Earthsea.
post
Discworld (Terry Pratchett), no question.
Very much Discworld. I shouldn’t have had to scroll this far down to find this shame on all y’all. The Night Watch series and The Witches series are my favourites and I do recommend reading series’s in order to but you can start practically anywhere if you want. Just remember the very first two books aren’t anyone’s favourites but are still good.
Yes. You may have seen the movies but the books are works of art. I still don't think I've read a better written book in my life. The hobbit is especially fun to read.
I read Tolkien growing up and it kind of set an unrealistic expectation for the quality of literature I would encounter later in life. I was constantly disappointed after that.
Earthsea, as someone else has already mentioned, was one of the few series that measured up.
Howl's Moving Castle was fun, as long as you don't take it too seriously. It's not meant to be serious.
I'm reading Wheel of Time now, and it's just okay. It's good as far as these things go, and I'm invested in the plot, so I'm gonna finish the series, but it's just not a masterpiece in my opinion.
Some of the characters are well done, some of them are kinda cringey, and only some of those are cringey on purpose. Some of the running jokes are funny, but some just sound like what an old british guy in the 90s would think is funny. Some of it didn't age well.
Some of it gets really repetitive, too. Like, I swear, if he says someone looks like a bird again, I'm gonna lose my mind. It's always someone from the brown ajah, too. And I think he overuses the ta'veren device to rationalize some kinda stretched plot points.
It probably sounds like I hate it. I don't. Well only a little. It's a bit love-hate ever since my favorite character died (won't say who but it was near the end of book five).
Character analysis (avoiding spoilers):
Some of the character development is pretty good though. Rand kinda turns into an asshole, but it makes sense because he's under so much pressure. I hope the author uses that device to bring it full circle so he corrects himself. If he's just an asshole for the rest of the series then that would be lame.
I really appreciate the flawed characters (namely, Nynaeve and Mat), both for the comic relief and their occasional redeeming moments. And how they're always projecting whenever they criticize others really cracks me up, especially when the two interact with each other. Cause you know that deep down, as much as they can't stand each other, either one would risk their life for the other in a heartbeat.
I started out liking Perrin, but I think the author dropped the ball on his development. He has some outdated ideas about chivalry, and at the same time Faile (as much as I want to like Faile, but she's just kinda one-dimensional) she encourages some really toxic and even abusive traits. It might be deliberate on the author's part, but I just think it's poorly done. Perrin is one of the few characters who isn't constantly lying to himself though, and I still like that about him.
Egwene's character development is really good. She starts off kinda bland and tokeny, but around book four she really starts coming into her own, and I can't spoil anything but I'm past halfway through the series now and her plot arc is probably the one I'm most interested in at this point. I'm legitimately so proud of her, and I think that part of the story is being handled well. It's not just like some "magic solution on a silver platter" that's the hallmark of bad writing. She still has challenges, but she meets them squarely, and her inner monologue is just so honest with herself. She's probably the most relatable character in the series in my opinion.
And Elayne's plot arc is fun because it's usually lighthearted due to her innocence and naïvete, but she makes some really intelligent decisions on things that are within her wheelhouse, and she's usually pretty honest with herself (usually). She's a strong character though, even leaving aside the obvious nepotism, and sometimes her strength and intelligence clashes with her innocence and naïvete in some really interesting ways.
I don't know who else I can talk about without spoiling things. I'm looking forward to Elaida's downfall (so clearly forshadowed by her hubris), which she'll deserve every bit of.
Some new characters have been introduced recently, and some old characters reintroduced, but I'm not gonna give anything away and honestly I still need to wait to form any opinions about them.
I will say, though, that there's a lot that could be done with some of the different groups that are coming together (and clashing), but that's another point where I think the author drops the ball. Some of them are just unrealistically hotheaded and arrogant, and it turns into this sorta clusterfuck where everyone's trying to teach the others to respect them by asserting their dominance. It's just really immature for the people who are supposed to be the wise leaders of their respective societies.
I mean, the machiavellian stuff makes sense within some contexts, like within the politics of the different nations, but that was always tangential or adjacent to the plot at most. Now it's just starting to seem like the groups that are supposed to be the main good guys are just as foolish as the meddlesome side characters running most of the governments...
Anyway, that's probably enough critique for now. I just don't really have anyone in real life to talk about this stuff with so I've been keeping it all bottled up inside my head (and occasionally rehearsing my critiques in my inner dialogue monologue...)
I have read the Hobbit! I was so excited for the movies and when the first one came out I almost cried in the theater. I made myself watch the second one but never did watch the third one. The book is good enough.
I still can't get over how they stretched that short of a book over that long of a trilogy of movies and still managed to not show enough of Beorn. All of the party arriving at Beorn's house is one of my favorite chapters and it's just... not there. The. Fuck.
There are several 'edits' you can put together online that are actually way better than the movies. They cut out a lot of the nonsense and trim around excess to provide a 2-ish hour movie that feels choppy but good.
His dark materials aka the Northern Lights series. I read it as a young teen and again as an adult. Really good.
Whenever I see someone asking for book recommendations, I always seek out comments like yours or make one if I don’t find it.
His Dark Materials aka Northern Lights (Golden Compass in US) is a really good one. I was 12 when I read the first one. It’s such a good story and I remember anxiously waiting for the 2nd and 3rd books to be published. When my friends started reading HP #1, I was already 2 books deep into HDM and was fully engulfed in Lyra’s story. HDM is a superior series that I think all children should read.
I read it again as an adult and realized how much those books really shaped my world view. Philip Pullman is an amazing storyteller.
Just a note to add that if OP does dig in to HDM, bear in mind that there are only three books. There are three more books masquerading as a continuation of Lyra's story, but they can be safely disregarded as they are a nonsense.
Brandon Sanderson books, specifically the cosmere stuff are all pretty fucking good.
My favourite is probably Mistborn but I know a lot of people prefer The Stormlight Archives. All worth reading!
Both Mistborn ages are really tight, making them easy reads. Intriguing magic, moving story, great characters.
Stormlight has all the same elements, but it lets every character have their own storyline. It's sprawling. It lets you see more sides of it.
Sanderson is a great airport read.
I wouldn't recommend it outside of that context. It's nothing special.
He's great at coming up with magic systems but he's basically a very talented YA writer.
I've heard great things about Malazan. I should probably pick that up.
I just finished Gardens of the Moon. In order to keep track of everyone, I made my own wiki. It felt like watching Eriksson play a war game.
I'm taking a break as the style isn't interesting to me. I hear his writing becomes more intimate and visceral in the rest of the series. Looking forward to this in book 2. Sort of wish I started with book 2 since none or few of the characters carry over.
I really like Frank Herbert's Dune. It is science fiction, but takes many aspects from history, like fiefdomship/politics and religion, especially from medieval times. Some argue the book is too much into details and thus can be dry (no pun intended) but I like it as the world seems more authentic, the characters more relatable.
Malazan, Malazan, Malazan. Literally the result of two bored archaeologists and their DnD campaign while they were out on a dig.
It hangs with the best in terms of humor, tragedy, epic scope, and heroism. It does not hold your hand, in fact it will delight in letting your hand go while leading you through a dark room. Deeply philosophical, challenges and embraces tropes in equal part, absolutely interesting magic system(s). It is hardcore hopecore, it champions the little guy, empathy, and the bright mind over the slow. Main series is finished, 10 giant books. Also a bunch of others outside that series by both creators.
Be patient with it, some payoffs take a while. Read Gardens of the Moon and then Deadhouse Gates to see if it's clicking. It isn't for all.
I feel like this might be a terrible suggestion to start with. It has ruined fantasy for me. Nothing else I've found has come close, the worlds feel half baked, the stories mediocre, the characters forgettable, the scale a fraction of Malazan's.
Erickson can get me more attached to a throwaway character that is introduced and killed off in a handful of pages than some authors can to their main character.
Glen Cook's Black Company novels come close for me. They're smaller scale, but they've got some heft. Erikson has said the series was a huge influence on him, too.
R Scott Bakker kinda scratches a similar itch, though it's much more bleak.
More bleak than the Chain of Dogs, the Children of the Dead Seed, Beak's candles, The Snake?!
I have had Bakker on my radar but I have to be in the right mood for fantasy.
Much more bleak. Erikson has more in the way of heroics in the face of the bleak. Bakker you get more of human flaws ushering in doom. It has a similar sense of scale, the world building is top notch. But the passage of time and intelligence are much less forgiving in Bakker's world.
I've done numerous rereads of Malazan, none for Bakker. Though it's just as deserving, if not more so. It's just... a lot less uplifting.
Series?
-
Le Guin's Earthsea Trilogy
-
Lloyd Alexander's Chronicles of Prydain
-
Discworld, especially the Night Watch books
-
Orson Scott Card's Alvin Maker series
Individual Books:
-
Robin McKinley, The Hero and the Crown, or anything else she wrote
-
Diana Wynne Jones, Fire and Hemlock and Howl's Moving Castle, or anything else she wrote
-
Philip K. Dick, "Galactic Pot-Healer" (Dick straddles the line between science fiction and science fantasy, but this one's firmly the latter)
-
Madeline L'Engle, Many Waters
I'm sure I'll think of more but my break is up.
Wait wait. You’re starting with Engel’s “Many Waters?” Isn’t it book 4 in a series where book 1 (“A Wrinkle in Time”) is considered a classic?
It’s been a long time but I remember liking book 2 a whole lot. I never did get book 5, though I think there is one?
I came here to say Chronicles of Prydain. I read them over and over as a child and they are so magical and well written, it's a shame they aren't more well known!
Kurt Vonnegut - Slaughterhouse 5
Firsthand account of one of the scariest events of the Second World War in the shape of highly entertaining sci-fi novel.
Must read for everyone.
Ah, I love recommendation posts.
It depends on what you actually enjoyed reading and why. I see you already have a lot of great suggestions. The only author I haven't yet seen mentioned is perhaps Asimov, although you said you prefer fantasy to sci fi. That's also my preference, however I find his short stories are worth reading and also low commitment for this reason.
One thing I find useful in recommendations is to know what else people have read and what they think about that. It helps me get an idea of which books I'm more likely to enjoy best or not, especially if I can compare their thoughts to mine about the same books. With that in mind, my thoughts:
Discworld is amazing. Pratchett is a great author. I like that he can write a story that on the surface is just a simple comedy/adventure, but if you are the type that also analyzes what they read you will soon see his stories go much deeper than what they appear to be. He will keep things entertaining and witty but also throw at you a piece of his mind for you to mull over and reflect on various aspects of life. Small Gods is one of my favorites.
I also really enjoyed Dungeon Crawler Karl, and I mean really really really. Hilarious. But it doesn't have the depth Pratchett has.
On a similar vein, The Witcher- loved the characters and the story is very entertaining, but t can't say I was blown away as with Pratchett.
I absolutely loved Abercrombie's First Law trilogy. Now that's some solid writing. The characters are so well fleshed out, unique, original. Somehow the world and the plot feel realistic, crazy as it sounds for a fantasy book. It may feel a bit slower in pacing than any of the three I previously mentioned, but not slower than LOTR which you have already read.
I can also recommend the first law trilogy, just finished it. There's actually some standalone books and a second trilogy in that world, i'm reading 'best served cold' now which is also excellent and features some characters from the trilogy. Can't wait to read the rest and dread the day i read them all.
DISCWORLD
Honestly, probably the most enjoyable series of novels ever. The jokes are so layered and absurd while being witty well setup. It's been a few years since I've read them, may be time to start over...
- Anne Rice's Vampire books.
- Sanderson's Stormlight Archives
- Jordan's The Wheel of Time
Sci-Fi:
- James S A Corey's The Expanse series
LOTR... Of course, since this is really the start of the genre as it exists today. So when you read it and think that it's full of tropes... Continue thinking a little bit and realize that LOTR CREATED those tropes.
The Belgariad by David Eddings. I'll come out and say it, David Eddings was a horrible person, but this series is worth reading. He's dead now so you won't be supporting him if you get these books. The followup series "The Mallorean" is not a must read, it's basically a retread of "The Belgariad". As are his later series "The Tamuli" etc...
The Cosmere by Brandon Sanderson. A lot of people will recommend Mistborn, or the Stormlight Archive, but both of those series are just parts of a greater arc called "The Cosmere". I would recommend starting with Elantris or Warbreaker, both of which are standalone books, but are in the Cosmere. Then go to Mistborn series 1, then tackle Stormlight Archive. Be warned, each book in SA is longer than LOTR in its entirety. But it's well worth the read.
A Song for Arbonne by Guy Gavriel Kay: One of my wife's favorite books. Not a series, but worth the read.
Memory, Sorry and Thorn by Tad Williams: Excellent series that doesn't get the recognition it deserves.
Destiny's Crucible by Olan Thorensen: I liked this one a lot and continue to follow it, although it's starting to get a little long.
The Riyria Revelations and Chronicles by Michael J Sullivan: Both of these series are great and worth the read.
Memory, Sorry and Thorn by Tad Williams: Excellent series that doesn’t get the recognition it deserves.
Came here to recommend these. I never see anyone talking about them. When I was like 12 some random dude at the bookstore recommended them to me when he saw me looking at the dragonlance section. They're really good.
I loved Belgariad/Mallorean as a late teen. I've recommended it and included it in my top five for decades.
I tried reading them again a few months ago and man, I just couldn't.
Everyone craps on Garion constantly for what amounts to just being a young kid who has lived a sheltered life and not yet had many experiences (especially Pol). I feel like the poor kid is legitimately emotionally abused and manipulated by those supposed to be caring for him, and the writing is trying to make you agree that this foolish child deserves the constant harsh criticism and punishment his supposed caretakers heap on him.
Much of the main cast are constantly talking about how idiotic everyone else in the world is. I enjoy some good snark but there's only so much smug and superior condescension I can take. It doesn't matter if it's an enemy or an ally: they're not part of the main cast? 90% chance someone in the main cast points out that they're a completely idiotic or naive moron and their cultural ways are totally backwards.
Everyone fawns over Pol despite her being constantly smug and arrogant and superior, and the writing is constantly going out of its way to show you how right Polgara is and how stupid everyone was that ever disagreed with her about anything.
Ehem. Sorry about that. Feels nice to get it out of my system though. I do still like some things about it. Many of the main cast are a lot of fun when they're not in "wow we're surrounded by ignorant idiots" or "Pol is the avatar of perfection and no one should ever disagree with her even when she's wrong" mode. I couldn't make it past meeting up with Ce'nedra though on my recent attempt to re-read. I couldn't stand her even on my first read when I was otherwise madly in love with the books.
P.S. The constant casual (often gleeful) murder and genocidal remarks by the protagonists were pretty off-putting too
Polgara and Belgarath are both several thousands of years old, so I really didn't read them as smug or arrogant, rather jaded and cynical. Beldin was jaded and cynical personified.
I'm in my mid-50's and honestly can identify with them at times, although I do my best not to act it.
Garion's treatment is probably evidence of the Eddings' proclivities toward children. They were both convicted of child abuse and spent time in prison for it about 10 years before "The Belgariad" was written. Their adopted children were also permanently taken away. Like many others I had no idea of that until after David's death in 2009.
I reread it about 8 years ago and I've had both my boys read it as well. It certainly did hit a lot differently. For one, if I was Garion I would have sent Ce'Nedra permanently packing in short order destiny be damned. I still loved Prince Kheldar (Silk) though.
There have been so many authors and celebrities whose work I have enjoyed over the years just to come out and be scummy trash that I'm at the point I just want to enjoy the art and not know who is behind it. That feels a lot like being a ostrich with its head buried in the sand, but I'm not really sure what the alternative really is.
I get you pard, there are some creative works that I still hold on to as well despite learning disappointing things about their creators. Others I've let go.
I love Silk as well, he's such a fun character. Belgarath I generally like except when he goes all in on mocking the stupidity of everyone around him, and when he starts dumping on Garion. The latter feels like a betrayal because otherwise he's very supportive of the kid. Being a kindly grandfather-figure to Garion is a big part of his role in the story so it's difficult when he acts otherwise. Durnik was always my favorite because I have a soft spot for the solid, practical, dependable types, likely based on my great relationship with my grandpa when I was young.
You have a point with the ancient characters being tired and jaded by all this, since they've been through all this type of stuff before many times, and having been around so long they do have an exceptional accumulation of experience and wisdom and knowledge, so I can see them getting frustrated more often with having to deal with their lessers. Still though: We see Belgarath fail. We see him be unsure of himself sometimes, we see him fall on his face, and even if begrudgingly, we see him own it. Same with Silk - he's recruited largely because he's the clever and witty one, but on more than one occasion we see him get bested and importantly (to me at least), he also owns it. Even Mandorallen, the guy whose whole shtick is being absurdly self-confident and self-assured, has his moments where he falters and struggles, and he owns it.
Polgara, though? Oh, no. Polgara is never wrong. If you ever question her, you had better be prepared for some mockery and intense cold shoulder and judgment by everyone else for even thinking of doubting her. And this will only end when you finally "realize" that you were wrong and apologize to her, at which point she oh-so-benevolently welcomes you back in now that you've admitted to her that you were wrong and sorry for ever thinking she was anything less than perfect. She feels like the type of character a narcissist would write as their self-insert.
Upon thinking about all this, I do also wonder about the fact that the humblest of the main characters end up getting together with the two most spoiled and self-satisfied ones. Given how I feel about Polgara, I was pretty bummed out when my guy Durnik never got over being smitten with her and they ended up together. But hey, there might be some evidence there that maybe he'll be good for her, at least.
Oh, and on the note of Durnik and Polgara getting together ... the one time she might have actually had to lose something, to really sacrifice something ... nope! Just kidding, what a twist! She actually has to give up nothing, and instead Durnik is elevated to sorcererhood solely to give her the loophole she needs to continue on being just perfectly amazing in every way and capability! Even the friggin rules of the cosmos bend to accommodate her!
Yeah yeah, I'm ranting. But people typically rant about things they care about. I loved these books, and I'm not just ranting out of grumpiness but out of being bummed out that I can't manage to love them anymore. Because I still want to. In any case, not trying to convince you to stop liking them, just venting and wanting these thoughts to be heard by someone. Thanks for the opportunity and take it easy out there.
The original "The Princess Bride" by S. Morgenstern
It's good, but even Wildbow themselves says it could use a thorough edit - which will likely never happen. Not to say you shouldn't read it. It's fantastic.
Just give a little warning. It's 'superpowers' written in a serial format that brings the brutality of a series like invincible, but while invincible sort of still plays it off in a comic appropriate way, it's never 'fixed' or back to the status quo in worm. While a lot of the brutality is glossed over except when the author is hitting that anvil, and even then more is able to be overlooked because the action and character interactions are just written so alluringly and you'll be speeding through it, taking a moment to step back and think about what just happened 'in universe' can be shocking.
I would recommend Jack Vance’s Dying Earth series as well as his Lyonesse Trilogy.
I'm gonna suggest a web novel, Practical Guide to Evil. Great series about 8 books long that follows the apprentice of a medieval fantasy villain. Looks like the first book just dropped on Amazon for kindle and audiobook last year
Pale Lights the author's ongoing serial, is even better. New chaptr just dropped a hour ago!
"A Song of Ice and Fire" if you can accept that the last books will never be written
Titan, Wizard, and Demon by John Varley. The first book starts off with a bog-standard "first human exploration of Saturn's system" bit, but starts going off the rails immediately. By the end, you'll meet a 50 foot clone of Marilyn Monroe and think, "eh, I'll accept that."
It's one of sci-fi's more delightfully unhinged stories.
Kingkiller chronicles so everyone can peer pressure rothfuss into finishing the fucking thing
He won't. Just toss him as a lost cause like George RR Martin and Scott Lynch and move on. You'll feel a lot better when you finish a different series that took way less time than what Rothfuss did writing his only 2 novels in the series.
I like the books, superficially they are a treat, the prose is brilliant, the words feel nice on my brain.
But reading just a little bit deeper than that, you start to realise the story is pretty empty. The characters are hollow. The first two books are pretty much the same story loop over and over again. The characters making the same mistakes and learning the same lessons over and over again.
The way the author writes female characters makes you seriously worry about the authors relationship with women, and if he even knows any women.
I read the first book because I'd heard praise for it. It was either during that one, or the next book what I thought:
- orphan
- gifted magician
- professor who hates him
- professor who likes him
- male friend
- female friend
- and some others that I can recall after so many years
...fucking hell. I'm reading a retelling of fucking Harry Potter!
Yeah. It's full of really common pop-fiction tropes. But the writing is so beautiful you don't notice it.
It really jumped the shark when in the second book the guy who is a virgin and can't talk to girls suddenly became the god of sex and literally out-sexed the sex nymph who had been sexing men to death for years.
I thought he specifically didn't out-sex the sex nymph, but as she was about to turn and kill her latest victim (because she used sex and he was used up), it turned out the victim (our heeeero) had an affinity for the 'supreme' or actual magic in the series, and he was able to use it to bind her in the old fashioned 'true-names-let-you-control' trope.... and then she turned him into a god of sex because she couldn't kill him and he wasn't going anywhere for a while.
I also think your characterization of quothe as not able to talk to girls isn't quite accurate, just that he was a fool who had decided there was only one girl for him.
None of this is to say the criticisms of rothfuss aren't accurate. The guy sniffs his own farts and thinks he creates pure oxygen in his bowels. His little vignette about making soap goes on for pages, and he had the temerity to sell it as it being just. so. necessary to do.
Did it? I think one of the points is that the narrator isn't particularly trustworthy.
Yes but also is that just Rothfuss’ excuse when fans call him out about plot inconsistencies? Because that’s how I heard that “explanation” came about.
I think Rothfuss/Martin and others are pressured too much. No matter what they produce, it will never be good enough to satisfy the hordes of loudmouths.
No matter what they produce
Now, I agree that we have no right to demand anything from them.
But... their output rate has been genuinely abysmal. If we had a right to demand anything at all from them (we don't), then it would be quite reasonable to ask them to at least finish one book every 10 years...
I mean, Rothfuss has produced a couple novellas, and Martin has some projects. I get it, but at the same time i wouldn't blame either of them if they didn't feel comfortable releasing another of their mainline series.
I want them to, and ten years is a long ass time, but nothing they produce will live up to the hype so that probably causes a lot of anxiety.
But maybe im projecting here. Idk. I feel like the same thing is the reason we don't have a Half-Life 3 video game. The first two made such a huge impact in terms of tech and gameplay that nothing is going to live up to the hype. So you can either kill yourself trying to achieve unachievable levels of amazing, or go do something you want to do.
Maybe not, but if they'd actually work on it instead of stringing us along, maybe there wouldn't be hordes of loudmouths.
Also...keep in mind, they chose the author's life. I find it pretty tone deaf for a famous person complaining about what fame brings when that's the path they pursued.
We're never getting the last book. And my theory is that he just outgrew it. Or at least I hope that's true, because the whole Denna storyline was just a bunch of incel bullshit.
Ok so since you're doing sci-fi as well, Hyperion/Hyperion series.
I just finished the Cantos this week. I think Hyperion is one of the best sci-fi setups ever conceived. The Canterbury Tales in Space is so hype, and so well executed. I could read it ten times and love it every time.
The rest of the series is ambitious, but never quite lived up to the first book. There are incredibly interesting ideas, and some excellent parts… but I can’t give the whole thing a 10/10.
Book four light spoilers
Aenea spends so much time talking at the reader, and her set up as the savior of humanity pins her character in a corner.
The discussion on how “humans stopped evolving” was an incredible turn on my view of the Ousters, and helped recontextualize the series as a radical, conservationist epic instead of just an anti-authoritarian one was also A+.
Since I just read this, I’ve been thinking a lot about how a television adaptation would work. Season one would be just the first book… one pilgrim’s tale per episode. But then I feel like the next three books would need a comprehensive overhaul to streamline the narrative and pick a clearer focus.
I started the second book shortly after reading the first, and I didn't finish it. I think I prefer to remember Hyperion as a standalone story as it's so perfect
I always loved the Bartimaeus books from Jonathan Stroud.
I also think if pop culture catch-up is a concern you could read Twilight and Eragon both were quite influential in my social circle at the time they were new. I have read both and I liked them too. I don’t think that they are revolutionary or the best pice of writing but they had arguably an impact.
Surprised I haven't seen someone yet mention Magician by Raymond E Feist. That whole first riftwar trilogy is great. Also the spin off Empire trilogy with Janny Wurts.
Seconding those who mentioned the R.A. Salvatore books including the Dark Elf series and the Icewind Dale series.
I don't really like manga, but one of the best stories I've ever read in any format is the 7-volume Nausicaa of the Valley of the Wind. It's post-apocalyptic fantasy about the nature of evil, the corruption of humanity, the extent to which individuals can fight against historical forces, and the fragility of civilization, for a start. Plus there's a lot of action and world-building. There's an anime movie which covers about one tenth of the story, if you want to get a feel for it.
I saw the movie. It was AMAZING. I had no idea it was based on book(s)!
The Neverending Story. Beautiful story and a deep musing on why humans need fantasy and storytelling.
I'll share my favourite part. Gmork the werewolf has revealed that, when a creature from the magical world Fantastica falls into the Nothing, it emerges in the real world as a lie.
"When it comes to controlling human beings there is no better instrument than lies. Because, you see, humans live by beliefs. And beliefs can be manipulated. The power to manipulate beliefs is the only thing that counts. That's why I sided with the powerful and served them - because I wanted to share their power."
"I want no part in it!" Atreyu cried out.
"Take it easy, you little fool," the werewolf growled. "When your turn comes to jump into the Nothing, you too will be a nameless servant of power, with no will of your own. Who knows what use they will make of you? Maybe you'll help them persuade people to buy things they don't need, or hate things they know nothing about, or hold beliefs that make them easy to handle, or doubt the truths that might save them. Yes, you little Fantastican, big things will be done in the human world with your help, wars started, empires founded. . ."
For a time Gmork peered at the boy out of half-closed eyes. Then he added: "The human world is full of weak-minded people, who think they're as clever as can be and are convinced that it's terribly important to persuade even the children that Fantastica doesn't exist. Maybe they will be able to make good use of you."
My ex was really fond of Dragonlance which is a DnD original setting. Inspired a bunch of heavy metal music I guess.
My mother is pretty obsessed with Anne McCaffrey's Pern series, which blends sci-fi into fantasy.
I can remember liking fantasy way too much as a teenager but nothing that I still think holds up now. Maybe Sabriel by Garth Nix, it was about necromancers
top 99 comments