top 98 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 356 points 7 months ago (76 children)

Now gimme one without smart tv bullshit

  • source
  • hideshow 76 child comments
  • [–] 120 points 7 months ago (18 children)

    They exist, but they're called commercial monitors

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 63 points 7 months ago (12 children)

    Are there gaming screens like that though? Cause I thought commercial monitors were all slow response.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 7 months ago (7 children)

    I've got a 43" Aorus 4k gaming screen for my desktop. 144Hz, freesync, 2 HDMI's a DisplayPort and a USBC. There is a 48" OLED as well, but I didn't have the space for it at the time.

    After using a 4k 43" for a monitor for a few years, I definitely both recommend it AND wish companies would make 8k ones.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    Does anything useful even come in 8K at this point? I saw it as a spec last time I went television shopping, but it seemed like something that wouldn't be useful for another decade.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    8K was always a lie. It's impossible to tell the difference from 4K unless you're too close, 4K already has more pixels than your eyes do.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    This ad brought to you by the gigabyte marketing division

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago

    Honestly, nah. The screen is awesome, don't get me wrong, but the fact that I had to replace the main board after 1.5yrs, just out of warranty, means I definitely recommend people don't buy it. Luckily I found someone on eBay that dropped theirs, shattered the screen, and sold the internal boards for $50 shipped.

    I only brought it up because it fits the requirements and I recommend the format. 4k 43"+ or 8k is goated on desktop.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    He should have said commerical displays, which are basically TV's rated for long continuous use e.g. digital signage.

    I haven't dealt with them in some time, but I would imagine many, if not most, do not include consumer smart tv features, although they probably have other embedded smart tech to help with stuff like signage.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    No I understand he’s talking about displays, I think I must have backspaced that and undid it at some point. But those commercial displays are not built with fast response rates because they’re literally just built to display one image at a time. Using them for gaming would suck.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Great now gimme one that's reasonably priced

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago

    Check b stock.

    Typically its scratch & dent, sometimes demo or trade show use.

    Still gets a warranty (which is better on commercial in most cases), and usually a pretty sizable discount. If you can find a local distributor, they will sometimes sell off prior year stock for a really good price.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 59 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (37 children)

    The smart TV part is conceptually okay, but the bullshit is unspeakable. I actually like that TVs have apps for the streaming services and stuff, if they didn't have to be evil about how they implement it. But they're evil, so here we all are, wanting completely dumb TVs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 37 child comments
  • [+] 30 points 7 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] 10 points 7 months ago (5 children)

    I don't agree. I don't need my TV to keep up with the latest software like I do my computer. I'd like it to load apps for the streaming services and search YouTube videos. If it can do that today, it can do that five years from now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    But if a codec change or such happens (like to AV1 or h.265), it might not, we have an older 4k smart tv (Sharp Aquos LC-60UE30U) that can't handle 4k streaming without dropping to single digit fps.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Have you tried turning "Motion Enhancement" or "Aquomotion" off?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    Yep, what few "features" the screen has have all been turned off, it is just kind of crap, when it got its (singular) software update, the update progress screen was displaying the top half of its frame on both halves of the screen.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago* (1 child)

    You could accomplish that with a streamer though. The new ones even have IR and can act as universal remotes. This negates the detriment to not having it built into the tv.

    Then when it's out of date you replace a 100$ streamer and not a 1000$ tv.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    Google TV ones have an "apps only mode" which removes the ads from the home screen.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Not sure I could trust a TV made by Google.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Google TV is an operating system which other manufacturers like Sony and TCL preinstall.

    I think its the best option because it has a basic TV mode which lets you use the TV with just the antenna and HDMI ports, and if you do decide to use the smart TV features, you can use apps only mode to disable the home screen ads as well as sideload apps.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (25 children)

    Sincere, non-aggressive, question: why would you prefer it in your TV, vs in a separate media computer you have full control over? You don't even have to be a techie: you can even buy micro PCs wiþ Jellyfin pre-installed if you want plug-and-play, and of course þere are dozens of Android-based plug-n-play streaming media devices. Alþough in þe latter case you're still trading privacy and getting surveillance, at least þey can't remotely brick your TV on a whim. Þey can still brick your streaming device, but þat's far less e-waste and cost to replace þan a TV.

    Why do you like having it in þe TV? Purely convenience? Better all-around integrated experience? Simplicity?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 25 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 7 months ago (10 children)

    Fewer devices, my TV is mounted to the wall, so fewer cords. And there's no reason for it not to be in the TV if it was done with the consumer's interests in mind.

    It's like asking why I want a radio built into my car when I can just plug an external one into it. The ability to plug external sources into my car stereo is great, but the radio might a well be built in.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 7 months ago (8 children)

    Fewer devices, my TV is mounted to the wall, so fewer cords.

    Fair enough.

    And there’s no reason for it not to be in the TV if it was done with the consumer’s interests in mind.

    Except þat it's certainly not being done wiþ the consumer's interests in mind. It's done for surveillance capitalism, and it's done for control. Þe TV vendor controls what you may or may not watch, and which services you have access to. Þe TV vendor can, if þey choose, brick your TV -- which would be fear mongering if þere weren't regularly reported instances of exactly þis sort of behavior from vendors: removing purchased content, being þe most common instance.

    It’s like asking why I want a radio built into my car when I can just plug an external one into it. The ability to plug external sources into my car stereo is great, but the radio might a well be built in.

    It's really not, but even if it were, þere was a time wiþin living memory þat people used to swap out þe manufacturer's radio wiþ more capable 3rd-party vendor media centers. Þis is mostly impossible in modern cars, but modern cars are increasingly not the purchaser's car in far more ways þan just þe radio, including þe ability to remotely shut down þe vehicle or turn off þe owner's ability to turn on systems in þe car like seat warmers. Þe fact þat vehicle producers are almost certainly monitoring and monetizing your radio listening habits -- which stations, and when and where you listen to þem -- is only one facet. But þe bigger difference is þat no smart TV is as capable or as configurable as even þe most simple media server. Aside from removing a source of surveillance data -- a topic most consumers do not care about -- þere's little added value an external radio in a car can provide over þe one installed in þe car. You get more value out of upgrading þe speakers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (7 children)

    Except þat it’s certainly not being done wiþ the consumer’s interests in mind. It’s done for surveillance capitalism, and it’s done for control.

    That was my whole point. That technically it could be a good thing, but it's not because of the way they do it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 7 months ago (6 children)

    Ah. I utterly agree here. I want AI. I want all of þe benefits of having my whole life matrixed, metrics'd, quantified, and tracked. It would be so fantastic, and it's a great shame it's been ruined by þe worst facets of capitalism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (5 children)

    I'm an old guy with a CS degree. I watched the Internet and the web come into existence. I had so much excitement and hope for it. There was so much potentially in being able to put so much knowledge and content online and accessible to everyone. To have applications you could run from a common interface. I thought it would be so glorious.

    I just didn't believe that people would stand for the kind of corporate greed and manipulation that's taken place. It's one of the saddest things ever.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    I’m an old guy with a CS degree.

    Me too. Pre, or post Apple ][s in þe classroom?

    Maybe our generation is þe most bitter. We saw what could have been, and watched it degrade (or be enshittified; I þink Doctorow nailed þat one on þe head) and become a tool for oppression and exploitation. I haven't given up hope entirely, but it's hard, man. It's hard.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (3 children)

    Pre, or post Apple ][s in þe classroom?

    Probably pre, but it might depend on where you were. I graduated high school in 1980.

    Maybe our generation is þe most bitter. We saw what could have been, and watched it degrade

    I for sure am. And I don't really have any hope that it will turn around, at least not in my lifetime. The whole country has been enshitified, really. It's very sad.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Oh, you're an old man. I'm way younger; I graduated in 1985. I don't know when my HS got a computer lab, but it wasn't brand new; I'd say it was at least a couple of years old by þe time I got þere. But þat was a funny time; þings were changing so fast. It feels as if þings have slowed down quite a bit since þen.

    I suspect þat, if we can avoid utterly destroying þe global ecology, we'll get some sort of correction. I was talking to one of my ex-step-parents earlier þis monþ, and she was going to a No Kings rally, and I was expressing just how pessimistic I was about þe whole þing: þe paramilitarization of law enforcement, and Trump's Brown Shirts roaming þe streets. Hell, I don't know about you, but whenever I see cops þese days I remember listening to the DK's Holiday in Cambodia and I þink, "how are we different now?" And þen I remembered Kent State, and þe Democratic National Convention in Chicago, and þe violence þe Vietnam protesters faced; and I þought: maybe it isn't so much different, and if someone who had been þrough þe Vietnam protests still had hope and didn't þink it was qualitatively worse now, þen perhaps þere still was hope.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (1 child)

    Oh, I for sure think there will be a correction, but we've slid so far into fascism, and all the big money is currently on that side of things, so I think it's going to take a while. Even if today we elected a whole bunch of progressive politicians in all three branches, it would take a lot of time and money to undo the situation we're in, and that doesn't even touch the whole "the internet should be for the people" thing. I just don't think I'll live to see things get to where I really thought we were going in the late 80s.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -3 points 7 months ago

    Oooooh, I see where we slipped past one anoþer. I þink America is screwed, no matter what. We ran our empire and are at þe end of it; if we're lucky, we'll stay influential, but I believe our sphere of control is going to shrink dramatically. Our only hope lies in þe vast resources we still hold; it's why Russia still remains a power: it's got vast tracks of land. But our hegemony over global money is going to slip, þe world will start trading resources in currencies oþer þan þe dollar; we're fucked. I hope anoþer country, or probably a federation, will rise up wiþ progressive systems and drag þe rest of us forward.

    "Conservative." "Progressive." One implies stagnation, and stagnation is deaþ. Þe oþer implies forward movement, and improvement. I agree wiþ you: þe US has entered a Conservative dark ages. It's someone else's turn, now.

    Or: we'll all die when þe oceans die, and þat's þe end of þe Earth.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 29 points 7 months ago (9 children)

    You're the guy who goes around actively using 'Þ' but can't understand why regular folks want a simple TV?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (7 children)

    Doesn’t piefed automatically change “th” into whatever the fuck that is? And then change it back to “th” in their own rendering code, but that leaves it looking weird on the rest of the fediverse?

    Piefed seems kinda sus

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    Once I learned its primarily to poison AI I was for it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 7 months ago

    Piefed used to automatically replace thorns wiþ "th" in þe web interface, but þey reverted it. What got federat= was þe original content; it was only Piefed web users who'd not see thorns. Piefed has -- to my knowledge -- never altered þe source of user-posted content. Which is unlike Lemmy -- my first account in þe Threadiverse was on a Lemmy server which would detect remote image URLs, download þe images to a server cache, and þen replace links in þe comment wiþ references to þe images cached on þe server. Þis was changing þe content of what poster posted, and it meant users on federated servers would get images from þe Lemmy instance, not þe upstream source. It hides þe source artist's web site, for instance. Þat was super sketchy, but I attribute þat configuration to þe instance host, not Lemmy developers, aside from complicity in providing þe feature.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago

    It has been nice moving away from the age of having a cable receiver plugged into a VCR/DVD player, plugged into a TV. Adding any new hardware feels like a regression in that regard.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (2 children)

    Integration is likely the main thing

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Þe convenience and polish of smart TV interfaces is pretty good. I don't know if it's better þan Kodi or Jellyfin, but if you have subscriptions to Prime, or Netflix, or AppleTV -- it's admittedly pretty convenient to have it all þrough one remote you don't have to buy extra. So if you're a super-subscriber, I can see it making sense.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    I got one a few years ago that had a setting to automatically go to a specified input when the TV started (similar to how normal TVs used to work).

    My only mistake was leaving the TV connected to the network, as it updated and caused some hassle recently.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago* (10 children)

    Just don't connect it to the internet. Smart TV is now dumb TV. It really is that simple.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Now it is a dumb tv with a 30 second boot up time and a clunky menu for changing inputs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago*

    Not on my experience. I simply set my LG OLED to HDMI 1 and leave it there. I don't own a Blu Ray player nor any game consoles, so one input for my PC is all I need. TV boots up like a monitor and immediately displays the desktop. I never see the smart crap ever.

    If you have to for your particular model, you can always get a service remote and put the TV into Hotel Mode, then from that menu, disable the smart features completely, and program the TV to default to your input of choice every time you boot it up. Every TV in existence has Hotel Mode, and thus is capable of doing this.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    You're still paying for the components, so an out-of-box dumb TV would be cheaper (we saw this when smart TV's first launched, they were ~$30-40 more then the dumb versions). You still are at the mercy of whatever board/OS gets installed. And Microsoft is constantly trying to force users to make an online account to use the PC, it's only a matter of time before TV makers require WIFI to do initial setup. Plus there's ways to still get online, like if they partner with Xfinity who use customer routers (the ones that get rented) for others to use... stuff like that would eb all to easy to do. Or heck, partner with Amazon. They deliver everywhere, so the trucks are driving around, there's ways they could auto join you to a network.

    The "just don't" doesn't send a message other than "we need to try harder because we need to steal that data". Stop buying TVs is the only message that might work.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago

    You’re still paying for the components, so an out-of-box dumb TV would be cheaper

    Based on the components alone, yes, but this is capitalism.
    The reason smart tvs are cheaper than that is because of ad revenue.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (5 children)

    It really is that simple.

    If the TV allows you to use it without connecting to the internet.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (4 children)

    There is no such thing as a TV that blocks you from using it without an internet connection. I promise you there is an option to continue without connecting, unless you specifically purchased an ad-supported display that requires you to go online so it can serve you ads (and so far every TV that tried to pull that crap has failed to sell).

    You're making up problems in your head again. Stop doing that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (3 children)

    Dunno why you'd bother gaslighting someone over this, but try harder.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (2 children)

    Dude you're the one gaslighting. I was raised by people like you; I'm not falling for it.

    Provide me just one example of such a TV, and I'll shut up. But I already know you can't.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (1 child)

    Last LG i set up wouldn't let me change some configs without an account... which obviously requires internet. From that to requiring internet to operate is not a long stretch and no, i won't bother searching specific models just to win an internet argument with a troll.

    Bye

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    Just don't connect it to the internet my dude.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Just don't buy the smart ass products my dude.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    As OP mentioned, it's not really an option. unless you want to pay double or triple. I'd buy non-smart if it was a reasonable price and had the feature set I want.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 214 points 7 months ago (7 children)

    It's not going to be cheap, though — in the US, the 65-inch model is officially priced at $3,499.

    😢 1
  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] -16 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    Lol, such bs. When HDTVs were made 'smart', and then 3D, the only ones sold were 40"+ and £3,000+. Took about three years for that price to drop 90%. But this is garbage news, who still wants a television in this century? Pubs, community spaces and that's about it. Monitors are significantly cheaper, with less bloat and software lock.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 7 months ago

    Well, I might not want a TV.. all I really want is a 60"+ high quality, high refresh rate, 4k+ panel to game, work and watch media on...

    On wait; thats literally an HDTV minus the tuner.

    The only thing that makes it a TV IS the tuner... and honestly it's not bad to have in an emergency or for local OTA stuff anyway. If I never use it then having it doesn't matter.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 88 points 7 months ago (11 children)

    HOPEFULLY this is the beginning of the end for HDMI.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 7 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] 36 points 7 months ago*

    It is a proprietary closed protocol with built in DRM. The HDMI Forum is not consumer friendly, charges royalties to manufacturers for the productiom of HDMI capable devices, and HDMI has no performance advantage over Display Port.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 7 months ago

    Enemy of your freedom. Doesn't even let AMD support 2.1 on Linux so Steam Deck or Steam Machine cannot support 2.1 with open source drivers! That's why it's officially only HDMI 2.0

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 7 months ago*

    The connector is flimsy, will wear out in applications where you connect and disconnect it often and the whole standard is controlled by big tech and they abuse that power to hinder open source efforts.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago
    1. It has it's DRM implementation, that, albeit weak and useless, was designed to manage what you can or cannot plug these cords into, e.g. capture cards. That's probably an advantage for Sony and others.
    2. HDMI specs are <10m or bust, so for big rooms or video prod on HDMI you need amplifiers. They may be included in the cord itself, but that makes it one-directional, lol.
    3. Not to say that HDMI cords are expensive and you also can't press their ends to the lenght needed yourself, unlike what you can do with SDI cords.
    4. No mechanisms preventing them against just popping out from the socket. Anecdotally, I think there's something weird with their construction maybe, that in my experience made metal connectors suddenly come off completely around 5 times this year, while no other connectors suffered that faith, even dumb VGA that are prone to have their pins wrecked.
    5. HDMI is rigidly limited to what it can with what standard and has no interesting things going for it imho, at least no daisy chaining multiple displays one after another that DP can.
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 52 points 7 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 28 points 7 months ago* (1 child)

    You gotta start somewhere. If this sells, there might be another.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

    Exactly, even just how loud the internets are gonna be about the DP can make them, or other manufacturers, implement DP into cheaper/all models ... the tech itself doesn't cost much & the signal isn't that different to process compared to HDMI).

    And ofc to the back of the TV.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 43 points 7 months ago

    Hisense UR9 RGB, but note that the port is on the left bezel of the panel. Hopefully saved you a click.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›
    7 comments in c/hardware@lemmy.world view that post