@OP please add a few key paragraphs of the article your posting quoted in your OP.

Why does this same thing get reported over and over for months?

Congress should hold the Justice department in contempt.

Nothing says guilty like a coverup

This is known as Obstruction of Justice in the civilized world.

We know

Yes, but... the Dow!

I would so love to see Blondi in prison over this. Same with Pedonald, of course.

Reactionary centrists in the Murc's Law media would say that wanting to see justice meted out for pedos and pedo-protecters means that someone has "Trump Derangement Syndrome".

I mean. Sue them. I’m not sure saying they broke the law over and over again is going to do anything substantive.

Traitors should be executed. Capital punishment.

Considering there's not a single email to or from him in the files... yeah, we know.

They say the cover up is always worse than the crime but I don't think that applies in this case.

Yeah, we fucking know.

Aren’t they archived?

Department of Jeffery Epstein (DOJ)

I mean... is anyone still surprised by this?

The U.S.A. are governed by a pedophile rapist and they don't go tear and shoot shit up. So the majority of them is fine with this.

No! 🙄

Well, no one is surprised, isn't

I mean, we all know they are breaking the law daily and donald trump has threatened them all with death if they don't scrub his name from every file.

I really wish the conservative party didn't just flop over like a possum for a horrible dictator, but they are desperate for control and this was their only way to get revenge on democrats and neutral people.

Someone else did all of the work on this, *these are the files that are missing. Heed the trigger warning:

YouTube video of Katie Johnson’s testimony: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gnib-OORRRod

Full court docket: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4154484/katie-johnson-v-donald-j-trump/

PDF of the initial complaint (WARNING very graphic): https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4154484/1/katie-johnson-v-donald-j-trump/

If the strategy of the party under investigation is to hide evidence, shouldn’t they just be assumed to be guilty? The burden of proof is on the accuser, but if the accused hides or destroys evidence, I think that should forfeit their assumed innocence. If withholding and or destruction of evidence can be proved, then the accused party should be assumed to be guilty.

Don't forget the 14 terabytes of other files and evidence not yet released.

nicholascageyoudontsay.jpg

"Yesterday, I reviewed unredacted evidence logs at the Department of Justice. Oversight Democrats can confirm that the DOJ appears to have illegally withheld FBI interviews with this survivor who accused President Trump of heinous crimes," Garcia stated.

We all knew this was going to happen - you can't trust this administration to not break the law.

But how’s the Dow?

Gosh I wonder why NPR got defunded