Some files have not been made public despite a law mandating their release. These include what appears to be more than 50 pages of FBI interviews, and notes from conversations with a woman who accused Trump of sexual abuse decades ago when she was a minor.

NPR reviewed multiple sets of unique serial numbers appearing before and after the pages in question, stamped onto documents in the Epstein files database, FBI case records, emails and discovery document logs in the latest tranche of documents published at the end of January. NPR's investigation found dozens of pages that appear to be catalogued by the Justice Department but not shared publicly.

The Justice Department declined to answer NPR's questions on the record about these specific files, what's in them, and why they are not published. After publication, the Justice Department reached out to NPR, taking issue with how its responses to questions were framed. Justice Department spokeswoman Natalie Baldassarre reiterated DOJ's stance that any documents not published are because they are privileged, duplicates or relate to an ongoing federal investigation.

all 4 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [S, M] 13 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Someone else did all of the work on this, *these are the files that are missing. Heed the trigger warning:

YouTube video of Katie Johnson’s testimony: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gnib-OORRRod

Full court docket: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4154484/katie-johnson-v-donald-j-trump/

PDF of the initial complaint (WARNING very graphic): https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4154484/1/katie-johnson-v-donald-j-trump/

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 8 months ago

    If the strategy of the party under investigation is to hide evidence, shouldn’t they just be assumed to be guilty? The burden of proof is on the accuser, but if the accused hides or destroys evidence, I think that should forfeit their assumed innocence. If withholding and or destruction of evidence can be proved, then the accused party should be assumed to be guilty.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago

    Don't forget the 14 terabytes of other files and evidence not yet released.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    nicholascageyoudontsay.jpg

  • source
  • 66 comments in c/news@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 116 points 8 months ago (7 children)

    Congress should hold the Justice department in contempt.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 8 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] 8 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Congress authorized the release of the Epstein files. Not some of them, but all of them. Congress has authority to hold the executive branch to account. They should exercise those powers to ensure their mandate is fulfilled. Anything less is capitulating to an authoritarian regime.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 52 points 8 months ago (11 children)

    Nothing says guilty like a coverup

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    No. Noooooo, he's just undercover. That's all. He's trying to take them down from the inside. Just you wait, he'll drain that swamp any minute now!!!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 8 months ago*

    It's not covering up a crime, it's just that the truth is complicated, and the citizens can't understand it. They're protecting us, it's for our own good.

    Edit: I decided I better add /s, before someone thinks that was actually a serious statement, which it would be for MAGAs.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    Speaking of coverups, the Franklin Scandal from 88 sure feels familiar (thumbnail is clickbait to appease the algorithm) coverup starts with a plane crash about halfway through and the bodies keep dropping until around 92: https://youtu.be/a2lvo38u4ds

    Early reports on Epstein's trafficing start in 94

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    That was a wild, disturbing ride. Let me down a rabbit hole to John David Norman and his child abuse network. Prosecutors decided to settle for Norman instead of pursuing his client list, which included some high-profile individuals. Also connected to at least two serial killers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 39 points 8 months ago (9 children)
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago

    Specifically because this is what Roger Ailes and his conservative friends created Fox News and the conservative media sphere to prevent. It's so crazy that it's worked so well for them. After Watergate happened they sat around together and came up with ideas to make it so they would never have to face consequences for their crimes again. They identified media coverage of Watergate, correctly as a thing that shifted public opinion against Richard Nixon. They never wanted public opinion to go against their guy again no matter how heinous their crimes. So they created Fox News and they created all the other conservative spheres specifically to stop public opinion from shifting in that way. It is so brilliant and so fucking evil.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    It is? I see the Epstein files all over Lemmy and endlessly posted on friends’ social media (Facebook, Instagram, etc)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Thats an extremely small bubble.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 8 months ago

    This is known as Obstruction of Justice in the civilized world.

  • source
  • [–] 58 points 8 months ago (11 children)
  • [–] 41 points 8 months ago (10 children)

    At the risk of quoting Junior Soprano, no you didn't know it, they just told you

    NPR reviewed multiple sets of unique serial numbers appearing before and after the pages in question, stamped onto documents in the Epstein files database, FBI case records, emails and discovery document logs in the latest tranche of documents published at the end of January. NPR's investigation found dozens of pages that appear to be catalogued by the Justice Department but not shared publicly.

    You may know of other investigations showing very similar things but this is new

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    I think we knew like we knew Eddie Spaghetti liked to eat spaghetti before anyone even told us that about Eddie.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 8 months ago (5 children)

    I've been putting off watching the Sopranos for over a decade (for no particular reason - I DO want to see it) but that line weirdly might have sold me on it

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Yeah, I really can't overemphasize how much of a petty insecure asshole the character who said it was, but the delivery of it is hilarious

    Also, as someone who's watched it, I have some mixed feelings about some of the narrative choices and implied messages in that show, but it really is a master course on dissecting the hypocritical and superficial psychology of mobsters, which I feel like this administration and all of its goons demonstrate constantly

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago*

    Mobsters indeed. I wonder, if the Mexican army swooped in and killed the head of the MAGA cartel, would we see the kind of violence in our streets as Mexico is having now? I mean, they're certainly well-armed enough but they are also lazy Americans. They'd be like, "can I go down to Home Depot and hire some Mexicans to do it for me?"

    (Which tbf is pretty much what I'm doing now with this speculation)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 8 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 7 points 8 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 14 points 8 months ago

    I would so love to see Blondi in prison over this. Same with Pedonald, of course.

    Reactionary centrists in the Murc's Law media would say that wanting to see justice meted out for pedos and pedo-protecters means that someone has "Trump Derangement Syndrome".

  • source
  • [–] 26 points 8 months ago* (2 children)

    I mean. Sue them. I’m not sure saying they broke the law over and over again is going to do anything substantive.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 8 months ago

    Traitors should be executed. Capital punishment.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 8 months ago

    Considering there's not a single email to or from him in the files... yeah, we know.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago

    They say the cover up is always worse than the crime but I don't think that applies in this case.

  • source
  • [+] 9 points 8 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 8 points 8 months ago

    Yeah, we fucking know.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago

    Aren’t they archived?

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Department of Jeffery Epstein (DOJ)

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago

    I mean... is anyone still surprised by this?

    The U.S.A. are governed by a pedophile rapist and they don't go tear and shoot shit up. So the majority of them is fine with this.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago
    [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    Well, no one is surprised, isn't

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago

    I mean, we all know they are breaking the law daily and donald trump has threatened them all with death if they don't scrub his name from every file.

    I really wish the conservative party didn't just flop over like a possum for a horrible dictator, but they are desperate for control and this was their only way to get revenge on democrats and neutral people.

  • source
  • 10 comments in c/Epsteinfiles@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] [M] 2 points 8 months ago*

    @OP please add a few key paragraphs of the article your posting quoted in your OP.

  • source
  • [–] -1 points 8 months ago (8 children)

    Why does this same thing get reported over and over for months?

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago (5 children)

    Are you kidding? This should be reported every single day.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    If you report the same thing every day no one is going to pay attention to you. Nobody needs to hear the same information over and over again. That's why they call it "news".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    Well thats simply not true at all. I can't fathom anyone thinking that's true having lived in our world. How do you live through the age of cable news and think that constant pounding of an issue doesn't keep it in the public eye more? Hell the entire conservative tactics of flood the Zone should explain to you why moving off from an issue is exactly how it's ignored and forgotten. They don't want things covered constantly.

    But I would point out it's not the same information, you are incorrect if you think that's true. New stuff is coming out everyday. This right here is new. Relatively . It's yet another example of the crimes they are committing.

    More than that though it is the moral imperative of every single person to constantly repeat to each other that our government is involved in a massive criminal conspiracy to hide the rape of children by the sitting president and multiple members of his Administration as well as other powerful individuals in the nation. That should be the biggest story in the last half century, maybe the biggest story in the history of our nation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Well thats simply not true at all. I can't fathom anyone thinking that's true having lived in our world.

    why moving off from an issue is exactly how it's ignored and forgotten

    We're not talking about an issue, we're talking about a singular piece of information.

    New stuff is coming out everyday.

    Then report on the new stuff.

    This right here is new.

    This is several months old. The DOJ published it and then took it back down a few minutes later.

    it is the moral imperative of every single person to constantly repeat to each other that our government is involved in a massive criminal conspiracy

    Anyone who did that would be an insufferable person I wouldn't continue talking to. Those of us who know, know. Those us who don't, don't want to.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    You could not be more wrong. This is a new story that was just filed yesterday thanks to some amazing journalistic work. Your attempts to spread misinformation and downplay horrific crimes committed against innocent people is extremely troubling.

    I find the general tone of your comment to be utterly reprehensible.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (1 child)

    Because in any decent country it would be investigated.
    And if this was Obama doing the child raping the republicans would be going absolutely wild!

    Not talking about it and not reporting it is exactly what the Gang Of Paedo's want to happen. For people to become tired of it all.
    Unfortunately people becoming tired of all the bullshit is exactly why nothing is happening. If americans got angry about the shit tRUMP pulled in the first term then the fat cunt would never have been elected again, and may even have court cases against him for the insurrection and the stealing of top secret documents. But no, they just accepted it.

    Your question shouldn't be "why is this being reported again" but "why is no one doing anything about it?" (That's if you want someone to do something about it, that is)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 1 comment in c/fark@ibbit.at view that post
    [–] 6 points 8 months ago

    Gosh I wonder why NPR got defunded

  • source