Ah bene grazie dell'info

Io con fairphone 6 con /e/OS, ancora non avevo provato, posso continuare a non provarci

Anzi pensavo di più, c'è speranza

Vanno bene anche gli asteroidi dai

In un universo parallelo, Rodotà ha diretto la stesura della costituzione dello spazio digitale, e saremmo tutti prendendo un dividendo dalle attività produttive rese possibili dai nostri dati

In Italy, when something is expensive, we say that it's salted. Because salt was expensive. Hasn't been for a while but the word is still there!

Massive resources are being used to build things in a useless attempt to get rid of workers

All those resources never showed up to help research teams finding a cure to cancer.

Well nationalise it, duh

A reduction in profits is not an issue to the production itself... I would understand if it were a 10% reduction in revenue. Nobody needs to be fired, profits are still above 0, the company is sustainable

Hopefully the increase in popularity will reduce per-person costs and at that point the government can do collective bargaining.

Thanks for the replies

Ofc not, see other reply

If it was were public I'd understand that.

But if it's private, you're basically increasing demand on the service by artificially lowering the price, without addressing potential overcharges... I guess it's still OK because you reduce traffic and end up saving elsewhere, and you can bargain the price collectively. Still I would prefer that bargaining to happen before the measure is put in place and you start giving away public money to a private company

I'm confused, why does the measure cost money to the government? Is the government going to pay the remainder?