I know you're not impressed that I use Ubuntu but it's not Windows, and I can't be bothered to learn a damn thing about how to operate a system.
post
boot
open librewolf
open neovim
code my silly lil' Dreamcast stuff
close neovim
play quake arena
shutdown
What do you code for the Dreamcast?
Dad energy. Debian + XFCE. Get off my lawn.
Iβve been considering this actually.
On my main pc, which I mostly use for gaming, Iβm running CachyOS, which was great when I actually had time to play games, but Iβve got a kid now and just got promoted to manager so I donβt really have a lot of time these days. I have a second pc which is technically a laptop but the battery is completely gone (and itβs also somewhat old now) that Iβve been planning on using more for office-y stuff. Iβve currently got it running Mint but Iβm heavily considering hopping to Debian.
I'm the kind of user that spends a whole weekend to fix a driver issue for an obscure 2000s sound card, then proceeds to erase the entire process from memory to repeat it from scratch on a new system next year.
Add a 3rd Dimensions and you will find BSD chads laughing at us from their jail's
They should laugh. When I switched from FreeBSD to Linux felt it like such a downgrade.
Im curious what you felt was a downgreade. I think its much better designed but I feel it lacks so many more features vs modern Linux
I think it was the general lack of consistency. Everything felt a bit messy. This was almost 20 years ago and back then the BSDs had some features that were missing in Linux.
i lub me some gentoo...
... but ...
K.I.S.S.
...?
whats's a distro? :3 My UI looks like Windows 95 and i have cute cats in my terminal :3 i can text my friends, play games, surf the internet and do arts :3 what else does a girl need? :)
I'm a nightmare for any IT department and software developer. I know enough to do damage, but don't have the patience and knowledge to wield this power. I go around editing shit in random config files in order to "temporarily fix" an issue and then forget that I ever did it, slowly turning and system I touch into a ticking time bomb. This also combined with my unique ability to seemingly break any piece of software by merely interacting with it, especially on Linux, before I even had the chance to install anything. I've installed and used Linux on countless devices and haven't ever had a smooth ride, yet still I'm completely daily driving Linux at this point.
I use Arch by the way :3 (and Fedora, and Ubuntu, and Raspbian, and God knows what else)
Debian
Enough said.
Debian on my production servers, Arch Linux as my daily driver, Linux Mint on the devices I manage for normies.
Debian is my daily driver and for regular people I help. Comes with a service card saying "it will work and you will like it".
I help for free. If someone does not like it, they can pay to have what they want done. But they don't get to ask for help again.
Debian is solid as fuck, perfect for work computers, but I like tinkering with bleeding edge software on the AUR in my free time.
When a huge batch of laptops at my workplace that couldn't support Windows 11 stopped receiving updates, I switched them to Mint for a drop-in-replacement that wouldn't scare them too much. Now that they're used to it Debian is probably the next step.
Devuan seems more pure Debian.
Debian took a turn from a bad vote, and kept the name, while being a different thing.
Systemd makes perfect sense for Debian, its a stable OS and systemd is objectively stable (its also more usable and easier, additionally its what every other distro uses and has the most support)
Debian is an OS for everyone that anyone can install
its what every other distro uses
Nope.
https://sysdfree.wordpress.com/2025/10/04/363/
https://distrowatch.com/search.php?defaultinit=Not+systemd (424 results btw).
also
systemd is objectively stable
more stable than sysvinit (or runit or openrc or other init systems)?
more usable
not in my experience.
easier
not in my experience.
I would consider easier to be an OS that just supports standard scripts and doesn't require manually adding files to make sure that it installs properly
Android 16
It's a bucket list item to someday have a pull request merged into a branch of the Linux kernel.
- Boot computer
- Steam, emacs, evolution, newsflash, and web browser auto open
- Check email
- Check news
- Cry
- Go to dropout or nebula
- Log onto Wurm Online/FFXIV/Whatever
- Do something obnoxious in emacs that could probably be done elsewhere
- Maybe tweak a config if it needs it. Haven't needed to in a year tbh.
- Shut down
- Realize I forgot to update
- Say I'll do it tomorrow Like I'm on Arch but it's a computer. I do computery things on it. Write my silly little stories that would traumatize a therapist. Do obscene things in video games.
I got really into customizing my system for a while, but now that it works I just leave it be, mostly. Most recent major change was my update command now spits out a list of packages, so if I need to reinstall I can just shove that into pacman
Fedora, simple, consistent, versatile, up to date.
The kind that pretends he understands the terminal output before entering "Y" after pasting in a decade-old user script suggestion on stack exchange.
You know, the kind that insists on using Arch, despite being slightly (or more) below the skill level one should have before using it.
Honestly the skill level for Arch is kinda overblown nowadays.
You can use Archinstall and get a full desktop and a pretty hands off experience if you don't go around tweaking any lower level system stuff.
And if you're extra lazy (like me) Endeavour or Cachy makes the minimal setup even more streamlined with good default settings. But you still get the AUR and fast updates, which I assume it what the average user wants more than complete control over how their system is setup.
It had an installer back in ~2009 as well.
It was removed for a few years because no one wanted to maintain it
Yes, you are mostly correct. In some sense, it is more a cultural thing. If your Arch breaks, the expectations for your ability to deal with it yourself are a bit higher. There are good instructions and people willing to help, but the latter (both inside and outside of Arch community, I think) may tell you that you shouldn't be using Arch if you don't meet their expectations.
Anyway, another aspect of it is the fact that with my system, I am a bit of a tinkerer.
And if you're extra desperate, there's always manjaro. But I love it. My hardware somehow works out of the box with them. Having the AUR is definitely a godsend for some things. One day I'll likely contribute something to it as a tiny tribute back.
Does anyone who installed arch using archinstall actually use the 'i use arch, btw' meme?


top 87 comments