all 13 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 11 points 7 months ago

Microsoft alternative: Nextcloud and Ionos develop open-source ‘Euro-Office’.

Nextcloud and Ionos are promising a modern, open-source office suite for the summer. To achieve this goal, they have forked OnlyOffice.

Nextcloud, Ionos and other partners are developing an open-source office suite under the project name „Euro-Office“ as an alternative to the market-dominant Microsoft Office. The software is scheduled to be released in a first stable version in the summer. Ionos and Nextcloud announced this jointly in Berlin on Friday. „The product is intended for the entire market, from small businesses to the public sector,’“said Ionos CEO Achim Weiß.

Ionos and Nextcloud want to differentiate themselves from the open-source package openDesk from the federal-owned ZenDiS through, among other things, stronger integration of the individual applications and through AI functions. Nextcloud’s leading development is intended to ensure deeper integration. „Nextcloud is in charge,“ said Weiß. Both partners intend to hire ‘a double-digit number of developers each’ for the further development of Euro Office, according to their own statements.

However, ZenDiS can also easily use Euro-Office as an office component of openDesk, said Karlitschek. OpenDesk currently includes Nextcloud as a file exchange platform and Collabora Online as an office component. Likewise, other providers could also operate the open-source Euro-Office.

In addition to Ionos and Nextcloud, other partners such as XWiki, Soverin, OpenProject and the EuroStack initiative support the Euro-Office project. According to a press release, they encourage ‘public bodies, community contributors, and civil society organizations committed to open standards, digital rights, and sovereign digital infrastructure’ to jointly develop the software further.

A fork replacing closed source parts of OnlyOffice sounds great, does anyone know if the desktop versions also have closed source components ?

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    That sounds great! I love OnlyOffice, but it feels a bit iffy with their supposed connection to the Russian military. I hope this will be free for personal use.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 21 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Nextcloud and Ionos justify the decision for the Only-Office fork with its more modern architecture and code base compared to LibreOffice and its browser variant Collabora. „Libre Office is 35 years old and no longer the most innovative and fluid,“ said Nextcloud CEO Frank Karlitschek. „You can also notice that in the browser.“

    Am I the only one reading that as "we can't add AI to LibreOffice, so out it is"?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago

    Good. I was curious why, when EU independence from US aoftware convos came up, Nextcloud was rarely mentioned.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (4 children)

    Erm, open only office is a Russian Trojan horse. What is next cloud thinking?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (1 child)

    Do not use open office: https://forum.cryptpad.org/d/232-onlyoffice-concerns-vendor-makes-shady-moves Dedicated website: https://eviloffice.tutdomen.com/ Licensing problems: https://opensource.stackexchange.com/questions/9481/is-onlyoffice-restricting-our-freedom-with-their-faq-agpl-v3 (is not really open source?) and mobile clients going proprietary: https://www.reddit.com/r/NextCloud/comments/fktqug/onlyoffice_fcked_us/

    Libre office are a project that comply with open source licenses instead of stealing the work

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 7 months ago

    All of the sources you linked are either terrible, particularly the eviloffice website, or cover relatively minor topics, like no remote file editing in the mobile OnlyOffice app.

    The 'dedicated website' you linked provides straight up misinformation.

    This is also why Russian developers are not allowed to maintain Linux kernel subsystems anymore.

    This is incorrect, as per their own link inside this paragraph (https://www.theregister.com/2024/10/23/linus_torvalds_affirms_expulsion_of/). Nowhere does it state that Russian developers aren't allowed to maintain Linux kernel subsystems. It only states that a bunch of maintainers associated with Russia were removed, and they may come back at some point in the future.

    Another link is about one part of their FAQ which seems to conflict with the AGPL license. The license allows for removal of all permissions in any forks, but in the FAQ OnlyOffice claims you can't. As mentioned by commenters under the linked posts, this is common and can just be ignored.

    OnlyOffice may not be entirely open source and the company behind it may or may not be engaging in shady business. However, the sources here are just garbage and prove no points whatsoever.

  • source
  • parent
  • 76 comments in c/technology@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 49 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    Sounds good to me! I hope they support the open document formats better than onlyoffice currently does. Also euro-office isn't a particularly good name, although it has the advantage of being explicit about where it's based.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    It looks like a well deserved middle finger to the US.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 7 months ago

    The article is on a 'pay or ok' site.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 19 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (47 children)

    Are there any actually good replacements for Excel? As an intermediate/advanced user, every alternative I've tried to date pales in comparison. I can't see anyone in my industry switching away from MS because of this, as things currently stand.

    Edit: I didn't expect so many replies. I use Sync (I know, it sucks and is dead) and it didn't inform me I had replies, so I'm only just seeing them, apologies. Can't get to everyone though.

    For those who think we're using Excel as a database, not really. Can't get into specifics regarding industry, but personally I use Excel daily for a variety of things, none of which is data entry. I build stuff to help calculate and solve issues; I'm not following a specific process in most scenarios. 🤷

  • source
  • hideshow 47 child comments
  • [–] 81 points 7 months ago (12 children)

    I hear this argument a lot but no one ever gives details as to what common features excel has vs say libreoffice. I'm really curious, because i'd like to contribute free time in this direction.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    What I always find missing in all these Excel vs. other spreadsheet software debates is the rationale for using a spreadsheet in the first place. I work a lot with large corporations, and it’s often the case that they can’t move away from Excel because, in the past, they relied on it to solve a process in a way that—at least today—could and should be handled better. Perhaps we should question the process more often and the Excel alternatives less.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

    As a data consultant, I would say those companies already do question the process, and have done for decades.

    Yes there are countless situations where a dedicated system or database could and should replace Excel, but there are just as many scenarios where Excel is ideal, and swapping out a spreadsheet for what would be potentially tens of separate applications across the business, or one absurdly expensive behemoth, to perform tasks that could be done rapidly and clearly in Excel is neither practical nor economically viable for most companies. A spreadsheet is perfect for plenty of situations.

    My job is literally to help these companies move to appropriate database solutions, often transitioning away from Excel. But there’s no getting around that a spreadsheet solves (often simple) problems that are impractical with other tools. You can move a company to a supplier’s sector-specific solution and solve huge numbers of issues, but unless that solution exactly meets every aspect of the business requirements, there’s always going to be a fallback and it’s often Excel, for better or worse.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (1 child)

    Exactly, spreadsheets themselves are the bottleneck, they worked back in the day but data and analytics have moved well beyond that, but companies refuse to migrate to a modern architecture because the dinosaurs in charge are afraid of change.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    It’s nothing to do with fear, it’s down to cost, practicality, experience and security.

    The one thing these people are not afraid of is change. Every senior management resource within every medium to large business wants to implement change.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    exactly this. Spreadsheets are so simple to understand that people think and communicate in spreadsheets. Managers don't understand how much they fucking love them. Its like a cult. They make everybody meet 5 times a week to look at various spreadsheets together. And don't see how ineffective they often are.

    "we have a problem? Ok lets make a spreadsheet! Oh, the problem wasn't solved yet? Ok then look at the spreadsheet every week now!"

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 7 months ago*

    Years ago, one of my buddies tried to open a very long spreadsheet and Libreoffice couldn't do it. I think the maximum row and columns reached parity in version 7. I think one more cosmetic feature that is missing is the easy to access table and chart style templates.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago

    I only have one example and it's not really a good one: 3-4 years ago I had one specific spreadsheet (that I got from the internet) which I used to help plan some stuff in a videogame I was playing. It had a table with a few hundred items with formulas that would iterate over those items many times.

    Excel on the local machine could handle changes to that sheet instantly. Anything else I tried (including excel web) would take several seconds to change any value, sometimes even minutes.

    It was probably some problem with the spreadsheet itself, but there was no other similar spreadsheet I could use so at the end of the day I had to use excel if I wanted to plan anything with that tool (but I ended up quitting the game within a few days)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 7 months ago

    Its almost always that they've been following specific workflows or processes for the last n years and find that particular workflow isn't directly supported in LO.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago*

    My answer isn't going to be helpful, because I can't remember specifically what I was doing, but even for a small personal project a year ago, I tried to do something I consider basic, and OnlyOffice (what I was trying out at the time) couldn't handle it and was ridiculously slow.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 31 points 7 months ago (9 children)

    May I suggest Python ?

    By the time you get tits deep in Excel to the point where other spreadsheets can't hack it, you may as well be using a real programming language instead of VBA...

    If you can do advanced Excel, you can do Python (and numpy will crush Excel in ways that aren't even funny, well OK, it's funny too).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago (5 children)

    Is python realistic for non tech people? I have a lot of databases across sharepoint but no real tech knowledge beyond basics.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 7 months ago

    It's one of the friendliest programming languages around. If you have written something in VBA then you'll do fine with Python, except for all the bad/outdated nonsense you'll have picked up from that language. And there's interactive interpreters you can just mess around in.

    If this doesn't scare you then give it a look:

    things = [4, 8, 15, 16, 23, 42]
    for number in things:
        print(number * 16)
    
    64
    128
    240
    256
    368
    672
    
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago

    it was partly made for mathematicians who did not know how to develop software, but also for education. so I guess it's a good starter language. but it allows doing way too much things that will be very confusing when overused

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

    If you are running multiple databases you are already a "tech people"

    Sharepoint is not a "database". Many people have made that mistake and it eventually comes back to bite you.

    I would recommend learning SQL. It is made to be human readable, and we've been perfecting it since the 1960's.

    Python let you run SQL on any file, and standard DB technology with a very small number of lines of code. Recommend reading about Pandas

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    I would just have a lot of interdependent excels on sharepoint, think customer data and their respective equipment, serials, progression. I detest microsoft sooving away woupd be ideal and if I can do it while getting my head around python then great.

    I have no idea what pandas is.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    Python is a modular language, so it has various packages to do different things you need to do. Whether that's math, graphing, database querying, language parsing, machine learning, or pretty much anything else you can think of, there's probably a python package for it. You just need to install the package in addition to the basic python library, and import the packages you're gonna use into your scripts.

    Pandas is a python package commonly used for data analysis. Another one is Agate.

    If you're learning SQL, there's a python package called SQLAlchemy that will enhance your database operations. Another one is Agate-SQL, which integrates with Agate. Both are interoperable with SQLite (for local storage) and PostgreSQL (for server-based setups).

    NumPy and Numba are python packages used for most math operations, and there are various other packages for higher-level math in case you need to do linear algebra, matrix multiplications, tensor calculus, or whathaveyou.

    Matplotlib and Plotly are used for graphing, and there are others with more advanced features like interactive data visualization.

    These are just a few examples. If you're in geoinformatics, astrophysics, cybersecurity, or just about anything else, there are python packages that will expand your toolkit.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 21 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    In what ways to they fail? I've used LibreOffice forever and don't have any specific complaints, but I'm definitely not using any of the more advanced features.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    I love and use LibreOffice, but I do find Calc much harder to work with than Excel. PivotTables, sortable lists with locked headings and sort-buttons, even simply setting print area were all harder for me to get used to and implement on Calc than Excel.

    I persist because I like the goal of FOSS, and it's "good enough" for my usage, I can definitely understand when people show frustrations - especially power users that have worked with MS Office for decades.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago

    I like to think of libreoffice calc as a spreadsheet program, it's for running calculations on cells, that's it.

    Excel was, but is no longer, just a spreadsheet program. Many things have been smashed into it that could have been better implemented separately, but when you're trying to tie down all office work to your single office suite, a hammer's gotta hammer. So they hammered a lot of those uses into excel to keep office workers tied to it. Admittedly, that does make it easier for office work since you don't need to train employees in multiple programs, you give them excel and teach them functions as they need them.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 7 months ago

    That's because most people are not willing to migrate their macros and some formulas from excel (lazy fucks that they are). It's doable, I've done it, did it years ago, and now build new ones for libre office all the time.

    I have never had to rely on, or even use, microshit's software since then, haven't had anything not work for me. Being the imbecile that I am at those things and having managed to make them work, it's just a matter of choosing to do it, which most people choose not to.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    I mean ideally people should move away from spreadsheets altogether, keeping the data and the view and control layers mixed like that is kinda terrible and scales poorly for large data sets that require any serious transformation and computations, ideally your data should reside in a acid compliant database or some data lake for safety and ease of access, and then view and transformations should be handled by a separate software on top of that, at least this is how most companies that do big data analytics set things up, I know it's overkill for some small to medium company that has limited needs, but there has to be something better than putting data into cells and writing functions on top of that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago (9 children)

    Probably more credibility if you actually give real, specific examples of what you cannot do on Libre Calc that you require?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago (7 children)

    Oh boy!

    Lack of proper table support.

    FILTER is borked.

    MAP functions and their ilk aren’t there.

    The DBASE functions have serious issues.

    Array formulas sort of work but often results in issues.

    Calculation speed is super slow. I’ve tried converting a pension forecast tool and it just ran so incredibly slowly.

    As someone self hosting my own Nextcloud with Collabora, I can tell you that living with LibreOffice is easy - but living with Libra Calc is impossible. It is not a workable, serious solution.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (2 children)

    The fact that you can't make real tables renders the software completely unusable. Tables are used in pretty much every spreadsheet.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (1 child)

    I think you might be thinking of databases… Access (barf), not Excel.

    I do think databases and tables are a useful thing but most database systems require over-specifying fields via esoteric “column types” while spreadsheets underspecify them via formatting (and extremely limited formatting at that)

    Some happy medium must exist out there, but I haven’t seen it. Notion and Google Docs (Format /Convert to Table) approach this but don’t quite get there.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 7 months ago* (3 children)

    I appreciate you attempting expansion, I will say it is still difficult when you're asked for specific detail and your response consistently States generalities like:

    "lack of support" - meaning what, feature isn't there at all? Doesn't display existing tables from uploaded excel docs?

    "has serious issues" - meaning... what are they?

    "results in issues" - ...

    "...is borked" - c'mon

    and "incredibly slow " - relative to what? Double time of expected from excel? Triple? Extra two seconds per attempt?

    You're using subjective terms that mean people can't A) determine if you're problem will impact them as well and B) you're not describing your perceived issues well enough to allow experts reading along here, now or in the future, to offer you actual solutions or alternatives.

    That considered, it makes you come off as a person who doesn't want their perceived problem solved.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Alternatively, it comes off as a person who has tried this in earnest numerous times and is exhausted by people who assume that they haven't given things a genuine shot.

    And there are few things more grating than a tech person assuming the other person doesn't know what they are doing in earnest just because they were short with you from having already explained it elsewhere, numerous times over time, to the same result of what is, effectively, tone policing. "You didn't phrase this in a technical manner thus I assume you know jack shit." Not far off from sea-lioning really.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 7 months ago

    You're bringing a lot of personal momentum to your responses obviously. My point was clear, state specific issues to allow the potential for specific answers. If you're moving in good faith, that's the approach.

    The perspective here is one of someone resistant to change, blaming FOSS as an easier scapegoat. Always simplest to blame the tool over the operator... And often, that "dumbshit, broken printer that won't print!!!" Just wasnt plugged in.

    Your rebuttal is borked.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    With the greatest respect, and trying my very best to not sound like an arrogant jerk, if you need to have Calc’s lacklustre FILTER function, which often just spits out Error 533 into cells and which can’t quite figure out if it wants to be an array formula, further explained then I dare posit that you may not be a heavy spreadsheet user and therefore spending a large amount of time explaining it does rather reverse the burden of proof. For goodness sake, try and do anything serious with FILTER is Calc and you’ll very, very quickly see what I mean.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago

    I was able to duplicate a simple Excel spreadsheet in calc with functions and VBA. I'd love an example of what it can't do.

    Also, jobs that still require advanced usage of Excel with VBA pay well enough to have someone redo it in typescript or JavaScript.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 30 points 7 months ago (7 children)

    Honestly this stinks of potential enshitification downstream. Libreoffice and Openoffice are just fine. Nextcloud's posture in the market and "Brand name feel" sets of my alarm that it is like 5 minutes away from charging people subscriptions for self-hosting if they don't already. Synology runner up?

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

    Nextcloud's business model is service contracts. Which is going great. The origin story of Nextcloud is that ownCloud was too commercial (open core) instead of fully open source, so they forked it. I haven't seen any moves by Nextcloud that has moved their focus from open source to hint at enshitification. Your claims are rather bold and without proof. Nextcloud doesn't even use LibreOffice, but the online derivative Collabora. Also OpenOffice has been dead for more than a decade so I don't know why you even reference that. Are you confusing this with the totally different OnlyOffice ('only' not 'open') which this news is actually about?

    Their fork of OnlyOffice is actually because it is open core and they want it fully open source: https://github.com/Euro-Office/#euro-office-liberates-the-onlyoffice-code-base

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    I haven’t made any claims. My comment is about the “vibes” of NextCloud as a “product” and “company”, if you want objectivity in what i’m saying.

    Im not a nextcloud user and it’s good that you personally don’t feel that they’ve made any moves towards enshitification but we’ve seen countless companies start with great and pure intentions that unfortunately throw that all out the window when: an opportunity to be a market leader, opportunity of profits becomes too great, or the userbase becomes significant enough. “Open Source” seems to unfortunately be part of the tech company corporate playbook.

    We live in a world where organizations and companies get to change terms after sale now. While it is not zero sum, if you’re not exercising skepticism towards those trying to offer you something, you’re probably doing yourself a disservice. Nothing is truly free.

    Also, OpenOffice is definitely not dead lol https://www.openoffice.org/

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago*

    Nextcloud uses GNU AGPLv3 and explicitly doesn't use a CLA: https://github.com/nextcloud/server/blob/master/contribute/HowToApplyALicense.md. They do this to prevent themselves from relicensing it. So they can't suddenly take the code and make it closed source.

    Regarding OpenOffice. I used to be a big fan of OpenOffice more than a decade ago, but LibreOffice has become my open source office suite since then.

    Apache OpenOffice (AOO) might still work, but there is no significant development (see commits of the last year https://github.com/apache/openoffice/graphs/contributors?from=2025-05-01&to=2026-04-02&type=c). Only one person is committing on a daily/weekly basis, but this person is in their own words not a developer (https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/202#issuecomment-2561915795). Most of the commits are 'cleanup' commits where whitespace or comments are changed https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commits/trunk/.

    LibreOffice on the other hand is actively developed. Others who are actually involved explained this better than I can:

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 14 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

    They need to come up with a less cringe name than EuroOffice if they want any adoption. Not going to replace nationalism with pan-European nationalism.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago (5 children)

    I tried Nextcloud. I didn’t find it great for syncing files. I’m the only user of the server and keep getting merge conflicts.

    Moved to OpenCloud which has been much more stable, if not as feature rich.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (3 children)

    ...if not as feature rich.

    Nextcloud has groupware, opencloud doesn't right?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [+] -10 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    Tried nextcloud, 3 updates per day, fuck off.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    I moved my data there a couple of months ago and couldn’t be happier. Maybe try a different provider?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    I love Nextcloud, but I have everything running in containers, and I have them auto updating on system boot.

    Its a super powerful software. Its on my top list of self hosting software. But it breaks so often with auto updates. And there is the potential of having to reinstall it because of a broken install, and your personal service being down for weeks.

    Borg backups work, but they are not intuitive to setup when using containers.

    Auto setting up trusted domains is not intuitive.

    My solution going forward, is to have secondary containers which I don’t update as frequently, that point to the same user files folder on the primary containers. Kind of like having my services load balanced. I plan on doing this for some of my other containers that are frequently down.

    In my experience, services that require more than 1 container are the ones that crash the most. Especially when they connect to a database container.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (1 child)

    my advise: do not update immediately to a freshly released major version of Nextcloud. Just wait several point releases.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    That's fair, but even then it might break when I update it. I think rotating containers on which one I update is the way to go so I always have 1 running.

    I've never tried this technique but I'm curious to try it out.

  • source
  • parent