I love her because she basically looks like the kind of woman a modern conservative commentator would condemn for subverting gender roles. Also with a proportional head.

    Diane de Versailles - Louvre catalogue

  • source
  • parent
  • [โ€“] 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Right they were "lost over time". You've got a bunch of ripped naked Greek guy statues in your basement don't you

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [โ€“] 2 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    I wish I had both any cool ancient things and any basement to put them in. I think the oldest thing I own is maybe 100 years at best.

    I think I'd be terrified to own anything much older too, conservation is hard.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [โ€“] 2 points 5 months ago*

    the hardest part of conservation is learning how to do it. like, i play saxophone and the instruments literally die and need expensive if you go too long without playing. how to take care of a sax? make sure your mouth is clean (like, rinse it out with water at least) before you play. ABSOLUTELY do not eat anything or drink anything other than water (not even flavored water bullshit) while playing unless you want to go brush your teeth before picking your sax up again. don't leave your spit swab in while it's in the case even though it fits so perfect in there, and play it regularly (like at least once a week but once a day is better) to make sure the cork doesn't literally die. so sax conservation boils down to playing often and keeping your mouth clean.

    guess how i ruined my first sax dudes. it was not doing this shit above.

  • source
  • parent
  • [โ€“] 24 points 5 months ago (2 children)
  • [+] 43 points 5 months ago (3 children)
  • [โ€“] 20 points 5 months ago

    It's like an explanation of conservatism in one photo.

  • source
  • [โ€“] 40 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    During high school I was friend with a guy from a village known for their conservative takes. And while this guy certainly wasn't as left as some of my other friends, he liked to fuck with his football teammates by making the take that gay sex is manly.

    Why? Because it involves two men. Hetero sex wasn't as manly because it involves a girl, and lesbian sex was as girly as it got. His teammates really didn't get that he was fucking with their worldview.

    Now he definitely had very idiotic takes himself, but this one always stuck with me because it's just so easy to troll any insecure right winger with

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [โ€“] 21 points 5 months ago

    As a lesbian I've definitely seen plenty of gay interactions that are so gendered that I feel most people of the other gender wouldn't be comfortable participating, especially conservative straight people. It's really funny to me how this stereotype of gay people as less gender conforming (while it absolutely carries a lot of truth to it) results in people not even considering that sometimes gay sex is just two really masculine men going at it in a manly way or two women being extremely feminine together.

  • source
  • parent
  • [โ€“] 19 points 5 months ago

    Apparently being straight is gay lmfao

  • source
  • [โ€“] 17 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    Well you know the old saying, "are you man enough to fuck another guy?"

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [โ€“] 4 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    There was that meme where a guy said he was the most straight person ever because in college, he blew a guy, and then had sex with him, and both times, he hated it.

    So he was 100% confident that he was straight. So if you never had gay sex, you'll never know and so you're just a uncertain straight.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [โ€“] 1 point 5 months ago

    I mean, that kind of makes sense. I have tried with ladies and it really doesn't feel like sex, it's not off-putting, I could do it like a performance but it's not a turn on either. I don't think experimenting means you are bi.

  • source
  • parent
  • [โ€“] 16 points 5 months ago

    I wish the Nazis would fuck each other and leave women alone. No really, you do you.

  • source
  • [โ€“] 16 points 5 months ago

    No no... no.

    This... no.

    No no no no no, no.

    This is waaaaay too on the nose.

    You know around 20 years ago it was basically a crass joke/insult to just say that these kind of people are ... their entire personality is a performance to avoid confronting latent homosexual tendencies.

    Me? Yeah, I'm bi, I kissed a dude and I liked it.

    Maybe a little more than that eheheheh, ahem.

    But I can also guarantee I'd fucked more women than Asmongold and Nick Fuentes, 100% guarantee. Individually, and also likely combined.

    Maybe/hopefully not more than Tate as the dude is literally the master of a sex rape dungeon you're not allowed to leave.

    ... these fucking people.

    These fucking people.

    They're infinitely more gay than I am, Jesus fucking Christ.

    Just... they're cult leaders of an anti-reality cult.

    Gay is Straight, if you think about, bro.

    ... I want to tear these people apart, limb from limb.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next โ€บ