Who could've known that abolishing the carbon tax, supporting the auto industry, cancelling the electric vehicle mandate, and subsidizing the oil industry would not lead to success in meeting those targets? It's not as if we've all had thirty years to find out that getting to "net zero" is a difficult challenge that would require actual leadership in the right direction.
post
No one is serious about climate change anymore in politics.
Anti-woke politics in America have given complacent people carte blanche to ignore the problem at best, actively fight it at worst.
The new great dying has already begun, but we're just barely getting started.
How can you without dramatically lowering living standards and getting voted out, exporting your emissions by buying Chinese coal produced products hardly makes you green, and that seems to be the main plan of green parties.
As Bernard Drainville of Québec's CAQ once said, "lâchez-moi avec les GES". Meaning something like "won't you drop it with those greenhouse gases". His last title was the head of the Ministry of Environment and Fight Against Climate Change. And he proudly announced that the ban on internal combustion vehicles planned in 2035 was scrapped. He cried on TV when his party announced that maybe building a third bridge over the St-Lawrence for $10G to save a few minutes may not entirely be a good idea.
He's also the xenophobic idiot that introduced ""Québec's Charter of Values". It didn't work but he still continues to this day to push his xenophobic agenda under the guise of secularism.
He is a despicable human being, and until recently he was responsible for the Ministry of Environment in our province, until he resigned. And the shittiest part is, he resigned to run as the next leader of the CAQ and could be our next premier.
In any way, whatever the next party in power, Québec probably won't help. Nobody really wants to. Every election everyone just wants economic growth. Ask them what's the most important every election? They'll tell you the economy is the most important thing, obviously! And have you seen the price of gas?! It's robbery! Gas should be cheaper!11!! That's what's important!
So no, we won't meet any climate target.
I say this with all my heart: fuck Bernard Drainville. I can't wait for him to lose the CAQ leadership race.
I wasn't paying much attention to the race but I just checked and apparently it's not going well for his aspirations. Good.
Sa croisade pour le troisième lien Québec-Lévis et sa sortie intempestive contre les tergiversations de Christine Fréchette à ce sujet n’ont pas été payantes.
Unfortunately Fréchette didn't admit yet that this is a bad idea, she's just "unsure" about the proposed route. And sadly Drainville is like a cockroach. If/when he loses, I expect him to find his way again into a party in power and continue pushing his BS.
Well, they threw their first set of hopeful numbers into the trash bin due to bad guessing and failure. Does anyone remember the Kyoto Protocol? It wasn't that long ago. We are not in any position to save anything until we stop praying to the god of monetary profit.
Mark Carney (who I voted for) is a banker and is seriously going to scrap everything to appease his other banker and corporate friends.
In all honesty, seeing how many allegedly 'liberal' people are acting around the world made me question where and how the term 'bleeding heart liberal' ever came to be by conservatives. They are being just as brutal with people's well-beings as many others.
Too busy investigating seditious Flatlanders and building a defence plan, I guess.
oh well. Shrug.
Right now my primary concerns are not being at war and beong able to have a roof overhead and food for the family. Everything else will have to wait.
Are any party running on taking away municipal zoning laws and forcing density and mass transit? Or what about ending imports from China and forcing reliability standards in the goods we buy?
If not I won't believe they are actually environmentalists, they are grifters and opportunists. They will gladly run mass immigration into massive urban sprawl, ballooning traffic and emissions, as they then tax fuel usage to raise home values near jobs.
In what way would ending imports from China reduce emissions? Giving up buying from the most efficient manufacturing ecosystem in the world that also happens to be electrifying and moving to nuclear and renewables at an unmatched pace is not going to increaseefficiency. What more efficient alternative would we switch to? Canada will not be more likely to hit goals by moving currently outsourced industrial manufacturing from an extremely effecient ecosystem with economies of scale to somewhere like here that has no comparable efficiencies of scale, grid development, or ecosystem development. We would need massive industrial expansion here, including with our grid. Dramatically expanding hydro is going to require huge new projects in places that are harder to develop than our existing hydro. Trying to build out solar while not buying from China? Let's see how efficient that is. We should be taking advantage of China's efficiencies to complement and build out our own systems, not cutting them off. It's one planet we share, and efficiencies and harm reduction in the global manufacturing ecosystem is what we should aim for, which requires leveraging complimentarities, not reducing them.
Shipping. The reason is shipping.
Oh. Also mistrust of any comms gear built under influence of One Belt people.
I think its a lot more coal. I am also unsure why we would carbon tax ourselves, making our own production more expensive, but maintain free trade with the largest coal user on the planet with little to no environmental laws. If you saw and smelt the rivers in China I think you'd realize what a dirty place it is.
Heres a nice looking documentary on it that I found: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GN0AVXZ_RrQ
Chinese emissions have plateaued and started falling. They actually dropped in 2025, including a 1% drop in Q4.
Cutting off Chinese manufacturing and bringing it all here, including cutting out Chinese inputs to Canadian manufacturing, would not be more efficient at all. It would not be better for the environment. This is a fantasy. We would need massive industrial expansion. We would be making the global situation less efficient and more harmful by reducing complementary systems, increasing redundancies, and increasing industrial inefficiencies.
Ending imports from China is not realistic with our economic landscape but we absolutely need denser cities and mass transit.
Its also not realistic to compete with a place that subsidizes its dirty energy it uses to manufacture goods. We need to stop cosplaying as green by exporting emissions while our per-capita living standards fall.
China is making strides in cleaning up their grid, it is by no means perfect. They still depend on coal for about 55% of their grid based on the most recently available data I could find, that dropped about 3% last year thanks to their expanding solar network.
I do think our grid is much cleaner especially with our plans for new nuclear reactors. However we do not have the complex manufacturing network that China has.
In saying that we should expand domestic production to strengthen our economic resiliency, especially for needs like housing, food and transportation. This transition can't be done quickly, doubly so if we're looking to minimize ecological impact, so in my mind China remains a necessary strategic partner.
Edit: Fixed the statistic for coal use by China, the first source I used wildly underestimated it.
5% is definitely too low, though they may have dropped some of its coal use when Russian energy suddenly became very cheap, their emissions continue to rise however.
No country is on track, especially not the biggest polluters like China and Russia.
Not so fun fact: If we stopped production of greenhouse gasses today (so we achieved net zero by 2026), we still have a climate problem.
People treat the rate of annual pollution as the target, and they pretend that hitting this target fixes something.
Only removing the carbon from the atmosphere will permit the Holocene to continue.
Shifting the conversation to far off climate targets or distant emissions standards is just a brainwash. We are doing something right now.
Canada is right now investing in global trade, high technology, fossil fuel production, manufacturing, expansion, growth economics, etc. The entire OLD Jenga tower civilization stack is being invested in and its getting higher.
top 40 comments