no comments (yet)

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here
20 comments in c/technology@lemmy.ml view that post
[–] 20 points 7 months ago (7 children)

No fucking way! ROFLMAO if true

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 7 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    It looks like the pull requests were authored by humans, then edited by the bot. I use codeberg, not github, so I'm not that familiar with the service. Does github have some kind of opt-in/opt-out llm editor feature, or is the bot just going around editing random pull requests?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (4 children)

    I believe that it happened, but I'm not yet convinced it wasn't some sort of bug. But I want to believe!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (2 children)

    so it seems raycast embeds this promo with link

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    No, so it's still just github copilot code review (bot). https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/concepts/agents/code-review#introduction

    Which is embedding this link of Raycast. Meaning Raycast is paying Microsoft for sure to get included in the bot comments or pr descriptions.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 19 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Enshitification so soon? And the bubble hasn't burst yet? I know it's all a matter of time before I ask AI for FOSS software recommendations and it tries to upsell me on some cloud-subscription bullshit that "addresses all my requirements" and comes with "award winning 24/7 support".

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 7 months ago

    Capitalism breeds innovation.

    The innovation:

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago

    Good, I hope every PR submitted by an AI proudly displays the AI that it was made with so maintainers know which PRs to reject

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago

    They already came out to say "we're sowwy" and took it back after the backlash

    We've disabled it already. Basically it was giving product tips which was kinda ok on Copilot originated PR's but then when we added the ability to have Copilot work on any PR by mentioning it the behaviour became icky. Disabled product tips entirely thanks to the feedback.

    https://xcancel.com/martinwoodward/status/2038612131084464521>>

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    why is copilot submitting prs? i figured any reasonable dev would use ai, if at all, like a rubber duck and syntax library?

    i still use devdocs.io - that’s my goto.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Lots of unreasonable devs out there.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago

    Yeah, and the worst part is that submitting the PR is trivial. You just offload the reviewing work onto the maintainer and then feed the review comments back into the AI. Effectively, you're making the maintainer talk to the AI, by going through you as a middleman, a.k.a. completely wasting their time.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Microsoft has become spiritually similar to one of those late night infomercial companies. So shameless and deeply unserious.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • This is just the average Atlassian or Slack experience coming to GitHub. You're just trying to do your job and the platform is constantly trying to push you to use services of advertisers.

  • source
  • 12 comments in c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 14 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    Kinda reminds me of the Black Mirror episode Common People.

    As a side note, I realize I have been making more and more comparisons to the show with our real life, and it's not exactly filling me with confidence.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    sometimes I feel like people should stop making dystopian themed media, because some people wouldn't get the message and instead try to build it They see those stuff and thinks it's cool instead of dystopian.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 7 months ago

    And now we're entering the era of hyper-enshittification, where ads and monetization are seamlessly interwoven into every interaction with no possibility of escape.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    It's easy to avoid if you don't use AI?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 7 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    It’s easy to avoid if you don’t use AI?

    By if you don't use AI do you mean if you don't accept pull requests on your projects and also don't read pull requests submitted to other projects you might care about?

    canonical Hide the Pain Harold (András Arató) photo (via wikipedia), no text

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    The PRs in the post are made by Copilot. If Copilot made a PR against one of my repos (which I don't think it would because I don't use it) I would close it without looking.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 2 points 7 months ago*

    Anyone can use copilot to open PRs under their own name on any repo which accepts PRs, so you can't easily know copilot is involved without looking.

    In the case of the first hit in the mastodon post's linked search query, it looks like a human actually opened the PR last year and subsequently requested a review from copilot (as well as from two humans); after some back and forth nothing else happened until 3 days ago when copilot updated the issue to tell them: you need to pick a "Usage billed to" option in your Copilot settings.

    And then, apparently, three minutes after they updated their billing information copilot pushed some more commits and helpfully edited the human's original PR description to insert the advertisement.

    (Obviously this is yet another reason to move off of github, but (1) that is much easier said than done for many projects, and (2) once it's normalized on github, "coding assistants" will also be spamming in other venues soon enough if they aren't already.)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago

    I mean, you train your LLM on search engines that inject ads into everything you look up, it's going to learn to inject ads into everything it vomits out too.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago* (1 child)

    The spam message says:

    Quickly spin up Copilot coding agent tasks from anywhere on your macOS or Windows machine with Raycast.

    Isn't this a Raycast ad, rather than a Copilot ad? This is probably a string injected by Raycast itself

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 3 points 7 months ago

    Isn’t this a Raycast ad, rather than a Copilot ad?

    It seems most likely that it is copilot inserting it, because the other screenshots in the post show similar ads for its integrations with various other services too

  • source
  • parent
  • 4 comments in c/technology@piefed.social view that post
    [–] 22 points 7 months ago

    Exactly what everyone predicted would happen

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Wow, one would think this sort of thing would be below a company like Microsoft.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments