Tate looks like a potato you forgot in the back of a cabinet and started to grow
post
I find women so attractive that I don't care if they have a dick or not. Damn
"Human males are more attractive, look at peacocks"
Rumour has it Tate fucked a peacock
allegedly
folks are saying it was a sick peacock
I always love when people make the connection with ducks for example. Like have you seen a female duck? Yeah they aren't as colorful, but their pattern is way more interesting and they are absolutely beatiful in their own right.
Also, idk, I think that what an ape thinks looks good has little bearing on what avians find attractive. For all we know male ducks think that bright plumage is unattractive.
Like for real, would parrots looking at us understand what we see in permanent large breasts? Or would they look at our other comically oversized sex characteristic (large, exposed penises without a baculum) as the primary showy mating display. Or would they see us as a species where sexual selection has resulted in both parties having a display to show off? Would they think that from their perspective it's obvious which looks better?
The Greeks invented sex but the Romans finetuned the concept by finding out you could also have sex with women.
The original copypasta uses "orgies". Since, you know, you can't invent something that has existed before even humans.
Would be funny if all this manosphere shit was just a ploy to turn more twinks gay, so Tate could finally have the harem of his dreams.
Is this actually for real?
https://xcancel.com/Asmongold/status/2060392930695643535
Too many replies to verify the other two.
Would it change your opinion of these weirdos?
Yes. To be clear, all this makes them even stranger (and deeper in the closet?) than I previously knew.
Soโฆ itโs not then?
Can't say for sure. It wouldn't change that all these people are trash. Let's see, if true it's sad that their stuck in a world that tells them it's not on to be who they are. And thus feeling like being shit stains of a human is the better than loving the right person. If false someone else is lieing, these guys are horrible people, no lies necessary.
I thought the same thing, and tried to find the 2 replies. In the grand scheme of things, it does not matter though, because all three of these ghouls would say whatever gets more attention because they are amorphous blobs of shite.
The "on average"-qualifier in there working like a lifeboat on a plane falling from the sky over the Sahara
Also
Does this man actually know what "gay" means?

I begin to think he means that in original meaning...
"I dumno which rapper is beefing with which other rapper because I am not happy"
"I agree man are more attractive on average because I am not happy"
Well.....maybe he just thinks "beefing" means shoving their beef stick intothe others man hole.
If he thinks thats what beefing is, I could see why he thinks it's gay.
I mean, he's wrong either way, but that would explain where his viewpoint is.
Beefing is when you're getting fucked in the arse so hard that your partner manages to get some air up there, so you fart. Like queefing, but with none of that gay vagina stuff.
Why does this sound plausible
The "it's not gay if you're the top" attitude seems surprisingly common.
The Deep on โThe Boysโ wasn't as overblown as some people thought.
There is nothing as manly as gay sex.
It can only be performed by real men. If a women is involved, it isn't gay sex anymore.
If the sex is between two men and one woman, regardless of who is penetrating who than it is 66.66% gay.
Guess they've never seen all of the statues of Athena, Artemis and Aphrodite. You don't get as many nude female statues because it was usually considered obscene for women to be naked in public.
But the Greek male statues were fully nude and depicted ripped mortal men because they were made in line with Aristotle's idea of good art being educational. Those were arguably the marble version of "git gud, scrub".
If there were more male "perfect" body statues at the time, which we can't establish because many have been lost over the millennia, it might actually be evidence that men were considered less attractive and they needed more body shaming to fix it?
Also they're depicted with small pps because that body part was associated with savagery iirc. If we had the same trend today they would probably all have underwear with a huge bulge because that's where puritanism and male beauty standards are currently.
Also one of the most significant statues of that era is a female figure...
The penis thing is pretty hotly debated, but savagery comes pretty close to my understanding of the theory you mention. It's not a hugely different concept from some of the manosphere stuff you find today though.
Basically the idea was (it's theorized) that thinking with your dick leads to making hasty and bad decisions, but you want to be like the cool smart intellectual philosopher rhetorician dudes ruling society who are strong enough to control their urges. You want to be the civilized powerful master strategist, not the uncivilized weak-willed destructive glutton. So... because art needs to be about reality and be educational (there's no place for that creative abstract shit), we're going to de-emphasize the body part associated with urges that are difficult to control. These are powerful rational dudes afterall.
The biggest difference with modern manosphere bullshit is maybe the part where they shrunk the pps on the ripped marble dudes to make that point. Instead we get... social media statue and peacock "science" analogies.
Didn't the Vatican whack them all off with hammers?
Phrasing. But yes, some of them - they seemed to prefer making plaster and metal fig leaves thankfully. Michelangelo wasn't thrilled about being told to change his work either. Some of them were whacked off earlier than the Catholics, and some were whacked off by the Vatican even as late as the 1850s in "The Great Castration".
Many of the lost appendages were accidental though, natural disasters and the like did a lot of amputation and decapitation, to the point where there are entire catalogue methods for mismatched heads on statues.
If we had? We have sculptors. We have people making sculptures. You don't have to guess what they would make.. but yeah, it's bulges..
Don't forget nemesis:

I think Nemesis is Roman, but probably a copy of a Greek statue. I might have chosen to forget because the "restoration" work on her head breaks my heart - but I know that's a common problem. Such a pity because the drapery is gorgeous.
Looking at this Diana/Artemis, who was much luckier than most statues by having her original head reattached, you can see how different it is. The proportions make much more sense.
Image text description below image:

Photo of a marble statue of Artemis (aka Diana), which lives at the Louvre. Artemis is mid-step reaching for an arrow in the quiver on her back. In her other hand she's pulling on the antlers of a small deer that she has caught. She's wearing a short and practical belted tunic (chiton) appropriate for hunting, functional sandals, and an equally pragmatic hairstyle with her wavy locks in an up-do. Her arms and legs are neither skinny nor super muscly, they're very average looking. But, being a goddess, she's got a tiara. Not an ostentatious tiara, a simple solid tiara. A utility tiara, if you will. And being a female goddess, you can still see her nips pushing on the intricate drapery of her chiton. She's clearly got some sex appeal carved in, but the statue is of a capable person who is independently getting shit done.
I love her because she basically looks like the kind of woman a modern conservative commentator would condemn for subverting gender roles. Also with a proportional head.
Right they were "lost over time". You've got a bunch of ripped naked Greek guy statues in your basement don't you
I wish I had both any cool ancient things and any basement to put them in. I think the oldest thing I own is maybe 100 years at best.
I think I'd be terrified to own anything much older too, conservation is hard.
the hardest part of conservation is learning how to do it. like, i play saxophone and the instruments literally die and need expensive if you go too long without playing. how to take care of a sax? make sure your mouth is clean (like, rinse it out with water at least) before you play. ABSOLUTELY do not eat anything or drink anything other than water (not even flavored water bullshit) while playing unless you want to go brush your teeth before picking your sax up again. don't leave your spit swab in while it's in the case even though it fits so perfect in there, and play it regularly (like at least once a week but once a day is better) to make sure the cork doesn't literally die. so sax conservation boils down to playing often and keeping your mouth clean.
guess how i ruined my first sax dudes. it was not doing this shit above.
Actually women are more attractive, especially to other women, it's science!
There was a quote I saw recently that said something along the lines of the idea that if your satire becomes indistinguishable from that which youโre satirizing it ceases to be a joke and just becomes more fuel for your target.
During high school I was friend with a guy from a village known for their conservative takes. And while this guy certainly wasn't as left as some of my other friends, he liked to fuck with his football teammates by making the take that gay sex is manly.
Why? Because it involves two men. Hetero sex wasn't as manly because it involves a girl, and lesbian sex was as girly as it got. His teammates really didn't get that he was fucking with their worldview.
Now he definitely had very idiotic takes himself, but this one always stuck with me because it's just so easy to troll any insecure right winger with
As a lesbian I've definitely seen plenty of gay interactions that are so gendered that I feel most people of the other gender wouldn't be comfortable participating, especially conservative straight people. It's really funny to me how this stereotype of gay people as less gender conforming (while it absolutely carries a lot of truth to it) results in people not even considering that sometimes gay sex is just two really masculine men going at it in a manly way or two women being extremely feminine together.
Well you know the old saying, "are you man enough to fuck another guy?"
There was that meme where a guy said he was the most straight person ever because in college, he blew a guy, and then had sex with him, and both times, he hated it.
So he was 100% confident that he was straight. So if you never had gay sex, you'll never know and so you're just a uncertain straight.
I wish the Nazis would fuck each other and leave women alone. No really, you do you.
No no... no.
This... no.
No no no no no, no.
This is waaaaay too on the nose.
You know around 20 years ago it was basically a crass joke/insult to just say that these kind of people are ... their entire personality is a performance to avoid confronting latent homosexual tendencies.
Me? Yeah, I'm bi, I kissed a dude and I liked it.
Maybe a little more than that eheheheh, ahem.
But I can also guarantee I'd fucked more women than Asmongold and Nick Fuentes, 100% guarantee. Individually, and also likely combined.
Maybe/hopefully not more than Tate as the dude is literally the master of a sex rape dungeon you're not allowed to leave.
... these fucking people.
These fucking people.
They're infinitely more gay than I am, Jesus fucking Christ.
Just... they're cult leaders of an anti-reality cult.
Gay is Straight, if you think about, bro.
... I want to tear these people apart, limb from limb.


top 98 comments