all 74 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 45 points 6 months ago (13 children)

Some people are just more comfortable with good old familiar units like baby elephants per corgi. What do they even use for that in the metric system? Millihectares per decilitre or something? Whatever.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [+] 31 points 6 months ago (10 children)
  • [–] 17 points 6 months ago (6 children)

    you could also say 12L meteor weighing 400kg .. which is pretty cool, imagine 12 cartons of milk weighing the same as 4 fairly large people

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    1.5 fairly large people. You're talking to Americans, remember.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    I mean they were probably already confused by the L and the cartons of milk ..

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 6 months ago

    Soda is generally sold in 2L bottles here, with single liter bottles growing in popularity. Alcohol is usually sold by the ml, though in units like "fifth" and "handle."

    Milk though, milk is sold in half-pints (not sure why they don't write cup), pints, quarts, half-gallon, or gallon. I like to pretend a quart is a shrinkflated liter though.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago* (1 child)

    For non-metric users, three gallons of milk is probably more accessible. 400 kg is 880lb, which is roughly 12x as dense as water, which is the wild part (or it feels like it, that could be a totally normal density for stone, I’ve already put too much effort in for napkin math on a shitpost)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 6 months ago

    What will we call a half ton? George Washington: 4 baby elephants.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 6 months ago

    The most fucked unit of measurement I've seen is your mom.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Is nobody bothered about how un-corgi-sized the meteor on the picture is?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 6 months ago (13 children)

    Had to check that it's actually plausible.

    Assuming a corgi is 0.4m long, 0.3m tall and 0.2m wide and that a baby elephant weighs 120kg that gives the meteor a density of 20000kg/m³.

    There are only a few elements denser than that, but it's possible.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago

    The meteor was, according to NASA, about 2 feet across and weighed 1000 pounds. So their baby elephants are on the lighter side and their corgis are fairly normal size.

    I'm going to assume a sphere, 60 centimeters in diameter, and a weight of 450 kg. Volume of the sphere is 113000cm^3^, which gives us a density of 3,9g/cm^3^. That's heavier than most rocks (silicon at 2.3), but much lighter than iron (7.9).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago (8 children)
  • [–] 8 points 6 months ago (6 children)

    Possibly, astrophysics is usually about order of magnitude and while iron is only 8000kg/m³ it's within error margins.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    And of course, it depends on how chubby the corgi is.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    And how malnourished the baby elephants are. I mean, there are 4 of them, that's a big litter for an elephant. Perhaps they aren't all suckling as much as is normal because the mother elephant isn't producing enough milk for 4. Maybe the mother elephant is sickly, after such a difficult birth. God, what if she even died?! The poor things will starve!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Mixing units of measurement here; corgis are metric dogs.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    I need a banana for scale.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago

    According to some searching a banana is 100 - 150 cubic centimeters, while this meteor was .012 cubic meters, meaning roughly the volume of 80 - 120 average bananas (mashed). The meteor weighed 400kg while an (again, perfectly average) banana weighs 100 - 130g. This means that the weight of the meteor is between 3076 - 4000 bananas. So let's call it the weight of 3500 bananas in the space of 100, or roughly 35x the density of your average earth banana. (Lemmy bananaticians or bananologists, please correct me if I did bad math.)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago

    Would be a great fit here

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago

    You know well that Americans have only a very loose grip on units and reality. That's why they use imperial and "elephants per football field" like units.

  • source
  • [+] 4 points 6 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    This is apparently from The Jerusalem Post.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago* (1 child)

    A headline created by an Israeli media outlet, aimed culturally at Britons, and run on various European sites? Much American.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • No you see, everyone else in the world exclusively describes the world in accurate SI units, only Americans are dumbfuck enough to measure things in bullets per cheeseburger. Nobody else in the entire world will casually say "it's the size of a medium dog" because America bad.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago

    you have to adapt to the target audience.. look where that asteroid hit.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago

    The hate for the french is everywhere 😓😓😓

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    You mean you can fit 4 baby elephants inside a corgy? Damn...

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 4 points 6 months ago
    [–] 9 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    Americans will measure anything except use metric 😂

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    That clipping is from a European publisher. Lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child)

    idk how you know that but even so, the news is from Texas which means they're probably just relaying a report from a US agency.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    I know it because this was circulated around the internet like 5 years ago when it happened, but the actual article was linked instead of just an image captcha. This is old news and an old "Americans will use pretty much anything but the metric system" type response.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago

    So that's, what, around 7 loaves of Wonder Bread weighing the same as one and a half gorillas?

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago

    Fahrenheit is still saner than Celsius for outside temperatures.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    So if a baby elephant weighs 250 lbs (middle of the 200-300 lb range Google gave me) and a corgi is 11 inches tall (and that the extra corgi length is compensated for by the fact that we are assuming that this corgi is spherical), that's 1.43 lb/in^3. I've run out of time to do conversations, but this meteor was apparent at least part neutron star.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    Elephants from Asia or Africa ? How old babies ?

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago*

    IDK, I'm metric all the way, but this is pretty helpful for illustration, and I don't think 0.2m³ and 500kg would necessarily tell me something that corgis and elephants don't.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    How many gumballs is that, Bluejay?

  • source
  • [–] -1 points 6 months ago (9 children)

    Amerikkkans (well, Tekkkans) will do anything but use the Metric system.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    People clown on these kinds of headlines as if the average metric user has an intuitive feeling of what size 0.012 cubic meters is.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (1 child)

    To be fair, if you pick your scales such that the numbers read ridiculous, nothing has an intuitive feeling. There's nothing much intuitive about a plane flying at an altitude of 16 thousand feet either, no matter how much they closetedly fetishise footstuff, in just about the same way there's nothing much intuitive about measuring the size of a star in meters.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • Pilot here: in a weird way, a thousand feet is a unit. "Five thousand, Five hundred feet" is processed kind of like 5.5 altitudes. Bonus: traffic patterns are typically flown at 1000 feet AGL, so 1.0 altitudes, so pilots see that distance a lot.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    12 comments in c/anythingbutmetric@discuss.tchncs.de view that post
    [–] 12 points 6 months ago (7 children)

    What the fuck is that thing made off?

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    Yeah, how would anything be that dense?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    I thought the same, ~500kg of mass in the volume of a Corgi, about 0.015 m^3, is around 33.3g/cm^3 (4 times the density of iron, 3 times that of lead, and 1.5 times that of gold). But after going to the article they say the 'diameter' was the length of a corgi so it would be 0.113 m^3, with a density of 4.4g/cm^3. Which is what you could expect of something made of iron and rock.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago*

    Do all Americans have a good sense of how much a baby elephant weighs? My impression is just a vague “it’s heavy, though less so than an adult elephant, which is really heavy”

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago

    Four baby elephants? How many baby elephants does it take to make one adult elephant? This leaves me with more questions than answers..

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    The meteor was approximately the size of 2,419 jack rabbit heads, and weighed in at just under 9,071 used condoms.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment